Merkel rejects claims Germany covered up Covid-19 lab leak report
Former German chancellor Angela Merkel dismissed accusations of a cover-up regarding her handling of intelligence reports on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, her spokeswoman said on Thursday.
The comment came after three newspapers reported that Germany's BND spy agency had concluded in 2020 that there was a strong likelihood the coronavirus accidentally leaked from a Chinese lab, but the finding was never released to the public.
"Former chancellor Merkel categorically rejects the accusation implied in your question," a spokeswoman told Berlin's Tagesspiegel newspaper when asked whether Merkel, who left office in 2021, had concealed relevant information from the public.
Merkel's successor, Olaf Scholz, has refused to discuss the reports.
"As far as intelligence findings are concerned, this is not the place to discuss them," he said at a press conference on Wednesday.
The reports published in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Süddeutsche Zeitung and Die Zeit said that the BND and Germany's Chancellery had asked scientists to examine the evidence in regards to the lab leak theory.
Investigators concluded that there was an 80% to 95% likelihood that a lab leak was to blame, based on information in the public domain, the papers said.
This hotly contested theory posits that the Sars-CoV-2 virus, which causes the Covid-19 disease, originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which conducted research on coronaviruses, and began spreading through some sort of accident or failure at the lab.
The findings by the German intelligence community have not been made public. The Neue Zürcher Zeitung reported that while the BND believed it had plausible evidence to support the theory, not all the researchers on the panel were convinced.
The other major theory for the pandemic's origin is that the virus had a purely natural origin, just like the SARS outbreak in 2002-03.
Beijung's response
Earlier in Beijing, China had urged caution and political restraint in the wake of reports that Germany's BND intelligence agency gathered plausible evidence that the coronavirus pandemic originated with a laboratory leak in the Chinese city of Wuhan.
"On the issue of the coronavirus, China firmly rejects any form of political posturing," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said in Beijing.
She said any discussion of the scientific issues surrounding Covid-19 should be left to scientists.
Mao also noted that an international team led by the World Health Organization had visited the Wuhan lab as part of their investigation into the origins of the pandemic. The team largely dismissed the so-called "lab leak" theory in 2021.
Still, the WHO has emphasized that all hypotheses regarding the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus remain on the table. As recently as December the UN agency called on Beijing to provide more pandemic-related data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
School choice continues to expand, even in blue and purple states
Press reports tend to draw a hard line between the 17 states which enacted universal school choice programs when both their legislatures and governors were Republican and the 33 others which have not. But it would be more accurate to say that choice is expanding everywhere, just with different structures. Even in states where at least one branch of government remains opposed to funding non-public education, the rapid growth of three inexpensive K-12 schooling options is making choice a reality for more students. The most popular of these low-cost alternatives is the so-called 'microschool,' a small educational venue which typically serves 16 pupils or less. Spontaneously formed by neighboring families during COVID-19, when the public schools were closed and open private schools were filled to capacity, these small-scale programs have continued to multiply, offering a more personalized learning experience in blue states as well as red. Today, according to National Microschooling Center CEO Dan Soifer, there are around 95,000 microschools across the U.S. serving over 1.5 million K-12 students. Another economical non-public option which has spread to states without legalized school choice is the 'church learning center.' As the name implies, this is a school which operates within a house of worship, typically during weekdays and at other times when its facilities are not used for religious services. Depending on the size of the church, its learning center can be as small as a microschool or serve hundreds of students. An accurate count of these church learning centers is harder to make, in part because there is no national organization representing all of them and also because the larger ones are reluctant to publicize themselves in ways that might invite regulation as a conventional private school. But a clear indicator of their popularity is the growing number of regional and denominational organizations dedicated to helping churches organize their own programs. In Kansas, for example, homeschool mom of six Delana Wallace runs the Heartland Education Reformation Organization, a nonprofit that advocates for 15 parish-sited schools and connects local clergy with educators interested in starting new ones. And in Boston, the city's Family Institute has successfully guided more than 20 religious groups in establishing their own Christian learning centers. At the other end of the country, in California, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles has encouraged the formation of five such schools. The third and final low-cost teaching venue is the 'hybrid school,' a term which refers less to a school's size, location, or curriculum than to how its students divide their time: two or three days a week online at home, and the other days in a more organized group setting. The provider of the structured portion can be a microschool or church learning center, but also a college, business, foundation or public charter school. One of the newer hybrid options is the traditional private or parochial school which runs a separate part-time academy. For example, the Canterbury Christian School in Los Altos, Calif., offers local homeschooled children a two day per week package of more conventional classroom instruction. 'If you're trying to support a family in a place like Silicon Valley, where ordinary homes cost $3-to-$4 million,' says the school's headmaster, Rev. Steve Macias, 'it's not easy to pay [our full-time tuition] with after-tax dollars.' What clearly helps all three kinds of low-cost schools to control their expenses is family involvement in program administration. Students' mothers and fathers work as classroom aids, break and lunchroom monitors, carpooling drivers, sports coaches and even teachers. Church learning centers have the added benefit of being able to draw on volunteer labor from their congregations. The second factor which controls expenses for these schools is that their typical student is registered as a homeschooler, which exempts them from a considerable regulatory burden. From the government's point of view, it is not the microschool, church learning center, or hybrid facility where the child is being educated, but the family home. The school itself is viewed as something more like a tutoring company, although the most accurate descriptor for the vast majority of them would be 'collaborative homeschool.' The final factor which has enabled microschools, church learning centers and hybrid schools to be seen as affordable options, even in the absence of government funding, is that all three of them have become increasingly reliant on the so-called 'classical curriculum.' That is to say, a curriculum which emphasizes logical reasoning over the memorization of facts, and the reading of the great books of Western civilization, especially those which inspired America's Founders. And while this educational methodology is not necessarily any less expensive than others, the evidence for its efficacy has convinced growing numbers of parents that they are getting an exceptional academic return for their investment. As the American Enterprise Institute's director of Education Policy Studies, Frederick M. Hess, has documented, classically educated students get exceptionally high scores on standardized achievement tests. As a result, they also have unusually high college acceptance rates. They even outperform on the SAT — an exam that the classical curriculum does not even attempt to 'teach to.' As for the actual cost of a microschool, church learning center or hybrid school, the answer depends on such factors as the ratio of paid staff to volunteers, the rent required to obtain a venue, and the extracurricular activities provided. On the low end is the Cornerstone Church in Uxbridge, Mass., which has long hosted a parent-run school called DELTIC Prep, short for 'Doing Education in Life Together in Christ.' It annually educates 70 to 90 students across multiple grades for just $15 to $75 each per year. There are programs which cost as much as $5,000 to $10,000, but still less than a conventional private or parochial school in their areas. Given the continuing reluctance of blue and purple state politicians to fund non-public education, school choice is indeed coming to their communities in a different way than in more conservative jurisdictions. But it is coming. Lewis M. Andrews is chair of the Kids' Scholarship Fund.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
After firing entire CDC vaccine committee, RFK Jr. appoints 8 new members including vaccine skeptics: Who they are and what to know
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who heads the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has announced eight new members to the CDC's independent vaccine advisory committee—some who are critical of vaccines—after firing the entire group, prompting questions and concerns. Kennedy said the new members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will be at ACIP's upcoming meeting on June 25 to June 27, which is slated to discuss vaccine recommendations for the HPV vaccine (which the CDC has deemed safe, and prevents cervical cancer and 90% of cancers caused by HPV in females), and of course the COVID-19 vaccine. Those new members are: Joseph R. Hibbeln, Martin Kulldorff, Retsef Levi, Robert W. Malone, Cody Meissner, James Pagano, Vicky Pebsworth, and Michael A. Ross—some of whom are either close allies of RFK Jr. or vaccine skeptics, according to the BBC. Kulldorff, an epidemiologist and biostatistician, helped write the Great Barrington Declaration, which questioned lockdowns and other public health measures early in the COVID-19 pandemic, per National Public Radio; while Malone worked on mRNA technology for the COVID-19 vaccine early on, then became a critic and made false claims about the shot, also per NPR. Wednesday's move comes just days after Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of the ACIP, which makes recommendations on the safety, efficacy, and clinical need for the shots, advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the vaccine schedule and required coverage of immunizations. While Kennedy justified the firings, saying in a Wall Street Journal op-ed the panel of esteemed pediatricians, epidemiologists, immunologists, and other physicians was 'plagued with conflicts of interest,' that's questionable. As Fast Company has previously reported, Kennedy has a long history of repeatedly making false claims that have been debunked, and railing against or ranting about vaccines, medical drugs, the health system, and our nation's food. RFK Jr. also has no medical degree, breaking with long-standing tradition for the health secretary post, and his nomination came in a string of controversial picks by Trump for his second term.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Nvidia will stop including China in its forecasts amid US chip export controls, CEO says
Chipmaker Nvidia will exclude the Chinese market from its revenue and profit forecasts following the imposition of tough US restrictions on chip sales to China, its CEO said Thursday. Asked whether the US will lift export controls after trade talks with China in London this week, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told CNN's Anna Stewart in Paris: 'I'm not counting on it but, if it happens, then it will be a great bonus. I've told all of our investors and shareholders that, going forward, our forecasts will not include the China market.' In recent years, Washington has stepped up efforts to restrict China's access to American chip-related technologies, aiming to prevent Beijing from using US innovations to bolster its military and artificial intelligence capabilities. Huang's comments underscore the impact of Washington's chip curbs on Nvidia, a company once best known for its video game graphics processors, that has profited tremendously from growing demand for AI chips and infrastructure. The company blew past Wall Street's revenue expectations in its first quarter of 2025, posting a 69% increase from the same period last year. But Nvidia missed out on an additional $2.5 billion in revenue because export restrictions prevented it from shipping its H20 AI chips to China. The company developed that chip specifically to accommodate US export controls but was told in April that it would need a special license to do so. Nvidia took a smaller hit than expected from the excess inventory, however: a $4.5 billion charge compared to the $5.5 billion it had expected. Kevin Hassett, director of the US National Economic Council, told CNBC Monday that the Trump administration might be open to loosening restrictions on exports of some microchips that China views as critical to its manufacturing sector. But the United States will maintain curbs on 'very, very high-end Nvidia' chips that are capable of powering AI systems, he added. On Thursday, Nvidia's Huang again criticized US chip export controls. 'The goals of the export controls are not being achieved,' he told CNN. 'Whatever those goals are that were being discussed initially, (they) are apparently not working. And so I think, with all export controls, the goals have to be well-articulated and tested over time.' Last month, Huang said at a news conference in Taiwan that the US curbs on chip exports were a 'failure' and warned that the restrictions were doing more damage to American business than to China. Nvidia's position as a critical supplier of AI chips has put it in the middle of the tech race between the US and China, which escalated earlier this year with the arrival of Chinese tech startup DeepSeek's supposedly cheap yet sophisticated AI model. The Trump administration has been eager to position the US as a leader in AI, with Vice President JD Vance saying that 'excessive regulation of the AI sector' could 'kill a transformative industry just as it's taking off' during remarks at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris earlier this year. Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities, said easing export controls could be necessary to prevent China from gaining an edge in AI. 'With the AI Revolution hitting its next gear of growth it is important for China tech players they get access to Nvidia chips with the current H20 ban essentially handing a good portion of Nvidia's business directly to Huawei on a silver platter,' he wrote in a June 11 industry note. In the meantime, Nvidia continues to expand – aiming to cement its place as a major AI player globally. Huang announced on Thursday that his company will build the world's first cloud computing platform for industrial artificial intelligence applications in Europe. It also said its Blackwell architecture will power new AI infrastructure projects in Europe. Olesya Dmitracova and Clare Duffy contributed to this article.
