We lost a STONE a month on a family Mounjaro mission – we'd done fad diets for 50 years now we can't stop shrinking
Mum tried to keep her diet a secret, but her results were too good for people to miss
WEIGH TO GO We lost a STONE a month on a family Mounjaro mission – we'd done fad diets for 50 years now we can't stop shrinking
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
MUM and daughter Gill Foster and Ellie Westcott have a combined 50 years of dieting between them.
But the pair say that none of their health kicks have been as successful as their most recent weight loss mission.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
Both Gill Foster and her daughter Ellie Westcott had struggled with their weight their whole lives
Credit: Supplied
7
The pair have now lost nine stone between them on a joint Mounjaro mission
Credit: Supplied
Gill, 58, and Ellie, 27, have lost more than nine stone and eight dress sizes between them - thanks to fat jabs and friendly family rivalry.
At their heaviest, Gill weighed 17st 10lb, and Ellie tipped the scales at 16st 2lbs, and despite trying traditional weight loss programmes, the weight would always creep back on.
Then, in August 2024, Gill, who wore a size 20, decided to take action, starting Mounjaro injections with NHS-backed healthy eating plan Second Nature - although she kept it a secret from Ellie.
But, when the duo met just four weeks after, and Gill had already lost 12 pounds, the driving instructor confessed - and Ellie, a project manager, was inspired to give the jabs a go.
She started with the same programme in September 2024, and between them, the pair have now lost a combined nine stone, and Gill and Ellie now weigh 12st 11lbs, and 12st 10lbs and wear a dress size 14 and 12-14 respectively.
Gill, from Blandford in Dorset says: 'I have battled with my weight for 30 years.
'I'd tried everything and even had success, but the weight would pile back on.
'Medication was a last resort because it was getting to the point where my weight was affecting my health.
'I wanted to be able to eat normally and healthily and be rewarded for my efforts.
'I did my research and found Second Nature. I was a little skeptical and didn't want to tell anyone I was doing it but just a few weeks later, the results were impossible to hide.'
Woman who forked out on fat jabs saw eight stone fly off her - people say she's being lazy, but they've changed her life
Ellie, from Pimperne just outside of Blandford, says: 'I've always had an unhealthy relationship with food.
'The only time I remember being slim but still thinking I was fat was back at school and doing extreme exercise to fit in my prom dress.
'I've done quite a few diets over the years since, the same as mum, and obviously growing up with a mum who also dieted, it's easy to learn those habits, and we obviously love food.
'But the day after taking Mounjaro for the first time, I texted mum to say that I hadn't been thinking about food at all, and my day seemed to feel quicker, because I wasn't constantly looking at the clock thinking, 'what am I going to eat next?''
Growing up, Gill struggled with body dysmorphia in her teens and had always been naturally curvy and a 'picker' when it came to food.
Looking for support in more healthy choices and a better relationship with food, she tried to join a weightloss programme at 19 but they told her she didn't weigh enough to join them.
When she went to university, she ate what she wanted and her weight spiralled. The next time Gill, a mum of three, went on a diet was when her oldest son was 18 months old and she was 28.
Diagnosed with an underactive thyroid in 2003, her health was starting to suffer.
7
Ellie says that her thoughts used to revolve around food
Credit: Supplied
7
She is now committed to weighing less than her mum
Credit: Supplied
7
Meanwhile Gill says that her yo-yo dieting always saw her putting the pounds back on
Credit: Supplied
7
She now has a healthier relationship with food and was amazed how quickly her weight slipped off
Credit: Supplied
Gill tried traditional diets, and weightloss plans over the years - but she would always end up putting the weight back on - and each time just a little bit more.
She says: 'I've always enjoyed healthy, good-quality food, but whenever I was cooking, I'd help myself to a mouthful here and there, kind of one for the pot and one for Gill but I've never been a big portions meal person.
'As my children got older and I worked as a driving instructor, time became my biggest issue. I would skip breakfast then grab something on the go.
'It's difficult to make healthy choices at the petrol station and when hunger strikes the temptations won. I was finding it harder and harder not to give up all hope.
'After getting home, I'd eat whatever I could find in the fridge - picking at cheese, leftovers, cold meats, pickles.
'I would have good intentions; portioning a healthy meal for dinner, sometimes spaghetti bolognese or homemade curry, but every time I went back into the kitchen, I'd help myself to another mouthful.'
Gill tried everything to lose weight but it was beginning to impact her health.
After four weeks on the programme, it became impossible to hide
Gill Foster
At her heaviest at 58, Gill weighed 17st 10lbs and was squeezing into size 20 clothes. She hit 'breaking point' and knew she had to do something 'drastic'.
Her online search took her to Second Nature, an NHS-backed healthy eating plan that uses behavioural science to 'rewire' eating habits.
It also offers medication-assisted programmes including Mounjaro, or tirzepatide, or as GLP-1 receptor agonists, which treats type-2 diabetes and weightloss, and Wegovy, or semaglutide.
Potential users have to complete a strict test online to see whether they're eligible for the medication.
She took her first Mounjaro injection at the end of August 2024 and almost immediately, her hunger began to subside.
'When I had dinner that night, I wasn't hungry anymore. It felt like a switch had flipped,' she says.
'I questioned how I was supposed to feel and couldn't help thinking it might be a placebo effect. I was terrified of the potential side effects but luckily didn't experience any.
'At first, I kept it a secret from my daughter Ellie. I didn't want her to think that I was doing something extreme. But after four weeks on the programme, it became impossible to hide.'
Ellie had also struggled with her weight for years.
Diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), she had tried everything from intermittent fasting to intense gym routines, and walking her dog every day.
Despite her efforts to shift the pounds, the dial on the scale rarely moved. At her heaviest, Ellie weighed 16st 11lbs and wore a size 20 clothes.
Seeing the difference in her mum, Ellie followed suit and joined Second Nature in September - and called her mum for the 'scary' first injection.
Everything you need to know about fat jabs
Weight loss jabs are all the rage as studies and patient stories reveal they help people shed flab at almost unbelievable rates, as well as appearing to reduce the risk of serious diseases.
Wegovy – a modified version of type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic – and Mounjaro are the leading weight loss injections used in the UK.
Wegovy, real name semaglutide, has been used on the NHS for years while Mounjaro (tirzepatide) is a newer and more powerful addition to the market.
Mounjaro accounts for most private prescriptions for weight loss and is set to join Wegovy as an NHS staple this year.
How do they work?
The jabs work by suppressing your appetite, making you eat less so your body burns fat for energy instead and you lose weight.
They do this my mimicking a hormone called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when the stomach is full, so the drugs are officially called GLP-1 receptor agonists.
They slow down digestion and increase insulin production, lowering blood sugar, which is why they were first developed to treat type 2 diabetes in which patients' sugar levels are too high.
Can I get them?
NHS prescriptions of weight loss drugs, mainly Wegovy and an older version called Saxenda (chemical name liraglutide), are controlled through specialist weight loss clinics.
Typically a patient will have to have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, classifying them as medically obese, and also have a weight-related health condition such as high blood pressure.
GPs generally do not prescribe the drugs for weight loss.
Private prescribers offer the jabs, most commonly Mounjaro, to anyone who is obese (BMI of 30+) or overweight (BMI 25-30) with a weight-related health risk.
Private pharmacies have been rapped for handing them out too easily and video calls or face-to-face appointments are now mandatory to check a patient is being truthful about their size and health.
Are there any risks?
Yes – side effects are common but most are relatively mild.
Around half of people taking the drug experience gut issues, including sickness, bloating, acid reflux, constipation and diarrhoea.
Dr Sarah Jarvis, GP and clinical consultant at patient.info, said: 'One of the more uncommon side effects is severe acute pancreatitis, which is extremely painful and happens to one in 500 people.'
Other uncommon side effects include altered taste, kidney problems, allergic reactions, gallbladder problems and hypoglycemia.
Evidence has so far been inconclusive about whether the injections are damaging to patients' mental health.
Figures obtained by The Sun show that, up to January 2025, 85 patient deaths in the UK were suspected to be linked to the medicines.
Ellie says: 'I was terrified of actually putting a needle in me and was on FaceTime to mum 'what if I'm allergic?' But it was nowhere near as bad as I thought.
'I definitely eat less because I'm able to control myself now, and with my portion control, I can pick and choose and know that I'm eating less.
'The biggest shock for me has been the health side of it, where I'm losing weight, I've had my first period in five years now, which is amazing. I'm healing.'
Instead of reaching for a chocolate bar, now when Ellie fancies a sweet treat, she opts for a few strawberries and she doesn't eat the whole punnet - like she previously would have.
In her breaks at work, she used to scroll Instagram looking at food and would eat a tupperware pot full to the brim of pasta for lunch before having a snack from the vending machine in the afternoon. Now, she naturally puts less on her plate.
We're healthier, happier, and we've made it through this journey together
Gill Foster
Ellie's lost 4st 6lbs and now weighs 12st 10lbs and Gill's lost 4st 13lbs and now weighs 12st 11lbs - and they've even turned their transformations into a friendly rivalry.
They check in with each other on their progress and push each other to keep going.
'I just want to weigh less than my mum,' Ellie admits.
They both admit they enjoy going through their weight loss together, and have supported each other through the ups and downs.
Gill says: 'We send each other screenshots of our scale progress every morning, and we share pictures of the meals we're eating.
'In the early days, when Ellie wasn't seeing as much progress, I felt like she needed some reassurance, and we'd talk about it. That kept us going.'
Ellie's target weight is to be a small size 12, and to wear the box of clothes that have been sitting above her wardrobe since lockdown.
Gill says she would like her weight to be less than 11st and have a healthy BMI.
She adds: 'Now, I feel like a 'normal' person again - I eat what I want, when I want, without feeling overwhelmed by food.
'We're healthier, happier, and we've made it through this journey together.
'The absolutely liberating part is I have zero guilt around food, the habits that I've tried to form over the years, it's being fulfilled now, because it's possible to do it, it's working, and I just have to make sure I do whatever it takes to keep that going.'
GILL & ELLIE'S DIETS BEFORE AND AFTER FAT JABS
GILL BEFORE
Breakfast: Skip
Snack: Crisps, chocolate
Lunch: Something convenient from the petrol station like a ready-made sandwich or sausage roll, crisps, and another chocolate bar
Dinner: Home-cooked meals such as pastas, curries, stews, but portions for 2 or 3 people
GILL NOW
Breakfast: Overnight oats or sourdough toast with a poached egg
Snack: Herbal tea, fruit like apples or berries
Lunch: A portion of the meal from the night before or something on toast or a jacket potato, homemade soup
Dinner: Sticky chicken with new potatoes or vegetarian curry with green vegetables, salmon fillet with steamed green veggies
ELLIE BEFORE
Breakfast: Skip
Lunch: Leftover from dinner - pasta or chilli in a tupperware bowl filled to the brim
Snack: Something from the vending machine.
Dinner: Big portion of pasta, homemade chilli or lasagne.
ELLIE NOW
Breakfast: Greek yogurt with homemade granola and berries
Lunch: Half a sandwich and a pepperoni stick, a much smaller portion of the meal left over from the night before
Snack: Fruit, hummus and veggies to dip
Dinner: Smaller portion of homemade chilli or salmon and salad, big healthy salads, paella, homemade family favourites like cottage pie with lots of veggies and much smaller portions
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
33 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Doctor leaders warn GP practices ‘on the brink' as demand intensifies
The snap survey ran from 6 May to 21 May this year and received 1,670 responses, with 38% of GP partners in Scotland taking part. Nearly half of GPs in Scotland who responded to the survey said the future of their practice is precarious or not sustainable. A total of 45% of GPs said this was the case, representing a rise of 10% since 2023. Four out of ten GPs (41.61%) said their practice is unable to meet patient demand for access and there is 'no realistic chance of this in the near future'. Most GPs (98.5%) believe urgent and sustained investment into General Practice is necessary. Meanwhile, more than nine out of ten GPs say they would take on additional GPs if they had sufficient funding (95.62%) Nearly all participants indicated that they could take on more General Practitioners (GPs) if they received adequate funding. The BMA found that an additional 160 whole-time equivalent (WTE) GPs could potentially be available, which would provide approximately 700,000 additional appointments annually. READ MORE: Doctors demand 1800 more GPs to improve patient care Scottish Government urged to improve NHS governance to deliver reforms This increase in capacity would be achievable if all sessional GPs seeking more work were able to secure their desired number of working hours. Dr Iain Morrison, chair of the Scottish general practitioners committee (SGPC), said the findings were "stark" in revealing the pressures GP practices are under. Dr Morrison also said the survey showed the 'devastating' impact of years of underinvestment and the results must act as a wake-up call to Government, with an urgent plan needed to see £290m deliver full funding restoration for GP practices and stabilise the position. The chair of the SGPC said: 'The findings of this survey show the crisis that GPs across the country are facing and must act as a wake-up call to government that we need a radical change of approach as to how it supports General Practice. 'At a time when we have record levels of demand, general practices are having to think about reducing services – we simply cannot continue to provide more and more for less and less resource. 'It is a situation which is completely unsustainable and is taking a toll on GPs who are all too aware of the challenges patients can face in accessing services. GPs want to deliver a service they can be proud of, rather than one they need to apologise for. 'This survey has found most practices would be able to take on more GPs if they had the funding available, as well as showing there are GPs who are looking for work. "Patients will rightly be bewildered that there are GPs struggling to find enough work while they can face a struggle to get an appointment. If the required funding was made available, patients would be able to rapidly see the benefits with the equivalent of 160 WTE GPs currently seeking to take on work.' The BMA's Scottish general practitioners committee has recently launched a campaign calling for a £290million funding gap to be addressed, which includes posters in GP surgeries explaining the issues to help patients understand why they may be struggling to get the service or access they want and need. Patients are also being urged to 'Stand with your Surgery' and back the call for general practice to receive more funding. Dr Morrison said: 'The survey also reveals an alarming number of practices are on the brink, with nearly half of GPs expressing concern about the sustainability of their practice in the future. 'Surgeries are at the heart of communities and we simply cannot afford to lose one more as a consequence of erosion of funding and rising cost pressures. That's why we are also calling for everyone to 'Stand with your Surgery' and advocate for General Practice to receive more funding, to be able to better serve their communities. 'This must begin with urgent action to deliver £290m for full funding restoration – around one percent of the Scottish NHS budget - which would initially help to stabilise General Practice and then grow the GP workforce to improve access and services for patients. 'The survey shows the devastating impact of years of lack of action and we cannot allow any more practices to close or GPs to leave the profession as a result. The government must now take the opportunity to support general practice and reverse years of decline before it is simply too late. 'General practice provides 90% of patient contact and can deliver the solution to the perpetual NHS crisis – but only if it is given the resources to do so.' One GP said despite working "harder than ever" she has recently faced more negativity around her line of work. Dr Karen Hopkins, a GP Partner in Stepps, North Lanarkshire, said: 'I used to be proud to tell people I was a GP; it used to be met with respect and appreciation. Now when people ask me, I tell them and brace myself for the barrage of frustration I know is about to be thrust upon me. 'Not out of malice, but because people - my friends, my family, parents in the playground- are increasingly frustrated with the NHS and service that is not fit for purpose. Yet my colleagues and I in primary care are working harder than ever. Longer hours, no lunch breaks, logging on at home on unpaid days off or holidays. 'Primary care is both the first point of access and the backbone of the NHS. Funding restoration would mean better access. It would mean more appointments with GPs and nurses. It would mean your chronic disease checks could be done promptly and on schedule. It would mean being a GP would once again become a more attractive job – 11-hour days with no break is not something any of us thought we were signing up for becoming GPs. 'Our nation has never been more unhealthy-obesity, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease. Preventing and treating this is the bread and butter of general practice, and yet while we are fire-fighting the insatiable demand, this important work cannot be done. Funding restoration needs to happen for the future of General the future of the NHS.' In its report, published in March, Audit Scotland, found Scottish Government ministers were "unlikely" to hit their target of delivering 800 more GPs by 2027. The BMA has previously said £290m is needed to plug a funding gap for GP surgeries and has warned if it is not addressed in the coming months then the "current direction of travel" is leading towards a formal dispute with Scottish ministers. The Scottish government said it has increased investment in general practice and is determined to increase the number of GPs in Scotland. Scotland currently has the highest number of GPs per head in the UK with 82 GPs per 100,000 population, compared with 64 in England. Health Secretary Neil Gray said: 'We want to make it easier for people to see their GP and are taking steps to address the challenges facing general practice. That includes ensuring that a greater proportion of new NHS funding goes to primary and community care. "We are in bilateral discussions with the Scottish GP Committee about core funding for general practice. 'GPs play an incredibly important role and we want to see more of them in Scotland. That is why we are determined to increase the number of GPs by 800 by 2027, with an additional 360 GPs added since 2017."
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Parent says no, stop the screen rot in schools
Bravo to the education committee for finally saying what we all know to be true: for young children, screens are like — and I'm paraphrasing here, but not by much — crack, in terms of rotting their brains and being ludicrously addictive. In its new report, 'Screen time: impacts on education and wellbeing', the committee concluded, 'The overwhelming weight of evidence submitted to us suggests that the harms of screen time and social media use significantly outweigh the benefits for young children.' In other words, it's not social media that's the problem. It's screens themselves. So, boy oh boy, that education committee will be really angry with whoever just made this decision: from September the national statutory tests for five-year-olds, the 'reception baseline assessment', will require at least two touchscreens — one for the teacher and one for the very young child (adult and child, side by side, both on screens, just as God intended.) Who on earth thought it was a good idea to test five-year-olds on tablets? Oh wait, it's written here in small letters, let me get my glasses …It was the Department for Education. Ah. By now, bodies ranging from the World Health Organisation to the NHS have published guidelines about screen time for young children. But these guidelines are arguably too little and definitely too late: a 2020 Ofcom report found that an astonishing 57 per cent of five- to seven-year-olds in Britain have a tablet. As a result of this large-scale outsourcing of parenting to screens, last week a coalition of schools, nurseries and colleges published a letter saying that children were now starting school with speech and emotional difficulties 'that are likely to have been exaggerated by or are even directly attributable to excessive screen time'. And yet the DfE has decided that those same screen-addicted kids should be tested on screens. And just to prove that too much screen time rots adults' brains too, I'm going to respond to this mess with an internet meme: DfE! Make! It! Make! Sense! • Schools issue parents with screen time limits from birth to age 16 So I emailed the department to ask — politely — what it was thinking. Why was it telling parents to give their kids less screen time while telling schools to give the kids more? Alas, to judge from the computer-says-no response I got, the DfE is now run by AI, which might explain its compulsion to test kids online: 'Digital assessments reduce the administrative burden on teachers, freeing up their time to focus more on teaching and supporting pupils' learning.' So young children will get to interact with teachers more by interacting with them less. Or something. Schools switched to digital learning during lockdown, and many found they enjoyed this easing of the 'administrative burden' so much, they never switched back. No surprise, given how much investment has been lavished on it: the UK-based primary school educational platform Atom Learning raised £19 million in 2021 and is now near ubiquitous. In April I wrote about the rise in primary schools of 'ed tech', aka education technology, aka teaching children via the medium of computer games, whizzy apps, tech portals and emojis. You don't need to be Mr Gradgrind to query the benefits of this gamification of education, teaching children from the age of five to expect lessons to be taught in ten-second bite-sized graphics. And we wonder why today's kids have such decimated attention spans. • Book holidays with bad wi-fi to get teens reading, says Winchester head Since then, I've heard some truly fascinating defences of education technology in primary schools. I was told that screens 'enrich students' learning experience', although when I asked if there was any proof of said enrichment, answer came there none. In fact, studies show that primary school kids experience what neuroscientists in one study describe as 'deeper reading' when learning from a paper text, whereas when they learn from a screen 'shallow reading was observed'. I was told that it's important to teach children how to use these devices for their future employment prospects, as though the devices weren't designed to be entirely intuitive, and addictive. And in any case, they will be utterly obsolete by the time these kids are in the workplace. Some argue that ed tech isn't social media, and that's true. But telling young children to do their school projects online is as ridiculous as telling them to do their homework in front of the TV: distraction is always a click away. And my personal favourite: 'The students really enjoy it.' They'd also enjoy eating sugar all day, so let's provide glucose on tap and see how that pans out. The one decent defence schools have for putting young kids on screens is that this is how they will increasingly be tested. Most GCSEs and A-levels will be online within a decade — so why not start them in primary school, seems to be the thinking. But five-year-olds are not 16-year-olds. One educator said to me breezily that this is simple 'market forces'. But schools — and certainly the DfE — should not be uncritical, passive consumers of tech. Mike Baxter, principal of City of London Academy, said last week, 'Over the past 20 years, schools and families have too often blindly trusted technology to aid and even enhance the education and wellbeing of our young people. However, the reality couldn't be further from this.' I have yet to meet anyone who can explain why it's better for children to write an essay online and upload it to Google Classroom than write one by hand in a notebook. If schools can't say how any of this benefits the pupils, they shouldn't do it. Computers aren't the only thing that can say no.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
NHS patients battling Alzheimer's WON'T be offered 'miracle' drugs as health watchdog rules they are 'too expensive to justify'
Two of the first drugs proven to slow down Alzheimer's disease will be denied to NHS patients from this week - unless they pay to go private. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has refused the 'miracle' drugs lecanemab and donanemab for use on the NHS as they are too expensive to justify. This means over 70,000 patients in England will be denied the 'game-changing' drugs, found to slow cognitive decline by an average of four to seven months, unless they can afford tens of thousands of pounds a year for private treatment. After a positive drug trial in 2022, lecanemab (brand name Leqembi) made by Eisai, and donanemab (marketed as Kisunla), made by Eli Lilly, were proven to clear toxic amyloid protein from the brain and thus slow the underlying cause of dementia. Campaigners hailed it as 'the beginning of the end' of Alzheimer's. Iain Hartnell, Research Communications Officer at Alzheimer's Society, said: 'The MHRA's approval of the first safe and effective Alzheimer's disease treatment, shown to slow progression, is a defining moment for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease in the UK and a significant step towards a more hopeful future.' Last year, both drugs were given drug licences in the UK by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). But without NICE's recommendation, the groundbreaking medicine will only be available to those with private healthcare. 'It is the end of the road for these drugs on the NHS,' an insider told The Times. Hilary Evans-Newton, the chief executive of Alzheimer's Research UK described the decision as 'deeply disappointing'. She told the publication that it sends 'a damaging signal to the life sciences sector - undermining confidence in the UK as a leader of dementia research, clinical trials and innovation, with knock-on effects for patients and the wider economy'. She added: 'These treatments are not perfect, and we recognise the challenges they pose around cost, delivery and safety. But scientific progress is incremental, and these drugs represent a vital foundation to build on.' The drugs were shown in trials to slow the rate of decline for those with mild to moderate Alzheimer's by an average of four to seven months. Lecanemab, for example, can slow the decline in memory and mental agility by 27 per cent in those with mild Alzheimer's taking the drug compared to people on the dummy drug. The research team also found that the drug reduced loss of quality of life by up to 56 per cent, according to the Alzheimer's Society. Importantly, the drug reduced the amount of amyloid protein present in the brain. Amyloid protein levels were also reduced in the blood and spinal fluid. Experts have long believed donanemab could herald a new era of dementia treatment, after studies showed it slowed the memory-robbing illness in its early stages Lecanemab has already been given the green light in the EU, US, China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea and Israel. It is estimated around 70,000 adults in England could eligible for the treatment if approved for use on the health service. Alzheimer's is the most common cause of dementia in the UK. Around 982,000 are currently estimated to be living with dementia UK - although this figure is expected to skyrocket to 1.4million in 2040. Alzheimer's Research UK analysis found 74,261 people died from dementia in 2022, compared to 69,178 a year earlier, making it the country's biggest killer. Recent analysis by the Alzheimer's Society estimates the overall annual cost of the dementia to the UK is £42billion a year, with families bearing the brunt. An ageing population means these costs — which include lost earnings of unpaid carers — are set to soar to £90billion in the next 15 years.
