‘Industrial level': Germany to help Ukraine build long-range missiles
Berlin | Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) that Germany would step up its support for Ukraine, increasing funding for the production of weapons, including long-range ones, and sending more military equipment to Kyiv.
The announcement, made at a joint news conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, comes as the United States is stepping away from the conflict and as Europe has been forced to move towards the breach.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
MAGA v the monarch: Is King Charles blowing royal raspberries at Trump?
But venture he did. And, not for the first time since Trump's restoration, he seemed happy to become the leading man in an intricately choreographed act of geopolitical theatre directed against the White House. Loading In Ottawa he essentially reprised the role he played on the weekend after the Ukrainian president got roughed up in the Oval Office by Trump and his vice-presidential henchman J.D. Vance. Then he welcomed a bruised Volodymyr Zelensky to Sandringham, his East Anglian estate. Arranged at warp speed, that meeting was also rapid royal rebuttal. A very British middle finger. The government of Keir Starmer also knows how to play the royal card, using it both to charm Trump and to chide him. Trump, whose mother was born in the Western Isles of Scotland, is an arch monarchist who idolised Queen Elizabeth II and does not seem particularly perturbed that Charles is the most 'woke' monarch ever to occupy the British throne. The simple fact that Charles comes with the title 'His Royal Highness' and enjoys the kind of dynastic privilege money cannot buy, gives him a form of diplomatic immunity. No matter that Charles is gently mocked by family members, I am told, for being to the left of George Monbiot, one of The Guardian's most progressive columnists. So Trump, who is so easily flattered, instantly took the bait when Prime Minister Starmer, in full reality-TV mode, pulled out an envelope during an Oval Office fireside chat in February that contained a personal invitation from the King for an unprecedented second UK state visit. Since then Starmer has been at the forefront of the European rearguard to protect Ukraine from both President Putin's warmongering and President Trump's supine peacemaking. Yet despite Starmer playing a double diplomatic game, the promise of that presidential visit to Britain seems to have kept him in Trump's good graces. Proof came in the form of a new trade deal with the United States earlier this month, the first negotiated by an international leader since 'Liberation Day'. What of 'Independence Day', I hear you bellow. Why is Trump being allowed by his party, the Republicans, to act like a monarch? This is not so historically perverse as it seems. The American revolution, after all, was primarily a rebellion against the British parliament rather than the British king. The complaint of some leading revolutionaries was that after the Glorious Revolution in the late 17th century the British parliament had usurped too many monarchical prerogatives, and that King George should have overruled Westminster in managing his insurgent North American colonies. In 1776 it was possible to be both a revolutionary and a royalist. Alexander Hamilton, despite the myth-making of the brilliant Broadway musical, fitted this description. After the Americans triumphed over the British, this strand of thinking shaped the new US Constitution, and in particular its creation of a strong executive branch. An irony of the War of Independence is that the United States ended up with a new head of state with more powers than the deposed king. The titles under consideration for what eventually became known as the presidency reflected this kingly bent: 'His Elective Highness', 'His Supremacy', 'His Mightiness', 'His Magistracy' and, yes, 'His Majesty'. As for Britain's current monarch, Trump's subversion of America's postwar alliance system means he now stands at the head of a revitalised Commonwealth of Nations, a friendlier pact altogether. Loading Trump's antagonistic relationship with Europe has also enabled Starmer to reset relations with the European Union, sealed earlier this month with the renegotiation of the Brexit deal, and become a more weighty global player. Perhaps Trump has helped Britain, after losing its empire, finally find a role: to use the soft power of the monarchy, its one-time figurehead of imperialism, to thwart the territorial expansionism of its former colony. It's a joust for the ages. The monarch against MAGA. King Charles against King Donald.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
MAGA v the monarch: Is King Charles blowing royal raspberries at Trump?
But venture he did. And, not for the first time since Trump's restoration, he seemed happy to become the leading man in an intricately choreographed act of geopolitical theatre directed against the White House. Loading In Ottawa he essentially reprised the role he played on the weekend after the Ukrainian president got roughed up in the Oval Office by Trump and his vice-presidential henchman J.D. Vance. Then he welcomed a bruised Volodymyr Zelensky to Sandringham, his East Anglian estate. Arranged at warp speed, that meeting was also rapid royal rebuttal. A very British middle finger. The government of Keir Starmer also knows how to play the royal card, using it both to charm Trump and to chide him. Trump, whose mother was born in the Western Isles of Scotland, is an arch monarchist who idolised Queen Elizabeth II and does not seem particularly perturbed that Charles is the most 'woke' monarch ever to occupy the British throne. The simple fact that Charles comes with the title 'His Royal Highness' and enjoys the kind of dynastic privilege money cannot buy, gives him a form of diplomatic immunity. No matter that Charles is gently mocked by family members, I am told, for being to the left of George Monbiot, one of The Guardian's most progressive columnists. So Trump, who is so easily flattered, instantly took the bait when Prime Minister Starmer, in full reality-TV mode, pulled out an envelope during an Oval Office fireside chat in February that contained a personal invitation from the King for an unprecedented second UK state visit. Since then Starmer has been at the forefront of the European rearguard to protect Ukraine from both President Putin's warmongering and President Trump's supine peacemaking. Yet despite Starmer playing a double diplomatic game, the promise of that presidential visit to Britain seems to have kept him in Trump's good graces. Proof came in the form of a new trade deal with the United States earlier this month, the first negotiated by an international leader since 'Liberation Day'. What of 'Independence Day', I hear you bellow. Why is Trump being allowed by his party, the Republicans, to act like a monarch? This is not so historically perverse as it seems. The American revolution, after all, was primarily a rebellion against the British parliament rather than the British king. The complaint of some leading revolutionaries was that after the Glorious Revolution in the late 17th century the British parliament had usurped too many monarchical prerogatives, and that King George should have overruled Westminster in managing his insurgent North American colonies. In 1776 it was possible to be both a revolutionary and a royalist. Alexander Hamilton, despite the myth-making of the brilliant Broadway musical, fitted this description. After the Americans triumphed over the British, this strand of thinking shaped the new US Constitution, and in particular its creation of a strong executive branch. An irony of the War of Independence is that the United States ended up with a new head of state with more powers than the deposed king. The titles under consideration for what eventually became known as the presidency reflected this kingly bent: 'His Elective Highness', 'His Supremacy', 'His Mightiness', 'His Magistracy' and, yes, 'His Majesty'. As for Britain's current monarch, Trump's subversion of America's postwar alliance system means he now stands at the head of a revitalised Commonwealth of Nations, a friendlier pact altogether. Loading Trump's antagonistic relationship with Europe has also enabled Starmer to reset relations with the European Union, sealed earlier this month with the renegotiation of the Brexit deal, and become a more weighty global player. Perhaps Trump has helped Britain, after losing its empire, finally find a role: to use the soft power of the monarchy, its one-time figurehead of imperialism, to thwart the territorial expansionism of its former colony. It's a joust for the ages. The monarch against MAGA. King Charles against King Donald.
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
US politics: President Donald Trump calls Elon Musk ‘terrific' ahead of the billionaire's last day in the White House
US President Donald Trump praised Elon Musk on Thursday (Friday AEST) and said he will hold a press conference with the billionaire, whose tenure in the administration is ending this week, in the Oval Office. 'This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'Elon is terrific!' Donald Trump will hold a press conference with Elon Musk on his last day in the White House. AP Musk announced he was stepping down from his White House stint on Wednesday (Thursday AEST), giving Tesla investors some succour after shares slumped this year in part due to the backlash to his support of Trump and right-wing parties in Europe. The billionaire spearheaded Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, charged with cutting federal spending. On Tuesday (Wednesday AEST), Musk criticised the price tag of the Trump administration's tax and budget legislation making its way through Congress. In addition, he had recently pledged to spend less money on politics after he plunked down nearly $US300 million on Trump's presidential campaign and on other Republican candidates last year.
