logo
Trump's Hiring Freeze Throws Wildfire Fighters Into Disarray

Trump's Hiring Freeze Throws Wildfire Fighters Into Disarray

Yahoo13-02-2025

(Bloomberg) -- Federal firefighters have found their jobs on the chopping block as a result of US President Donald Trump's executive orders, with a hiring freeze simultaneously blocking reinforcements in the aftermath of the Los Angeles wildfires and ahead of the upcoming fire season.
Why American Mobility Ground to a Halt
Saudi Arabia's Neom Signs $5 Billion Deal for AI Data Center
SpaceX Bid to Turn Texas Starbase Into City Is Set for Vote in May
Cutting Arena Subsidies Can Help Cover Tax Cuts, Think Tank Says
Can Portland Turn a Corner?
'I know multiple people who were supposed to start work on Monday and were not able to,' said Rachel Granberg, a firefighter who serves as representative for the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE), in an interview this week. A US District Court judge on Wednesday cleared the way for Trump's buyout offers to millions of federal employees, overcoming a lawsuit by labor unions.
Granberg warned that without an exemption to the Trump administration's widespread hiring freeze, 'we're not going to have fire crews fully staffed.'
Potential reductions to the approximately 18,000 federal firefighters, who are trained to battle blazes deep inside forests as well as at the intersection of cities and nature, would come at a time when their work has never been more crucial. Rising temperatures are contributing to faster-burning fires and ensuring blazes occur more frequently and torch more land. Climate change has also extended the burning season by two months in the US since the 1970s.
Yet the ranks of firefighters haven't increased, and now reinforcements aren't on the way. The union representing federal firefighters said that job offers have been withdrawn due to the hiring freeze.'The LA fires may have had less destruction if the proper crews were fully staffed,' said Pat Bouman, a former federal firefighter who is now a member of the New York City Fire Department, referring to highly specialized 'hot shot' crews employed by the government.
'It's a wildly risky move to invite your firefighter workforce to leave in February, a few weeks before you expect fire season to ramp up,' said Rob Arnold, a union representative with NFFE.
Federal firefighters are spread out across five agencies: the US Forest Service, which is part of the Department of Agriculture, as well as the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs and Fish and Wildlife Service, which are part of the Interior Department. Crews from these agencies move around the country as fire hotspots shift throughout the year. For the US Southwest, fire season ramps up next month.
'Wildland firefighting positions are considered public safety positions,' said a spokesperson for the Forest Service, adding that the agency is working with the Office of Personnel Management on the wildland firefighting positions. A spokesperson for the Interior Department said it 'continues to review funding decisions to be consistent with the President's Executive Orders.'
Past federal hiring freezes have exempted firefighters. In a round of government job cuts in 2017, during the first Trump administration, firefighters weren't affected. This time is different, although the consequences of the 60-day freeze that started on Jan. 20 remain unclear. 'There is a lot of confusion,' Granberg said.
About half of all federal firefighters are currently employed as full-time workers, according to Granberg, while the other half are seasonal hires.
Granberg herself is impacted by the freeze: She's been a seasonal federal firefighter for the past 10 years and is a squad boss who manages helicopter crews. Because her paperwork needs to be renewed every year, her usual March start date is in limbo.
US Senator Adam Schiff, a Democratic from California, wrote a letter on Feb. 7 asking for an exemption for firefighters and 'to stop encouraging firefighters to resign,' noting that they had been deployed to stop the Los Angeles fires.
Firefighters on the job described thinning ranks even before the hiring freeze. 'Right now is the time of the year that the agencies are finalizing hiring and bringing people on,' said Alex Pawelczyk, a dispatcher for the US Forest Service and a representative for the NFFE. 'The few of us that are left are so stretched thin, people could be at risk.'
'Staffing levels are the No. 1 risk to firefighter safety,' he added. 'You burn people out, they don't operate safely.'
Warner Vanderheuel, another union representative and a battalion chief with more than two decades of experience, said worker exhaustion has already prompted what he described as mass resignations. 'We have employees who are supposed to start in March,' he said. 'I don't know if they have a job.'
For the majority of firefighters, who serve local communities, specialized training for wildland and urban-interface fires isn't provided. The International Association of Fire Fighters offers a class that costs $50,000 a course. Currently, funding for the training comes from grants and appropriations at the federal, state and local level.
The hiring freeze isn't the only new setback for federal firefighters. Retention pay originally made available by former President Joe Biden's administration to boost firefighter salaries is set to lapse in March. The loss of that money would cut compensation by as much as $20,000 per person.
For Keith Kelly, a Forest Service employee and member of the NFFE union, the loss of that cash would be 'catastrophic.' He and his wife are both federal firefighters who met on the job and have two children under the age of three. He's now trying to figure out how they will manage childcare costs if they lose it.
'That's where all of our cash goes,' he said.
--With assistance from Max Rivera.
Elon Musk's DOGE Is a Force Americans Can't Afford to Ignore
The Game Changer: How Ely Callaway Remade Golf
How Oura's Smart Ring Bridged the Gap From Tech Bros to Normies
How Silicon Valley Swung From Obama to Trump
Japan Perfected 7-Eleven. Why Can't the US Get It Right?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rallyers in Denver demonstrating against ICE arrests march down the middle of Lincoln Street
Rallyers in Denver demonstrating against ICE arrests march down the middle of Lincoln Street

CBS News

time13 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Rallyers in Denver demonstrating against ICE arrests march down the middle of Lincoln Street

A large gathering that started out at the Colorado State Capitol to rally against the growing numbers of deportations of people in Colorado and the country illegally became a march down a Denver street on Tuesday evening. Demonstrators march down the middle of Lincoln Street in Denver on Tuesday night. CBS Hundreds of protesters first gathered at the Colorado State Capitol at the start of the evening. By 6:15 p.m. they started a march down the middle of Lincoln Street. The march made it temporarily impossible for all lanes of traffic to get through. The White House has directed Immigrations and Customs Enforcement to step up daily arrests. CBS News reports the goal is to make 3,000 arrests a day nationwide. Protesters have also taken to the streets in other cities, including Dallas and San Francisco, and Los Angeles is in the midst of a fifth day of protests over federal immigration raids. On Monday evening in California, tensions boiled over following a day of peaceful demonstrations. President Trump has doubled the number of National Guard troops being sent to patrol the city to 4,000 -- a number that Los Angeles city officials say vastly outnumbers the protesters -- and has said they will remain there indefinitely. There were security concerns leading up to Tuesday's demonstration in Denver, but everything has been peaceful so far. Groups have been protesting ICE for months now, but their message is even louder given the recent events in L.A. In a protest in Aurora on Monday organizers said they want to show solidarity with what's happening in California. Organizers say they're demanding an end to what they call targeted raids in immigrant communities that are tearing families apart. Some people in Denver called for ICE to be abolished altogether, while others want state and local law enforcement to stop cooperating with federal immigration agents. Many in Colorado held signs and chanted against immigration enforcement. One protester said she knows the pain of deportation personally. "My dad was deported a couple years back and I know how it feels to have family separated and struggle with that. And I don't want anybody else to go through that. Because I know my mom suffered. I suffered, and it's really traumatic and I don't want anyone to feel that way," she said. Denver police, Colorado State Patrol, and other agencies say they're monitoring the protest and are ready to respond if necessary.

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Los Angeles mayor announces curfew as anti-ICE protests continue downtown
Los Angeles mayor announces curfew as anti-ICE protests continue downtown

CBS News

time14 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Los Angeles mayor announces curfew as anti-ICE protests continue downtown

Mayor Karen Bass announced a curfew for downtown Los Angeles as anti-ICE protests continued on Tuesday. The curfew will begin at 8 p.m. tonight, last until Wednesday morning, and apply to one square mile of downtown L.A. For five consecutive days, protesters and law enforcement have lined the streets of downtown, resulting in nearly 200 arrests. Some of the encounters between demonstrators and police turned violent at times. The demonstrations started on Friday after several immigration raids in the Westlake District, downtown and South LA. Crowds quickly formed around federal agents during the operations. Some individuals attempted to prevent authorities from placing individuals into vans. The nearly week-long protest caught the attention of President Trump, who deployed thousands of troops from the California National Guard and 700 U.S. Marines to protect federal buildings, against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Donald Trump is putting fuel on this fire. Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state is illegal and immoral," Newsom wrote Sunday on X. "California will be taking him to court."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store