Satellite images indicate severe damage to Fordow, but doubts remain about below-ground destruction
A closer satellite view shows holes and craters on a ridge at the Fordow underground complex after the US struck the underground nuclear facility on June 22. PHOTO: REUTERS
A closer satellite view shows the ridge at Fordow underground complex after the US struck the underground nuclear facility on June 22. PHOTO: REUTERS
A combination picture shows satellite images over the Fordow underground complex before and after the US struck the nuclear facility on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS
WASHINGTON - Commercial satellite imagery indicates the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged - and possibly destroyed - the deeply-buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but there was no confirmation, experts said on June 22.
'They just punched through with these MOPs,' said Mr David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector who heads the Institute for Science and International Security, referring to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the US said it dropped. 'I would expect that the facility is probably toast.'
But confirmation of the below-ground destruction could not be determined, noted Mr Decker Eveleth, an associate researcher with the CNA Corporation who specialises in satellite imagery. The hall containing hundreds of centrifuges is 'too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery,' he said.
To defend against attacks such as the one conducted by US forces early on June 22, Iran buried much of its nuclear programme in fortified sites deep underground, including into the side of a mountain at Fordow.
Satellite images show six holes where the bunker-busting bombs appear to have penetrated the mountain, and then ground that looks disturbed and covered in dust.
The United States and Israel have said they intend to halt Tehran's nuclear programme. But a failure to completely destroy its facilities and equipment could mean Iran could more easily restart the weapons program that US intelligence and the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) say it shuttered in 2003.
'Unusual activity'
Several experts also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the US strike and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the US and UN nuclear inspectors.
They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing 'unusual activity' at Fordow on June 19 and June 20, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance of the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on June 22 that most of the near weapons-grade 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack.
'I don't think you can with great confidence do anything but set back their nuclear programme by maybe a few years,' said Mr Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. 'There's almost certainly facilities that we don't know about.'
Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat and member of the Senate intelligence committee who said he had been reviewing intelligence every day, expressed the same concern.
'My big fear right now is that they take this entire programme underground, not physically underground, but under the radar,' he told NBC News. 'Where we tried to stop it, there is a possibility that this could accelerate it.'
Iran long has insisted that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
But in response to Israel's attacks, Iran's parliament is threatening to withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the cornerstone of the international system that went into force in 1970 to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, ending cooperation with the IAEA.
'The world is going to be in the dark about what Iran may be doing,' said Mr Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association advocacy group.
'Double tap'
Reuters spoke to four experts who reviewed Maxar Technologies satellite imagery of Fordow showing six neatly spaced holes in two groups in the mountain ridge beneath which the hall containing the centrifuges is believed to be located.
General Dan Caine, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that seven B-2 bombers dropped 14 GBU-57/B MOPs, 30,000-pound precision-guided bombs designed to drive up to 200 feet (61 metres) into hardened underground facilities like Fordow, according to a 2012 congressional report.
General Caine said initial assessments indicated that the sites suffered extremely severe damage, but declined to speculate about whether any nuclear facilities remained intact.
Mr Eveleth said the Maxar imagery of Fordow and Mr Caine's comments indicated that the B-2s dropped an initial load of six MOPs on Fordow, followed by a 'double tap' of six more in the exact same spots.
The US strike, dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, also targeted Tehran's main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, he said, and struck in Isfahan, the location of the country's largest nuclear research centre. There are other nuclear-related sites near the city.
Israel had already struck Natanz and the Isfahan Nuclear Research Centre in its 10-day war with Iran.
Mr Albright said in a post on X that Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery showed that US Tomahawk cruise missiles severely damaged a uranium facility at Isfahan and an impact hole above the underground enrichment halls at Natanz reportedly caused by a Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bomb that 'likely destroyed the facility'.
He questioned the US use of cruise missiles in Isfahan, saying that those weapons could not penetrate a tunnel complex near the main nuclear research centre believed to be even deeper than Fordow. The IAEA said the tunnel entrances 'were impacted'.
He noted that Iran recently informed the IAEA that it planned to install a new uranium enrichment plant in Isfahan.
'There may be 2,000 to 3,000 more centrifuges that were slated to go into this new enrichment plant,' he said. 'Where are they?' REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next
The past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. PHOTO: AFP Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON – For some families who gathered this weekend at Fort Benning in Georgia, the past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. On June 20 , a group of Army enlistees graduated from basic training. On J une 21 , President Donald Trump bombed Iran. On June 22 , service members and their loved ones pondered an uncertain future. 'People can lose their life, so I'm worried,' said Ms Michele Bixby, 24, of upstate New York, whose brother had just graduated. 'But it's what he wanted to do; it's what he loves to do. He's going to move forward with it no matter what.' One day after the administration announced it had carried out airstrikes at three nuclear sites in Iran, the mood in some communities around military bases on US soil varied from firm support to bitter disagreement. But one sentiment stood out among those interviewed: concern for the safety of America's troops everywhere. No one knows how the strikes on Iran could affect service members. Mr Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, emphasised on June 22 that the administration did not want an open-ended war. But Iranian leaders have vowed to retaliate, and US military installations in the Middle East, with more than 40,000 active-duty troops and civilians employed by the Pentagon, are already potential targets. That reality, along with the potential repercussions for the entire military, was on the minds of many people around US bases at home, even as service members accepted that reality as part of the job. 'A lot of the families around here are quickly realizing this is a real threat; this is something we need to be worried about,' said Ms Meghan Gilles, 37, a self-described military brat who works in the Army Reserve's human resources division at Fort Campbell in Kentucky, a training site and home to the 101st Airborne Division. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, Blake Carlson, a 23-year-old Army National Guard combat medic who was visiting from Austin, Texas, said that he could be deployed. 'It's what I signed up for,' he said. 'If I have to, I'll do it.' But his mother and brother hoped the country would not be dragged into the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Some people who were interviewed stood by Mr Trump and agreed with his assertions that the targeted bombings were unlikely to lead to a wider conflict. Mr Carlson's mother, Ms Tonya Carlson, said she hoped the attack would force Iran to negotiate with the United States. Others stood by Mr Trump's statement that Iran posed an imminent threat – a point that contradicts recent national security assessments. 'Iran doesn't need to have nuclear weapons, for sure,' said Mr Tony Saluzzo, 72, a former combat engineer who served in the US offensive against Iraq and lives near Fort Campbell. Mr James Arthur, a 42-year-old retired Coast Guard captain who lives north of Tampa, Florida, and was visiting the Air Force Armament Museum at the Eglin base, said that the Iran airstrikes happened 'about two decades too late'. Other former service members castigated Trump for bombing Iran without congressional approval. The Constitution's framers included language to ensure that wars would not be entered rashly, said Mr Paul Oyler, a Navy veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and who lives near the Naval Air Station Lemoore in California, where he was based while on active duty. He said he would have agreed with the airstrikes if there were a proven, credible threat to the region, but 'I don't have any reason to believe that Iran was in possession of actual nuclear weapons.' Mr Denver Thiery, 30, who works on military maintenance contracts and lives in Trenton, Kentucky, near Fort Campbell, said he would remain firmly behind Trump. But he also acknowledged that it was difficult to know exactly what capabilities Iran possessed. 'I don't know the truth of what's going on,' he said. 'I don't know if they really have nuclear warheads or not. I don't know what I can support anymore.' Ms Meghan Gilles , the reservist, whose father is a veteran and whose husband is an active-duty serviceman, was troubled by the decision to edge the country to war at the very moment the government was cutting funding for Veterans Affairs. The administration is taking away a lot of benefits for veterans and 'then just sending them off again to be the world police,' Ms Gilles said. If the current conflict worsens, military members and veterans said, they would put aside their disagreements over Mr Trump and support one another. But one veteran lamented what he said such a scenario would ultimately mean. 'I learned from my time on active duty that war is devastating,' Navy veteran Oyler said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


AsiaOne
40 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
China says US attack on Iran has damaged its credibility, World News
HONG KONG — China said the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has damaged Washington's credibility and Beijing was concerned that the situation "may go out of control", its state broadcaster reported, following a UN Security Council meeting on Sunday (June 22). President Donald Trump said the US had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong said parties should restrain the "impulse of force, avoid exacerbating conflicts and adding fuel to the fire," according to the state broadcaster CCTV. Fu said parties, especially Israel, "should immediately cease fire to prevent the situation from escalating and avoid the spillover of war." Iran was hurt "but the United States credibility was also damaged- both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations," Fu said. State media commentary late on Sunday said the US move was extremely dangerous and provocative. The Global Times newspaper in an opinion piece, said external military interference would never bring peace, and only "deepen regional hatred and trauma." Separately China's embassy in Iran said late on Sunday that most Chinese citizens in Iran had been evacuated safely, and those remaining were not in high-risk areas. [[nid:719366]]

AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Iran must not take destabilising action, European leaders say, World News
FRANKFURT — The leaders of Britain, France and Germany on Sunday (June 22) urged Iran not to take any actions that would further destabilise the region following US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities overnight. "We have consistently been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and can no longer pose a threat to regional security," the government heads of Germany, Britain, France, known as the E3, said in a joint statement. "We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear programme. We stand ready to contribute to that goal in coordination with all parties." The E3 also confirmed their support for the security of Israel, the statement said. US forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites, President Donald Trump said late on Saturday, warning Tehran it would face more devastating attacks if it does not agree to peace. "We will continue our joint diplomatic efforts to defuse tensions and ensure the conflict does not intensify and spread further," the E3 statement said. [[nid:719363]]