logo
This food bank saved big with solar. GOP cuts could crush similar efforts.

This food bank saved big with solar. GOP cuts could crush similar efforts.

Yahooa day ago

When the team at Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest North Carolina first started planning construction of a new headquarters in Winston-Salem in 2019, they seriously considered solar panels.
'Food banking at its core has always been about sustainability,' said Beth Bealle, Second Harvest's director of philanthropy, stewardship, and engagement. The organization rescues food that would have ended up in landfills to feed those in need, and Bealle and her colleagues wanted to push the sustainability concept 'in other aspects of our work — like our facility.'
But at the time, they were advised that a rooftop array would be too expensive. Second Harvest shelved the idea and moved into its gleaming new 140,000-square-foot building in a former R.J. Reynolds Tobacco industrial park.
'Fast forward to the Piedmont Environmental Alliance Earth Day Fair of April 2023,' Bealle said. That's where she met the alliance's new green jobs program manager, Will Eley, who asked, 'Did y'all know about the Inflation Reduction Act?'
Eley and Bealle 'hit it off fabulously,' she said. Together, they took the food bank's solar plan off the shelf and worked through the details of complying with the federal law's clean energy incentives. Two years later, on Earth Day 2025, Second Harvest and the alliance flipped the switch on a 1-megawatt array, one of the largest rooftop solar projects in the state.
Assuming promised refunds from the federal government materialize, the project is expected to save Second Harvest $143,000 each year, funds the group says will be reinvested directly into programs that provide food, nutrition education, and workforce development across 18 counties of Northwest North Carolina.
But with the tax rebates now on the chopping block in Congress, other organizations considering new facilities may not have the chance to follow Second Harvest's footsteps.
'We've already talked to several food banks who are in that process about our project, because they're interested in putting solar on the rooftops of their new buildings,' Bealle said. 'And that's not going to be within reach for some people if these tax credits aren't available.'
The federal government has long offered tax credits to incentivize renewable energy projects, from solar farms to rooftop arrays. But before the Inflation Reduction Act, those enticements were of little use to food banks and other entities that don't pay an income tax.
The 2022 landmark climate law allowed organizations like Second Harvest to access the 30% tax credit on their solar investment by essentially transforming it to a rebate.
'The process by which they were able to fully monetize the tax credits was quite the game changer,' Eley said.
In North Carolina, the provision known as 'direct pay' serves as a vital sequel to an expired rebate program from utility Duke Energy, which helped dozens of houses of worship and other nonprofits go solar during its five years of existence.
'Duke Energy had the nonprofit solar rebate, and that was a tremendous tool that was very helpful,' said Laura Combs, a one-time solar salesperson who worked with tax-exempt groups around the state to access the cash back from the utility. 'When the direct payment came into play,' she said, 'that took up that slack.'
The federal climate law also offers other inducements. It provides a 10% bonus to tax credits for projects deployed in government-defined 'energy communities,' including those on former industrial sites or brownfields. At least another 10% is available for clean-electricity projects that are located in or benefit low-income communities.
As an organization that serves food-insecure households and that is headquartered in a poor census tract on a brownfield, Second Harvest qualified for both of these extra incentives.
'We really maximized the clean-energy layer cake,' Eley said.
Altogether, the tax credits cut the $1.5 million price tag for the solar rooftop installation in half, Eley said. While the food bank had to pay the full amount up front and won't recoup those savings until it files its tax return for the year, the extra incentives mean the 1,702 solar panels will pay for themselves more quickly in the form of lower energy bills.
Second Harvest and Piedmont Environmental Alliance hoped the project would serve as a beacon to other nonprofits looking to go solar. And in and around Winston-Salem, that's starting to come true, Eley says.
'It's opened up several doors there,' he said, mentioning that a local credit union and groups like Goodwill have expressed interest in installing panels. 'We're presently working with six faith communities that are navigating [direct pay] and going through their feasibility and contracting processes for solar specifically.'
That tracks with a nationwide trend of houses of worship going solar thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act.
There's also been an uptick in nonprofit installations statewide, according to data compiled by the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association.
The association doesn't monitor whether institutions access the direct-pay feature, and some recent arrays may be holdovers from the Duke rebate program, which ended in 2022. But the numbers are striking nonetheless: Since 2011, almost 150 houses of worship, local governments, and other entities that don't pay taxes have erected solar arrays, nearly all on rooftops. Sixty-three, or 42%, did so in 2023 and 2024.
Now, Eley said, the groups he's working with are especially motivated to act quickly.
'The idea of going solar has been something they have tossed around for a number of years,' he said. 'We're certainly reiterating to them if you're going to make that investment, do so now.'
That's because the massive budget bill passed last month by the House — dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in an homage to President Donald Trump — would make tax credits for solar and other renewable energy projects nearly unusable. The Senate is now considering whether to pass the measure as is or to make changes.
As the legislation stands now, projects would have to begin construction within 60 days of the bill's passage to access the 30% tax credit. That's an easier feat for a rooftop installation than a larger, ground-mounted affair, but still incredibly difficult for nonprofits, religious institutions, or local governments that tend to have lengthy decision-making processes and aren't already planning to go solar.
Even more unworkable is a provision that requires documentation that no component of a project, no matter how small, is linked to a ​'foreign entity of concern' such as China.
While House lawmakers voted to make the underlying 30% tax credit virtually useless, they didn't explicitly target the three related adjustments that helped enable the Second Harvest project: direct pay, the low-income community benefit, and the brownfield benefit.
'These cross-cutting provisions are part of the tax credit structure, but they are their own mechanisms,' said Rachel McCleery, the former senior adviser at the U.S. Department of the Treasury who led stakeholder engagement for the climate law's implementation.
The survival of direct pay in the House measure stands in contrast to the elimination of its twin in the private sector, transferability, which allows smaller energy companies better access to incentives.
But direct pay means little if the baseline 30% tax credit is still hamstrung by the 60-day start-work requirement and the foreign-entity provision.
'This is backdoor repeal of the IRA,' said McCleery, who now advises clients on defending clean energy tax credits, 'and it's backdoor repeal of direct pay — because you can't use direct pay if you don't have an underlying tax credit.'
The same applies to the bonus incentives for low-income and brownfield communities. 'These cross-cutting mechanisms can still be used,' McCleery said, 'but if the underlying credit is moot, that essentially repeals the mechanisms.'
On the flipside, if the Senate restores the viability of the underlying 30% tax credit in its version of the bill, the mechanisms that aid nonprofits like food banks and houses of worship will also be accessible.
But advocates say that remains a big 'if.' And there are other challenges: Slashes to the Internal Revenue Service workforce could delay payments to Second Harvest and others. And the group is bracing for the impact of the other budget cuts in the House bill as written, such as to food assistance and Medicaid.
'It's just going to put pressure on people who are already under-resourced,' Bealle said. 'And that has a ripple effect to every organization that supports under-resourced people, including us.'
Combs, the former solar sales professional who also volunteers with climate advocacy group North Carolina Interfaith Power and Light, called it a 'tragic snowball.' She then brought up U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, the North Carolina Republican who has consistently voiced disapproval of a full-scale repeal of the tax credits.
'Thank goodness Sen. Tillis has spoken out and been a leader on the importance of the Inflation Reduction Act incentives,' Combs said. 'I am anxious to see how this plays out in the Senate.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Duke Energy to propose new natural gas plant in Anderson County, SC
Duke Energy to propose new natural gas plant in Anderson County, SC

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Duke Energy to propose new natural gas plant in Anderson County, SC

Duke Energy (DUK) announced the company's intent to submit an application to the Public Service Commission of South Carolina for approval to build a new natural gas power plant in Anderson County. As part of the company's responsibility to serve nearly 860,000 retail electric customers across 30 South Carolina counties, Duke Energy says it needs to build and enable large amounts of new generation quickly to keep up with the success the state is seeing in economic development and population growth. The company expects to submit the construction application to the PSCSC later this year. If approved, construction is anticipated to begin in summer 2027 and would be expected to serve customers by early 2031. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See Insiders' Hot Stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on DUK: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Duke Energy price target raised to $127 from $126 at UBS Duke Energy price target lowered to $125 from $126 at Morgan Stanley Duke Energy Issues $300M First Mortgage Bonds Sector Spotlight: Utility stocks in focus after first quarter earnings Duke Energy price target raised to $142 from $130 at Citi Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits
KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

KY could lose thousands of solar, battery jobs if GOP in Congress ends tax credits

A technician services photovoltaic cells. (Photo By Getty Images) A solar industry group is warning that Kentucky stands to lose out on thousands of jobs in manufacturing solar energy components and batteries if clean energy tax credits are cut short under a mega-bill moving through Congress. An analysis published in late May by the nationwide Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) says Republican-led efforts to curtail or sunset tax credits would cost more than 300,000 jobs across the country and sacrifice hundreds of billions of dollars of investment through the end of the decade. Some of the credits are technology neutral but benefit solar and battery manufacturing industries. Republicans in Congress axed the 'green new scam,' but it's a red state boon The U.S. House has approved the spending and tax bill, dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill' by President Donald Trump. It is now under consideration by the U.S. Senate. Republicans are using a process called reconciliation to move the bill with a simple majority of votes in the Senate, rather than the three-fifths majority usually required in the upper chamber. That means the package could become law without any Democrats' votes. The bill as it came out of the House would accelerate the phase down of tax credits benefiting clean energy production, low-emission hydrogen fuel production, components for renewable energy, carbon capture technologies and the purchase of electric vehicles. These tax credits were created under the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 and championed by the former Biden administration. A States Newsroom analysis found the tax credits primarily benefitRepublican-controlled states. In Kentucky, where solar and battery manufacturing industries are growing though at a slower pace than in other states, the Solar Energy Industries Association estimates about 3,300 existing and potential jobs could be lost. Brenden Frazier, a board member for the advocacy organization Kentucky Solar Energy Society, said the sunsetting of tax credits could hamper the residential solar industry in the state. He said recent 'Solarize' campaigns, in which cities encourage residents to adopt solar energy in their homes and businesses, show the incentives are having a 'big impact' in terms of growing the industry in Kentucky. He said he worries about sustaining the business without the incentives. Frazier serves as the director of product and technology for the Puerto Rico-based solar panel manufacturer SOLX. Frazier said the loss of tax credits would set back solar and battery manufacturing as Kentucky, like much of the rest of the country, faces growing energy demands from prospective data centers coming onto the electricity grid. While the amount of electricity generated through solar energy in Kentucky is miniscule, the state has seen an influx of solar developers interested in setting up utility-scale solar installations. A Canadian company also announced last year it was investing over $700 million in a Shelby County manufacturing plant to build utility-scale battery storage systems. Republicans supportive of ending the tax credits have argued they are too expensive and that incentives give renewable energy an unfair advantage over fossil fuel production. Republican Kentucky U.S. Rep. Brett Guthrie in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in May said the reconciliation legislation would end spending on 'Green New Deal-style waste' and 'reverse the most reckless parts of the engorged climate spending in the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act.' Matt Partymiller, the president of the Kentucky Solar Energy Industries Association, told the Lantern the accelerated phase down of the tax credits is a 'real threat to manufacturing jobs' and to the United States' ability to compete with China on solar energy. 'We just started onshoring U.S, manufacturing of solar in earnest in the past couple of years,' Partymiller said. 'A lot of these incentives are really tied to that, and if they go away, I think this whole manufacturing industry that was just created largely stops with it.' Solar panel manufacturers across the country have significantly ramped up production in recent years to meet a boom in utility-scale solar energy development, producing enough solar panels to generate nearly 52 gigawatts of electricity. China has historically controlled much of the world's solar panel production as the country has subsidized production. The U.S. Senate will likely change the version of the reconciliation bill that passed the U.S. House in May. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Expert warns 'China Shock' on manufacturing that struck one state could spread to the rest of the country via the 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'A chilling effect'
Expert warns 'China Shock' on manufacturing that struck one state could spread to the rest of the country via the 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'A chilling effect'

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Expert warns 'China Shock' on manufacturing that struck one state could spread to the rest of the country via the 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'A chilling effect'

Few states were hit harder by "the China Shock" than North Carolina. Now, few are seeing a bigger manufacturing revival. This is an economic turnaround story that every American should hear. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, factory jobs in North Carolina collapsed — especially in textiles, apparel, and furniture. Entire communities in places like Hickory and Alamance County saw their local economies hollowed out. Between 2000 and 2010, the state lost nearly 330,000 manufacturing jobs — that's almost half its industrial workforce gone in less than a decade. The Great Recession accelerated those job losses as companies invested in automation. Since then, manufacturing jobs have been basically flat. But that could soon change. In 2022, Democrats passed the Inflation Reduction Act — the largest investment in clean energy and advanced manufacturing in U.S. history. North Carolina has emerged as one of the biggest winners of this law. Companies have flocked to the state, investing more than $20 billion in new advanced manufacturing facilities. These factories are expected to generate thousands of jobs. This manufacturing renaissance could come to an early end if the IRA is repealed as part of the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill." To that end, few U.S. senators will hold more sway in these negotiations than Thom Tillis from North Carolina. Tillis has voiced concern about killing the IRA, and he was one of four senators who publicly supported the protection of clean energy incentives. North Carolina has benefited from $23 billion in clean energy manufacturing investments since the IRA passed. If the law is repealed, the state could lose 17,500 future jobs. Tillis has warned that an abrupt repeal would create "whiplash" for investors and "devastate" America's ability to remain an innovation leader. Should the government continue to give tax incentives for energy-efficient home upgrades? Absolutely No Depends on the upgrade I don't know Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. An immediate phaseout, he told The Washington Post, would "have a chilling effect" on "future investments" in the domestic energy sector. In fact, the manufacturing renaissance resulting from the Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPS and Science Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill has amounted to a 279% increase in manufacturing across America. Whether that manufacturing growth will continue may be up to the senators debating the Big Beautiful Bill in Congress. Editor's note: If you want to use your voice to make a difference, you can look up how to contact your own state senators here — whether or not (and perhaps especially if not) they appear on this list. Michael Thomas is the founder of Cleanview, a platform that helps clean energy leaders track the energy transition in real-time, and the author of a newsletter about climate change, Distilled, that has been read by more than 50 million people. Follow Michael on LinkedIn here, where this post appeared in its original form, or subscribe to his newsletter here. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store