Where is Maria? S.F. woman vanishes after telling relatives ICE was taking her
An immigrant traveling to her early morning work shift at a San Francisco Target store Friday has vanished — after texting a relative that she was being taken by immigration officers — and now her family and police are trying to confirm whether she was truly arrested.
But so far, federal immigration officials have not said whether Maria Auxiliadora Jarquin Morales is in their custody — and her family says they have not heard from her since about 4:30 a.m. when she left a series of text messages saying she was being taken.
In her texts, Morales, a 33-year-old Nicaraguan woman who is the mother of one daughter, told the relative that she was driving to her job on Geary Street in the Richmond District when she was pulled over and asked for her driver's license, according to the family member who received the voicemails from her.
The family member spoke to the Chronicle on condition that her identity not be revealed and in accordance with the Chronicle's policy on anonymous sources.
Morales texted that she was scared and sent her location in case anything happened to her, the family member said. Morales told the family member that she was being taken by immigration authorities and told the relative to care for her daughter.
Morales also sent a video while in her car and then told her relative where she had left her parked vehicle, which her family later recovered.
Her family has not heard from her again, despite dozens of texts and calls to her, and no agencies have confirmed any arrest. Morales was authorized to work in the U.S. and had no criminal record, the family member said.
Morales has always been a hard worker and never disappeared — or been out of contact with her family — before. She has been in the United States for three years.
The family member reported the woman missing to San Francisco police, who also have not been able to confirm with Immigration and Customs Enforcement or other federal agencies that the woman is in their custody, the family member said.
San Francisco police confirmed they received a report of a missing person in the Richmond District.
ICE did not respond to the Chronicle's request for comment Friday.
The disappearance of Morales comes days after lawyers said ICE arrested four immigrants in the San Francisco Immigration Court after attending their court hearings in their asylum cases. Advocates have vowed to fight the arrests, which came after Department of Homeland Security lawyers unsuccessfully moved to have their cases dismissed.
Lawyers said the arrests and deportation efforts from the administration of President Donald Trump infringes on the due process of immigrants, circumventing the decisions of immigration judges ruling against the Department of Homeland Security.
The woman's family is continuing their search for answers on her whereabouts, including checking hospitals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California AG says federal cuts are actually helping legal fight with Trump: ‘They can't keep up'
WASHINGTON — Democratic attorneys general fighting the Trump administration on an array of policy issues are seizing on the widespread cuts and resignations of federal employees, an effort that may be coming back to bite the White House. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, buoyed by $25 million from a special legislative session, has been hiring new staff — including some of those former federal employees, he told the Chronicle while in Washington, D.C., to hear Supreme Court arguments in a case the state is party to. While Bonta and other state attorneys have been strategically preparing for prolonged legal battles against the administration, federal cuts have left the U.S. Justice Department without enough staff to handle its workload. More than half the attorneys at the Justice Department's civil rights division, led by San Francisco attorney Harmeet Dhillon, have left, the Wall Street Journal reported. And in some cases, Bonta said, U.S. attorneys — district prosecutors — have appeared on the Trump administration's behalf instead of lawyers from the main Justice Department. 'Their own strategy of 'flood the zone' — and the confusion and chaos and shock and awe — has almost this boomerang effect, where we've responded and the ball's back in their court now and they can't keep up,' Bonta said. 'This speed and this volume has repercussions on their ability to defend themselves.' During the first Trump administration, then-California Attorney General Xavier Becerra brought or was party to 110 cases, according to a CalMatters database. The state won 82% of the 28 cases that reached a final verdict. This go-round, Bonta has already brought or is party to 22 cases and won injunctions against the administration in nine. The volume of cases is 'double the speed, double the pace,' compared to the first Trump administration, Bonta said. At the current rate, 'we will hit the number of total cases of Trump 1.0 by the (2026) midterms.' 'We're doing everything faster and with more volume in a broader variety of cases, more nuance, more issues,' he said. 'So we're just more proficient at it … including working together and filing more quickly, being more responsive to the actions.' That includes coordination among state attorneys. 'More bodies and more talent is going to help us. We've learned as Democratic AGs how to marshal resources together and share those resources, and deploy them strategically and efficiently,' Bonta said. The first Trump administration was a period of discovery for state attorneys general, who were figuring out how they could use their authority, he said. This time, the top state lawyers were more prepared and began sharing resources over a year before Trump took office. During the first month of Trump's current term, 23 Democratic state attorneys general held a daily video chat to coordinate their efforts, Politico reported. They strategized over which courts to file cases, whether to seek state or federal venues and how to prove sufficient harm to be heard in court. Bonta told Politico he preemptively drafted challenges to potential actions from a second Trump administration, particularly focusing on ideas from Project 2025. Although the final verdict in many of these cases could come from the Supreme Court, whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three Trump appointees, Bonta appeared confident that the state would prevail in several key cases. The state has primarily faced pushback on jurisdictional issues. A U.S. District Court judge hearing the state's challenge to Trump's tariffs suggested it should be heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade instead. In the state's suit over the termination of teacher preparation grants, the Supreme Court ruled that the case was a contractual dispute and needed to be heard in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims rather than a District Court. UC Davis law professor Aaron Tang argued that ruling was effectively the Supreme Court trying to give Trump a win, without actually letting him win by not ruling on the merits of the case. Bonta said the cases that pose the biggest financial risk to California involve the administration's massive import tariffs and its efforts to withhold congressionally appropriated funding from states — which make up about half of the cases he has brought. Trump's proposed tariffs would be 'massively damaging,' to California, he said. 'We're the largest state — nearly 40 million people — fourth largest economy in the world now, largest importer of any state, second largest exporter, biggest manufacturer, largest agricultural exporter,' Bonta said. 'An outsized economy means an outsized impact on California of the tariffs.' Federal funding freezes or cuts are also of huge concern, Bonta said. The second case he brought was against the administration's efforts to freeze all federal grant funding, which would have left a $168 billion gap in California's budget, at a time when the state is facing an enormous deficit. The two cases Bonta said pose the biggest social risks are the administration's effort to revoke birthright citizenship — which was the reason Bonta had traveled to Washington, D.C. — and to force states to require proof of citizenship to vote while prohibiting states from counting ballots received after election day. He said he's confident the states will win the birthright citizenship case because 'it's a deprivation of a constitutional right by our own federal government, and it's so clear and so blatant.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nationwide protests target Houston-based Avelo Airlines for ICE deportation flights
The Brief Houston-based Avelo Airlines signed an agreement in April to fly federal deportation flights for ICE. A National Day of Action was held on Friday and Saturday against the airline. Protesters in Houston gathered outside the company headquarters. HOUSTON - Immigrant advocates across the country held a National Day of Action to target a Houston-based airline that agreed to fly deportation flights. What we know Stop Avelo protests were held on Friday and Saturday in cities in New York, Florida, Oregon, California, and more. A protest was also held in Houston on Saturday outside the Avelo Airlines headquarters on Greenway Plaza. The protests were held in response to the airline handling deportation flights for immigrants. According to the Associated Press, Avelo signed an agreement in April to fly immigrants out of the country for the U.S. Immigration Control and Enforcement agency, also known as ICE. The flights have reportedly been flying out of 26 cities since May 12. What they're saying One protester told FOX 26 that her main focus was for immigrants to have a chance for their cases to be heard in court. "I think people should be given due process in courts," said Kathryn Rabinow. "I don't think that people who are here illegally should be here without due process. They shouldn't be here." The other side Representatives with Avelo Airlines declined an interview with FOX 26. The following statement was released: The safety and well-being of our Crewmembers (employees), Customers and all individuals involved is our highest priority. While we recognize the right of individuals to peacefully assemble, Avelo's main priority will continue to be maintaining the safety and timeliness of our operation. The Source Information in this report comes from the Associated Press, Stop Avelo protestors, and Avelo Airlines.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Immigration on the agenda: Democratic leaders hold town hall in Phoenix
The Brief Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari and other Democratic leaders held a town hall in Phoenix on May 31. Attendees expressed concerns about immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, especially recent ICE actions. Other topics discussed included Medicaid, education, federal job cuts, and veterans' funding. PHOENIX - The Trump administration says it's taking off the gloves on immigration enforcement. For weeks, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have targeted immigration courts in downtown Phoenix, making arrests that they call, "expedited removals." Border czar Tom Homan is doubling down on recent efforts, saying cities who harbor illegal immigrants will be targeted. He added that no city is off the table. The Department of Homeland Security says it's fast-tracking deportations of migrants at their immigration hearings who illegally crossed the border during the last two years. What we know On May 31, Arizona's newest congresswoman, Yassamin Ansari, participated in the "Tell Me How You Really Feel" town hall in north Phoenix to address some of these issues and hear from constituents about their concerns. State Senator for Legislative District 24 Analise Ortiz and Washington Elementary School District Governing Board President Kyle Clayton Gore were also at the event. Among the topics being discussed was immigration under the Trump administration. Some of the attendees said they were showing up because they want to fight for democracy, and that included showing up to share their disdain for how the current administration is handling immigration. Other topics they were hoping to discuss included Medicaid, education, federal job cuts, and funding for veterans. But the issue of immigration was top of mind after ICE agents showed up several days in a row outside the immigration courts in downtown Phoenix. What they're saying "Horrific. This should not be happening," said Rep. Ansari. From the streets of Phoenix to the halls of the U.S. Capitol, Ansari says Americans should be shocked by the Trump administration's immigration policy. "We're seeing an administration that is trying to trick people and dupe people and folks are going to the court thinking that they are here for an appointment and instead they are being rounded up by ICE officers en mass." But Homan says there's nothing shocking about people breaking American laws. "We are not saying we are going to favor one area over another. We're all over the country, every neighborhood and every city. And you are going to see an expansion of that. Like I just said, we're gonna increase the teams greatly, so you're gonna see more teams on the streets you've never seen before. You're gonna see more work site enforcement than you've ever seen in the history of this nation." Ortiz shared the feedback she's getting from some voters. "This is really horrifying and there's a lot of people who are really scared right now because what we are seeing is that there's an unprecedented pattern of immigration judges dismissing cases, telling people they're free to go, and then ICE is waiting outside the courtroom to immediately re-arrest them and put them into new removal proceedings," she said. "This is horrible because these are folks that are trying to follow the rules and to come for their fair day in court." During the town hall, Ansari and Ortiz heard from Democratic voters on a range of topics, but people were most outspoken about one subject: immigration. "I think that the administration is being very heavy-handed, very brutal, cruel, running amok. That goes back to democracy," said Mike Smith. Ruthee Goldkorn said, "This is not immigration reform. This is what was promised during the campaign in '16 and the campaign in '24. The purge." The other side "I hope most Americans agree that public safety threats and national security threats shouldn't be walking the streets of this country, especially here illegally," said Homan. "So, yeah, we like all the support we can get. I think we got the support of majority American people according to the polls, right?" But Ortiz says federal policy is based on fear. "This is terrifying even for people that have lawful residence. We are seeing the Trump administration ignore the rules and that means we are all at risk, even those of us who are U.S. citizens." Homeland Security, which runs ICE, says arrests at immigration courts, like the one in Phoenix, are part of so-called "expedited deportations" and apply to those in the country illegally, regardless of their standing in immigration court.
