Musk put a spotlight on federal spending, but cut less than he wanted
Elon Musk's effort to dramatically cut government spending is expected to fall far short of his grand early pronouncements, and perhaps even his most modest goals.
It didn't have to be that way.
According to experts across the ideological spectrum, a major problem was a failure to deploy people who understood the inner workings of government to work alongside his team of software engineers and other high-wattage technology talent.
Even that might not have achieved Musk's original target of $2 trillion, which is roughly the size of the entire federal deficit.
Musk, whose last day spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency is Friday, slashed his goal for savings from $2 trillion to $1 trillion to finally only $150 billion.
The current DOGE results put Musk's efforts well short of President Bill Clinton's initiative to streamline the federal bureaucracy, which saved the equivalent of $240 billion by the time his second term ended. The effort also reduced the federal workforce by more than 400,000 employees.
It also seems clear that Musk was unable to change the overall trajectory of federal spending, despite eliminating thousands of jobs. The Yale Budget Lab, in an analysis of Treasury data, shows money is flowing out of government coffers at an even faster pace than the previous two years.
'It was an impossible goal they were trying to achieve. They kept lowering the standards of success,' said Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. 'A more knowledgeable DOGE team wouldn't have made insane promises that would be impossible to keep. They set themselves up for failure.'
At a White House event with Trump on Friday, Musk said his team would stay in place and renewed the goal of reaching at least $1 trillion in cost savings.
'This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning. The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time. It's permeating throughout the government,' Musk said in the Oval Office, wearing a black blazer over a T-shirt emblazoned with 'The Dogefather.' 'We do expect over time to achieve the $1 trillion.' The early evidence suggests that the goal will be exceedingly difficult to reach.
By relying chiefly on information technology experts, Musk ended up stumbling through Washington and sometimes cutting employees vital to President Donald Trump's own agenda.
Immigration judges were targeted at the same time the administration was trying to accelerate deportations of people in the U.S. illegally. Likewise, technologists with the Bureau of Land Management were purged from the Department of Interior, despite their significance to clearing the way for petroleum exploration, a Trump administration priority.
In many cases, fired employees were rehired, adding administrative costs to an effort aimed at cutting expenditures.
Had Musk's team been staffed with experts on what positions are required under federal law to continue efforts such as drilling and immigration enforcement, it could have avoided similar mistakes across multiple departments, Nowrasteh said.
'I just think there were a lot of unforced errors that a more knowledgeable DOGE team would have avoided,' Nowrasteh said.
Grover Norquist, president and founder of the conservative Americans for Tax Relief, had a more favorable perspective on Musk's work, saying it should be judged not only by the total dollars saved but his ability to spotlight the issues.
'When you find the problem, you don't know how far the cancer has spread. You just found a cancer cell,' Norquist said.
Norquist said it's up to Congress to take the baton and set up a permanent structure to continue where Musk is leaving off.
'I just think it's going to be seen five to 10 years from now as something very big and very permanent,' Norquist said, 'and that was done only because of a guy like Musk, who can come in and shake things up.'
Elaine Kamarck, a key figure in Clinton's government efficiency effort, said its efforts were guided by more modest fiscal targets than DOGE. The initiative was led by Vice President Al Gore, and it was aimed at making the government more responsive to people who used it, and focused heavily on updating antiquated hiring and purchasing procedures.
It took years and carried into Clinton's second term.
'We went about it methodically, department by department and, yes, used some outside analysts, but they were seasoned government civil servants who knew about government in general,' Kamarck said.
Clinton's effort saved $136 billion by the end of Clinton's second term, the equivalent of more than $240 billion today, and contributed to budget surpluses for each of the final four fiscal years he was in office.
Kamarck said she expects what she called Musk's 'chaotic' approach will reveal mistakes or oversights that could create crises down the road, such as a transportation problem, response to a natural disaster, or delivery of entitlement benefits.
'These are the things that really hurt presidents, and they are increasing the probability that something is going to happen,' Kamarck said. ____ Associated Press writer Chris Megerian contributed from Washington.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?
I have been to some very loud concerts. Nothing compares to what I witnessed at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles on Aug. 9, 2023, when I attended Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. 'Here we are on the last night of the U.S. leg of the Eras Tour, in the eighth month of the year on the ninth day of the month,' Swift told the 70,000-plus people in the audience near the end of the 3½-hour show. '... There's something that I've been planning for a really, really, really, ridiculously, embarrassingly long time. And I think instead of just telling you about it, I think I'll just sort of show you.' The screaming during Swift's speech — her emphasis on the numbers eight and nine could only mean one thing — was just a warmup for the deafening roar when the enormous screen behind her transformed into the cover art for '1989 (Taylor's Version).' The surprise reveal of Swift's fourth rerecorded album, an effort she started in 2019 after her devastation that her master recordings of her first six albums were sold to music manager Scooter Braun, sent the crowd into such a frenzy that my ears still hurt when I think about it. That was the last rerecording announcement that Swift made until Friday morning, when the superstar dropped the bombshell that after the years-long battle, she finally was able to buy back her masters and now owns her entire music catalogue. The purchase, which Swift called her 'greatest dream come true,' immediately made global headlines, from every corner of social media to midday cable news. ('Now it's all going to be Taylor's version,' said CNBC reporter Bertha Coombs, to which anchor Kelly Evans replied, 'All is well with the world.') The most ecstatic people were in her fandom, the famously loyal Swifties who ensured that all of the 'Taylor's Version' albums ('Fearless' and 'Red' in 2021, 'Speak Now' and '1989' in 2023) debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart. Swift embarked on this project to gain control of her music and as a way to devalue her original recordings so they wouldn't be worth as much to Braun, who Swift claimed bullied her for years. (In 2020, he sold her masters to private equity firm Shamrock Capital.) Until Friday, the most die-hard fans called those songs the 'stolen versions' and refused to listen to them, even if they preferred the originals to the updated tracks. Swift's announcement, however, also prompted some criticism on social media and beyond from people who looked back on the 'Taylor's Version' endeavor and called it a 'scam,' or mocked fans who spent money on the rerecords when Swift — whose net worth reached a reported $1.6 billion last year — turned around and bought back the masters anyway. Swift's statement implied that she won't be releasing the highly anticipated 'Reputation (Taylor's Version)' and that there's no timeline for her rerecorded self-titled debut album. There's no doubt that Swifties have had an extreme reaction to this project: the internet-consuming countdown to every rerelease day; the intense speculation about when Swift was dropping 'Rep TV,' including the widespread theory that she would reveal the date at last week's American Music Awards (nope); the literal tears of joy after Friday's announcement. But as I thought about it, I went back to that eardrum-piercing night in Los Angeles and what Swift said during her speech before she revealed the album, as she talked about how she was 'pleasantly surprised' by how much fans had supported her rerecording quest. 'That was something that I expected to be just a 'me' thing, just a personal thing,' Swift said. '... The way that you have embraced that, the way that you have celebrated that — you really decided that it was your fight too, and that you were 100 percent behind me. And if I cared about it, you cared about it. I will never stop thanking you for that.' Setting aside the idea that Swift could actually be surprised that her listeners cared about her actions (in 2014, iTunes Canada accidentally uploaded eight seconds of static labeled as a Taylor Swift song and it immediately rocketed to No. 1), her speech got to the core of why Swifties connected so deeply to the rerecords. The foundation of Swift's legacy as a once-in-a-generation pop star is the inimitable relationship she has with her fan base, building on the personal nature of her music that has enthralled listeners for nearly 20 years. Swift's back-and-forth with her fans dates back to her country music days as a teenager in Nashville, when she spent hours chatting on MySpace and stayed at venues until every autograph was signed. She bought listeners Christmas presents and showed up at their houses and left comments on their Instagram photos, and she jumped out of the car to meet them if she saw them wearing one of her tour T-shirts on the street. Swift has never charged for meet-and-greets at her concerts. She hosted backstage after-parties and had 'secret sessions' for early album previews at her home. She referred to her fans as friends, and emphasized that they are all equally important participants in her musical journey. But as Swift has become a global celebrity, the relationship with her fans had to change. Her fan base has grown at an astonishing and unmanageable rate, and for both logistical and safety reasons, Swift hasn't hosted meet-and-greets since 2018. Although she posts the occasional reaction on TikTok, she's rarely active on social media. When I interview Swifties, they often say that they understand why she had to pull back on letting everyday people into her life, but that they still wish they could talk to Taylor like they did in the old days. In a way, the rerecords allowed the less accessible Swift to communicate with her fans once again. She incentivized the purchase by including 'from the vault' songs that she left off the albums the first time, which provided new details for the Swifties who meticulously track her life story, and shed insight into how she thought about her career and legacy. On the rerecorded 'Fearless,' she paid homage to her country music roots as she tapped Keith Urban and Maren Morris to sing with her on two vault tracks. The new 'Red' included the 10-minute version of 'All Too Well,' with unreleased lyrics that fans had been clamoring for for almost a decade. With the 'Speak Now' rerelease looming, she assured one concert crowd that she didn't need anyone defending her online — presumably a preventative measure for people to leave John Mayer alone about 'Dear John,' the album's scathing ballad. The updated '1989' included vault songs with even more vulnerable lyrics about a breakup. All of her actions surrounding the rereleases, including the letters she included with each album that explained her choices in making the record, proved the most important thing for Swifties: that she was still listening to them. A few years ago, I wrote about how the hunt for hints and Easter eggs in Swift's work (something she has always encouraged) had exploded over time. One fan told me, 'She's aware of the game, so if we play the game, it feels like we're all doing something together.' That sums up why the practice only increased through the rerecords. During the Los Angeles announcement, for example, people in the stadium also lost their minds when Swift appeared onstage in a blue costume. Because '1989' is associated with the color blue, they (correctly) assumed a 'Taylor's Version' announcement was coming that night. This doesn't make sense to anyone outside the fan base, but that's the point. In her letter about her masters on Friday, Swift noted that the success of the Eras Tour (which grossed more than $2 billion) allowed her to make this purchase — but so did the support from her fans. And that underscores what Swift has told them all along and what the Swifties believe: that Taylor and the fans always have been, and always will be, in this together.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
YC partners say AI founders are closing huge deals fast by taking a page out of Palantir's early playbook
AI founders should see themselves as "forward-deployed engineers," said Y Combinator partners. The term, popularized by Palantir, refers to engineers who embed themselves with clients. Founders have closed "six, seven seven-figure deals" by being forward-deployed engineers, said a YC partner. Some AI founders are landing big enterprise deals by doing something old-school: showing up, writing code, and building the perfect demo — fast. YC partners say this strategy is taking off, and it's straight out of Palantir's early playbook. Startup founders should see themselves as "forward-deployed engineers," said Garry Tan, YC's CEO, on an episode of the "Y Combinator" podcast published Friday. The term, popularized by Palantir, refers to engineers who embed themselves with clients to fine-tune the product on-site. Tan, who was Palantir's 10th employee, said the defense tech company's edge came from recognizing that many government agencies and Fortune 500 companies lacked deep technical expertise in the room. Palantir bridged that gap by embedding technically savvy engineers during sales and implementation. Much of Palantir's success comes from its business with the US government. The Department of Defense is its biggest customer, making up 41% of its fourth-quarter revenue. Startup founders need to be "technical," "great product people," and even "ethnographers" and "designers," said Tan, who worked at Palantir from 2005 to 2007." "You want the person on the second meeting to see the demo you put together based on the stuff you heard, and you want them to say, 'Wow, I've never seen anything like that.' And take my money," he added. This hands-on approach is already delivering big results. YC partner Diana Hu said she and her team have seen founders close "six, seven seven-figure deals" with large enterprises by being forward-deployed engineers. Sometimes, she said, a pair of founders wins a deal by walking into a boardroom, gathering context, and coming back the next day with a tailored AI demo. Once the deal is closed, some of these founders go on-site to work closely with customer support teams, continuously fine-tuning the software or language model to improve performance, said YC partner Harj Taggar. Tan said this model gives AI startups a chance to outmaneuver giants like Salesforce, Oracle, and Booz Allen. "You have big fancy salespeople with big strong handshakes, and it's like, how does a really good engineer with a weak handshake go in there and beat them?" Tan said. "It's actually you show them something that they've never seen before, and like, make them feel super heard." Y Combinator did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Microsoft's Bad News—500 Million Windows Users Must Now Decide
Surprising bad news suddenly hits Microsoft. A new warning has been issued for Windows users, whose PCs have been described as 'magnets for security threats,' just as new data gives Microsoft a surprising bad news story ahead of the critical next few months. You can expect many more such warnings as 500-million Windows users face an increasingly urgent decision. The latest advice comes courtesy of PC maker Asus, pointing out that 'if you're still using Windows 10 or, dare we say it, something even older — your computer's days of regular updates and support are numbered.' As for upgrades, 'what makes Windows 11 different?," Asus says. "one word: Copilot," as it pushes the latest range of AI PCs. Clearly, you don't need to decide on a premium Copilot PC to benefit from Windows 11's future-proofing, ensuring your PC receives critical security updates after Windows 10's demise in October. AI PCs remain a niche, despite projections they will eventually dominate new PC sales. Right now, there's a more fundamental decision to make. Windows 10 versus Windows 11 globally. The latest Windows market data presents a painfully bleak picture with just over five months to run until free Windows 10 security updates end for all users. Paid extensions are available, but they're expensive for enterprises and restricted to just 12-months for home users who also must pay. Microsoft is pushing free upgrades not paid extensions. A month ago, it seemed Windows 11 had turned the tide against Windows 10. The newer OS already outanks its older sibling in the U.S. but not globally. Come the end of April, though, Windows 11 was within 10% of Windows 11 for the first time. 'Just over half (53%) of all users are still on Windows 10, but that's inching down month by month.' Not any more, it seems. While more directional than exact, Statcounter's data at the end of May shows a slight month-over-month increase for Windows 10, while Windows 11 dips. This after four months of steady progress the other way. Windows 10 is holding stubbornly above 50% while Windows 11 remains 10% behind. Windows 10 versus Windows 11 in U.S. This means there are around 750 million users are yet to upgrade to Windows 11, of which at least 240 million don't have an eligible PC. That still leaves around 500 million users who can take up Microsoft's offer for a free Windows 11 upgrade but have not. Even in the U.S., where Windows 11 has overtaken Windows 10, May's data suggests Windows 10 has grown its share from 41% in April to more than 43%, while Windows 11 drops a more worrying 3.5%, from 56.5% down to below 53%. All this makes June's data critical. Come the end of this month, there will be just three months until Windows 10 is shuttered. If Microsoft is to avoid a cybersecurity nightmare hitting mid-October, something need to change. For all those Windows 10 users with PCs eligible for a free upgrade, do not run out of time.