House committee advances bill requiring Oklahoma school cellphone bans
A poster reads, "bell to bell, no cell" at the Jenks Public Schools Math and Science Center on Nov. 13. The school district prohibits student cellphone use during class periods. (Photo by Nuria Martinez-Keel/Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY — A major priority for Oklahoma lawmakers and the governor was the first item on the House Common Education Committee's agenda Wednesday.
In its first meeting of 2025, the committee voted 11-2 to pass House Bill 1276 with bipartisan support. The bill, from Rep. Chad Caldwell, R-Enid, would require public schools to ban students from using cellphones and smart watches while on campus. It would take effect July 1 and start applying in the 2025-26 school year.
It advances to the Education Oversight Committee, which must pass the legislation before it could be heard on the House floor.
Gov. Kevin Stitt and legislative leaders have said one of their top goals this year is curbing student cellphone use to reduce distractions in the classroom.
House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, voted in favor of the bill at the committee meeting.
'It's time our classrooms return to being places of learning, not distractions,' Hilbert said in a statement afterward. 'House Bill 1276 gives Oklahoma's schools the flexibility to set policies that fit their needs while reinforcing a simple goal — to let kids be kids and let teachers teach.'
Rep. Chris Banning, R-Bixby, and Rep. Molly Jenkins, R-Coyle, were the only committee members to vote against the bill.
Banning noted in his line of questions to Caldwell that schools already can implement a cellphone ban voluntarily. The number of districts enacting similar policies has increased in recent years as the popularity of these prohibitions grows nationwide.
Caldwell said the bill would prompt all districts to develop their own cellphone-free policy.
'Candidly, I wish more of our schools would have already done that, but we're going to help our schools do the right thing to go phone free,' he said during the committee meeting.
The state Senate will consider similar legislation in Senate Bill 139 from Sen. Ally Seifried, R-Claremore.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Schumer says 16 Republicans have ‘discomfort' with green tax credit rollbacks
Democrats are working to convince some 16 of their Republican colleagues to oppose the GOP's policy bill because of its rollbacks to climate-friendly tax credits, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday. 'We have a group…of seven or eight Democrats who are talking to their Republican colleagues…and we're getting some vibes that people realize this bill went too far and we're hoping they can all go together to [Majority Leader] John Thune and to [Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike] Crapo and say 'change it. We can't be for it the way it is,' Schumer told reporters Wednesday. 'We have a list of 16 Republican senators who have shown some discomfort with this and that's the main group we're focused on,' he added. The version of the 'big, beautiful bill' passed by Republicans makes major cuts to tax credits for climate-friendly energy sources, making it so that any project that is not already under construction within 60 days of the law's enactment is ineligible for the tax credits. This provision, among others, is expected to bar many projects from eligibility and could ultimately lead to less low-carbon energy development. At least some Republicans have publicly expressed skepticism of a rapid end to the credits with Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) warning against a 'full scale' repeal. However, House Republicans who have championed the cuts are pushing for them to stay in their current form, with members of the Freedom Caucus board recently saying it will 'not accept' changes that water down the cuts.
Boston Globe
36 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law
Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement that the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. 'Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports.' Advertisement The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. Advertisement 'This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes,' Hare said. 'Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case.' The appeal was filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, and was first reported by Front Office Sports. It would be heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Axios
40 minutes ago
- Axios
The winners of the Congressional Baseball Game since 1962
Congressional Democrats will seek to stop Republicans' four-year winning streak at the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday, with the first pitch at 7pm ET. Why it matters: The games started in the early 1900s, with lawmakers sometimes competing against members of the press. It's been an annual red vs. blue contest since 1962. Since then, Republicans have won 38 times and Democrats have won 23 times, according to stats kept by the House. There has been one tie, and the game was cancelled in 2020 because of COVID-19 concerns.
