Brother of Ashling Murphy murderer told gardaí back medication was affecting his memory
Jozef Puska's brother Marek told gardaí investigating the murder of Ashling Murphy that his back medication was affecting his memory and preventing him from telling them more.
Marek Puska (36) is accused of withholding information that was crucial to the investigation into Ms Murphy's murder. He is on trial with his brother Lubomir Puska jnr (35), who is also accused of withholding information.
Their wives, Jozefina Grundzova (31) and Viera Gaziova (38), are accused of impeding Jozef Puska's apprehension or prosecution by burning the clothes he wore when he murdered Ms Murphy.
Each accused has pleaded not guilty.
READ MORE
On Friday, Det Garda Cian Steers told prosecutor Anne-Marie Lawlor that Marek agreed to give a voluntary statement at Tullamore Garda station on January 14th, 2022, two days after Ms Murphy's murder.
He described how the family ended up in Ireland, with three brothers, their wives and 14 children all living in one house in Mucklagh, Tullamore. He described the period as 'golden times, the best of times'.
He said he and Jozef were on disability allowance due to back problems.
On January 12th, the day of the murder, Marek got up at his usual time of about 12.30pm. Jozef was not home, which was unusual, and he had not taken his phone. Marek went into Tullamore to search for Jozef.
When he could not find Jozef, he went to a Garda station to report his brother missing and to the local hospital to ask whether anyone named Jozef Puska had checked in.
Marek said he went to Dublin that evening, but returned to Mucklagh the following day by bus. As he pulled up to the house, he noticed gardaí. A Polish garda told him 'someone from my house had killed someone', he said. 'I did not know how to answer or what to say ... Is it about me, my brothers? I thought about it and said, 'No, it is not possible'.'
He said nobody who knows his family would say they could kill someone. At the end of his statement, Marek said: 'I want to tell you a bit more, but I can't because of the medicine I have taken. My doctor told me it can affect my memory.'
He promised to contact gardaí if he remembered anything else, adding: 'I want to help.'
In cross-examination, Det Garda Steers agreed with defence senior counsel Karl Finnegan that at the start of the statement, Marek accurately described Jozef's bicycle and immediately identified the bike when shown a photograph.
Det Garda Joanne O'Sullivan told Ms Lawlor that, in the following days, gardaí became aware that Marek wished to make a further voluntary statement.
Gardaí arrested Jozef on the morning of January 18th. That evening, gardaí interviewed Marek. He told Garda O'Sullivan that, when he and Lubomir jnr were looking for Jozef on the 12th, they received a call telling them their brother was at home and in a 'poor state', having been 'beaten up'.
He said Jozef had injuries, blood on his head 'like he had been hit', and three holes in his abdomen. He said Jozef told him it was 'not my business' and not to ask questions. Jozef claimed to have self-inflicted the wounds to his abdomen, Marek said.
Marek said he did not believe his brother would do that to himself and cried when Jozef refused an ambulance. He said he is close to his brother, 'like two halves of an apple, I can't live without him'.
He described Jozef as the 'go-to man' who would 'help everyone'. He said Jozef did not have mental issues and would talk through any problems he had.
Later on the night of the murder, Marek said Jozef left with their parents to go to their house in Dublin.
It is alleged that Marek failed to disclose that Jozef returned home on the night of Ms Murphy's murder with visible injuries and admitted to killing or causing serious injury to a woman. It is further alleged he knew of the arrangement to burn Jozef's clothes and that Jozef travelled to Dublin that night.
Lubomir jnr is alleged to have also withheld that Jozef returned home with visible injuries, admitted to 'cutting a female', and travelled to Dublin.
Jozefina Grundzova, who is married to Marek, and Viera Gaziova, who is married to Lubomir jnr, are accused of assisting in burning clothing between January 12 and 14th without reasonable excuse. They are also accused of intending to impede Jozef's apprehension or prosecution, knowing or believing him to have committed the offence of murder or some other arrestable offence of a similar nature.
All accused have pleaded not guilty and have an address at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Tullamore, Co Offaly.
The trial continues on Monday before Ms Justice Caroline Biggs and a jury of seven men and five women.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
4 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Republic of Ireland's toothless attack fires blanks as Heimir Hallgrimsson's side stumble to bore draw in Luxembourg
AND the winners from Ireland's last game before their summer holidays were the players already on their summer holidays. 2 Ireland players leave the field after a scoreless draw against minnows Luxembourg 2 Republic of Ireland head coach Heimir Hallgrimsson won't be happy with the end-of-season showing on his birthday A 0-0 draw against the Grand Duchy was as good as it got, as Ireland never looked like losing and rarely looked like winning. In truth, it was typical end of season friendly fare on the final day before everyone on the pitch goes on their summer holidays. But it meant the real winners were those that Hallgrísson had told to go on their holidays already. When picking his squad, he left out the majority of Championship players because their season finished five weeks ago telling them to rest up for the World Cup qualifiers. read more on football In fact, they told them to take a holiday this year because there would be none next year as Ireland prepared for the World Cup! If Josh Cullen, Finn Azaz et al were watching last night in a beach bar, they will have seen that they were missed and should be back in the side for the autumn qualifiers. This June window has seen the emergence of That said, it was a game that Ireland could still have won. Most read in Football But a win would have just painted over the cracks that Ireland's performance was well below par - especially in the first half. Heimir Hallgrimsson gives first call-up to four Ireland players in squad for friendlies vs Senegal and Luxembourg During that 45 minutes, an average team - nevermind a good one - would have punished the Boys in Green. Fortunately, Luxembourg are below average as their one win in the past 18 months proves with their team having more problems than simply getting results. That was evident even before kick-off from the banners around the ground aimed at the local FA - FLF - and the selection of Gerson Rodrigues. In March, he lost his appeal against a conviction for three assault and battery charges, including one on his former girlfriend. There were banners in the stands that made the feelings of many Luxembourgers clear. 'Red card for violence against women' and'Shame on you, FLF' were hung while red cards were brandished by a small section of fans. Rodrigues was also booed, but the majority of that came from the Ireland fans who had little to cheer from their own team. There were five changes to the team as Max O'Leary came in for his debut and Hallgrímsson spoke about how his side have got the 'basics' right but there were few signs of that in Luxembourg as they struggled to gain any foothold. The warning signs were there early on as Collins hit a long diagonal that Robbie Brady could not keep in play and Dara O'Shea was cajoling his teammates to up the tempo. By ten minutes, boss Hallgrímsson was standing on the edge of his technical area, and moved Will Smallbone more centrally after 25 minutes, as his head hardly got a kick. The summer holidays start today but Luxembourg were often able to glide through the Ireland midfield as if they were already in flip flops. Had Luxembourg posed a real threat, they could have punished Ireland but the positive - if we are clutching at straws - was the Boys in Green's backline did hold firm. Debut goalkeeper O'Leary had little to do but did it well coming and making a few catches cleanly though his distribution was erratic. In fairness to him, neither Troy Parrott nor Evan Ferguson were getting any favours from Austrian referee Stefan Ebner despite some robust Luxembourg challenges. But the ball was not sticking to either of them and meant that the Irish backline was continually under pressure. O'Leary had to make a decent save to turn away a Danel Sinani shot from distance after Ferguson gave the ball away and allowed the Luxembourg front man to race forward. Early in the second half, O'Leary again did well when he denied Laurent Jans' effort from a tight angle with his legs after Parrott had lost possession in his own half. Later, he saw a cross from Vincent Thill come back off the butt of his post. And the second half did see Luxembourg pepper O'Leary's goal more often though, in truth, they were largely from distance where you never expected Ireland to concede. That said, Ireland did create chances too and could have won without playing well. Collins came close to an opening goal just before half time when he headed against the post after O'Shea had headed a deep Smallbone free kick back across goal. Early in the second half, Friday's goal scorer McAteer showed his attacking flare with a run from inside his own half and shot that fizzed just wide. And the winger was involved in Ireland's next decent chance when he arrived at the far post to drill Ryan Manning's left cross from the left into the six-yard box. Unfortunately for Ireland, Parrott could not adjust his feet quick enough to turn the ball in as he was then adjusted to have handled the ball as it bounced up awkwardly. Parrott did have the ball in the net on 67 minutes but it was rightly ruled out for offside as he made his run onto McAteer's pass too early. And McAteer - who was moved to the left flank in the second half before going off - also flashed a shot wide as he stretched to reach a ball over the top from Jake O'Brien. Taylor also saw a 20-yard drive cannon off the crossbar four minutes from time that could have earned the Boys in Green a win. But Ireland are going to have to play a lot better in the autumn World Cup qualifiers. Luxembourg 0 Ireland 0
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
No proof Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law knew he had killed when they burned his clothes, trial hears
CLOSING SPEECHES | Lawyers for Jozefina Grundzova (32) and Viera Gaziova (40) delivered their closing speeches to a jury this afternoon Jozef Puska's brothers, Marek and Lubomir, and their wives, Jozefina Grundzova and Viera Gaziova Lawyers for Jozefina Grundzova (32) and Viera Gaziova (40) delivered their closing speeches to a jury this afternoon. The two women are on trial with their husbands, Marek Puska (36) and Lubomir Puska Jnr (38). Jozef Puska, a brother of Marek and Lubomir Jnr, murdered Ashling Murphy on January 12, 2022, by stabbing her in the neck on the canal towpath outside Tullamore, Co Offaly. Marek and Lubomir Jnr are on trial accused of withholding information relating to the murder while Ms Grundzova and Ms Gaziova are accused of impeding Jozef's apprehension or prosecution by burning his clothes. All the accused were living with Jozef Puska, his partner Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly when the offences are alleged to have occurred in January 2022. All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges. The trial has heard that, in a statement to gardai, Ms Gaziova said that on the night of the murder, Lubomir Jnr and Marek spoke to Jozef in his bedroom and afterwards, Lubomir told her that Jozef had "confessed that he killed a girl". Paul Murray SC, for Ms Grundzova, today told the jury that for his client to be guilty, the jury must be satisfied that she knew what Jozef had done when she helped Ms Gaziova to burn the clothes. Counsel told the jury that "hindsight is a wonderful thing" but they must look at the circumstances in the Puska household in the immediate aftermath of the murder. When his client burned Puska's clothes, she did not have any of the evidence that would later prove Jozef's guilt, Mr Murray said. At that time, about 24 hours after the murder, gardai also didn't know because they had arrested and were questioning the wrong man, Mr Murray said. All Ms Grundzova knew, counsel said, was second-hand information that had been relayed to her regarding conversations between Jozef Puska and others in the household. Jozef had said numerous things which were "obvious nonsense" and "garbled lies" along with the truth - that he had stabbed or killed a girl. Ms Grundzova could not have known that the true part was that Jozef had murdered Ashling Murphy and that the rest was nonsense, counsel said. She, like the others in the household, didn't believe that Jozef could be capable of such a thing. Jozef Puska's brothers, Marek and Lubomir, and their wives, Jozefina Grundzova and Viera Gaziova News in 90 Seconds - Tuesday June 10 The nub of the prosecution case, counsel said, is that Ms Grundzova knew or believed Jozef Puska to be guilty of the murder of Ashling Murphy at a time when gardai themselves had arrested an entirely different person. Mr Murray asked the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. Prosecutor Anne Marie Lawlor SC has previously told the jury that all the accused knew what Jozef had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder. She said Jozef told Lubomir Jnr and Marek, who then relayed it to the others in the house. Ms Lawlor said the only reason for the withholding of evidence or burning of clothes was that they didn't want Jozef to be apprehended or prosecuted for murder. Damien Colgan SC, for Ms Gaziova, told the jury that the "crux of the case" is whether his client knew that Jozef Puska had stabbed Ms Murphy. Her view at that time, Mr Colgan said, was that Jozef had been the victim of an assault. When she was told what Jozef had said he did, she didn't believe it because she "didn't believe Jozef was capable of killing anybody". Kathleen Leader SC, for Lubomir Jnr, said her client delayed but did not withhold information. She said he had a reasonable excuse for the delay and asked the jury to consider the "natural sense of protection for his younger brother". She said it is understandable that Lubomir Jnr was reluctant to accept that his brother had "committed a truly horrific murder". The family was "particularly close", she said, living together as six adults and 14 children in a four-bed home. Lubomir told gardai that their relationship was "full of love". When Jozef left the house early on the January 12 and returned that night with visible injuries, the initial concern among the close knit family was, Ms Leader said: "Not that Jozef had behaved in a criminal manner, much less that he had murdered someone, but that Jozef himself had been hurt in some way." Lubomir Jnr spoke to gardai on January 14, 16 and 18. Ms Leader said the statements reveal the progression of a man "coming to terms with something awful that was not of his doing." She added: "He is working his way to a place where he is able to leave the bonds of family and brotherhood and love and all that entails, to where he discharges his other obligation to society as a whole, which is what he did." Ms Leader said that by January 18, Lubomir was "squarely supporting the prosecution", telling them everything he knew. She reminded the jury that he said: "If you find out it was him, well let him. He is going to pay for what he did." Ms Leader asked the jury to think of someone they love. She added: "Think of that person coming home, out of the blue, and telling you they had done something so truly awful, something you hadn't imagined in your wildest dreams. Was it reasonable in those circumstances to disclose the information in stages?" Ms Leader said the law does not require people to be "superhuman" as she asked the jury to acquit her client. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs has begun her charge to the jury and will continue tomorrow.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Undercover gardaí supplied Carlow gunman with firearms and ammunition, Oireachtas hears
Undercover gardaí supplied guns and ammunition to Carlow man Evan Fitzgerald – who was then charged with possession of the firearms, an Oireachtas committee has heard. While awaiting trial on the firearms charges, Mr Fitzgerald (22), from Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, stole another weapon from a neighbour and fired shots in a Carlow shopping centre before turning that gun on himself . Garda Commissioner Drew Harris was questioned about Mr Fitzgerald's caseby Labour TD Alan Kelly and later by Senator Michael McDowell during his appearance at the justice committee on Tuesday afternoon. Mr Kelly asked the commissioner a number of questions about the Fitzgerald case: 'What was the provenance of the guns that the deceased young man bought off the dark web? Where did they come from? Was this a controlled delivery of guns and ammunition? Did undercover gardaí engage with this young man face to face prior to this delivery of guns and ammunition?' READ MORE The commissioner said he had referred the issue to Fiosrú, the office of the Garda ombudsman. Fiosrú concluded an investigation in less than three weeks and 'have no further action they wish to take', Mr Harris told the committee. He said: 'I would say then that controlled delivery is a very sensitive police methodology. We use it both for organised crime and for terrorist offences.' Mr Kelly went on to ask: 'Are you in a position to say whether gardaí engaged with this individual prior to this controlled delivery that was organised by An Garda Síochána of guns and ammunition to this individual, and are you able to answer about the provenance of the guns?' Mr Harris replied that he was 'not going to speak to the provenance of the firearms as that touches on sensitive methodology and the other matter is still before the courts'. Mr Kelly said he had 'serious concerns' about the situation, while Senator Michael McDowell also expressed his concerns. [ Evan Fitzgerald: Carlow gunman was due in court to face 13 firearms and explosives charges Opens in new window ] In a statement to The Irish Times, Mr Kelly said later: 'What he was doing was wrong, but where is the proportionality in the actions of An Garda Síochána? When undercover gardaí met this young man, followed him and knew who they were dealing with, did they not assess the level of threat differently and look at alternative interventions? They knew they were not dealing with dissidents or organised crime gangs but a young man with some issues. They have effectively said the same and even agreed to his bail, so obviously they didn't believe he was a huge threat.' In reply to queries, Garda Headquarters said Fiosrú, which investigates allegations of wrongdoing and other matters relating to the Garda, examined the nature of the sting operation after a referral was made to it last month. It added that Fiosrú had informed the Garda last week 'it would not be taking any further action on the matter'. Mr Fitzgerald, a former steelyard worker, was on bail at the time of his death, having been charged last March with firearms and explosives offences. A Garda member told a court the young man had a 'fascination' with firearms.
