Alice Weidel, unlikely queen of German far-right AfD
As an openly gay politician who lives with her Sri Lanka-born partner in Switzerland, Alice Weidel was an unusual choice to many to lead Germany's far-right and anti-immigration AfD into Sunday's elections.
To her legions of political foes, Weidel serves as a "fig leaf" for a party that rails against asylum seekers, Islam and multiculturalism and some of whose top figures have voiced revisionist views on Germany's Nazi past.
On Sunday the 46-year-old, who says Margaret Thatcher is her political idol, looks set to propel the Moscow-friendly AfD to a record result, with polls predicting it will win second place at around 20 percent.
Ahead of the election, Weidel has basked in the vocal support of US President Donald Trump's key allies -- especially the tech billionaire Elon Musk -- as well as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Often sporting a pearl necklace and a trouser suit, she was the first AfD politician to be invited to a pre-election TV debate where she sparred with Chancellor Olaf Scholz and his main rival, the conservative Friedrich Merz.
All of this has contributed to the "normalisation" of a party, said Der Spiegel magazine, after the AfD was long kept at arm's length by the majority of German voters, and protested against by thousands on the streets.
"Under Alice Weidel, the party has lost its horror for many voters, and Weidel's numerous TV appearances have accelerated the normalisation of the AfD," it said.
Weidel in January took part in a livestream on X with Musk, who has enthusiastically supported the AfD as the only party that can "save Germany".
In the meandering conversation, they railed against "woke" policies before chatting about Musk's plans to settle Mars and Germany's dark history, with Weidel insisting Hitler was a "communist".
- 'Uncrowned queen' -
In February, Weidel was invited to a private meeting with US Vice President JD Vance on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference.
Vance had boosted the AfD in a blistering speech there in which he called on Germany to drop its long-standing "firewall" that aims to isolate the AfD.
Seeking support from foreign right-wing leaders, Weidel also recently made an appearance in Budapest with Orban, who described her as "the future of Germany".
"This election campaign has made it clear that (Weidel) is the uncrowned queen of the AfD," said Wolfgang Schroeder, a politics professor at Kassel University.
"Her visibility has grown enormously. This has also given her more power within her own party."
Weidel was born and educated in western Germany, making her an oddity in the AfD, whose core voter base is in the country's formerly communist east.
She later lived in China, working at Bank of China, before moving on to Goldman Sachs.
Weidel first joined the AfD in 2013, the year it was founded. Unlike many other early members who quit as it became more overtly xenophobic, she stayed.
Weidel represents a wing of the AfD that "aspires to an independent existence to the right of the conservatives, with the possibility of forming a coalition", said Schroeder.
As a West German and a gay woman, Weidel has had "some problems connecting with the ideology of her party", said political scientist Anna-Sophie Heinze from Trier University.
- 'Remigration' -
Der Spiegel said Weidel is "the perfect fig leaf" for the party, which is considered by Germany's domestic security service to be right-wing extremist in parts.
"If someone accuses the AfD of being misogynistic, homophobic or racist, they can say they have Weidel, so the AfD cannot be all of those things, even though it is," the magazine said.
While Weidel has never hidden her relationship with her partner, with whom she is raising two sons, she has distanced herself from the broader LGBTQ movement.
At a party conference in January, she rejected accusations that she has failed to engage with the movement, charging that her critics "have no idea at all about the reality of my life".
"And I must honestly say that I will not tolerate any interference in my life or my family," she said.
Despite presenting a more moderate face for the far-right party, Weidel has not shied away from some of its most radical positions when firing up party members.
At the AfD congress, Weidel vowed that a government that includes the AfD would force the "total closing of Germany's borders" as well as "large-scale repatriations".
"I say to you quite honestly, if this must be called remigration, then let it be called remigration."
clp-fec/fz/gv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What's happening to Harvard happened in Hungary first
Shattuck, currently a professor of the practice of diplomacy at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, has deep experience in and knowledge of politics, diplomacy and academia. In the 1980s, he was a vice president at Harvard, responsible for the university's relations with government, and taught at Harvard Law School and the Kennedy School. He was an assistant secretary of state for democracy and human rights in the Clinton administration, served as the US ambassador to the Czech Republic, and from 2001 to 2009 was chief executive of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. In 2009, he became the fourth president of Central European University in Budapest, which was founded by billionaire philanthropist George Soros in the heady days after the Soviet Union and communism collapsed, with an ambitious mission to help revive academic freedom in eastern Europe. Advertisement Shattuck's tenure as the president of CEU coincided with that of Hungary's prime minister Viktor Orban, the authoritarian whom Trump has described as his favorite European leader. The As Vice President JD Vance put it, when it comes to reshaping higher education, 'I think his way has to be the model for us.' Advertisement Shattuck said Orban's attacks on universities in general, and CEU in particular, was in keeping with his populist ideology. 'His principal appeal was to a rural constituency, an anti-elite appeal,' Shattuck said. 'The elites were in Budapest. They were running the universities.' Because Hungarian universities rely on government funding, Orban was able to control them with relative ease. Privately funded by the Hungarian-born Soros, a bogeyman in right-wing circles whom Orban accused of importing left-wing ideology, CEU presented a more difficult challenge. While the Trump administration has framed its 'He certainly didn't do everything at once the way Trump has been doing,' he said. 'Orban did this over a number of years. He didn't use a series of executive orders. He used various pressures from accrediting agencies. As time went on, it became clear he wanted to shut down parts of the university.' In CEU's case, Orban demanded action in three specific areas of academic disciplines: he wanted to abolish gender studies, end the study of immigration issues, and to dramatically alter the way the Holocaust was taught. Shattuck said gender studies and research into immigration conflicted with Orban's vision of Hungary as a Christian nation. Orban rose to power as a vocal opponent of immigration, especially that from Muslim nations. 'Most disturbing,' Shattuck said, 'was that Orban began to characterize the Holocaust as having been caused by outside forces in Germany whereas history and scholarship demonstrated quite clearly that Hungarian participation in the Holocaust was local, not imposed by Hitler. You can imagine how controversial that was.' Advertisement One of Shattuck's earliest clashes with Orban was over CEU's Institute of Advanced Study, a post-graduate program in collaboration with other universities. The Hungarian government had supplied a building for the program, but the Orban administration abruptly ended that. 'They made it clear they wanted to shut it down. We wanted to keep it,' Shattuck said. 'But there were no government funds used, so the institute continued.' A few months later, Shattuck said, he was summoned to the education ministry, where he said officials told him if he didn't shut the program he would be accused of stealing state assets. But there were no state assets involved, and the Obama administration intervened, asserting that the US government backed CEU's autonomy and independence. But if CEU won that battle, the war continued. To hold off Orban, CEU tried to emphasize its value to Hungary. Shattuck said school provided a platform for diverse points of view, including ministers from the Orban government. 'We explained the economic value of the university to Hungary, taking no taxpayer dollars in our case,' he said. 'We increased the number of Hungarian students. We worked with other Hungarian universities.' But, Shattuck said, he drew a red line. 'If they wanted to work with us, fine, but we would not allow the government to make or mandate academic decisions,' he said. 'So we defended gender studies, immigration studies, history.' Harvard President Alan Garber is trying to draw a similar red line as the Trump administration tries to dictate the university's business. Shattuck said he has talked to Garber, offering advice to him and other Harvard officials framed by his experience with the Orban government. Advertisement He gives Garber high marks for 'He's reforming and changing the model, the way Harvard operates, providing broader access and diversifying the political opinions of faculty. These are things a university can and should do,' Shattuck said. 'My advice has been, draw the red line and stick with it. But also be very reasonable about ways to operate the university in the community. He (Garber) is doing that. Once the government starts making decisions about what can be taught and learned and discussed, that's when we've crossed into an authoritarian world.' In Hungary, despite CEU's best efforts, Orban kept up the pressure, eventually Shattuck doesn't believe Harvard will be forced to relocate to another country in its showdown with the Trump administration. But he said it's important that other universities and civil society in general stand in solidarity with Harvard and academic freedom. He notes that 'Two things to say about rising authoritarians,' Shattuck said. 'The only way to defeat them is to come together, and bring together people who are otherwise competitors. The second thing is to take Maria Ressa's advice.' Paraphrasing Ressa, the Filipino journalist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Shattuck said: 'You have to stand up now, because now is when your strength is greatest.' Advertisement Kevin Cullen is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A lingering Musk: Will ex-aide Elon get up Trump's nose?
Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill has careened into an Elon Musk-shaped brick wall, complicating its passage into law and risking a schism between the most powerful man in the world and the wealthiest. The US president's "big, beautiful bill" -- the centerpiece of his domestic agenda -- could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. But the budget-busting package is getting a rough ride in Congress over proposals to fund an extension of his 2017 tax relief by piling on debt and cutting social welfare for the poorest Americans. Enter tech billionaire Musk, who dropped a nuclear bomb on the 1,100-page blueprint at a crucial stage in negotiations on Tuesday, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk, who last week ended his brief advisory tenure as Trump's costcutter-in-chief, tore into the bill's exploding deficits and runaway spending in a prolonged denouncement. The South African-born tycoon has voiced concerns before, but his language was much more combative, coming across as a declaration of war on the Republican Party, if not Trump himself. The White House brushed off the criticism, saying Trump "already knows where Elon Musk stood," but the remarks will likely have gotten under the president's skin. - 'Lennon and McCartney' - The stakes could hardly be higher for Trump, who has made clear, with signature hyperbole, that he sees his bill as "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed." He has yet to respond personally to Musk's rant -- sustained over six hours, across 13 posts and reposts on his social media platform X -- and Washington watchers aren't necessarily expecting a public falling-out. Behind the scenes, a careful circling of the wagons is underway, with pro-Trump pundits under orders to refrain from trashing Musk and instead frame his broadside as what Politico called "principled self-interest." Still, for analysts contacted by AFP, there may be choppier waters ahead. "It's the Lennon and McCartney of modern politics. Two egos, one spotlight, and a fragile alliance built on mutual benefits," said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. "The moment either one sees more upside in conflict than cooperation, the breakup goes public." But political consultant and former Senate aide Andrew Koneschusky, a key player in negotiations over Trump's 2017 tax cuts, believes the Republican leader has nothing to gain by biting back. "Musk has more money. Musk's megaphone, X, is bigger than Trump's. And Musk was deeply embedded in the administration for months," he told AFP. "There's no telling what Musk heard or saw that could be embarrassing or problematic for the administration if the two were to go to war." - 'Bromance' - Crucially, Musk lit a fire under right-wing lawmakers who voiced concerns over debt but cleared the bill for Senate consideration anyway -- almost the entire 220-strong House Republican group. Musk, who spent around $280 million getting Trump elected, undoubtedly has the cash to make his mark on the midterms and in the internal Republican candidate selection process. And the de facto leader of America's "tech bro" community demonstrated his political firepower in a single tweet in December that blew up a government funding bill that had enjoyed bipartisan support. His take on the deficit implications of Trump's proposals is evidenced by copious independent research and he was immediately backed by some fiscal hawks in the Senate. Continued interventions by Musk over government policy could be an ongoing headache for Trump, as he bids to shepherd his policy priorities through razor-thin Republican majorities in Congress. But cheerleaders of the package -- and independent analysts contacted by AFP -- believe the Tesla magnate may discover that his celebrity in Trumpworld relies entirely on the say-so of its mercurial chieftain. "Musk may have had influence in December when his bromance with Trump was in full bloom," said Donald Nieman, a political analyst and professor at Binghamton University in New York state. "But his break with Trump and his massive unpopularity with voters makes it easy for lawmakers to ignore him. If anything, it helps Trump by distancing him from a man who has become a pariah." ft/bjt
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Before-and-After Satellite Images Reveal Russian ‘Pearl Harbor' Devastation
Newly available satellite imagery reveals the devastating aftermath of Ukraine's long-range drone strike on multiple Russian airbases in what pro-Moscow bloggers are calling "Russia's Pearl Harbor." The operation, codenamed "Operation Spiderweb," saw the deployment of 117 drones that targeted at least four strategic sites deep inside Russian territory. The drones were smuggled across the border, placed in wooden containers with removable roofs fixed on trucks. The Belaya air base in Irkutsk Oblast, more than 2,500 miles from Ukraine's border, bore the brunt of the assault. Ukrainian intelligence reported the destruction of at least 13 aircraft across all targeted sites. Satellite images provided to Newsweek from Maxar Technologies shows rows of strategic bombers reduced to scorched wreckage. A wide-angle before-and-after image of Belaya air base shows intact bomber aircraft in revetments replaced by charred remains and blackened craters. Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) stated that the drone barrage disabled 34 percent of Russia's cruise missile bomber fleet and inflicted an estimated $7 billion in damage. Among the aircraft confirmed destroyed at Belaya were at least three Tu-95MS bombers and one Tu-22M3 aircraft. Others were damaged but not obliterated, according to Ukrainian officials. A close-up image shows a cluster of Tu-95MS bombers with visible fire damage and blast debris surrounding their parking spots. Satellite images that captured the damage at multiple airfields show previously pristine runways now marked by burn scars and aircraft fragments. A detailed damage shot captures melted fuselage sections, crumpled wings, and residual fire damage across the concrete apron. Russia's Ministry of Defense admitted that aircraft caught fire at multiple sites but framed the strikes as "terrorist attacks" by the Kyiv regime. In a statement to Tass, the ministry said some drones were intercepted and added that several perpetrators had been detained. It denied any casualties among servicemen or civilians. Other airbases targeted included Olenya in Murmansk Oblast and Diaghilev in Ryazan Oblast. The Kyiv Independent cited Ukrainian sources who said the drones were smuggled into Russia in trucks outfitted with wooden cabins and deployed from beneath removable roofs. Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War noted that the operation "will likely force Moscow to reconfigure its air defenses," possibly expanding coverage and introducing mobile air defense groups to counter future drone threats. Open-source analysis has suggested one A-50 spy plane was damaged or destroyed at Ivanovo air base, as well as four Tu-95 aircraft and three Tu-22M3 bombers at the Belaya air base, the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank said on Monday. The drone strikes came on the eve of fresh rounds of face-to-face talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Turkey. Initial discussions last month produced the largest prisoner swap of the war but little shuffling toward a peace deal that U.S. President Donald Trump vowed to broker. Related Articles 'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Fuels Fears Over Chinese Cargo Ships at US PortsSteve Bannon Says Lindsey Graham Should Be Arrested Over Ukraine SupportWhat 'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Says About Trump's Golden DomeOperation Spiderweb: How Ukraine's Daring Top Secret Drone Assault Unfolded 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
