New York Times Exposé Vindicates CCHR: ADHD Isn't Biological, Says Watchdog
LOS ANGELES, Calif., April 21, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — A recent exposé in The New York Times Magazine will send shockwaves through the psychiatric community, affirming what the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR) has warned for decades: there is no medical proof that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a biological disorder.[1] Yet, over 3.4 million American children are labeled with ADHD and prescribed powerful, mind-altering stimulants.
According to Jan Eastgate, President of CCHR International, The Times' revelations 'should prompt federal lawmakers and public health officials to investigate how millions of children could be drugged under a false premise—and why dissenting voices were ignored.'
The New York Times Magazine article by Paul Tough details how ADHD was long marketed as a neurobiological disorder requiring medication, despite lacking any objective test. Tough writes that the entire system rests on shaky assumptions: 'that ADHD is a medical disorder that demands a medical solution; that it is caused by inherent deficits in children's brains; and that the medications we give them repair those deficits.' But many of those once involved in building this narrative are now disowning it.
As the article concedes: 'Unlike with diabetes, there is no reliable biological test for ADHD,' and diagnosis often relies on 'subjective judgment.'
Eastgate underscores the damage: 'Millions of parents were led to believe their children had a brain disorder—one that science now admits it cannot medically confirm. That's not mental healthcare. That's institutional betrayal.'
EXPERTS RETREAT FROM ADHD'S SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION
Among the most striking revelations is the reversal of leading researchers who once championed the disorder and its treatments.
Dr. James Swanson, a research psychologist and one of ADHD's early proponents, was central to efforts in the 1990s that drove public acceptance of the diagnosis. At that time, CCHR was actively protesting the mass drugging of children, warning that the supposed science behind ADHD was fundamentally flawed. Their concerns are now echoed by Swanson himself.
After three decades of research, Swanson told the Times: 'I don't agree with people who say that stimulant treatment is good. It's not good.' He also found that children taking the drugs were still symptomatic years later and were shorter than their peers.
Other prominent scientists quoted include:
Sonuga-Barke went further, calling the search for a biological marker a 'red herring,' and admitting: 'There literally is no natural cutting point where you could say, 'This person has got ADHD, and this person hasn't got it.' Those decisions are to some extent arbitrary.'
THE HUMAN TOLL: WHY KIDS QUIT THE DRUGS
The exposé also reveals how teens themselves reject ADHD stimulants. Swanson notes the high dropout rate among young users—many of whom said the drugs made them feel worse. 'If it's so effective, why do people stop?' he asked.
Eastgate responds: 'For decades, parents were told by doctors, 'If you don't medicate your child, you're a bad parent.' But when children themselves report the drugs made them feel bad, it's psychiatry that refuses to listen.'
In response to the widespread overuse of ADHD diagnoses and stimulant prescribing—even in children under five—the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has launched a federal review. CCHR welcomes this as long overdue.
For over 40 years, CCHR has maintained that psychiatric labels such as ADHD are not rooted in biological science but are voted into existence through panels of psychiatrists—not discovered through medical testing. As far back as the 1980s and 1990s, CCHR was on record opposing the mass diagnosis of ADHD and the marketing of stimulants to schoolchildren.
'This investigation must look at how pseudoscience became policy,' said Eastgate. 'And why the system ignored watchdogs, parents, and even the United Nations, until some of the same researchers who created the mess began to admit their mistake.'
In 2017, Dr. Dainius Pūras, a psychiatrist and then UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, urged governments to move away from the biomedical (drug-based) model of mental health.[2] CCHR had already submitted evidence to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), documenting psychostimulant prescribing in 14 countries.
The UNCRC responded by recommending strict monitoring of ADHD drug use in children and criticized the 'medicating' of children without addressing root causes or offering alternative supports.[3]
More recently, the World Health Organization and the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights jointly declared that 'legislation on mental health must… move away from the narrow traditional 'biomedical paradigm.''[4]
The New York Times exposé represents a landmark moment in pediatric mental health. It exposes how ADHD's 'biological' foundations were misleading, and the harms of its treatments were undersold. CCHR says it validates what the group has long stood for: that millions of children were mislabeled and drugged.
'This is a reckoning,' concludes Eastgate. 'But it must become a reform. It's not enough to admit the science was wrong. The system must now be held accountable for what it did with that false science—and ensure it never happens again.'
About CCHR: Mental health industry watchdog established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and the late professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz. CCHR has achieved hundreds of reforms, including bans on minors being electroshocked and federal protections against forced drugging of schoolchildren.
To learn more, visit: https://www.cchrint.org/2025/04/17/new-york-times-affirms-cchrs-warning-adhd-isnt-biological/
Sources:
[1] Paul Tough, 'Have We Been Thinking About A.D.H.D. All Wrong?' The New York Times Magazine, 13 Apr. 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/magazine/adhd-medication-treatment-research.html?smid=em-share
[2] 'World Needs 'Revolution' in Mental Health Care, U.N. Health Rights Expert Reports,' CCHR International, 14 June 2017, https://www.cchrint.org/2017/06/14/world-needs-revolution-in-mental-health-care/; 'World needs 'revolution' in mental health care – UN rights expert,' United Nations, 6 June 2017, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2017/06/world-needs-revolution-mental-health-care-un-rights-expert; https://web.archive.org/web/20170118053505/http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Health/Pages/SRBio.aspx
[3] 'Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 44 of the Convention,' UNCRC, 17 Sept. – 5 Oct. 2012, p. 15, https://web.archive.org/web/20130729192330/http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/Canada_CRC-Concluding-Observations_61.2012.pdf
[4] 'New WHO Mental Health Guideline Condemns Coercive Psychiatric Practices,' CCHR International, 18 Sept. 2023, https://www.cchrint.org/2023/09/18/who-guideline-condemns-coercive-psychiatric-practices/; 'Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation,' World Health Organization, OHCHR, 9 Oct. 2023, p. xvii, https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/373126/9789240080737-eng.pdf
MULTIMEDIA:
Image link for media: https://www.Send2Press.com/300dpi/25-0421-s2p-cchr-reform-300dpi.jpg
Image caption: 'This is a reckoning. But it must become a reform. It's not enough to admit the science was wrong. The system must now be held accountable for what it did with that false science—and ensure it never happens again.' – Jan Eastgate, President CCHR International.
NEWS SOURCE: Citizens Commission on Human Rights
Keywords: Religion and Churches, Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR International, mental health, LOS ANGELES, Calif.
This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Citizens Commission on Human Rights) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P125617 APNF0325A
To view the original version, visit: https://www.send2press.com/wire/new-york-times-expose-vindicates-cchr-adhd-isnt-biological-says-watchdog/
© 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA.
RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT.
Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jamie Oliver reveals recent diagnoses in his "neurodiverse family" as he embarks on a mission to get better support
Jamie Oliver has been incredibly open about how his dyslexia has affected him throughout his life, especially during his education, and has consistently advocated for better support for neurodivergent children. It seems, however, that the celebrity chef isn't the only member of his family to grow up with a learning difference, as he revealed that some of his children are in the same situation. In a brand new interview with The Sunday Times, the 50-year-old shared that there have been various diagnoses of dyslexia, ADHD and ASD (also known as autism spectrum disorder) in his "very neurodiverse family" over the last year. Though he did not go into any more detail than this, he said that he and his wife Jools have in fact "learned to understand that their [children's] behaviour is because they're seeing things differently," and that "being aware of that allows you to be a better parent". Jamie also called his family life "amazing but bonkers", joking: "Imagine four neurodiverse people at the dinner table trying to get their point across." He further rebuked the attitudes taken towards neurodivergence by older generations, saying: "Older people tend to have the 'we didn't have that when we were young' attitude. We just didn't know as much about our brains 30 years ago." The celebrity chef has been working on an hour-long documentary for Channel 4 called Jamie's Dyslexia Revolution, which will explore the challenges facing dyslexic children and interrogate what the British government can change to support them within education. Jamie also opened up about the emotional toll that making the documentary took on him, telling the publication: "I'm unpacking quite a lot of stuff. I thought I'd buried it but it's hitting a nerve. Genuinely, of all the things I've ever done, this documentary is the most viscerally painful. "I've seen so many high-flying, talented, grown men cry about this – I've just done it to you [referring to his crying during the interview] – the concept of being worthless [when you're] young is real. It's really triggering." Though the father-of-five has been vocal and open about his struggle with the learning difficulty, especially during his school days, for a long time, he only received his official diagnosis in January of this year.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doubled down on his claim that there won't be Medicaid cuts in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' despite projections that millions of low-income individuals would lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Johnson, during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' pushed back on independent projections that the bill would lead to 4.8 million who would lose coverage because of work requirements, saying they won't lose it 'unless they choose to do so.' 'Those 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so,' he told host Kristen Welker. 'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied — these young men, for example, okay — to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week, and that's too cumbersome for them? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it.' He added that the people who are complaining about losing their coverage are doing so 'because they can't fulfill the paperwork,' noting that the policy follows 'common sense.' 'When people work, when able-bodied young men work, it's good for them, for their dignity, their purpose, and it's good for the community,' he said. 'If you can't find a job, then volunteer in your community for 20 hours, and you will meet the requirement.' The proposed Medicaid and health care reforms would require states to impose work requirements on childless adults aged 19-64 to be eligible for Medicaid. It also aims to shorten the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act, among other changes. The reforms are key components of the bill, which the House Energy and Commerce Committee crafted after being tasked with finding more than $800 billion in savings over a decade. Those portions of the GOP proposal would save $625 billion over 10 years, according to the CBO. Johnson said that the bill 'strengthens' Medicaid and said what they are doing is 'an important and frankly heroic thing.' 'It's intended for young, you know, single, pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly,' he said. 'But what's happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able bodied workers, who are on Medicaid. They're not working when they can.' His comments are just the latest assertion from Johnson that the bill won't threaten Medicaid coverage for people who need it. However, the bill is hitting some roadblocks for Republican lawmakers, who are finding themselves enveloped in criticism at their town halls. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
How many days a month the average person is tired, has headaches or deals with tummy issues
Feeling off more often than on? You're not alone. Most of us are running on empty, clutching our stomachs or popping pain relievers more often than we'd care to admit — and a fresh study has the data to prove it. 3 A new survey shows Americans feel tired an average of 12.9 days per month. Antonioguillem – A new survey — conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Doctor's Best — has revealed that only 28% of us feel completely healthy, with the remaining 72% living in chronic discomfort. Respondents said they feel tired 12.9 days, experience mood changes 10.1 days, suffer from tummy issues 9.8 days and deal with headaches 7.5 days — per month. The research also found that the average American only feels truly healthy for 19 days out of the month — meaning nearly two weeks are spent in a fog of fatigue, headaches or digestive distress. And those aches and pains may be taking more than a physical toll. 3 Around 32% of men admit to having trouble performing sexually as a result of their health issues. fizkes – Roughly 65% of Americans say their health issues make it more difficult to function optimally at their job — and 40% report they make it harder to exercise, potentially creating a negative cycle of wellbeing. Another 15% complain they take away from their ability to enjoy quality time with family and 32% of men admit to having trouble performing sexually as a result. Of the maladies, gut issues appear to have the biggest impact on our personal lives — as one in three Americans regularly deal with stomach problems, with almost half (48%) confessing these tummy troubles make them more reluctant to have sex. 'When your gut is unbalanced, everything else begins to suffer: work, sleep, intimacy and even the simple joy of being with family,' Katie Lucas, CMO of Doctor's Best, said in a press release. 3 'When your gut is unbalanced, everything else begins to suffer: work, sleep, intimacy and even the simple joy of being with family,' Katie Lucas said. leszekglasner – 'We often try to convince ourselves that health is a private issue, but the statistics show otherwise. When we don't feel well, it affects every aspect of our lives. Healing the gut isn't just about improving digestion; it's about reclaiming the parts of life we're gradually losing.' Perhaps surprisingly, the data indicates that — of all of the generations — Gen Z is the one most likely to suffer from upset stomach. This is troubling, as bloating, gas and discomfort are often dismissed as harmless digestive issues, but they can sometimes signal more serious health problems — such as colon cancer, which has been on the rise among younger adults. 'Normalizing chronic symptoms like bloating, discomfort or irregular bowel habits can delay diagnosis of underlying conditions such as SIBO, IBS, celiac disease or even inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer,' gastroenterologist Dr. Ali Rezaie previously told The Post.
