logo
SC notifies guidelines for retention, disposal of records

SC notifies guidelines for retention, disposal of records

India Gazette4 hours ago

New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday highlighted a lacuna over the management of administrative records and issued guidelines for retention and disposal of documents to create accountability and efficiency across all registry wings.
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, in a message, said that over the years, the registry of the Supreme Court has witnessed a significant increase in the volume and diversity of administrative records generated across multiple branches.
CJI said, 'While judicial records pertaining to case proceedings are governed by explicit provisions contained in Order LVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and further elaborated in Chapter XXI of the Handbook on Practice and Office Procedure of the Supreme Court of India, 2017, a lacuna has persisted with respect to the management of administrative records.'
He further added, 'This disparity leads to inconsistent practices across branches, affecting archival clarity and efficiency. The 'Guidelines for Retention and Destruction of Records 2025' aim to remedy this by promoting coherence, accountability, and efficiency in managing administrative records, including institutional decisions, policy implementations, inter-departmental correspondences, audits, and engagements with external stakeholders.'
He underscored the importance of properly managing these records for transparency and accountability, and guidelines to establish a rational framework.
Operational efficiency is enhanced by the systematic elimination of obsolete documents, easing storage burdens and improving record retrieval speed, said the CJI.
'The Guidelines ensure compliance with audit and statutory obligations by defining appropriate retention periods based on fiscal, legal, and administrative relevance. They are aligned with national public record management standards,' he further continued.
The guidelines were stated to have been borne out of detailed consultations among Registrars and officials of the Registry.
As per the issued guidelines, original submission notes or paper books bearing signatures of the Chief Justice of India and judges of the Supreme Court are to be preserved permanently. Policy files, office orders and circular files were to be preserved permanently.
In case the records of one branch or wing were correlated with those of a different branch or records relating to the confidential branch, an intimation on 'the pendency of court case is to be sent to them as soon as the court case is received in the section', it said.
Destruction and retention of records by the relevant branches should be carried out after due approval from the registrar concerned, it further said. (ANI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We are 60': Michelle on divorce rumors, explains why she's rarely seen with Barack Obama
‘We are 60': Michelle on divorce rumors, explains why she's rarely seen with Barack Obama

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

‘We are 60': Michelle on divorce rumors, explains why she's rarely seen with Barack Obama

Michelle and Barack Obama (ANI) Former US first lady Michelle Obama has once again addressed the rumours surrounding her marriage with former President Barack Obama, saying the reason behind them seldom being photographed together is simply because they're 'too old for Instagram". 'The fact that people don't see me going out on a date with my husband sparks rumors of the end of our marriage,' 61-year-old Obama told NPR podcast host Rachel Martin. 'It's like, 'OK, so we don't Instagram every minute of our lives. We are 60. We're 60, y'all,'' she said. 'You just are not gonna know what we're doing every minute of the day.' The former first lady explained that she deliberately went against expectations by choosing not to attend high-profile events, such as former President Jimmy Carter's funeral and President Donald Trump's inauguration, and acknowledged that she had to 'own it' when her absence drew backlash and further fueled speculation about problems in her marriage. 'One of the major decisions I made this year was to stay put and not attend funerals and inaugurations and all the things that I'm supposed to attend,' she said. 'That was a part of me using my ambition to say, 'Let me define what I want to do, apart from what I'm supposed to do, what the world expects of me.' And I have to own that. Those are my choices,' she added, acknowledging that her choice to stay away had sparked criticism. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo 'Whatever the backlash was, I had to sit in it and own it. But I didn't regret it, you know? It's my life now, and I can say that, now,' she said. Michelle Obama has spoken candidly about her family and marriage challenges on her podcast, IMO, which she co-hosts with her brother, Craig Robinson. She also shared how she felt the need to scale back her personal ambitions as both a working mother and the first lady. 'As a working mother, I - you know, I think all of that stuff, it kind of cut my ambitions short a little bit. Because I had to make a set of decisions, 'OK, my husband's over here, I've got these kids over here. I don't know if I can afford to be ambitious right now. So I have to take a step back,'' she said. Michelle Obama has previously responded to the rumors about her marriage, firmly stating that if they were true, she wouldn't remain silent. Last month on a podcast "The Diary of a CEO' Obama told the host Steven Barlett, 'If I were having problems with my husband, everybody would know about it. My brother would know it. I'd be problem-solving in public. I'm not a martyr,' she said. Amid ongoing divorce rumors, the Obamas made a public appearance last month, enjoying a date at the upscale Lowell Hotel restaurant in Midtown Manhattan, and were also spotted looking affectionate during another dinner outing in Washington, DC, back in April.

'Water Won't Go Anywhere,' Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil Reiterates India's Stance on Indus Waters Treaty
'Water Won't Go Anywhere,' Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil Reiterates India's Stance on Indus Waters Treaty

India.com

time2 hours ago

  • India.com

'Water Won't Go Anywhere,' Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil Reiterates India's Stance on Indus Waters Treaty

Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil on Thursday reaffirmed India's position that it will not lift the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, stating that the water under the treaty will not go anywhere. Addressing a press conference in New Delhi, Paatil said, "The water won't go anywhere. He "Bilawal Bhutto) had threatened of blood and water flowing but we are not scared of such hollow threats," he to Pakistan People's Party Chief Bilawal Bhutto's remarks on the Indus Water Treaty, he sais India will not be threatened by false or aggressive added, "Earlier, Bilawal Bhutto also gave a threat that if water won't flow, blood will flow. I want to say that we won't be intimidated by such threats. Ham aisi gidar dhamkiyon se darte nahi" Regarding the Indus Water Treaty, CR Patil stated, "This decision belongs to the Indian government. Whatever decision is taken will only benefit the nation." During a media briefing on the 11 years of the Modi government, Patil highlighted the government's achievements and work done by the Jal Shakti Ministry. He mentioned, "Under PM Modi's leadership, our country has been growing... This is the first government that thinks for all sections of society... Our farmers are getting direct transfer benefits." Patil also spoke about the government's efforts to conserve and effectively use water for the country's benefit, stating that a Rs 501 crore grant has been received for the Jal Jeevan Mission and the ministry is actively working on its implementation. Earlier, an important source told ANI that the Indian government has decided to divert water meant for Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty for use in four Indian states, Rajasthan, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi. The Jal Shakti Ministry is working on infrastructure development at a war-footing level to implement this decision. The ministry aims to ensure that not a single drop of water meant for Pakistan goes to waste. Instead, it will be utilised to meet the water needs of four states, Rajasthan, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi. These states will benefit from the diverted water, addressing their water shortages, sources added. This initiative aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement that "Desh ka pani desh ke haq me bahega ("India's water will flow in India's favour")". The Jal Shakti Ministry has been working towards this goal under the guidance and supervision of Home Minister Amit Shah. Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil held several meetings at the Jal Shakti Ministry to review and discuss the Indus Water Treaty with officials. (With ANI inputs)

Constitution above all three democracy wings, says CJI Gavai
Constitution above all three democracy wings, says CJI Gavai

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Constitution above all three democracy wings, says CJI Gavai

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Wednesday said the Constitution of India is supreme, and all three wings of our democracy - the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary- are under the Constitution of CJI said this on Wednesday at a private event in his hometown of Amravati in eastern might be mentioned here that Vice President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar last month had remarked that the judiciary should not encroach on the role of other April, the Vice President had said that the Parliament is supreme and MPs are the ultimate masters of the Constitution. Dhankhar had further said that "there cannot be any authority above them".The VP had further raised questions over the remit of the Supreme Court within the framework of the government as defined in the at a Delhi University event in April, the Vice President had also said that "every word spoken by a constitutional functionary is guided by supreme national interest".CJI Gavai, on Wednesday, said that "there is always a discussion as to which wing of democracy - executive, legislature or judiciary - is supreme. Many say and believe Parliament is supreme but for me it is the Constitution".He added "neither the Parliament, nor the Executive nor the judiciary are supreme. It is only the Constitution of India which is supreme. All the wings are under the Constitution (of India)".Referring to a judgment passed by the top court on the foundation of the 'Basic Structure' doctrine, CJI Gavai said Parliament has the power to amend, but it cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution.A judge does not become independent just by passing orders against the government, the CJI added."A judge should always remember that we have a duty, and we are custodians of the rights of citizens and constitutional values and principles. We don't just have power, but a duty is cast upon us," CJI Gavai said on Wednesday.A judge should not be guided by what people will say or feel about their judgment, he said."We have to think independently. What people will say cannot become a part of our decision-making process," CJI Gavai added. The top judge also asserted that he always let his judgments and work speak, and always stood by the fundamental rights enshrined in the referring to his judgment against " bulldozer justice ", he said the right to shelter is supreme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store