Mayor: One lesson of the OKC bombing is that evil can and must be resisted
Editor's Note: This commentary is adapted from the speech delivered by Mayor Holt at the 30th anniversary of the Oklahoma City Bombing on April 19, 2025.
Matthew 6:34 states 'Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.'
We humans talk a lot about tomorrow. Macbeth was weary of tomorrow. The Bible is quite concerned that we worry too much about tomorrow. But I would argue that most of the time, tomorrow represents hope. It did for Scarlett O'Hara and Fleetwood Mac. Tomorrow is a blank canvas. And though no one is promised tomorrow, we each depend on it, and we hold it close, like a lottery ticket. Tomorrow may bring us a better day than today. On some days, it feels like tomorrow almost has to be better than today.
On April 19th, 1995, on one level, the people of Oklahoma City certainly had to feel that way. How could tomorrow not be better than today? But on another level, we all knew the sorrows of April 19th would still join us tomorrow. Hundreds of families knew there was someone who was going to be just as gone tomorrow as they were today.
There have been nearly 11,000 tomorrows since the bomb went off. As a city, those tomorrows have in fact brought all the hope and promise we could have ever imagined. One day of darkness has unquestionably been followed by thirty years of light here in Oklahoma City.
We have invested billions of dollars into our quality of life, often fueled by unifying community choices that transcended partisanship or other things that might divide us. We are drawing new residents from around the country; we're now America's 20th-largest city. Our economy is diversified, our low unemployment rate is on a record streak, and new developments open every month.
We have a global identity that is built on a foundation of success and/or basketball, but definitely not a bombing. We have launched our Thunder into what we hope is a historic NBA playoff run. And in three years, we will welcome people from around the world as we stage seven events of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. This month, our city turned 136 years old, and these last 30 years have unquestionably represented our city's golden age. No one who knows and loves Oklahoma City would dispute that statement.
On the other hand, for those who lost so much on April 19th, 1995, for those who survived, and for those changed forever, those 11,000 tomorrows have been a mixed-bag. Even as tomorrow has brought weddings and births, graduations and success, there has always been an empty chair, or a traumatic memory, or a dark realization of the evil that humans can do. For each of you, I hope this community has done and will continue to do all that it can. I think I use an aspirational word like 'hope' there because to us, just standing with you can feel a bit inadequate. We want to return your loved one, we want to make your pain go away. But though we can't, I know each of us believes that our role in the Oklahoma Standard is to do all we can.
As your mayor, I pledge that no priority in this city will ever stand between us and that commitment to you and your family who lost so much. It was a commitment originally made by President Clinton, but we all co-sign. Tomorrow is often a symbol of hope, but it is can also be a word of commitment, a reflection that a promise will endure into the future. We all recommit on this 30th anniversary that we will stand with you for as many tomorrows as it takes.
I want to also state a related commitment that will outlive all milestones, and all of us.
Over eight anniversary addresses, I have spoken in favor of love, empathy, truth and better conversations. I have asked us to embrace pluralism, to look past things that can be used to divide us, like political opinions or ethnicities or religion, and asked us to instead consider the infinite ways in which we are alike. I have spoken against dehumanization and words of division, and I have asked us to gaze into the Memorial's reflecting pool and consider whether the person that you see is living up to the Oklahoma Standard in their own words, and social media posts, and actions. I have stated that this obligation starts with us as citizens of Oklahoma City, but that it should apply to everyone in this entire country, especially and including elected officials and all those in the public eye.
I have also spoken repeatedly these last eight years about the passage of time. It's on my mind as this 30th anniversary is a milestone in the measurement of time.
Thirty years is an inflection point, no doubt. Ten years is the blink of an eye. Twenty years is still less than a generation. But 30 years hits different. Many of us now have to admit that there are more yesterdays for us than there are tomorrows.
Perhaps that reality reminds us that in addition to the obligation we have to the families most directly affected, we also have another related obligation in Oklahoma City, and this obligation is timeless and will outlive us. And that is the obligation to speak and act against the forces that created the environment for this act of evil, and really, for all acts of evil across human history.
Even when the personal remembrances have faded, the people of this city will still have a scar in our downtown, a place where people used to go to work, serving their neighbors. The site of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building is now peaceful and shaded by tall beautiful trees, but the jagged edges of concrete that surround it remind us that it is a scar, a symbol of what humans can do to each other when do they not love each other, when they do not seek to understand each other, when they fail to acknowledge our shared humanity, when they dehumanize each other, when they entertain conspiracy theories, when they are willing to act outside of peaceful democratic processes even to commit violence, and when they let extremism rot their brains to the point where even a child is a soldier in their imagined war.
Humans are highly unlikely to ever fully shed our capacity for evil, but evil can be answered and kept at bay. Evil must be answered. And the residents of this city must always be the protectors of a commitment to do so.
Perhaps on this 30th anniversary, like a relay runner in one of our memorial marathons, we are beginning to pass the baton of that commitment. And that baton of commitment will be kept by P.J. Allen, Rebecca and Brandon Denny, Joseph Webb, Nekia McCloud and Chris Nguyen, the six children who survived the bombing. It will be kept by Clint Seidl, Krista Doll, Dina Abulon, Hilary Johnson, Dionce Thomas, and the 249 children who lost one or both parents that day. Those are the youngest among us who bore direct witness.
But this commitment will also be kept by those who are too young to have borne witness. It will be carried by the 38 members of the Memorial Teen Board. It will be kept by my kids, George and Maggie, who are now almost the age I was when the bombing happened. They host a video about the bombing for middle school kids you can find on YouTube. It will be kept by your kids and your grandkids. It will be kept by the people who will stand here on the 60th anniversary and the 90th anniversary, when everyone here will turn towards a wheelchair on stage and ask the last remaining survivor what it was like. Even then, when tens of thousands of tomorrows will have passed, this commitment by the people of Oklahoma City to stand against evil must endure.
I thank each of you and those who will follow us for your commitment, for it will require all the tomorrows that lie ahead.
David Holt is mayor of Oklahoma City.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Our shared humanity must shine forth as we remember the past | Opinion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stephen A. Smith says he doesn't want to run for office. His commentary suggests otherwise
Stephen A. Smith hasn't always been known for his hot takes on political issues. His reputation was built in sports journalism, especially basketball. But now, when he's not making appearances as an NBA analyst for ESPN, he's either on his own show or others sharing his political opinion, criticizing across party lines. And people have noticed. During a guest appearance on Jon Stewart's 'The Daily Show' on Monday, he was asked why he's more recently 'pushing those buttons' and thrusting himself into the political spotlight, where people may view him as a potential political candidate. 'Is that something that appeals to the vanity? Is it something that appeals to your principle, to your morality? Where do you take that interest?' Stewart asked Smith. 'People think I'm interested in being an elected official,' he said. 'I have no desire to be that.' He believes his talents and passions lie in remaining a commentator who can push against either political party's narrative without pressure from constituents. 'I want to be a major player in terms of a voice and a conduit for change. I want to make sure that people know that the BS has got to stop,' he added. 'I believe white, black, and everything in between, society as a whole, by and large, are a lot of great God-fearing individuals that can get along just fine,' he said. 'I think the politicians in this country have served to divide us and paint us against one another for their own selfish deeds, and I think that they have contributed to the demise of this country, so I don't mind calling them out at all.' Many wonder if that's completely true. Just a month ago, he was criticizing Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' 'Fighting Oligarchy Tour' with New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on his show, saying that if they were to become the face of Democratic Party leadership, then he might need to step in. 'Are we supposed to leave it to Bernie Sanders and AOC?' he asked his viewers, given 'how socialistic they are in their thinking.' In the same episode, he called himself an independent and said that he 'has no desire to be on either side' of the political spectrum, even though he voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris. 'When I think about me, and I think about me running for president of the United States, let me reemphasize that I am woefully unqualified,' Smith said. But, added that if he were to be president, 'I would create a new lane, I'd be a centrist.' 'I want to work with both sides of the aisle. I'd have Democrats and Republicans in my Cabinet. They would be the ones butting heads and fighting, but their mandate would be to come to me with an idea that works for America.' 'It's about problem solving, it's about fixing the issues that really matter. It's about caring about all of America, not just a segment of our population,' Smith said.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Ducks ‘Les Misérables' Character Question, Internet Brutally Answers It For Him
Donald Trump hit a flat note Wednesday when pressed on 'Les Misérables,' the musical he's long praised as one of his favorites. Appearing on the red carpet ahead of a performance of the show at the Kennedy Center — the typically bipartisan institution which Trump has purged and controversially made himself chair — the president was asked by a reporter: 'Have you seen the musical before and do you identify more with Jean Valjean or Javert?' Valjean, the heroic protagonist, seeks redemption after 19 years in prison for stealing bread. Police inspector Javert, meanwhile, is utterly obsessed with law, order and punishment. Trump dodged the question. 'That's a tough one. The last part of that question, that's tough, I think,' he said, before turning to his wife, first lady Melania Trump, and saying: 'You better answer that one, honey.' 'I don't know,' he added. 'I've seen it, we've seen it a number of times. It's fantastic. I thought it was just about our first choice. That's why we got, and we have others coming — other great ones are coming.' Watch here: Trump's answer — or lack of one — quickly drew mockery on social media. Some critics compared it to when Trump dodged a question about his favorite Bible verse. Others asked if he actually knew the 'Les Mis' story, which centers on an anti-government uprising, at all. Many suggested he definitely identified as Javert. Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Trump's Latest Threat Maggie Haberman Sounds Alarm On How Trump Could Still Cling To Power After 2028 'Absolutely Despicable' Trump-Troops Rally Moment Sends Chill Down Critics' Spines Seth Meyers Shreds Trump's 'Les Misérables' Visit With A Show-Stopping Punch Line
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Ducks ‘Les Misérables' Character Question, Internet Brutally Answers It For Him
Donald Trump hit a flat note Wednesday when pressed on 'Les Misérables,' the musical he's long praised as one of his favorites. Appearing on the red carpet ahead of a performance of the show at the Kennedy Center — the typically bipartisan institution which Trump has purged and controversially made himself chair — the president was asked by a reporter: 'Have you seen the musical before and do you identify more with Jean Valjean or Javert?' Valjean, the heroic protagonist, seeks redemption after 19 years in prison for stealing bread. Police inspector Javert, meanwhile, is utterly obsessed with law, order and punishment. Trump dodged the question. 'That's a tough one. The last part of that question, that's tough, I think,' he said, before turning to his wife, first lady Melania Trump, and saying: 'You better answer that one, honey.' 'I don't know,' he added. 'I've seen it, we've seen it a number of times. It's fantastic. I thought it was just about our first choice. That's why we got, and we have others coming — other great ones are coming.' Watch here: Reporter: Do you identify more with Jean Valjean or Javert?Trump: That's tough. I don't know — Acyn (@Acyn) June 11, 2025 Trump's answer — or lack of one — quickly drew mockery on social media. Some critics compared it to when Trump dodged a question about his favorite Bible verse. Others asked if he actually knew the 'Les Mis' story at all. Many suggested he definitely identified as Javert. There's no way he knows either one of them. — Decoding Fox News (@DecodingFoxNews) June 11, 2025 Editor's note. Trump doesn't know who either Valjean or Javert are! — Janice Hough (@leftcoastbabe) June 12, 2025 He doesn't know who they are 😂 — Kathy (@gallymeroreboot) June 12, 2025 Reminds me of 'tell us your favorite Bible verse'... — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) June 11, 2025 This reminds me of the time Trump was asked by the Christian Broadcasting Network in 2015 if he preferred reading the New Testament or Old Testament and his answer made it clear he didn't know the difference and never cracked open either in his life. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 12, 2025 Javert, he is Javert — Geffrey Klein (@gyndok) June 12, 2025 "Which one puts kids in jail? I like that guy." — AbstractThreats (@Dreamtwister6) June 12, 2025 He's Javert if Javert was chasing Valjean for decades because he made fun of his spray tan. — Elias Toufexis (@EliasToufexis) June 12, 2025 Trump identifies with Javert — Brown Eyed Susan (@smc429) June 11, 2025 Well we know it's not Valjean… or right, it doesn't have a clue. — Lisa (@LisaMK2021) June 12, 2025 Do you identify with:A ex criminal who spent 19years trying to redeem the guy who became so obsessed with morals and law he lost sight of the morals and law he sought to hard. — Bad Elk Tales (@DarkelkTales) June 12, 2025 Valjean stole bread to survive. Trump stole power to stay out of prison. Not the same, bro. — Nikos Unity (@nikosunity) June 11, 2025 Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Trump's Latest Threat Maggie Haberman Sounds Alarm On How Trump Could Still Cling To Power After 2028 'Absolutely Despicable' Trump-Troops Rally Moment Sends Chill Down Critics' Spines Seth Meyers Shreds Trump's 'Les Misérables' Visit With A Show-Stopping Punch Line