logo
Canadian content creator talks about his love for, and challenges with Canada

Canadian content creator talks about his love for, and challenges with Canada

Yahoo12 hours ago

When Canadian nurse Hamza Aziz started asking strangers one simple question on camera—'What motivated you?'—he didn't anticipate launching a viral movement. In less than two years, his social media pages accumulated over 2.5 million followers and he was able to raise close to a million dollars for people in need.
Aziz is now one of Canada's most impactful digital storytellers—and he's just getting started, he told Yahoo Canada.
n our new series 'My Canada", we spotlight Canadians —born-and-raised to brand new — who share their views on the Canadian dream, national identity, and the triumphs and tribulations that come with life inside and outside these borders.
I'm happy to be Keny cause, you know, like, the, the perfect example is my dad.
He gave up his education back home in Pakistan to come to Canada just for him to work in, in a factory, so his kids could have a better life, right?
So for me to be Canadian, it's basically, we have these opportunities that other people in other countries don't have, and we, you know, it's, it's up to us to take it and to Take those opportunities and do something with it.
And I'm proud to be Canadian because uh, I would not have these opportunities if I was in another country.
The biggest challenge was just dealing with a little bit of, uh, bit of racism growing up.
And even till now, it's actually quite bad.
I, I've noticed in the past year, I don't know, maybe some stuff's going on, uh, locally in Canada.
There's so much like hate and racism going right now on social media, and you'll notice, especially, I even experienced.
the size of South Asian now, even the public for some reasons.
Uh, but it's like, I, I want to show that like, listen, there's people from all around the world that live in Canada, and they all have these amazing stories.
And as I said from the start, you should never judge a book by its cover, and these people are all doing these like different odd jobs that, you know, like, just to support their families and, uh, it's, uh, and that's, that's what I do.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Gen Z is ditching popular emojis for unexpected alternatives
Why Gen Z is ditching popular emojis for unexpected alternatives

Fast Company

time27 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Why Gen Z is ditching popular emojis for unexpected alternatives

Not all emojis are created equal. The sparkle emoji or red heart emoji are staples of text conversations and social media captions. But how often are you using the baggage claim icon or the non-potable water symbol? Recently, a new trend has emerged: mainstream emojis are being passed over in favor of more creative alternatives. The broken heart emoji? Tired. Predictable. The wilted rose emoji? Aesthetic. Unexpected. The trend began earlier this year when a video from one TikTok user went viral. The caption read: ''💔' lowkey starting to become too mainstream / i might just start using '🥀'.' Others quickly joined in. 'How it feels using '💔' in the '🥀' era,' one TikTok user posted, cutting to a photo of someone's grandpa. As David Doochin explained for Emojipedia: 'One of the most typical memes gaining traction among the TikTok contingent is the 'X has gone mainstream / we now use Y' format that declares a given meme, emoji, or cultural symbol as out of date or past its prime and offers a replacement, usually a derivative of the original symbol in some way but sometimes totally arbitrary.' The most commonly used emojis include faces, hearts, and hand gestures—ones that slip seamlessly into texts to convey emotion. 'Loudly Crying Face' was the most-used emoji of 2024, followed by 'Face with Tears of Joy' and the 'Fire' emoji. Now, among younger generations and the chronically online, certain emojis have taken on entirely new meanings—with lesser-used icons pulled from obscurity. YouTuber John Casterline posted a video last month encouraging people to adopt the aerial tramway emoji—once the least-used emoji in the world —as a replacement for the common 'Crying Laughing Face.' 'I came up with a plan where we can make this emoji one of the most used emojis, at least on YouTube,' he explained. 'Instead of using laughing emojis from now on, replace it with this. And if someone doesn't know why you're doing it, don't tell them.' This isn't the first time the aerial tramway has been thrust into the spotlight. Back in 2018, the now-defunct X account @leastUsedEmoji reported that the aerial tramway held the title of least-used emoji for 11 weeks straight. Responding to the call, public transportation advocates rallied around the underappreciated emoji, spamming Twitter/X with strings of the aerial tramway. The plan worked. After 77 days, the tram climbed the ranks and was replaced in last place by input symbol for latin capital letters. As of the account's last post on August 3, 2020, input symbol for symbols had been the least-used emoji for 264 days. Perhaps it's time it gets the same treatment.

The Story of Movies in the 21st Century Is One of Context Collapse
The Story of Movies in the 21st Century Is One of Context Collapse

New York Times

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The Story of Movies in the 21st Century Is One of Context Collapse

It's mostly the internet's fault, but in the past 25 years, the lines we drew in the 20th century got blurry. Time and space have collapsed. Now you can attend a meeting across the country, text your long-distance boyfriend halfway around the world, and watch a decades-old movie from another hemisphere on TV at home, all in one day. We've learned to make friends with people we've never met and develop obsessions with things we'd never have known about had we lived at any other point in human history. The story of the 21st century, among other things, is a tale of crumbling contexts and newly porous boundaries. Small wonder, then, that our 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century list, created by polling hundreds of directors, stars and other film professionals, shows the same trend. Every list tells a story about its maker or, in this case, makers. It's clear, for instance, that the movies they remember were mostly not reboots, remakes or franchise fare, which have become Hollywood's bread and butter. Star vehicles are fading. And while streaming has elbowed in and upended how we watch movies, there's only one film on the list produced by a streamer — No. 46, Alfonso Cuarón's 'Roma,' which Netflix gave a respectable theatrical release. All interesting trends, some encouraging and some troubling. But what strikes me most about the list is this: Long-held categories in the movie business are fading, just like they are in the broader culture. Until pretty recently, for instance, common wisdom held that commercially successful genre fare and self-serious awards films didn't overlap, and that auteurs would pick a lane and stay there. Christopher Nolan's 'The Dark Knight' (No. 28) seemed like an outlier in this respect, a Batman movie so good that when it failed to be nominated for best picture in 2009, the academy changed the number of nominee slots from five to 10. But since then, other horror, superhero and action flicks have increasingly sneaked into awards conversations, including 'Get Out' (No. 8), 'Mad Max: Fury Road' (No. 11), 'Black Swan' (No. 81) and 'Black Panther' (No. 96). That may explain the triumph of 2022's best picture winner, 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' (No. 77), a whimsical and occasionally deranged pastiche comedy blended with a sincere-hearted family story that pays obvious, sometimes ironic homage to a number of genres: martial arts, melodrama, science fiction, surrealism, even video games. In fact, some of its references also appear on the list, like Wong Kar-wai's 'In the Mood for Love' (No. 4) and Ang Lee's 'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon' (No. 16). Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Remember Anna Wintour's shocking first Vogue cover?
Remember Anna Wintour's shocking first Vogue cover?

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Remember Anna Wintour's shocking first Vogue cover?

By today's standards, the front cover of American Vogue's November 1988 edition seems typical enough. Beside the text 'the real cost of looking good,' Israeli model Michaela Bercu gazes past the camera, her windswept hair brushing across the shoulders of a bejeweled $10,000 Christian Lacroix couture jacket. Yet, the cover signaled a revolution at the storied fashion bible. It also marked two important — and related — firsts: This was the first Vogue cover produced by editor-in-chief Anna Wintour and the first ever to feature a pair of jeans. London-born Wintour, who on Thursday stepped down from the role after 37 years (she will remain as Vogue's global editorial director and publisher Condé Nast's global chief content officer), had been hired to shake things up. The magazine's previous editor, Grace Mirabella, oversaw a surge in readership but was, by her own admission, increasingly out of step with the 1980s zeitgeist. Condé Nast executives were reportedly worried the title was losing its edge. Mirabella had famously repainted former editor Diana Vreeland's red office a shade of beige, which became a metaphor for her reputation as being too unadventurous. Practically every American Vogue cover from 1980 to 1988 had been taken by Richard Avedon, a fashion photographer known for his stark, minimalist style. Models were usually shot against plain studio backgrounds in heavy makeup and statement jewelry. The covers were self-consciously elegant, standing aloof from the more mainstream women's weeklies they shared newsstands with. By contrast, Wintour's debut was warm and easygoing. German photographer Peter Lindbergh held the shoot outdoors rather than in a controlled studio; Bercu's eyes were neither fully open nor looking directly at the camera. As a result, she came across as a glamorous everywoman. Wintour's unpretentious approach was seemingly epitomized by another coverline on that first issue: 'Paris couture: haut but not haughty.' 'It looked easy, casual, a moment that had been snapped on the street, which it had been, and which was the whole point,' Wintour recalled in a Vogue feature marking publication's 120th anniversary. Then there were the jeans. These were not a high-fashion label's take on Americana, they were stonewashed denim pants straight from Guess. Having launched less than a decade earlier, the denim brand's highest-profile moment at that point had come courtesy of Michael J. Fox, who wore a pair of Guess jeans as Marty McFly in 1985's 'Back to the Future.' As such, both in style and styling, Wintour's first cover was a major statement — one that set the tone for hundreds of issues to follow. She went on to forge an editorial identity her predecessors might have looked down on, from spotlighting pop culture icons to featuring a man on the cover (Richard Gere, who appeared alongside then-wife Cindy Crawford). But there was an element of luck behind her debut issue, too. Wintour has since revealed that the jeans were a last-minute decision forced upon the shoot's stylist, Carlyne Cerf de Dudzeele, by unforeseen circumstances. Bercu was initially wearing a full Christian Lacroix suit comprising the beaded jacket (which Wintour described as 'all very 'Like a Prayer'') and a skirt, but the latter didn't fit properly. '(Bercu) had been on vacation back home in Israel and had gained a little weight,' Wintour recounted in the 2012 Vogue feature, before qualifying: 'Not that that mattered. In fact, it only served to reinforce the idea to take couture's haughty grandeur and playfully throw it headlong into real life and see what happened.' Wintour has since recalled that the magazine's printers were so surprised by the front cover that they called to see whether it had been sent in error. The veteran editor also played down the intention behind the image, though she surely knew, better than most, that magazines are judged by their covers. 'Afterwards, in the way that these things can happen, people applied all sorts of interpretations: It was about mixing high and low, Michaela was pregnant, it was a religious statement. But none of these things was true,' she said. 'I had just looked at that picture and sensed the winds of change. And you can't ask for more from a cover image than that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store