Hundreds of students rally on State House steps for climate action
After the noon rally, students met with more than 100 state legislators to advocate for a number of bills. Among them were
Advertisement
'Legislators need to listen to us and look at what's important here, how these bills will help not just the environment but the overall environmental justice movement,' said Vinh Nguyen, a 17-year-old student at Boston Latin School.
Sebastian Lemberber, 18, who goes to school in Andover, spoke about the importance of the rally as a show of democracy while the Trump administration
'As our opportunities to fight climate change within the federal government are cut off by the annihilation of the civil service, we need a functional state government more than ever,' Lemberber said, advocating for the bill that would reverse the state legislature exemption
Seneca Smith, a 15-year-old student at Four Rivers Charter School, spoke in favor of the farm to school bill. Smith said switching school lunch providers from corporate to local farmers will help lower emissions and create a more generative economy.
Advertisement
Another bill would create an advisory committee that would determine which state communities suffer most from air pollution and reduce it by 50% by 2030 and by 75% by 2035. Vi'Shon Ginyard, 18, said he supports the bill because of his experience with asthma.
'This bill means something to me on a deep level because it can truly change the future of our community for people like me…especially for people born with asthma,' he said. 'I don't want my little brothers, my little cousin, my neighbors, your children, your family [to have to live like this].'
According to the
The rally is part of the Massachusetts Youth Climate Coalition's 2025 Youth Climate Lobby Week. Last fall, the coalition successfully helped advocate for the
Cars honked and people cheered as they drove by the group of students gathered on the State House steps. Attendees said they were hopeful after seeing the number of people who came out to the rally.
'I'm glad everyone's here today lobbying and able to talk to legislators — I often feel like policy is the base of change and nothing's going to move without policy,' said Naomi Francis, an 18-year-old student at Olin College.
Advertisement
After the noon rally, students met with more than 100 state legislators to advocate for a number of bills.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Emily Spatz can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29-04-2025
- Yahoo
Boston built America's innovation engine. Now it's under attack by Trump
It's a strange time to be marking the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution. Back then, some of the main flashpoints related to Britain's tight grip on commerce in the colonies and taxation without representation. When the King got angry about the boisterous Boston Tea Party, he shut down Boston's port so that merchants couldn't import or export goods. That knee-capped the local economy, leading to business closures, high unemployment, shortages of food and other essentials and soaring prices. And it led the colonists to organize the First Continental Congress to plan their response. Now, the danger to our economy comes not from abroad, but from a president who gleefully uses phrases like 'long live the king' to refer to himself. His administration is attacking the foundations of what we have been building here since the 1630s, when Boston Latin School and Harvard College got started. That foundation tightly integrates education, smart students and professors from around the world, research and development activities, funding from the federal government and private philanthropists and experienced entrepreneurs and investors who form companies around the research projects that look most promising. What we have built on top of that foundation has been significant both societally and financially. We have cured deadly diseases in children and adults, developed surgical anesthesia, performed the first human organ transplant, helped sequence the human genome, created the field of proton therapy for cancer treatment, and we also did some of the earliest work on the GLP-1 drugs now widely prescribed for diabetes and weight loss. We developed radar systems that helped the Allies win World War II, and also the guidance computers that enabled Apollo spacecraft to land humans on the surface of the moon. We built some of the earliest hardware and software that allowed the ARPANET — the Internet's forerunner — to link computers together in the 1960s, sent the first email and ensured that the web has remained an open standard that everyone can benefit from. We created the first videogame, booting up an industry that now spins off revenues of more than $180 billion globally each year. An entrepreneur educated at the University of Massachusetts Lowell and working in Cambridge co-founded a startup called Android, now owned by Google, and is the world's most popular mobile operating system. Before that, we invented the telephone. (The Scotsman Alexander Graham Bell was a Boston University professor — but not yet a U.S. citizen — when he made the earliest phone calls.) In 2025, we're trying to do things like edit or silence the malfunctioning genes that cause diseases; help our military develop hypersonic missiles; and build a functional nuclear fusion reactor, with no carbon emissions or long-lived radioactive waste. You get the idea; this list could go on for a whiiiiiile. Just one industry that our university labs helped incubate here in the late 1970s, biotechnology, last year created more than $600 billion in economic activity in the U.S., and employed more than 300,000 people. Some of its early pioneers and current leaders — people like the late Henri Termeer of Genzyme and Noubar Afeyan of Flagship Pioneering — were foreigners who came to this country to advance their education. For its part, the Trump administration asserts that it aims to cut government research funding to help bring the deficit under control — a key mission of the Department of Government Efficiency. And the administration believes that it can get universities to address antisemitism on campuses, or increase ideological diversity on faculties, only with high-pressure tactics like withholding federal funding, rescinding their ability to enroll foreign students or revoking their tax-exempt status. Supporters of the administration may want to play out this hand of cards and see if those aims can be achieved. But I'd make the case that what we're seeing right now is a federal government that is jackhammering away at the foundations of what makes Boston work — not to mention similar ecosystems such as Seattle, New York and Silicon Valley. It seems they are rooting for the towers atop that foundation to tumble, without truly understanding the impact that that would have on America's competitiveness. They have demolition equipment, but I'm not convinced they have a blueprint or construction equipment. (As they wrangle with our great institutions, create anxiety around visas, and deny funding to cutting-edge researchers, you can already watch savvy countries swinging into action to attract those people.) There is also one possible impact of the Trump administration's war on Ivy League schools that few people understand, and it has to do with the universities' nest eggs — their endowments. If federal funding gets yanked or cut, universities may tap their endowments to fill the gap. There are also proposals in Congress to potentially increase the tax rate on wealthy universities' endowments from 1.4% to as much as 21%. Why does that matter? Endowment money often gets handed to venture capital firms so that they can fund startup companies — the next Moderna, HubSpot, Wayfair or Vertex. So increasing the pressure on university endowments could reduce the money venture capitalists have to support new company formation — a key ingredient of the U.S.' economic vitality. The 'acute issue,' says Boston venture capitalist Michael Greeley, 'is simply not knowing what endowments will be called on to fund' at universities, which could suck money out of the venture capital system. 'In 1775, the proud New Englanders stood strong, threw down their plowshares and confronted the totalitarian threat, even though they knew the battle would be long,' wrote Don Ingber, director of the Wyss Institute, a research lab at Harvard, in a recent blog post. This time, instead of taxation without representation, Ingber says one of the central issues is 'cessation [of government funding for university research] without justification.' To help highlight the role that academic research plays in the economy, the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce this month rebooted a coalition of nearly fifty other chambers that it originally started during the first Trump administration, Business for Federal Research Funding. Research, says James Rooney, CEO of the Greater Boston Chamber, 'creates jobs — blue and white collar jobs — all over the country, in every state." But aside from elected officials like Gov. Maura Healey and Senate President Karen Spilka, and university leaders like Harvard's Alan Garber and Danielle Holley of Mount Holyoke College, it's hard to find evidence of private sector leaders using their megaphones to speak out, or organizing to defend the education, research and innovation-driven economy we have been building here over nearly 400 years. It's an engine of progress that has, quite literally, won wars, cured terrible diseases and shaped the technology we use and how we communicate. 'Too many leaders in the private sector are worried about retribution that could harm their businesses,' observes John Maraganore, a longtime biotech industry executive and co-founder of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals in Cambridge. Understood. But in the two-and-a-half centuries since we helped spark the American Revolution, have we turned into a state populated by meek worriers? Or are we still willing to act to defend what we hold dear? This high-profile EV charging startup just left Massachusetts Mass. Gov. Healey says she's playing defense against an anti-innovation Trump administration How the CEO of CarGurus is playing the car market right now Mass. CEOs see tariffs creating 'maximum uncertainty'
Boston Globe
14-04-2025
- Boston Globe
Driscoll fills in for Wu at research bureau, while Mariano jokes about RFK Jr.
Advertisement Wu recently said in a social media post that she decided not to attend the lunch, a tradition for the sitting mayor, because of her concern that the business-backed research bureau has been acting as a 'political action committee to lower corporate taxes.' (Wu was referring to their difference in opinion about how commercial real estate should be taxed.) Instead, Wu ended up around the time of the lunch at Boston Latin School, where she met with actor Ayo Edebiri, a BPS alum and star of the TV show 'The Bear.' Mayoral challenger Josh Kraft, who attended the research bureau event, highlighted Wu's absence with an email he sent out that morning accusing his opponent of shutting out a nonpartisan organization over a policy disagreement. Advertisement House Speaker Ron Mariano, meanwhile, wasn't about to miss his own annual speaking engagement that morning with another business group, the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, even though he was fighting a cold. He joked about that while speaking at the Fairmont Copley Plaza hotel, by referring to US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and some of his controversial stances. 'You'll have to forgive me. I've had a cold for a week but I'm on direct orders from Secretary Kennedy of Health and Human Services to attend as many crowded events as possible,' Mariano said to much laughter. 'We're trying to achieve herd immunity.' This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston's business scene. Jon Chesto can be reached at
New York Times
21-03-2025
- New York Times
Bruce M. Selya, Federal Judge Known for Polysyllabic Prose, Dies at 90
Bruce M. Selya, a federal judge who issued more than 1,800 opinions and was celebrated (and occasionally chided) for a sesquipedalian writing style — that is, his use of long words that sent readers scrambling for a dictionary — died on Feb. 22 in Providence, R.I. He was 90. His family announced his death. A Republican who was active in electoral politics before President Ronald Reagan nominated him to the bench in 1982, Judge Selya issued opinions that did not conform to a predictable conservative ideology. Last year, he was part of a court panel that upheld Rhode Island's ban on high-capacity gun magazines, having continued to work as a senior judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston until his death. In 1998, he struck down the use of racial preferences in student admissions to Boston Latin School in the first ruling from an appeals court that restricted affirmative action in public schools, a long-sought goal of conservatives. On the other hand, he sided with a liberal understanding of the separation of church and state when he ruled in 2021 that Boston could bar a Christian group from flying a religious flag at a ceremony outside City Hall. The United States Supreme Court unanimously reversed Judge Selya, saying that the free-speech rights of the religious group prevailed. The U.S. District Court of Rhode Island, where Judge Selya began his career on the bench, called him 'one of the most widely quoted jurists in America.' His best-known law clerk in his 38 years as an appellate judge was Ketanji Brown Jackson, the future Supreme Court associate justice nominated by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. In a memoir, she described Judge Selya as 'a brilliant, meticulous and scholarly practitioner of the law.' In his 22 years as a corporate lawyer before joining the bench, Judge Selya bemoaned the sleep-inducing prose of typical legal opinions. He vowed to enliven his own writing with original vocabulary and colorful figures of speech. He became known for obscure word choices — some extremely so. He preferred perscrutation rather than a simpler synonym, scrutiny; inconcinnate (unsuitable); and rodomontade (boastful talk). The National Law Journal in 2008 published a guide to 'Selyaisms,' compiling some of his favorite recondite words and phrases, to aid lawyers making their way through his opinions. The list included asseverate (declare), crapulous (unrestrained in drinking) and sockdolager (a decisive blow). The judge was also a punster. In a case involving the International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, he wrote in his ruling that 'a lingerie manufacturer made a slip,' that 'plaintiffs' own filings place them in the tightest of corsets' and that the union had 'played pantywaist.' To some critics, such writing was needlessly opaque, even sophomoric. Bryan A. Garner, the editor in chief of Black's Law Dictionary, once compared the judge to Holofernes, the pedantic schoolmaster who spouts Latinisms in Shakespeare's 'Love's Labor's Lost.' 'Many of his words are not in most dictionaries and have been obsolete for a long time,' Mr. Garner told The New York Times in a 1992 article about the judge's literary style. 'To say 'perscrutation' instead of 'examination' is ludicrous.' The judge did not accept the reprimand. 'There are no such things as obscure words; there are just words that are temporarily abandoned,' he told The Boston Globe in 2006. 'It's part of my responsibility to resuscitate them.' Juan R. Torruella, a fellow appellate judge on the First Circuit, told The Globe that he admired and sometimes repeated Judge Selya's unique vocabulary. 'One of his favorite words, 'struthious,' I like very much,' he said. 'If people have to look it up, that's OK. It makes them think about his decisions.' struthious, adj., designating or of an ostrich or ostrichlike bird Bruce Marshall Selya was born on May 27, 1934, in Providence to Herman Selya, a chemical engineer, and Betty (Brier) Selya. He attended Classical High School in Providence and went on to Harvard, earning an A.B. from Harvard University in 1955 and a Bachelor of Laws degree from Harvard Law School in 1958. He practiced corporate and real estate law from 1960 to 1982 in Providence, where he was active in state Republican politics. He ran unsuccessfully for attorney general in 1964 and was a longtime fund-raiser and kitchen-cabinet adviser to John H. Chafee, a governor and four-term U.S. senator from Rhode Island. Mr. Selya managed Mr. Chafee's first Senate race in 1976, and in an act of political patronage Mr. Chafee urged President Reagan to nominate him to the federal bench. He became the first Jewish federal judge to serve in Rhode Island, according to Jack Reed, the U.S. senator from that state. Judge Selya was with the district court from 1982 to 1986, when Mr. Reagan named him to the First Circuit appeals court, which oversees much of New England as well as Puerto Rico. He is survived by his wife, Cindy (Anzevino) Selya; his daughters, Dawn Selya and Lori Ann Young; his sister, Susan Jane Rosen; six grandchildren; and two great-granddaughters. A previous marriage, to Ellen Barnes, ended in divorce. In 2005, Judge Selya was appointed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, which takes a second look at denials of government requests for wiretaps in national security cases. He issued an opinion in 2008 that telecommunication companies must comply with government requests to eavesdrop on certain phone calls and emails of Americans suspected of being spies or terrorists. Judge Selya stepped back from a full workload on the First Circuit appellate court in 2006, assuming senior status. But he continued to hear cases. He told The Providence Journal in 2022 that he worked a five-day week from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. His eyesight had diminished, so his staff read documents to him. 'It doesn't stop me,' he said.
