Cryptosporidium outbreak at Cowbridge farm reaches 81 cases
An outbreak of a parasitic infection linked to public animal feeding sessions at a popular farm in South Wales has now affected 81 people, with health officials urging the public to take hygiene precautions when visiting farms.
Seven new cases of cryptosporidium have been confirmed since last week, all linked to visits to Cowbridge Farm Shop, Marlborough Grange Farm in the Vale of Glamorgan, during March and April.
The infection has led to 16 people requiring hospital care for at least one night.
Officials from Public Health Wales and other agencies met on Wednesday for the fourth time since the outbreak began to co-ordinate the response.
The farm stopped all public feeding sessions involving animals, including calves and lambs, on April 29 and continues to co-operate with the investigation.
Cryptosporidium is a microscopic parasite that causes gastrointestinal illness and is commonly associated with contact with farm animals.
It can spread easily from person to person and poses increased risk to young children and those with weakened immune systems.
Beverley Griggs, consultant in health protection at Public Health Wales, said: 'We are continuing to work with our partners to investigate this outbreak and to reduce the risk of further transmission.
'Cryptosporidium infection often clears up without treatment, but it can be more serious for vulnerable people.
'We advise anyone who visited the farm and is experiencing symptoms such as diarrhoea, stomach pain or nausea to contact their GP or call NHS 111 Wales.'
Symptoms typically appear two to 10 days after exposure and can last up to two weeks.
Public Health Wales warned that infection can still spread after symptoms subside and has urged those affected not to go swimming for two weeks.
Visitors are being reminded to avoid close contact with animals, supervise children closely, and wash hands thoroughly with soap and warm water after touching animals or walking around a farm.
Alcohol hand gels do not provide sufficient protection.
Pregnant women are also being advised to steer clear of newborn lambs during lambing season due to a higher risk of infection.
Further updates and guidance are available on the Gov.uk website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Cash strapped NHS board to cut nappies for newborns in bizarre bid to slash costs
Bosses at a cash-strapped health board are to axe the free provision of disposable nappies in maternity wards – to save just £8,000 a year. Executives at NHS Grampian decided parents of healthy newborns can foot the bill for the absorbents as they struggle to manage the board's budget. The development comes despite the fact a study last month revealed the board had the highest-earning manager in Scotland's public health service. Scottish Conservative MSP Tess White MSP said: 'It's a measure of the SNP 's chronic underfunding of NHS Grampian that they've axed the provision of nappies for newborns. 'With NHS Grampian paying a medical director a whopping £242k a year, making him the highest earning NHS manager in Scotland, new mums will rightly question whether huge wage bills at the top should be prioritised over the needs of patients.' NHS Grampian needs to reduce a deficit of £23million but the anticipated savings form the nappies would amount to just 0.035 per cent of the total required. Other planned belt-tightening proposals include the reduction of services over public holidays while spiritual care would also be scaled back. Last month, it emerged that the health board has been escalated to stage four of NHS Scotland's National Performance Framework amid concerns over finances and governance. Holyrood ministers decided to step up scrutiny at NHS Grampian after it needed a loan of more than £67million to tackle overspend. Documents put before the board tomorrow (Thu) say about the nappies: 'This proposed saving relates to discontinuing the provision of disposable nappies for all well babies born in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Dr Grays Hospital, Inverurie Community Maternity Unit and Peterhead Community Maternity Unit. 'Note that a reusable nappies voucher is provided in the baby box supplied to all pregnant women in Scotland by the Scottish Government.' It goes on to say the proposal has 'potential negative impacts' as it could be seen discriminatory against babies or pregnant women and it would impact those on lower incomes. However, to mitigate the lack of kit in maternity wards it adds: 'It is intended that pregnant women will bring their own supply of nappies for their babies who are born well and not admitted to the neonatal unit.' The paperwork clarifies the move would not affect babies who require special-sized nappies that are admitted to the neo-natal unit. But the overall savings from the move are understood to be in the region of just £8,000 a year. In 2024, NHS Grampian welcomed around 4,800 babies. On average each newborn needs up to 10 nappies a day putting the annual requirement for the health board to around 50,000 per year. In January 2022 a consumer website said the average price of a nappy was 14.6p and allowing for inflation it could now be around 16p costing NHS Grampian the total of £8,000. A recent study by the campaign group Taxpayers' Alliance (TPA) revealed the health board manager earning most in Scotland in 2023/24 was Paul Bachoo, acute medical director and portfolio lead (surgery and clinical support) at NHS Grampian, with a total remuneration of £242,500 – enough to pay for the nappy provision for the next 30 years. A spokesman for the National Childbirth Trust, or NCT, warned of the impact on new parents and said: 'The early hours and days of having a newborn can be a challenging period for parents, and postnatally the NHS has a responsibility to support new babies. 'Parents may have arrived in hospital unexpectedly, following a traumatic birth, or may not have arrived with a packed birth bag with newborn nappies. 'Offering a supply of free to access nappies is an essential item in the immediate hours after birth, and giving parents a moment to catch their breath, and find the appropriate nappies for their baby upon discharge from hospital.' Critics said the move to axe the free provision of nappies is just the latest example of the Scottish Government's failures over the National Health Service. Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP said: 'Health board budgets are facing the squeeze, but cruelly snatching away nappies that don't even cost much is hardly the way to deal with it. 'What's next? Cots and blankets? 'The Scottish Government should be working with health boards to devise a proper strategy to ease these budget pressures. But as usual, the SNP are failing to step up and deliver for our NHS.' Scottish Labour health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie added: 'Right across Scotland NHS boards are being forced to make difficult choices as pressure mounts on frontline services. 'The SNP has taken NHS Grampian into special measures so it is directly responsible for these cuts. 'This cut will take a toll on new families and barely make a dent on the board's eyewatering deficit. 'The SNP must work with Health Boards to ease the dangerous financial pressure on local services and protect patients.' Shimeon Lee, policy analyst at the TaxPayers' Alliance said the plan to cut disposable nappies was a 'poorly targeted move which will save very little' when top bosses were paid such large amount. He added: 'Recent TPA research found that the NHS wastes hundreds of millions on electricity and postage costs, highlighting where trusts could make better use of their resources. 'Instead of penny pinching from babies, the health bosses should focus on meaningful efficiencies to cut costs.' The NHS Grampian paperwork also warns that any increases in costs would minimise the impact from the planned savings. It adds: 'There are a number of risks associated with the financial recovery plan for 2025/26 which would leave NHS Grampian with no flexibility to manage any in year cost pressures that arise.' A spokesman for NHS Grampian said the 'board is being asked to approve those savings at the meeting on Thursday'. Health Secretary Neil Gray said: 'The Scottish Government has received the financial recovery plan from NHS Grampian and we will continue to work with them as they work towards a position of financial sustainability. Our expectation is that proposed savings are proportionate, while also protecting frontline services. 'As part of the escalation to Stage 4 of the NHS Scotland Support and Intervention Framework there is a programme of enhanced scrutiny and support from the Scottish Government. I am confident that, through these actions, we will soon have a clear plan to stabilise the system and set the right conditions for the necessary, longer term transformational work – with the key aim being to ensure the sustainable delivery of high quality healthcare services for the benefit of local people.'
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Vaccine sceptic RFK Jr disbands government advisory committee on immunisations
Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US Health Secretary and a prominent vaccine sceptic, has dismissed all 17 members of a committee that issues official government recommendations on immunisations. In an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Mr Kennedy claimed that 'retiring' the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) was necessary to help rebuild trust in vaccines and ensure 'unbiased' health recommendations. 'The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,' he said, adding that he wanted to 'ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible'. The move – which some committee members found out about via the media – has been widely criticised by public health experts and scientists, who point to Mr Kennedy's long track record questioning the efficacy and safety of vaccines, sometimes based on dubious science. 'We have just watched politics bury science,' said Dr Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota. 'If you look at [Kennedy's] accusation that he's doing this because of growing problems with vaccine trust – well, that's kind of like an arsonist complaining that so many houses are on fire,' Dr Osterholm said. 'He's the one that's been seeding these doubts for the last decade.' Since he became the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mr Kennedy has taken a number of controversial decisions related to vaccines – including from bypassing ACIP to issue new Covid vaccine guidance, to stopping adverts for seasonal influenza shots and cancelling a $766 million contract with Moderna to develop a bird flu jab for humans. Now, Mr Kennedy has claimed the ACIP needs a complete overhaul because members have too many conflicts of interest, and are immersed 'in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy'. But his move appears to directly contradict promises given during his confirmation hearings. Bill Cassidy, a Republican Senator from Louisiana who is also a doctor, said he only voted for the appointment after Mr Kennedy committed to maintain ACIP 'without changes'. 'Of course, now the fear is that the Acip will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion,' Mr Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. 'I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.' In a statement, Dr Bruce A Scott, executive director of the American Public Health Association, added that Mr Kennedy's move would help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases, at a time when vaccine coverage is declining across America. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Dr Scott said. 'Rapid destruction' of critical oversight The committee is attached to the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and included 17 experts – including epidemiologists, infectious disease doctors, vaccine experts and paediatricians – who typically serve overlapping four-year terms. Eight of the members were appointed in January 2025. But it has been in flux since Mr Kennedy assumed office, with its first meeting delayed by the department, before the Health Secretary announced new Covid-19 recommendations in a video posted on social media – unilaterally changing the guidance without an ACIP consultation. Still, retiring all panellists – and deleting a webpage listing the members – has come as a shock to some. Dr Noel Brewer, a professor in public health at the University of North Carolina who was a member of the ACIP, told the Telegraph his removal was 'very unexpected,' given he was meant to serve for three more years. He added that he heard about it only when 'received a copy of the Wall Street Journal article from a journalist', and later received an email confirming it at 5:48pm. 'The most immediate impact of this action is to destroy trust among healthcare providers in ACIP,' said Dr Brewer, a behavioural scientist who specialises in research about why people do or don't get vaccinated. 'The top priority right now is to restore trust in ACIP recommendations. If that is not possible, then it is time for medical organisations to create an alternative vaccine advisory committee for the nation.' On this, there has already been some progress. Earlier this year, CIDRAP launched the Vaccine Integrity Project, which aims to facilitate conversations and offer advice about US vaccine policy – almost like a version of ACIP that's not aligned to the government. 'When I started the vaccine integrity project, there were a lot of doubters that anything of major consequence would happen… [especially after] Kennedy promised in his Senate hearings that he would not take vaccines away from anyone,' said Dr Osterholm. 'Well, look at all this change. 'We are watching the very rapid destruction of critically important vaccine evaluation oversight efforts of the US government, both at the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] and the CDC. These are committees that have performed marvellously well.' He added: 'It's terribly significant. The real victims are the public, specifically young children, who are going to face a very different world of vaccine preventable diseases than even a decade ago… I don't know what happens next, but it doesn't bode well.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
RFK Jr's ‘clean sweep' of CDC vaccine panel experts will erode public trust
Health secretary Robert F Kennedy's 'clean sweep' of a critical vaccine advisory panel spread shock and dismay among health experts, as many warned Kennedy's decision would erode trust in the US vaccine approval system. The secretary fired all 17 members of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) advisory committee for immunization practices (ACIP) – a group of scientific experts who recommend how vaccines should be administered and distributed. 'Some would try to explain this away by blaming misinformation or antiscience attitudes,' Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, announcing the change, on Monday. 'To do so, however, ignores a history of conflicts of interest, persecution of dissidents, a lack of curiosity, and skewed science that has plagued the vaccine regulatory apparatus for decades.' The immediate concern for public health officials, scientists and vaccine researchers was both the erosion in trust and who will fill the newly opened seats. Candidates for the voluntary roles often go through months of vetting, but it appears the new candidates may have already been chosen. A press release from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which Kennedy leads, said ACIP's upcoming June meeting would go forward as planned. Dr Tom Frieden, President and CEO of the public health nonprofit Resolve to Save Lives and former CDC Director, said in a statement on X that Kennedy's decision to remove the 'seventeen dedicated doctors, pediatricians, scientists, and parents who served on [ACIP]' is 'a dangerous and unprecedented action that makes our families less safe'. 'ACIP has long been a model for the world of transparent, fact-based guidance with rigorous reviews of vaccine safety and effectiveness,' Frieden said. 'Make no mistake: Politicizing the ACIP as Secretary Kennedy is doing will undermine public trust under the guise of improving it.' Frieden's comments were echoed by scientists, doctors and public health leaders, many of whom questioned Kennedy's own conflicts of interest. Before becoming secretary, Kennedy led arguably the world's most influential anti-vaccine advocacy group and was paid by personal injury law firms for referring alleged victims of vaccine injuries. 'Removing all the members of the ACIP and replacing them with new members is far more likely to destroy public confidence in the federal government's approach to vaccines than to restore trust,' said Public Citizen health research group director Dr Robert Steinbrook in a statement. 'It shouldn't matter which administration appointed the members of a federal scientific advisory committee. The wholesale firing and replacement of ACIP members is a blatantly political act that will undermine scientific impartiality and integrity, not promote it.' The CDC usually, though not always, takes ACIP's recommendations. A complementary panel advises the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on whether to approve vaccines, called the vaccine and related biologic products advisory committee (VRBPAC). Those recommendations, which are approved by the head of the CDC, translate into official recommendations in the childhood and adult vaccine schedules. Those schedules are then used by insurers to decide which vaccines their plans should cover – making them a critically important document for Americans' access to immunizations. Still, the CDC is without a leader, and Kennedy has not signed off on the most recent recommendations from ACIP, according to reporting from STAT. The decision to fire the entire ACIP committee comes after Kennedy attempted to make an end-run around them for a separate announcement: that Covid-19 vaccines would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. Ultimately, the recommendation for healthy children to receive the vaccine was preserved by the CDC, which added a new note that decisions about the Covid-19 vaccine should be made in 'shared decision making' with a healthcare professional. But Kennedy's initial announcement, which hit social media with few details, similarly shocked doctors. It also came only days after the leaders of the leaders of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and FDA declared pregnancy an 'underlying medical conditions that can increase a person's risk of severe Covid-19'. Kennedy oversees both agencies in his role as health secretary. Doctors worried Kennedy's decision would bring 'devastating consequences' for pregnant women, who are known to be more susceptible to severe complications from Covid-19 infection. Leading vaccine experts have planned for Kennedy to cause upheaval to vaccine policy: in April, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota launched the Vaccine Integrity Project. Kennedy's move did please one group: his anti-vaccine supporters. 'This represents an extremely positive development,' said Nicolas Hulscher, administrator for the McCullough Foundation, a nonprofit affiliated with Peter McCullough, a well known anti-vaccine campaigner. 'We hope ACIP will be repopulated with truly independent experts who prioritize public safety over Vaccine Ideology.'
