Geely Holding sales surge 31% in Q1
Chinese automaker Zhejiang Geely Holding Group reported a 31% year-on-year surge in global vehicle sales to 946,627 units in the first quarter of 2025, driven by an 83% jump in new energy vehicle (NEV) sales to 463,372 units – or 49% of its total vehicle sales in this period.
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited, comprising the group's Chinese brands, reported a 48% increase in first-quarter sales to 703,824 units, including 589,813 Geely-branded vehicles, 72,608 Lynk & Co sales, and 41,403 Zeekr sales. The company's commercial vehicle unit, Farizon New Energy Commercial Vehicle Group, saw its sales rise by 62% to 26,710 units. Sales outside China amounted to 89,953 units, underpinned by the recent roll-out of the EX5 in Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Vietnam, and across Latin America.
First-quarter sales by the group's Volvo Cars subsidiary amounted to 172,219 vehicles, including 74,483 NEVs, while Polestar sold 12,304 units.
Geely has stepped up its globalization strategy in the last two years, underpinned a strong new product launch strategy. Exports from China surged by 57% to 414,522 units last year, with the company reporting strong demand for its products in the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Africa, Latin America and Europe.
"Geely Holding sales surge 31% in Q1" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
The U.S.-China leverage game
Negotiations usually boil down to leverage — specifically, who has more of it. In the U.S.- China talks underway Monday in London, the question of who has the upper hand boils down to macro- versus micro-economics. The big picture: A slew of data out of China shows the massive cost that U.S. tariffs impose on the Chinese economy, reflecting both underlying economic weakness and what the nation stands to lose if no trade peace is reached. The U.S., meanwhile, has had a run of perfectly solid macroeconomic data, but has much to lose if China continues throttling supplies of rare earth minerals and other specific goods that U.S. industries desperately need. State of play: All is not well for the fundamentals of China's economy, and plunging trade with the U.S. exacerbated those problems. Chinese exports to the U.S. fell 34.5% in May from a year ago, according to Chinese National Bureau of Statistics data out Monday. Its imports from the U.S. also fell, by 18%. Consumer prices fell for the fourth consecutive month, the bureau said, while producer prices fell the most in nearly two years. The mix of moribund export activity and falling prices compounds the nation's challenges grappling with a property bust and debt overhang. Yes, but: That might make Chinese negotiators eager to make a deal. After all, the nation's leadership views maintaining stable economic conditions and good living standards as crucial for their own hold on power, and collapsing exports to the U.S. undermine that goal. But they have plenty of leverage of their own, tied to U.S. reliance on very specific Chinese exports. Reality check: China's power in this standoff is tied to its ability to restrict exports of rare earth minerals, certain electronics, and pharmaceuticals. By throttling a handful of export categories, China can potentially exact damage on the U.S. economy that's far larger than the dollar value of the lost trade flows. Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, argued in an influential essay this spring that this means China has "escalation dominance," the power to escalate or de-escalate according to its goals. What they're saying: "The United States gets vital goods from China that cannot be replaced any time soon or made at home at anything less than prohibitive cost," Posen wrote in Foreign Affairs. In the event of aggressive escalation, he wrote, the U.S. "will face shortages of critical inputs ranging from basic ingredients of most pharmaceuticals to inexpensive semiconductors used in cars and home appliances to critical minerals for industrial processes including weapons production." The intrigue: The Wall Street Journal reported Monday morning that President Trump has authorized his negotiating team to loosen export restrictions on jet engines and other products as part of the talks, citing people familiar.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality
Donald Trump clearly wants the public to believe he recently struck a trade deal with China. The president did not actually reach such an agreement, but he's leaned into his fictional narrative with great enthusiasm lately. Last Thursday, for example, the Republican published an item to his social media platform, noting that he'd spoken to Chinese President Xi Jinping about 'the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' Soon after, during an Oval Office event, he again touted the same 'trade deal.' A day later, Trump posted a follow-up item, announcing the members of a delegation who would travel to London to meet with Chinese officials about 'the Trade Deal.' The bad news is that the 'trade deal' in question does not exist, no matter how many times the American president pretends otherwise. The good news is that administration officials will actually have some discussions with their Chinese counterparts. NBC News reported: Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. About a month ago, Trump announced what he characterized as a 'deal' with China, but the closer one looked at the details, the more the truth came into focus. Georgetown University professor Abraham Newman wrote a great piece for MSNBC that explained, "While the U.S. did avoid a major economic calamity, this is not a deal. The U.S. blinked. ... Far from some diplomatic coup, the U.S. climb down reflects the economic risks of maintaining such high tariffs.' The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal came to the same conclusion, noting, '[T]he China deal is more surrender than Trump victory.' Complicating matters, while the White House and Beijing reached a tentative agreement that paused the two countries' tit-for-tat tariffs, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. All of which brings to mind Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade adviser, who boasted in April, 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days.' Navarro added that such a plan 'is possible' in part because 'the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.' Roughly two months later, the grand total currently stands at zero. Generous observers might be inclined to give Trump credit for striking a deal with the U.K., but as The Washington Post's Dana Milbank summarized in his latest column, that deal is really more of a 'vaguely phrased framework with Britain that still hasn't been made public.' What's more, a new Politico report added that a month after the agreement was announced, the U.S.-U.K. duties 'remain in place' and 'there is still no clear timeline for when they'll lift.' Or to put it another way, two-thirds of the way into the '90 deals in 90 days' vow, the White House appears to be 90 deals short. Undeterred, Navarro returned to Fox Business late last week, where he was asked when the public should expect to see some breakthroughs. 'We will have deals,' Navarro said. 'It takes time. Usually, it takes months and years. In this administration, it's gonna take more like days.' On average, the typical timeframe for a U.S. trade deal is roughly 30 months. That didn't deter Navarro from pushing the '90 deals in 90 days' talking point in April, and it apparently didn't stop him from claiming again last week that Team Trump will produce amazing results in a matter of days. The White House's top trade adviser should be going out of his way right now to lower expectations after already having set an impossibly high bar. For reasons unknown, Navarro is doing the opposite, setting up the Trump administration for additional failure. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) on TripleS Special Situations's Substack by Tiny Stock Ninja. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on NAK. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK)'s share was trading at $1.2 as of 4th June. A large open-pit mining site, its machinery providing a long-term supply of copper. Northern Dynasty Minerals (NAK) offers a uniquely asymmetric investment opportunity at the intersection of geopolitics, resource sovereignty, and severe market mispricing. The Pebble Project—one of the world's largest undeveloped copper deposits—has long been stalled by regulatory hurdles, but the return of the Trump administration has radically altered its strategic outlook. Recent executive orders prioritize domestic mineral independence and list copper and gold as critical to national security, with directives to expedite permitting. These policy shifts directly benefit dormant projects like Pebble, especially as the U.S. now imports over 45% of its copper. Simultaneously, the global copper supply is entering a structural deficit, exacerbated by decades of underinvestment and geopolitical tensions, including tariffs cutting off U.S. access to Chinese rare earths. Legally, Northern Dynasty has advanced its position through persistent appeals and a well-documented challenge to both the EPA veto and Army Corps denial, citing contradictions with the Final Environmental Impact Statement, which found no measurable impact on local fisheries. These appeals align with the administration's deregulatory momentum, especially in Alaska, where a broad pro-development agenda is unfolding. The Pebble resource base is staggering, with measured and inferred deposits totaling tens of billions of pounds of copper and millions of ounces of gold, carrying a gross market value exceeding $400 billion. At a current market cap of just $660 million, the upside is massive, with after-tax profits projected in the tens of billions. While regulatory and execution risks remain high, the strategic alignment of policy, resource needs, and valuation distortion sets the stage for potentially generational returns. Previously, we have covered a on Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) by Intelligent_Okra5374 on the Value Investing Subreddit in April 2025, which operates in the same industry as Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Harmony Gold is a profitable, cash-generative gold producer with diversified assets and a strong balance sheet, benefiting from macro tailwinds in precious metals and expanding into copper for long-term growth. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 9 hedge fund portfolios held NAK at the end of the first quarter which was 6 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of NAK as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
