US Travel Ban: Trump plans new restrictions on 36 more countries in expanded crackdown
US Travel Ban: US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing a dramatic expansion of its travel ban, targeting citizens from 36 more countries across Africa, the Caribbean, Asia, and the Pacific. A memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and seen by The Washington Post outlines sweeping new demands on identity verification and visa enforcement. Countries have 60 days to comply or risk full or partial entry bans. Critics warn the move revives discriminatory tactics, echoing the 2017 Muslim ban Trump once imposed.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Targeted nations: Africa dominates the list
What the memo says: Overstays, fraud, and non-cooperation
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A wider pattern: Travel bans as a political tool
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What comes next: Countdown to compliance
List of countries facing possible US travel ban
The Trump administration is considering new travel restrictions on 36 countries, according to a classified State Department cable. If implemented, this would more than double the number of nations whose citizens face full or partial entry bans into the United States. Affected countries include key U.S. partners in Africa and the Caribbean.The directive was sent out over the weekend in a diplomatic memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It instructs U.S. diplomats to give listed countries until 8 a.m. Wednesday to submit initial action plans to meet stringent new security and identity verification requirements.The memo identifies a wide range of countries now under review. Twenty-five are in Africa, including Egypt, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Nigeria. The Caribbean nations of Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Saint Lucia are also named. Others include Bhutan, Syria, Tonga, and Vanuatu.If these countries do not meet U.S. benchmarks within 60 days, they could face bans similar to those enacted earlier this month under Trump's executive order.The internal cable raises several concerns. According to the memo, 'The Department has identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days.'Some nations reportedly lack a 'competent or cooperative central government authority' to issue reliable identity documents. Others are flagged for 'widespread government fraud,' failing to accept deported citizens, or high numbers of visa overstays The memo also cites problematic citizenship-for-investment programmes and 'antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States' by nationals of some countries.This expansion follows Trump's June 4 proclamation, which banned entry from 12 countries including Afghanistan, Iran, and Somalia, and restricted seven others. During his first term, Trump imposed a controversial travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries. That policy was eventually upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 after legal challenges.Now in his second term, Trump has revived and expanded his earlier agenda.'This administration continues to single out African and Caribbean countries in a way that is deeply troubling,' said a Democratic congressional aide.Critics from civil rights groups and Democratic lawmakers argue that the new list shows a discriminatory trend, disproportionately targeting countries in the Global South. They say it echoes earlier bans rooted in xenophobia.While the White House has not officially commented on the proposed expansion, the president has stated on multiple occasions that he intends to make the ban 'bigger than before.'The State Department, when asked by Reuters and The Washington Post, declined to discuss the memo, stating only that it regularly 'reevaluates policies to ensure Americans are safe and foreign nationals abide by the law.'Nations on the list must now act quickly. They've been given 60 days to meet U.S. demands. An initial response is due within days.Failure to comply could trigger a travel ban that bars their citizens from U.S. entry altogether, reshaping not only diplomatic ties but also the lives of thousands who travel to the U.S. for education, work, and family.This move would also likely ignite legal battles in U.S. courts and intensify global criticism of America's immigration posture under Trump's leadership.Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Can China reclaim its IPO crown?
One after another, blockbuster Chinese listings are coming to Hong Kong. In May Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, a drug manufacturer, and CATL , a battery-maker, sold $5.3bn-worth of shares between them. Seres, which makes electric vehicles, hopes to raise $2bn in the coming weeks. Shein, a fast-fashion firm, may abandon plans for an offering in London for one in Hong Kong. All told, in April more than 130 applications were under consideration by the local exchange, up from fewer than 60 at the start of 2024. On current trends, the city will be the world's largest venue for stock debuts this year. For Chinese firms, this is an exciting but incomplete turnaround. Although their country is in the midst of a tech boom, last year they raised just $20bn in IPOs at home and abroad. Only twice in the past two decades have public share sales yielded so little. Although $9.8bn has been raised in Hong Kong so far this year, only $3.9bn has been drummed up on the mainland. Stock exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen are 'barely functioning' as a destination for IPOs, says a banker. And not all Chinese companies will be able to go public in Hong Kong, either because of political constraints or because they are insufficiently prominent. A healthy domestic market is crucial to China's tech future. Reviving Hong Kong is a welcome start. The covid-19 pandemic and China's sluggish economic growth caused stock valuations to plummet in 2021; they stayed low well into 2024. That made new listings unappealing to firms, investors and regulators. Companies such as Hengrui and CATL, already listed on mainland exchanges, had been exploring Hong Kong, but permission from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) proved hard to obtain. The watchdog feared secondary listings in a depressed Hong Kong would drag down valuations in China. Rising tensions with America then provided another barrier. The Biden administration's restrictions on American investment in Chinese companies working on sensitive technologies, such as semiconductors or artificial intelligence, made the country's tech firms seem like risky bets. Since September, when Chinese officials became more serious about tackling the country's economic woes, investment has begun to trickle back. In January a mini tech-boom inspired by the progress of DeepSeek, an AI startup, added to the optimism. With the Hang Seng China Enterprise Index, which tracks Chinese companies in Hong Kong, now 50% higher than at the start of 2024, official opposition to secondary listings has weakened. Bankers report that approvals from Beijing have flowed more freely in the past six months. Hong Kong has even found simple ways around America's tech-investment rules. Bankers working on IPOs now massage the language in sales materials. Horizon Robotics, which went public in October, was a test case. The autonomous-driving firm also designs semiconductors and develops its own AI models. But such words were mysteriously absent from the description of its business in the share prospectus. These sorts of changes, bankers say, make investors less wary. Could a restart on the mainland follow? Exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen have deep-rooted problems that lead to over-exuberance followed by languor. In 2022 Chinese IPOs raised a record, world-topping $81bn. That reflected a central-government plan which encouraged tech firms, especially in favoured fields such as chipmaking, to list within the country. Leaders' enthusiasm then waned in 2023 as stocks tumbled. They focused instead on liquidity in existing listings, fearing new offerings might reduce it and drive down valuations. In 2024 only 100 firms went public, the fewest for at least a decade. Mainland IPOs are still in a funk, with regulators more sensitive than ever about the performance of the leading stockmarket indices. The CSRC is said to have a lower bound of 3,300 points for the Shanghai Composite. To preserve liquidity, entire sectors, including the cosmetics and spirits industries, have been unofficially banned from listing. Only firms in critical tech industries are allowed to apply. As few as ten applications may be under review. Instead of focusing on IPOs, the CSRC is pushing through long-term reforms it hopes will stabilise share prices, such as making state-owned companies more accountable to shareholders. If market prices remain stable, more companies will gradually be allowed to go public. The CSRC has recently started contacting local regulators to spread the message that 'the market is not closed', an insider says. But because preparing an offering in China takes 12-18 months, a healthy flow of local share sales may start in earnest only in 2026, even if companies apply in droves. For firms thirsty for funds, that is a long wait. Hong Kong will not suit them all. Seres, the EV-maker, is backed by Huawei, a telecoms-equipment giant and perhaps the main target of American sanctions. Its prospectus will be another test of investors' risk appetite and bankers' creative-writing skills. The CSRC's growing control over IPOs in Hong Kong is another cause for worry. And though China's economy is showing signs of improvement, growth may worsen as the trade war begins to hurt. That could harm valuations—and again make IPO approvals harder to obtain. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Protests against a regal presidency have been notably peaceful
AT MIDDAY, BY the time the 'No Kings' march in Chicago was due to start, so many people were squashed into Daley Plaza, in the city's downtown, that it caused a sort of gridlock, with protesters unable to march in any direction. There were a few stirring speeches—for those close enough to hear, anyway—but mostly people milled around enjoying the show. Some came in fancy dress: furries; Mexican wrestlers; clowns and two men dressed as cardboard tanks. Some carried megaphones. The communists, with hammer and sickle flags, were well prepared; the families with small children on cargo-bicycles less so. What united them all was disdain for Donald Trump. The protests, under the banner 'No Kings', were America's largest in years. There were as many as 2,000 separate events planned, in all the biggest cities and in hundreds of smaller ones. Thousands turned out even in Republican-voting places like Provo, Utah; or Boise, Idaho. Overall attendance was probably in the millions, yet there was little disorder and relatively few arrests. Meanwhile in Washington, Mr Trump celebrated his 79th birthday by watching a military parade he ordered up—the first in the capital in more than three decades—which culminated in a day of festivities marking the army's 250th birthday. Mr Trump had expressed his desire for a big martial parade during his first term but was dissuaded by advisers who noted that such rituals were a staple of countries like Russia or North Korea. Here as in many other areas, Mr Trump proved determined to throw off constraints during his second term. The president beamed as more than 6,000 soldiers joined a parade down Constitution Avenue, dressed in kit from across the country's history, culminating with a progression of aircraft and tanks that ground up Washington's streets along the way. Attendees wore MAGA gear and in many ways the mood was similar to a Trump rally, with vendors selling anything from DOGE hats to shirts commemorating the 'big beautiful military parade'. (One young attendee had a shirt that declared: 'I'm here for the tanks.') Many in the crowd didn't understand the fuss. 'I wish it was not the birthday of President Trump,' said Keith Lay, a retired businessman from Tennessee. But he traveled to the capital, he said, to honour the military and his late son, who took his own life after serving two tours of duty in Afghanistan: 'It's for our troops, doggone it.' Protesters gathered in front of the White House a few blocks away, and a few others appeared elsewhere. Perla Celnicker, a teacher and Mexican immigrant, said she came to protest for the first time on account of Mr Trump's deportation campaign. But seeking to avoid an inflammatory confrontation in Washington, the great majority of anti-Trump protesters assembled elsewhere. The size of the crowds suggested a summer of sustained anti-Trump protests may lie ahead. The initial lack of violence is a relief. For days beforehand, following protests in Los Angeles that turned violent, Republicans had warned of mass disorder. In Florida one sheriff warned protesters: 'We will kill you, graveyard dead.' Democratic leaders worried that scenes of violence might provoke Mr Trump to send the national guard into more big cities. In New York, NYPD officers donned riot helmets and batons along Fifth Avenue. Yet when it came to it, almost all were orderly. The one exception was in Los Angeles, where police clearing streets ahead of an 8pm downtown curfew once again deployed tear-gas on a small group of protesters who had remained after most went home. At the end of the march in Chicago, the local police handed out bottles of water. In New York as of 6pm, the police reported making no arrests at all. A crowd in which middle-aged and upper-middle class protesters were well represented was also notably well behaved. At one point some in New York broke into a word-perfect rendition of 'Do You Hear The People Sing' from the French revolution musical 'Les Misérables'. They did not build any barricades themselves. For some the whole thing was rather nostalgic. 'You walk in a crowd like this [and there is a] feeling of love that comes over you for your country and your fellow man,' said Jayne Goldstein, at the march in Manhattan, closing her eyes and smiling. Her first protest was against the Vietnam war. The peacefulness of the demonstrations contrasted with the violence inflicted by one man in Minnesota. Two state politicians, both Democrats, were shot, with their spouses, in the small hours of June 14th by a man who came to their door dressed as a police officer. One of his victims, Melissa Hortman, the speaker of the state House of Representatives until January, was killed; so was her husband. Senator John Hoffman and his wife underwent surgery in hospital. It was an 'act of targeted political violence,' said Tim Walz, the state's Democratic governor, at a press conference. The alleged gunman, named as Vance Boelter, a 57-year-old private-security operator, is still on the loose. He is a graduate of a Pentecostal bible college associated with Christian nationalism, and he had in his car a list of nearly 70 different targets, including other Democratic politicians and anti-abortion activists, according to the police. He also had copies of flyers for Minneapolis's No Kings protests. In the aftermath, Mr Walz urged protesters in the twin cities of Minneapolis and St Paul not to demonstrate, lest they be targeted too. Thousands turned out anyway, and paid homage to their murdered representative. For all of the fear about mobs, it was a reminder that throughout America's history, many of the worst acts of violence have been committed by lone individuals. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Sometimes they have to fight it out': Trump says Iran-Israel will fight before peace; offers to help
AP photo US president Donald Trump on Sunday called on Iran and Israel to "make a deal" as the two countries continue exchanging military strikes. However, he also suggested that fighting may continue before any agreement is reached. "I think it's time for a deal," Trump told reporters at the White House before leaving for Canada to attend the G7 summit. He added, "Sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens." WATCH: President Trump remarks on the Israel-Iran war, "there's a good chance there'll be a deal" The latest clashes between Iran and Israel mark a dangerous escalation in their long-standing conflict. For years, both sides have targeted each other through proxy groups and secret operations. But now, they are openly launching strikes against each other, raising fears of a wider war in the Middle East. The current round of fighting began on Friday, when Israel launched attacks inside Iran. The strikes reportedly killed senior military officers and nuclear scientists, and hit military bases, nuclear facilities, and residential areas. Trump declined to say whether he had asked Israel to hold back on further airstrikes. However, a senior US official told AFP that Trump had blocked an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Posting on his Truth Social platform earlier, Trump said he believed that Iran and Israel "should make a deal, and will make a deal." He added that "many calls and meetings" were taking place behind the scenes and that peace could come "soon".
