Paddleboard guide who led 4 people to their deaths on Welsh river imprisoned for 10 years
LONDON (AP) — A former Welsh police officer who who led four people to their deaths in a paddleboarding tragedy in the U.K. was sentenced Wednesday to 10.5 years in prison for manslaughter.
Nerys Bethan Lloyd, 39, had previously pleaded guilty in Swansea Crown Court to four counts of gross negligence manslaughter and failing to discharge her duty for the Oct. 30, 2021 incident.
The River Cleddau in Haverfordwest was raging after heavy rains when Lloyd, who operated a side business called the Salty Dog, made the ill-fated decision to lead a group of beginners toward a dangerous weir where the churning waters created a deadly undertow.
Lloyd had not warned the group about the obstacle nor instructed them how to get over it safely.
While Lloyd managed to navigate her way down a narrow fish ramp that bisected the low dam, several customers were swept over the top and sucked under the turbulent brown waters.
Paul O'Dwyer, who helped Lloyd lead the tour, managed to reach shore but returned to the river to help those in distress and was also killed.
Andrea Powell, 41, Morgan Rogers, 24, and Nicola Wheatley, 40, also drowned.
'I accept you are desperately sorry for what happened that day," Justice Mary Stacey said. "'Your life has also been massively impacted. But being sorry for what happened is different from remorse.'
Prosecutor Mark Watson said Lloyd and O'Dwyer were not remotely qualified to guide clients on the dangerous stretch of river.
Defense lawyer David Elias read a statement from Lloyd, saying she took full blame for the incident.
'The pain for me has been unbearable but the pain for the families unmeasurable," Lloyd wrote.
The Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
10 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
US reports another arrest of Chinese scientist with no permit to send biological material
DETROIT (AP) — A Chinese scientist was arrested while arriving in the U.S. at the Detroit airport, the second case in days involving the alleged smuggling of biological material, authorities said Monday. The scientist is accused of shipping biological material months ago to staff at a laboratory at the University of Michigan. The FBI, in a court filing, described it as material related to certain worms and requires a government permit. 'The guidelines for importing biological materials into the U.S. for research purposes are stringent, but clear, and actions like this undermine the legitimate work of other visiting scholars,' said John Nowak, who leads field operations at U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The scientist was interviewed and arrested Sunday after arriving on a flight from China, where she is pursuing an advanced degree at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan. She planned to spend a year completing a project at the University of Michigan. Her shipments, including an envelope stuffed inside a book, were intercepted last year and earlier this year and opened by authorities, the FBI said. The court filing doesn't indicate whether the FBI believes the biological material was dangerous, though U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr. said smuggling 'threatens our security.' The government last week charged two Chinese scientists who are accused of conspiring to smuggle a toxic fungus into the U.S. One was turned around at the Detroit airport and sent back to China last year, while the other, a researcher at the University of Michigan, was arrested. She remains in custody. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
10 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Tennessee prison riot contained after several hours; 3 inmates and 1 guard injured
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Inmates at a Tennessee prison destroyed property, compromised security cameras and set a few fires during a riot that took several hours to contain and caused minor injuries to three inmates and one guard, the facility's private operator said. On Sunday evening, a large group of inmates at Trousdale Turner Correctional Center from several housing units left their cells and accessed an inner yard, becoming 'disruptive and confrontational,' according to CoreCivic spokesperson Ryan Gustin. The prison in Hartsville, about 50 miles (80 kilometers) northeast of Nashville, is the subject of an ongoing U.S. Department of Justice investigation . One correctional officer was assaulted and released from the hospital. Three inmates were being treated for minor injuries, Gustin said. The prison's staff used chemical agents on the inmates, who were secured by early Monday morning. They did not reach the perimeter and state troopers and local law enforcement officers were positioned outside the facility. The Tennessee Highway Patrol deployed about 75 troopers and the agency remained on site overnight until 'every prisoner had been accounted for,' Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security spokesperson Jason Pack said. The prison remained on lockdown while CoreCivic and the Tennessee Department of Correction investigate the riot, Gustin said. The incident followed an assault by two Trousdale inmates Saturday that injured a correctional officer who remains at the hospital, Gustin said. Last August, the U.S. Department of Justice announced an investigation into the Trousdale prison after years of 'reports of physical assaults, sexual assaults, murders and unchecked flow of contraband and severe staffing shortages,' according to then-U.S. Attorney Henry Leventis. The department confirmed Monday the investigation remains ongoing. Tennessee's corrections agency has fined CoreCivic $37.7 million across four prisons since 2016, including for understaffing violations. Records obtained by The Associated Press also show the company has spent more than $4.4 million to settle about 80 lawsuits and out-of-court complaints alleging mistreatment — including at least 22 inmate deaths — at four Tennessee prisons and two jails since 2016. The state comptroller released scathing audits in 2017 , 2020 and 2023 . The Brentwood, Tennessee-based company has defended itself by pointing to industry-wide problems with hiring and keeping workers. CoreCivic has said it offers hiring incentives and strategically backfills with workers from other facilities nationally. Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee's administration has stood by CoreCivic. However, the Republican-led Legislature this year showed its concern by unanimously passing a bill that would move 10% of inmates out of a private prison each time the annual death rate is twice as high as a comparable state-run facility. Lee signed the legislation. Department of Correction spokesperson Sarah Gallagher said the agency is developing a procedure to calculate and report the death rate for 2025 under the new law. The legislation was spurred by the advocacy of Tim Leeper, a roofing businessman who has attended the same local Rotary Club as the two Republicans who ultimately sponsored the bill, Rep. Clark Boyd and Sen. Mark Pody. Leeper's son Kylan was an inmate at Trousdale when he died of a fentanyl overdose. His family has sued CoreCivic over his death. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
The Intercept
12 minutes ago
- The Intercept
In Shocking Move, Oklahoma AG Decides to Retry Richard Glossip for Murder
Support Us © THE INTERCEPT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Sheriff's deputies lead longtime death row inmate Richard Glossip to a courtroom on June 9, 2025, at the Oklahoma County Courthouse in Oklahoma City. Photo: Sean Murphy/AP It was after 10 a.m. on Monday morning when Richard Glossip was led into an eighth-floor courtroom in the Oklahoma County Courthouse by three sheriff's deputies. Wearing orange prison scrubs and Crocs, and shackled at the waist and ankles, Glossip, now 62, looked small compared to the hulking deputies around him. His hair, now almost entirely gray, was long and combed to the side. Though his expression was impassive as he entered the room, his face softened into a smile when he caught sight of his wife Lea and other supporters sitting in the front row. It was the first time in years that Glossip had been in a courtroom, and it was the first hearing in his case since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in late February that prosecutorial misconduct had so tainted Glossip's case that his death penalty conviction should be overturned. It was a victory not only for Glossip but also for Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, who had taken unprecedented steps to block Glossip's execution — and fought alongside him to secure the high court's decision. 'The high court has validated my grave concerns with how this prosecution was handled,' Drummond said shortly after the ruling. 'I am thankful we now have a fresh opportunity to see that justice is done.' Drummond wasn't in court on Monday morning. But his proxy Jimmy Harmon, chief of the AG's criminal division was — and signaled that the office is ready to prosecute Glossip for a third time. While Harmon did not publicly announce what the charge would be, Judge Heather Coyle noted that the state has said it would not be seeking the death penalty — suggesting that the state will try Glossip for murder yet again. The state's plans were confirmed in a statement released by Drummond's office shortly after the hearing. 'While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence,' Drummond said. 'After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction. … Unlike past prosecutors who allowed a key witness to lie on the stand, my office will make sure Mr. Glossip receives a fair trial based on hard facts, solid evidence and truthful testimony.' Drummond's announcement that the state would retry Glossip for first-degree murder was a shocking reversal of his recent public statements about the case. Drummond, who is running for governor, made the rounds in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, boasting about his success at the high court. Asked at a press conference how he might resolve the case, Drummond said 'everything is on the table; a jury trial, all the way down.' But he noted that it 'would be difficult' to retry Glossip after so many years. More recently, in an April interview on the CBS Evening News, Drummond reemphasized his support of the state's death penalty, reminding viewers that he has witnessed every execution carried out during his tenure, while making clear that Glossip's case had jumped out as problematic from the start. Glossip 'didn't murder the victim,' Drummond said. 'Frankly, given the history of this case, we don't think there can be a fair trial.' In court, Andrea Miller, legal director of the Innocence Project at the Oklahoma City University School of Law and one of several lawyers now representing Glossip, was blunt with the judge. 'Frankly, given the history of this case, we don't think there can be a fair trial,' she said. Nevertheless, the defense team is preparing for another high-profile murder trial. Miller told the judge that famed death penalty lawyer Judy Clarke would be joining Glossip's team. Glossip was twice convicted and sentenced to die for the 1997 murder of Barry Van Treese inside a seedy Best Budget Inn that Van Treese owned on the outskirts of Oklahoma City. No physical evidence linked Glossip, the motel's live-in manager, to the crime. The case against him was based almost entirely on the testimony of a 19-year-old maintenance man named Justin Sneed, who admitted to bludgeoning Van Treese to death but insisted it was Glossip's idea. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed escaped the death penalty and was sentenced to life without parole. At issue before the Supreme Court was Glossip's and Drummond's contention that prosecutors knew that Sneed, the key witness against Glossip, had lied on the witness stand but had failed to correct his testimony as the state was constitutionally required to do. This failure had violated Glossip's rights and fundamentally altered the case, the justices found. 'Besides Sneed, no other witness and no physical evidence established that Glossip orchestrated Van Treese's murder,' Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority opinion. Sneed's credibility was central to the case and would have been undermined if the jury had learned the truth. 'A prosecutor's midtrial revelation that Sneed lied on the stand would have significantly undercut' his account, Sotomayor wrote. Since being sentenced to death, Glossip has faced execution nine times. In 2015, he came within moments of lethal injection but was spared after officials realized they had the wrong drugs on hand. A moratorium on executions followed, pushing any new execution date well into the future and giving Glossip's attorney Don Knight, who had already uncovered compelling evidence of Glossip's innocence, crucial time to investigate further. The decade since has brought a steady series of explosive revelations, including that the state destroyed key evidence before Glossip's 2004 retrial and also hid evidence that Sneed had attempted to recant his testimony implicating Glossip. A slew of new witnesses also came forward to challenge the state's depiction of Sneed as a meek follower who was under Glossip's control when he violently murdered Van Treese. They instead described Sneed as dangerous and unpredictable — and entirely capable of killing on his own. Another said that while Sneed was locked up in the Oklahoma County jail, he had bragged about setting up Glossip to take the fall. The new witnesses offered accounts of the night Van Treese died that flipped the script on the state's case. According to these witnesses, Sneed often worked in concert with a girlfriend, one of the many sex workers who occasioned the Van Treese's motel, luring targets into a room to rob them. The woman in question was also said to be in a relationship with Van Treese. Instead of submitting on the night in question, Van Treese fought back, ultimately prompting Sneed to kill him. Read Our Complete Coverage A persistent problem for Glossip has been his documented behavior and statements in the wake of Van Treese's death. Oklahoma City cops became suspicious of Glossip in part because he'd failed to give them information that tied Sneed to the murder. The night Van Treese was killed, Glossip said, Sneed had woken him up around 4 a.m. by knocking on the wall of his apartment, which was adjacent to the motel's office. Standing outside with a black eye, Sneed told Glossip he had chased off some drunks who had broken a window in one of the motel rooms. According to Glossip, he asked Sneed about his black eye, and Sneed flippantly replied, 'I killed Barry.' It wasn't until the next morning, when no one could find Van Treese, that Glossip realized Sneed might have been serious. Still, Glossip didn't tell the cops right away; he said his girlfriend suggested waiting until they figured out what was going on. After Glossip finally confessed this to police, he was charged as an accessory after the fact to Van Treese's murder — an acknowledgment that Glossip had nothing to do with the killing, but had withheld material information about it. That charge was escalated to capital murder after Sneed told detectives that Glossip had masterminded the crime. There was good reason to be skeptical of this story. Not only was there no evidence to support it, Sneed implicated Glossip after a highly coercive interview by Oklahoma City homicide detectives, who repeatedly named Glossip as a possible conspirator before asking Sneed for his version of events. Nearly 30 years after the murder — and with the credibility of their star witness irrevocably destroyed — the most logical course of action would have been for the state to offer Glossip a plea to a lesser charge, and finally end his legal ordeal once and for all. Sneed, who is now 47 and remains incarcerated on a life sentence, has changed his story numerous times over the years, making him a terrible witness if prosecutors were to put him on the stand. In an ordinary case, the Supreme Court's ruling would leave the question of a new trial to the elected district attorney in Oklahoma City, Vicki Behenna, who would decide how to proceed. But Drummond's announcement on Monday made it clear that the ultimate decision is his to make. For now, Glossip is being held in isolation at the Oklahoma County Detention Center, where he was moved in April. The jail is notoriously chaotic and violent: Seven people have died inside since the beginning of the year alone. On Monday morning, Judge Coyle scheduled a hearing to consider the defense's request that Glossip be released from jail on bond pending a new trial. In an email to Drummond's office, The Intercept asked how Drummond reconciled the new murder charge with his previous statements and with his various legal briefs which conceded that the case against Glossip 'hinged almost entirely' on Sneed, whose credibility had been fatally compromised. The Intercept also asked if the state had uncovered new evidence implicating Glossip in the crime. AG spokesperson Phil Bacharach did not answer the questions. 'Because it is an active case, we are unable to comment beyond the news release.' Join The Conversation
