OpenAI scrubs mention of Jony Ive partnership after judge's ruling over trademark dispute
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A budding partnership between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and legendary iPhone designer Jony Ive to develop a new artificial intelligence hardware product has hit a legal snag after a federal judge ruled they must temporarily stop marketing the new venture.
OpenAI last month announced it was buying io Products, a product and engineering company co-founded by Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion.
But it quickly faced a trademark complaint from a startup with a similarly sounding name, IYO, which is also developing AI hardware that it had pitched to Altman's personal investment firm and Ive's design firm in 2022.
U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson ruled late Friday that IYO has a strong enough trademark infringement case to proceed to a hearing in October. Until then, she ordered Altman, Ive and OpenAI to refrain from 'using the IYO mark, and any mark confusingly similar thereto, including the IO mark in connection with the marketing or sale of related products.'
OpenAI responded by scrubbing its website of mentions of the new venture, including a web page of the May 21 announcement.
In its place, the company had a message Monday that said the page 'is temporarily down due to a court order' and added: "We don't agree with the complaint and are reviewing our options.'
IYO CEO Jason Rugolo applauded the ruling Monday in a written statement that said the startup will aggressively protect its brand and tech investments.
"IYO will not roll over and let Sam and Jony trample on our rights, no matter how rich and famous they are,' Rugolo said.
——
The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement that allows OpenAI access to part of AP's text archives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
32 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Court filings reveal OpenAI and io's early work on an AI device
Legal filings submitted earlier this month from lawyers representing OpenAI and Jony Ive's io reveal new details about the companies' efforts to build a mass-market AI hardware device. The filings are part of a trademark dispute lawsuit filed this month by iyO, a Google-backed hardware startup developing custom-molded earpieces that connect to other devices. Over the weekend, OpenAI pulled promotional materials related to its $6.5 billion acquisition of Jony Ive's io startup in order to comply with a court order involved in the suit. OpenAI says it's fighting iyO's allegations of trademark infringement. For the last year, OpenAI executives and former Apple leaders now working at io have vigorously researched in-ear hardware devices, according to filings submitted in iyO's lawsuit. In a June 12 filing, lawyers representing OpenAI and io said the companies purchased at least 30 headphone sets from various companies to explore what's on the market today. In recent months, OpenAI and io executives also met with iyO's leadership, and demoed their in-ear technology, according to emails revealed in the case. That said, OpenAI's first device in collaboration with io may not be a pair of headphones at all. Tang Tan, a longtime Apple executive that co-founded io and serves as the startup's chief hardware officer, claims in a declaration to the court that the prototype OpenAI CEO Sam Altman mentioned in io's launch video 'is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device.' Tan notes that the design of said prototype in not yet finalized, and that the product is at least a year away from being advertised or offered for sale. The form factor of OpenAI and io's first hardware device has largely remained a mystery. Altman merely stated in io's launch video that the startup was working to create a 'family' of AI devices with various capabilities, and Ive said io's first prototype 'completely captured' his imagination. Altman had previously told OpenAI's employees at a meeting that the company's prototype, when finished, would able to fit in a pocket or sit on a desk, according to the Wall Street Journal. The OpenAI CEO reportedly said the device would be fully aware of a user's surroundings, and that it would be a 'third device' for consumers to use alongside their smartphone and laptop. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Our intent with this collaboration was, and is, to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces,' said Altman in a declaration to the court submitted on June 12. Lawyers representing OpenAI also said in a filing that the company has explored a wide range of devices, including ones that were 'desktop-based and mobile, wireless and wired, wearable and portable.' While smart glasses have emerged as the front-runner for AI-enabled devices, with companies like Meta and Google racing to develop the first broadly adopted pair, several companies are also exploring AI-enabled headphones. Apple is reportedly working on a pair of AirPods with cameras, which would help power AI features by gathering information about the surrounding environment. In recent months, OpenAI and io executives have done considerable research into in-ear products. On May 1, OpenAI's VP of Product, Peter Welinder, and Tan met with iyO's CEO, Jason Rugolo, to learn more about iyO's in-ear product, according to an emailed invitation revealed in the case. The meeting took place at io's office in Jackson Square, the San Francisco neighborhood where Ive has bought several buildings to work on LoveFrom and io. At the meeting, Welinder and Tan tested out iyO's custom-fit earpiece, but were disappointed when the product failed repeatedly during demonstrations, according to follow-up emails revealed in the case. Tan claims in his declaration that he met with Rugolo as a courtesy to his mentor, longtime Apple executive Steve Zadesky, who recommended he take the meeting. Tan also claims he took several precautions to avoid learning too much about iyO's IP, such as suggesting that his lawyers review materials before he does. However, it seemed that OpenAI and io employees thought they could learn something from one of iyO's partners. To customize its in-ear headsets, iyO sent a specialist from an ear-scanning company, The Ear Project, to someone's home or office to get a detailed map of someone's ear. In one email revealed in the case, Marwan Rammah, a former Apple engineer that's now working at io, told Tan that purchasing a large database of three-dimensional scans from The Ear Project could give the company a 'helpful starting point on ergonomics.' It's unclear if any such deal took place. Rugolo tried repeatedly to forge a deeper relationship between iyO, io, and OpenAI — but largely failed, according to the emails. He pitched OpenAI on launching iyO's device as an early 'developer kit' for its final AI device. He pitched OpenAI on investing in iyO and, at one point, even offered to sell his entire company for $200 million, the filing say. However, Tan said in his declaration that he declined these offers. Evans Hankey, former Apple executive turned io co-founder and chief product officer, said in a declaration to the court that io is not working on a 'custom-molded earpiece product.' The ChatGPT-maker seems to be more than a year out from selling its first hardware device, which may not be an in-ear product whatsoever. Gven what the company said in this lawsuit, it appears it is also exploring other form factors.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas governor calls for special session after vetoing a bill to ban THC-infused goods
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed a bill that would have banned consumable hemp products containing THC ingredients in the state, but said he's open to lawmakers passing a new effort to regulate what has become a booming business. In fact, he's already summoned lawmakers to a special session in July to do just that. But the Republican's 11th-hour veto Sunday night, delivered just minutes before the bill would become law, drew sharp criticism from some of his top conservatives allies who want to eradicate a business they consider dangerous. The veto was a victory for thousands of retailers and hemp farmers in Texas who worried they could be put out of business, and for advocates who said a ban would harm people who use THC to treat PTSD and other serious conditions. At a press conference Monday, Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who has led the effort to crack down on the THC market, said he was confused by the governor's actions and that the veto amounts to legalizing marijuana in Texas. Here's what else to know: What is THC and how is it regulated? Tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, is the compound that gives marijuana its psychoactive properties. It can be derived from hemp, a plant that is related to but different from marijuana and is used to produce textiles, plastics and other goods. A 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, which must contain less than 0.3% THC, but variants of hemp can be modified to have more potent concentrations. This has opened up a lucrative market of hemp-derived THC goods that are available in many convenience stores across the country, including in states like Texas where marijuana is strictly prohibited. Critics of the Texas bill pointed to the thousands of jobs and millions in revenue the industry has brought into the state. Many retailers have also said that it allows people to access the medicinal benefits of marijuana without navigating the state's limited medical marijuana program. Supporters of the bill have expressed concerns about the dangers of THC consumables because there is little federal oversight into how they are manufactured. The fate of THC in other states Several other states have moved to regulate hemp-derived THC goods. States where marijuana is legal, such as Colorado, restrict THC consumables with age limits and caps on potency per serving. Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee and other states where recreational marijuana is prohibited have also pushed for more regulation. Texas' bill would have been one of the more far-reaching because it did not allow any amount of THC, according to experts. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in Florida refused to sign similar legislation last year over concerns that it would hurt small businesses. The governor's veto On Sunday, the Texas governor called for a special session to take up the THC bill and other proposals this July. In his veto of the bill, Abbott encouraged lawmakers to consider age restrictions and regulation around the marketing and packaging of THC consumables rather than an outright ban to avoid hemp farmers, pharmacists and others from being prosecuted for owning small amounts. 'Legislators could consider a structure similar to the way alcohol is regulated, with strict enforcement by an agency like the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission,' Abbott said in his proclamation vetoing the bill. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the president of the Senate, said Monday that regulation instead of prohibition would be the same as legalizing marijuana in the state. 'I'm not going to legalize marijuana in the state of Texas," Patrick said. 'By this veto, he has now put us in a box." Supporters of the veto Many industry groups and retailers applauded the governor's decision on Monday and thanked him for taking their concerns seriously. 'This is a victory for all Texans who have spoken loudly and clearly,' the Hemp Industry & Farmers of America said in a statement Sunday. 'This is what we have been asking for,' the Texas Hemp Coalition said in an Instagram post in response to the governor's proclamation. 'Thank you for trusting us!' ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
The Republican attempt to discourage Trump lawsuits has hit a big obstacle
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans have hit a roadblock in an effort that could deter nonprofits, individuals and other potential litigants from filing lawsuits to block President Donald Trump over his executive actions. As Trump faces lawsuits nationwide, GOP lawmakers had sought to bar federal courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions against the federal government unless the plaintiffs post what in many cases would be a massive financial bond at the beginning of the case. The proposal was included in the Senate version of Trump's massive tax and immigration bill, but ran into trouble with the Senate parliamentarian, who said it violates the chamber's rules. It is now unlikely to be in the final package. Federal judges can already require plaintiffs to post security bonds, but such funds are commonly waived in public interest cases. The GOP proposal would make the payment of the financial bond a requirement before a judge could make a ruling, which critics said would have a chilling effect on potential litigants who wouldn't have the resources to comply. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer hailed the parliamentarian's ruling in a press statement and called the GOP effort 'nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored the nation since it's founding.' 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold,' Schumer said. Lawmakers are running scores of provisions by the Senate parliamentarian's office to ensure they fit with the chamber's rules for inclusion in a reconciliation bill. The recommendations from Elizabeth MacDonough will have a major impact on the final version of the legislation. On Friday, she determined that a proposal to shift some food stamps costs from the federal government to states would violate the chamber's rules. But some of the most difficult questions are still to come as Republicans hope to get a bill passed and on Trump's desk to be signed into law before July 4th. Republicans could still seek to include the judiciary provision in the bill, but it would likely be challenged and subject to a separate vote in which the provision would need 60 votes to remain. The parliamentarian's advice, while not binding, is generally followed by the Senate. Republicans and the White House have been highly critical of some of the court rulings blocking various Trump orders on immigration, education and voting. The courts have agreed to block the president in a number of cases, and the administration is seeking appeals as well. In April, the House voted to limit the scope of injunctive relief ordered by a district judge to those parties before the court, rather than applying the relief nationally. But that bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate since it would need 60 votes to advance. That's left Republicans looking for other avenues to blunt the court orders. 'We are experiencing a constitutional crisis, a judicial coup d'etat,' Rep. Bob Onder, R-Mo., said during the House debate. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
