logo
'Boil in a bag' funerals to become available in Britain after catching on around the world - here's how the controversial method works

'Boil in a bag' funerals to become available in Britain after catching on around the world - here's how the controversial method works

Daily Mail​3 days ago

Putting a loved one to rest in the UK typically involves either a ground burial or a flame-based cremation.
But an alternative method could finally get the go-ahead.
A new consultation into funerary methods by the independent Law Commission could finally result in legal approval of 'boil in a bag' funerals in the UK.
At the moment, there is no regulatory framework for the method, officially known as water cremation or alkaline hydrolysis – effectively banning it from use in the country.
Water cremation involves rapidly decomposing a corpse in water and alkaline chemicals under high temperatures, leaving only liquid and bones.
The liquid, known as 'effluent', can go down the drain with other wastewater and bones that can be ground to ash for the bereaved owner to take home.
Advocates say the method is better for the environment, but others believe it is an undignified way to dispose of the dead.
Here's a look at how the controversial method works.
What is water cremation?
Water cremation uses water, alkaline chemicals, heat, and sometimes pressure and agitation, to accelerate natural decomposition, leaving bone fragments and a neutral liquid called effluent.
The effluent is sterile, and contains salts, sugars, amino acids and peptides – but no tissue or DNA is left.
This effluent is discharged with all other wastewater, while the softened bone can be ground up for the owner to take home and lay to rest, much like ashes – although any metal hip and knee joints come out unchanged.
At the Bradshaw Celebration of Life Center in Minnesota, there's an alkaline hydrolysis machine located in the basement that cost $750,000 (£580,000) to install about a decade ago.
Bodies go into the rectangular steel box, which is about six feet high and four feet wide and looks like part of a high security 'bank vault'.
With just the press of a few buttons, the machine locks and starts to fill with water – and the 90-minute process can begin.
By the end, all tissue has dissolved and is free from DNA – and is a brown colour that somewhat resembles 'tea or an ale'.
What happens during a water cremation?
The corpse is loaded into the machine, which then works out the amount of water and potassium hydroxide needed.
The pressurised tank is filled with the alkaline solution.
The tank is heated to 152C (305F).
The remaining liquid is cooled in a separate tank and drained.
The liquid (about 330 gallons) is washed down the drain.
The bones are ground to powder and given to the family in an urn.
According to one Wired journalist who visited a water cremation facility in California, the liquefied human body 'smells like steamed clams'.
Any metal hip and knee joints come out unchanged, but otherwise all that's left is the bones, which now crumble and fall apart to the touch and can be easily ground down and scattered much like ashes, or kept.
Water cremation is not new – the process was originally patented in 1888 – but only now is it becoming an option for the general public.
Some see religious connotations in water cremation, echoing the use of water in baptism at the start of a life.
Why is water cremation controversial?
Critics argue that dissolving bodies and disposing of the resulting liquid down the sewers along with other wastewater lacks dignity.
In certain religious and cultural communities, water cremation is barred due to its perceived desecration of the body.
Dr Lian Lundy, a wastewater specialist at Middlesex University, said the biggest hurdle blocking it in the UK is social acceptability.
Staff at the Bradshaw Celebration of Life Center operate the alkaline hydrolysis machine located in the basement
'Some people view it as basically mixing up my loved one with poo in the sewer and they don't like that,' she told the Telegraph.
'But there's a lot that goes into the sewer that we don't really think about – waste from mortuaries and hospitals and all sorts of things that we don't know about – so from that perspective, it's not really any different.'
Where is water cremation available?
Water cremation is already available to the general public in nearly 30 states in America and is also permitted in Canada and South Africa.
Ireland opened its first water cremation facility in early 2023 – the first of its kind in Europe.
But in the UK, regulatory hurdles are preventing the method from becoming available.
When will water cremation come to the UK?
Co-op Funeralcare, which arranges more than 93,000 funerals every year, revealed in 2023 it would start to offer the service for deceased Brits, but plans were delayed as it was 'unable to find a path through the current regulatory framework'.
Co-op Funeralcare welcomed the consultation on new funerary methods, which could potentially see water cremations come to the UK by the end of the decade.
A spokesman from Co-op Funeralcare said: 'At Co-op Funeralcare, we are committed to serving the needs of our member-owners and clients and offering the most sustainable and affordable services.
'In 2023, we announced our ambition to pilot Resomation in the UK, and we subsequently worked closely with the Government to explore the regulatory requirements to introduce this service across the nation.
'However, we did not proceed with this as, at the time, we were unable to find a path through the current regulatory framework.
'We welcome The Law Commission's review and encourage exploration into alternative methods that provide consumers with greater choice and deliver environmental benefits.'
How much will water cremation be?
While the cost for water cremations remains unclear, it's expected to be around the same prices as a traditional cremation – a few thousand pounds.
In countries where water cremation is already legal, the price typically ranges from $1,500 (£1,180) to $5,000 (£3,950), depending on the provider and location, the Farewell Guide explains.
'In the UK, once the service becomes available, the cost of water cremation will likely be competitive with regular cremation prices,' it adds.
At the Bradshaw Celebration of Life Center in Minnesota, it costs $3,395 (£2,500) for a 'basic cremation' and $4,995 (£3,680) for an additional memorial service.
Why are water cremations better for the environment?
Advocates describe the method as 'green cremation' as it's a more eco-friendly alternative to land burials (which can pollute the soil) and flame-based cremations.
A traditional cremation using flames consumes fuel and releases large amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the air.
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, the average cremation produces about 535 pounds of carbon dioxide, which is equivalent to driving a car about 600 miles.
Land burials, meanwhile, pose the problem of the vessel containing the corpse taking years to decompose in the soil if it's made of metal or plastic.
Even if the vessel is compostable, such as a pine box, the decomposing corpse doesn't usually have a healthy impact on the soil and can often stop grass and plants growing properly.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves announces £6 billion to provide millions of NHS tests and procedures
Reeves announces £6 billion to provide millions of NHS tests and procedures

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Reeves announces £6 billion to provide millions of NHS tests and procedures

Rachel Reeves has announced a £6 billion investment to speed up tests and treatment within the NHS, after setting out huge year-on-year rises in the health service's budget. New scanners, ambulances and urgent treatment centres are among the things which the additional cash will pay for, with the aim of providing up to four million more tests and procedures over the next five years. The announcement comes after the Chancellor put NHS funding at the heart of her spending review on Wednesday, raising its budget in a move worth £29 billion a year. This comes, however, at the expense of other areas of public spending. The new £6 billion funding will help to meet the Government's target of reducing NHS waiting lists in England, the Chancellor claimed. 'Over a decade of underinvestment from the previous government put the NHS on its knees, with people across the country unable to get the care they need. We are investing in Britain's renewal, and we will turn that around,' Ms Reeves said. She added: 'Part of our record investment will deliver four million tests, scans and procedures, so hard-working people can get the healthcare they and their families need. 'There is no strong economy without a strong NHS, and we'll deliver on our Plan for Change to end the hospital backlog, improve living standards and get more money in people's pockets.' The latest spending commitment will help patients get access to diagnostic scans and treatment in places such as shopping centres and high streets, speeding up their diagnoses. The Government hopes this will help to cut NHS waiting lists, meeting Labour's goal of ensuring the health service carries out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'Since taking office we have been relentless in our drive to cut waiting times for patients, delivering over 3.6 million extra elective care appointments and reducing the overall waiting list by over 200,000. 'The £6 billion investment we are announcing today will generate millions more vital diagnostic tests, scans and procedures for patients across the country.' On Wednesday evening, Ms Reeves said the Government was 'confident' it could meet its pledge to reduce waiting lists after giving the NHS a 3% annual increase in funding at the spending review. Some health leaders are, however, sceptical that the Government will meet its target, despite the funding boost provided at the spending review. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said: 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times, more GP appointments, and adequate mental health services and more can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.'

NHS to receive £6bn to provide millions more tests and procedures, Reeves confirms
NHS to receive £6bn to provide millions more tests and procedures, Reeves confirms

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

NHS to receive £6bn to provide millions more tests and procedures, Reeves confirms

Rachel Reeves has pledged a £6bn investment aimed at accelerating tests and treatments within the NHS, following substantial year-on-year budget increases for the health service. The additional funding will facilitate new scanners, ambulances, and urgent treatment centres, with the goal of delivering up to four million more tests and procedures over the next five years. This announcement follows the chancellor's emphasis on NHS funding in her recent spending review, where she allocated an additional £29bn annually to the NHS budget. However, this increase comes at the expense of other areas of public spending. The £6bn boost is intended to support the Government's objective of reducing NHS waiting lists in England, according to the chancellor. 'Over a decade of underinvestment from the previous government put the NHS on its knees, with people across the country unable to get the care they need. We are investing in Britain's renewal, and we will turn that around,' Ms Reeves said. She added: 'Part of our record investment will deliver four million tests, scans and procedures, so hard-working people can get the healthcare they and their families need. 'There is no strong economy without a strong NHS, and we'll deliver on our Plan for Change to end the hospital backlog, improve living standards and get more money in people's pockets.' The latest spending commitment will help patients get access to diagnostic scans and treatment in places such as shopping centres and high streets, speeding up their diagnoses. The Government hopes this will help to cut NHS waiting lists, meeting Labour's goal of ensuring the health service carries out 92 per cent of routine operations within 18 weeks. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'Since taking office we have been relentless in our drive to cut waiting times for patients, delivering over 3.6 million extra elective care appointments and reducing the overall waiting list by over 200,000. 'The £6bn investment we are announcing today will generate millions more vital diagnostic tests, scans and procedures for patients across the country.' On Wednesday evening, Ms Reeves said the Government was 'confident' it could meet its pledge to reduce waiting lists after giving the NHS a 3 per cent annual increase in funding at the spending review. Some health leaders are, however, sceptical that the Government will meet its target, despite the funding boost provided at the spending review. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29bn won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said: 'The chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times, more GP appointments, and adequate mental health services and more can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.'

UK Pharmaceutical industry at risk from government's 'sky-high' rebates system
UK Pharmaceutical industry at risk from government's 'sky-high' rebates system

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK Pharmaceutical industry at risk from government's 'sky-high' rebates system

The UK's status as a leader in medical research is at risk from 'sky-high and unpredictable' repayments pharmaceutical firms hand the Government, says an industry boss. Richard Torbett, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, said the rebate system – where firms repay money they make through selling medicines to the NHS – was sending 'a terrible message to international investors'. Rachel Reeves promised to support 'the UK's strengths in life sciences' and 'ensure patients get rapid access to the most clinically and cost-effective new technologies'. The Treasury plans to invest up to £520million in drug manufacturing in the next five years. Another £600million is earmarked for a health data research service to accelerate the discovery of new medicines. But Torbett said more was needed. 'Over the past decade, accounting for inflation, the NHS budget has grown by a third in real terms, while investment in the most rigorously cost-benefit-tested part of health spending – investment in the medicines needed to treat people – has fallen from around 11 per cent to 9 per cent of the health budget,' he added. And he attacked plans to increase what drug companies must repay from drug sales to 31.3 per cent, from 15.5 per cent. 'The sky-high and unpredictable payment rates send a terrible message to international investors when the UK is trying to position life sciences research and development as an engine for health and growth. For the sake of patients, the NHS and the economy, we need a commitment to bring these unsustainable rates down.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store