logo
The Planet Is Burning — But Proven Solutions Are Within Reach

The Planet Is Burning — But Proven Solutions Are Within Reach

Forbes3 days ago

In 2024, the world lost 6.7 million hectares of tropical primary rainforest, the highest level of loss in at least two decades. That's nearly double the destruction recorded in 2023. Fires were the main culprit, fueled by record heat, prolonged drought, and a failure to enforce environmental protections. But, amid the devastation, there is a powerful truth that is too often overlooked: we already know how to stop this.
New data from the University of Maryland's GLAD lab, published by Global Forest Watch, shows that the tropics lost forest at a blistering pace of 18 football fields per minute in 2024. The 3.1 gigatons of carbon released into the atmosphere from this single year of forest destruction was greater than India's entire annual fossil fuel emissions. The world's primary rainforests, vital for regulating climate, storing carbon, and preserving biodiversity, are disappearing before our eyes.
In Cambodia, where Wildlife Alliance has worked for more than two decades, we have helped protect over 1.4 million hectares of rainforest in the Cardamom Mountains, one of Southeast Asia's last intact forest ecosystems. This isn't symbolic protection; tangible, measurable, boots-on-the-ground conservation has kept the forest standing. Independent evaluations have shown that Wildlife Alliance's direct protection model is among the most effective in Southeast Asia at preventing deforestation in real-time. By integrating satellite surveillance, ranger deployment, and community incentives, we have created a replicable approach that can be adapted for other threatened forests around the world. Our approach combines law enforcement, technology, and community engagement through direct partnerships with the Cambodian government, Indigenous communities, and local authorities. We fund and manage ranger patrols, build capacity for rapid enforcement, and use satellite data to detect threats before they escalate.
The result? In the areas we patrol and manage, satellite data shows forest clearance has fallen to near zero.
We are not alone. In 2024, Indonesia and Malaysia reduced their primary forest loss. Their success was also no accident. It was the product of consistent government policies, corporate accountability, and better fire prevention. In southern Bolivia, the Charagua Iyambae Indigenous Territory showed what's possible when early warning systems and community land governance are taken seriously. Despite the flames raging across Latin America, this area stayed intact thanks to foresight, training, and local leadership.
Yet such examples remain the exception, not the rule.
Smoke from wildfires blankets forests south of the Orinoco River, Venezuela (March 26, 2024)
Alarmingly, Global Forest Watch reports that the 2024 fire season devastated forests across Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Nicaragua, and Mexico, much of it tied to agricultural expansion, mining, and weak governance. Bolivia saw a 200% increase in forest loss. Brazil alone accounted for 42% of all tropical forest destruction, with illegal soy and cattle farming driving deforestation deep into the Amazon. In Central America, forest fires burned through protected areas and Indigenous lands, often with ties to organized crime.
In Africa's Congo Basin, the world's second-largest rainforest, forest loss also reached record highs, driven by charcoal production, smallholder agriculture, and land pressures made worse by violent conflict. These are complex challenges. But complexity is not an excuse for inaction.
Too often, international climate finance goes to ideas still being tested or to 'capacity building' projects with little real-world enforcement impact. Meanwhile, field-tested models like ours, which deliver verifiable results, struggle to scale due to a lack of funding. The gap between rhetoric and reality is growing wider every year.
If we are serious about halting and reversing deforestation by 2030 — a promise made by over 140 countries in the Glasgow Leaders' Declaration — we must act differently.
First, we need more vigorous enforcement. Whether through national ranger programs or Indigenous-led patrols, the world must invest in proper protection on the ground. This includes satellite monitoring, rapid-response teams, and legal action against illegal deforestation.
Second, we must scale what works. Proven conservation models — as in Cambodia, Bolivia's Indigenous territories, and parts of Indonesia — need finance to expand. These efforts must be rewarded based on verified results, not good intentions.
Third, the global community must confront the reality that commodity production and deforestation remain tightly linked. Cattle, soy, palm oil, and mining continue to push deeper into tropical forests. Voluntary commitments are not enough; market countries must enforce laws like the EU Deforestation Regulation and ensure companies are not profiting from environmental destruction.
Fourth, Indigenous communities must be empowered and financed as frontline protectors of the world's forests. They are already doing this work, often without support or recognition. The world must back them, not just with words, but with resources, legal protection, and land rights.
And finally, forest protection must be treated as a frontline climate solution. Forests are carbon sinks, natural air conditioners, and buffers against extreme weather. Letting them burn undermines every other climate goal.
The forest loss in 2024 should be a turning point, shaking us out of complacency. But we've seen data like this before and still the money, policies, and enforcement needed to turn the tide remain insufficient.
Wildlife Alliance stands ready to help scale what works. We don't need another conference or another set of promises. We need action grounded in science, delivered in partnership, and driven by urgency.
The forests are burning. We have the tools to stop it. The question is not whether we know what to do but whether we will do it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Natural Disasters May Be Shaping Babies' Brains
Natural Disasters May Be Shaping Babies' Brains

Bloomberg

time3 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Natural Disasters May Be Shaping Babies' Brains

Climate disasters are known for damaging homes, disrupting power and displacing residents. But even after the lights come back on and people return to their homes, their effects can linger — including in the brains of children born afterwards, a new study suggests. Climate stressors, and the effect they have on pregnant people, appear to affect the brain development of their babies, according to the study published in PLOS One on Wednesday, which relied on brain imaging conducted years after 2012's Superstorm Sandy hit the New York City metro area.

Orbital Intelligence: When Satellites Meet Machine Learning
Orbital Intelligence: When Satellites Meet Machine Learning

WIRED

time7 hours ago

  • WIRED

Orbital Intelligence: When Satellites Meet Machine Learning

How BCG X, research institutions, and space agencies are using generative AI to supercharge weather forecasting with the GAIA Foundation Model. The 20,000-Foot (or Mile?) View Here's a fact that almost everyone on the planet is becoming increasingly familiar with: As the Earth's climate warms and its weather systems become less reliable, so do the weather prediction capabilities underpinning the business practices of countless agriculture, insurance, public safety, and scientific research organizations around the world. Here's a less obvious fact: As those prediction capabilities deteriorate, so do many of the public and private services we take for granted every day. 'Having better, more reliable, more detailed intelligence about what's going on in the weather system has a lot to do with who's going to win and lose in financial industries like insurance and lending, in infrastructure sectors like energy, and places like state and local government,' says David Potere, geospatial tech leader and BCG X managing director and partner. 'As an example, the way we characterize risk affects the homes we buy, the businesses we invest in, the cities that grow or don't. And right now, there is a known gap in the insurance industry being able to cover a rapidly changing game board.' The impact that this weather intelligence gap—and countless other gaps like it—has on organizational margins can trickle down to consumers in harsh ways. New volatility in the climate system can manifest as extended droughts and high winds that fuel record-breaking wildfires, or back-to-back 100-year storms that cause property damage at massive scales. A societal inability to forecast those kinds of events drives up our insurance rates, undercuts public safety measures, and strains governmental relief efforts. The world needed a novel solution to a rapidly growing problem. The BCG X AI Science Institute may have found it alongside a growing new class of gen AI-powered weather models. Turning to Eyes in the Sky Enter GAIA (Geospatial Artificial Intelligence for Atmospheres) Foundation Model, an open source foundation model built in partnership between the BCG X AI Science Institute and several of the world's leading aerospace organizations to help researchers all across the world better understand and anticipate weather's next move. Similar to large language models (LLMs) trained on text, the GAIA Foundation Model is a gen AI vision model trained on 25 years of satellite imagery that allows researchers to study climate and weather patterns at a greater speed and accessibility than ever before. Specifically, GAIA works with images from a constellation of school bus-sized satellites that 'stare' at the planet from a stationary position more than 22,000 miles above the surface, capturing high- resolution images of the entire 'disk' of the Earth every 30 minutes. This provides a continuous, real-time stream of images and atmospheric data. Taken in concert with a global array of thousands of hyper-detailed weather ground stations, meteorologists can essentially visually map weather developments in near real time across the entire globe. 'There are naturally gaps in this record, including a 'soft spot' when it comes to tracking weather in polar regions,' says Potere.. 'What we're talking about is investments on the ground through generative AI capabilities like GAIA that have the potential to unlock a synthetic fourth satellite constellation.' That kind of visualization capability, produced via open source gen AI technology, is groundbreaking on its own. But the setup behind that tooling is equally innovative. Consider compute power: Depending on the bands and mosaicking process, global satellite imagery can clock in at 3298 x 9896 pixels (and more), and a 15-year span of data measured every 30 minutes yields 263,000 images—more than the total frames in a typical Hollywood feature length film. That's 17 TB of data to be crunched per training session for the GAIA model. The team is also working with live weather data, tapping into the same operational satellites that weather forecasters use on the news at night. These foundation model approaches require a lot of GPUs—a common reason why visual-based gen AI tools have traditionally been a lesser-explored space. 'Up until now, the sheer compute and the algorithms and the know-how you need to be able to translate pixels into answers has been very rare,' Potere says. Tackling the Compute Problem BCG X made two conscious decisions when scoping the endeavor that not only proved to be novel but allowed them to bring the project online in just one year rather than the 18 to 24 months typical for other projects. The first was to commit to creating an environment that could be deployed in the cloud, rather than being tethered to a purpose-built supercomputer. According to Tom Berg, BCG X lead engineer for the project, 'There was something really daunting here; it's almost become an accepted truth that to roll up your sleeves and build your own foundational model is too expensive, if you look at the immense resources the hyperscalers are using. One of the things we wanted to show is that if it works, you don't have to have a dedicated supercomputer to do these kinds of builds.' To that end, the GAIA team turned to a national network of university computing resources distributed across the United States. This constellation of off-the-shelf GPUs (ranging from state-of-the-art to 10-year-old GPUs) is precisely what BCG X's development team had in mind. 'That profile, rather than matching a supercomputer, gave us a lot of parameters to work with,' Berg says. 'It's a very, very adaptable system, and at one point we were using 15 percent of the NRP's entire cloud.' Still, such a setup provided some interesting challenges. Where a dedicated supercomputer has all of its processing power in one building with one uniform power configuration, Berg and Potere's team would instead be connecting GPUs on opposite sides of the Earth. There were also acute issues like power outages, or a university unexpectedly cycling their data centers. Crucially, GAIA was sharing compute space with hundreds of other research applications running at the same time. 'You're basically on a busy public road rather than a dedicated racetrack,' Berg says. The team's second operational decision was to initially narrow their focus to precipitation and top-of-cloud temperature data—as opposed to modeling all aspects of every layer of the atmosphere. Because that selected data closely corresponds to a range of weather phenomena, it provided researchers with the flexibility needed to prove out the foundation model and run experiments at a still-manageable level of initial effort. Critically, by focusing on this 'lower complexity' problem statement, the GAIA team was able to immediately scale their modeling to global atmospheric conditions, putting a dent in the problem of weather predictability. That surgically targeted start allowed the team to reach an equally targeted—yet incredibly meaningful—outcome. Building a Global Toolset and Modeling Solutions A key reason why the team was able to build so rapidly: open source tools and resources, oftentimes combined with earlier research from equally pioneering research teams. 'We have the benefit of standing on the shoulders of some of the earliest groups working on this,' Potere says. 'Even now, the literature has gotten three times denser since we started, but there was something of a literature, so we certainly benefited from the second mover advantage.' That open source, iterative mindset will now define the project's next phase, as well: To give back to the research community and contribute to its ever-evolving toolset, BCG X and their collaborators released the GAIA Foundation Model to the global open source community. In other words, they modeled the Earth, for the Earth. And their work couldn't have come at a better time. As governments, businesses, and research institutions increasingly grapple with the new normal of disruptive weather volatility, gen AI weather and environmental models like GAIA can fuel faster and better decision making—something experts and organizations across the world need more every day. Climate change may very well be the defining issue of our time—and GAIA may very well be part of how the world as a whole is able to meet it. Learn more about Boston Consulting Group here.

Scientists mapped what happens if a crucial system of ocean currents collapses. The weather impact would be extreme
Scientists mapped what happens if a crucial system of ocean currents collapses. The weather impact would be extreme

CNN

time8 hours ago

  • CNN

Scientists mapped what happens if a crucial system of ocean currents collapses. The weather impact would be extreme

Climate changeFacebookTweetLink Follow The collapse of a crucial network of Atlantic Ocean currents could push parts of the world into a deep freeze, with winter temperatures plunging to around minus 55 degrees Fahrenheit in some cities, bringing 'profound climate and societal impacts,' according to a new study. There is increasing concern about the future of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation — known as the AMOC — a system of currents that works like a giant conveyor belt, pulling warm water from the Southern Hemisphere and tropics to the Northern Hemisphere, where it cools, sinks and flows back south. Multiple studies suggest the AMOC is weakening with some projecting it could even collapse this century as global warming disrupts the balance of heat and salinity that keeps it moving. This would usher in huge global weather and climate shifts — including plunging temperatures in Europe, which relies on the AMOC for its mild climate. What's less clear, however, is how these impacts will unfold in a world heated up by humans burning fossil fuels. 'What if the AMOC collapses and we have climate change? Does the cooling win or does the warming win?' asked René van Westen, a marine and atmospheric researcher at Utrecht University in the Netherlands and co-author of the paper published Wednesday in the Geophysical Research Letters journal. This new study is the first to use a modern, complex climate model to answer the question, he told CNN. The researchers looked at a scenario where the AMOC weakens by 80% and the Earth is around 2 degrees Celsius warmer than the period before humans began burning large amounts of fossil fuels. The planet is currently at 1.2 degrees of warming. They focused on what would happen as the climate stabilized post-collapse, multiple decades into the future. Even in this hotter world, they found 'substantial cooling' over Europe with sharp drops in average winter temperatures and more intense cold extremes — a very different picture than the United States, where the study found temperatures would continue to increase even with an AMOC collapse. Sea ice would spread southward as far as Scandinavia, parts of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, the research found. This would have a huge impact on cold extremes as the white surface of the ice reflects the sun's energy back into space, amplifying cooling. The scientists have created an interactive map to visualize the impacts of an AMOC collapse across the globe. London, for example, could see winter cold extremes of minus 2.2 Fahrenheit , while Oslo could see temperatures as low as minus 55 Fahrenheit and endure maximum temperatures below 32 Fahrenheit for 46% of the year. Parts of Europe will also become stormier, the study found. The increased temperature difference between northern and southern Europe will strengthen the jet stream and increase storm intensity over northwestern Europe. It 'completely shifts the narrative, right?' van Westen said. 'Because now policy is planning for a warmer future, but maybe instead, we need to also prepare for a colder future.' While cooling on an ever-hotter planet may sound like good news, van Westen warns it's anything but. Society in many parts of the Northern Hemisphere 'is not built for these kind of cold extremes,' he said. Crops would die, threatening food security, and infrastructure could buckle. What's more, the impacts of an AMOC collapse would mostly be felt in Europe's winter; it would still endure increasingly deadly heat waves in the summer as the climate crisis intensifies. The Southern Hemisphere, meanwhile, is projected to experience increased warming. The scientists also looked at the impacts of an AMOC collapse in an even hotter world. If global temperatures reach around 4 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the heat outweighs the cooling impact of an AMOC collapse in Europe, van Westen said. 'The warming signal actually wins.' But, he added, an AMOC collapse won't only affect temperatures. Other impacts include increased sea level rise, which will particularly affect the US, where a weaker AMOC is already driving significantly increased flooding on the northeastern coast, according to recent research. Stefan Rahmstorf, a physical oceanographer at Potsdam University in Germany who was not involved in the latest research, said the study confirms 'an AMOC collapse would have massive impacts on European climate.' The research uses only one climate model; others will rely on different models and will likely come up with a variety of scenarios, he told CNN. What ultimately happens will depend on the how the two opposing trends play out: AMOC-induced cooling and climate change-induced heating. A 'large uncertainty' remains, he said. The study is 'by no means the last word' especially as huge questions remain over whether the AMOC could be on course to collapse, said Richard Allen, a climate science professor at the University of Reading, also not involved in the research. 'But even the mere possibility of this dire storyline unfolding over coming centuries underscores the need to forensically monitor what is happening in our oceans,' he said. What is crystal clear is that an AMOC collapse would be very bad for society, van Westen said. 'We want to avoid it at all costs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store