Trump calls for Tehran to be evacuated
CALGARY, Alberta, Canada - U.S. President Donald Trump has announced he is leaving the G7 summit after just one day, and after refusing to sign a planned joint statement by the other G7 countries, calling for de-escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict.
Coinciding with the president's pending departure, which was announced on X, Mr Trump posted a warning to Iranian citizens to evacuate the country's capital on his own social media platform Truth Social.
"AMERICA FIRST means many GREAT things, including the fact that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" Mr Trump said in an initial post.
In a follow-up post the U.S. president made the call for Tehran to be evacuated.
"Iran should have signed the "deal" I told them to sign," he said.
"What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran! the president posted.I
Iran's ambitions for nuclear weapons is hotly disputed, particularly by Iran which has consistently maintained it nuclear power program is for peaceful purposes only. The major party, worldwide, insisting that Iran has nuclear weapons is the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Speculation was rife Tuesday that the U.S. may join or support Israel in its ongoing conflict with Iran. This despite U.S. intelligence being at odds with Netanyahu's claims.
This could be another Iraq, all over again. The George W.Bush-Dick Cheney administration took the U.S. and its allies to war against Iraq claiming it had weapons of mass destruction. The claim was false. Extensive searching following an invasion to unearth these weapons, failed to find any trace of them. They did no exist.
For more than 3 decades Netanyahu has been crying wolf over Iran, claiming it was on the verge of attaining nuclear weapons,.
Below is a collation of key statements he has made over the past 30 years (1993–2023), along with approximate dates and contexts where available.
1990s: Early Warnings
1993 – As Deputy Foreign Minister, Netanyahu warned in interviews that Iran was seeking nuclear weapons, calling it the "greatest threat to world peace."
"Iran is three to five years away from producing nuclear weapons… and the world must act now to prevent it."
1996 – In his book Fighting Terrorism , Netanyahu wrote:
"The ayatollahs in Tehran are hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons… They see nuclear arms as their shortcut to dominance in the Middle East."
2000s: Public Speeches & UN Warnings
2001 (Post-9/11) – Netanyahu, then out of office, argued in U.S. media that Iran, not just Iraq, was the real nuclear threat.
"Iran is developing nuclear weapons while the world is distracted."
2006 – As Leader of the Opposition, Netanyahu repeatedly accused Iran of accelerating its nuclear program.
"Iran is moving full steam ahead toward nuclear weapons… The world cannot afford to wait."
2009 (UN Speech) – In his first major address as PM at the UN, Netanyahu held up a diagram of a bomb and said:
"This is what Iran is doing. They are building nuclear weapons."
2010s: "Red Line" at the UN & Nuclear Deal Opposition
2012 (UN "Red Line" Speech) – Netanyahu famously drew a red line on a cartoon bomb, warning:
"By next summer, Iran will have enough enriched uranium for a bomb. The world must stop Iran before it's too late."
2015 (Opposition to JCPOA) – Netanyahu called the Iran nuclear deal a "historic mistake":
"This deal doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves it." (Speech to U.S. Congress, March 2015)
2018 (Presentation on Iran's Nuclear Archive) – Netanyahu revealed seized Iranian documents, claiming:
"Iran lied about never having a nuclear weapons program. Here's the proof."
2020s: "Sanctions Must Stay" & "Iran is Nearing the Threshold"
2020 – Netanyahu warned that Iran was "weeks away" from having enough fissile material for a bomb:
"They're enriching uranium at levels only needed for weapons."
2021–2023 – As Iran advanced uranium enrichment to 60%, Netanyahu repeatedly stated:
"Iran is on the brink of nuclear weapons… Israel reserves the right to act." (2023 CNN interview)
Key Patterns in Netanyahu's Rhetoric:
Consistency: He has maintained for 30+ years that Iran seeks nukes, often citing intelligence.
Visual Props: Used diagrams (2009 bomb cartoon, 2018 nuclear archive) to dramatize claims.
Diplomatic Pressure: Urged sanctions, opposed the JCPOA, and pushed for preemptive action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
21 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What to know about bunker-buster bombs and Iran's Fordo nuclear facility
BANGKOK (AP) — If the U.S. decides to support Israel more directly in its attack on Iran, one option for Washington would be to provide the 'bunker-buster' bombs believed necessary to significantly damage the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, built deeply into a mountain. Such a bomb would have to be dropped from an American aircraft, which could have wide-ranging ramifications, including jeopardizing any chance of Iran engaging in Trump's desired talks on its nuclear program. Israeli officials have also suggested that there are other options for it to attack Fordo as it seeks to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. But aside from a commando attack on the ground or a nuclear strike, the bunker buster bomb seems the most likely option. What is the bunker-buster bomb? 'Bunker buster' is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. In this case, it refers to the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the American arsenal. The roughly 30,000 pound (13,600 kilogram) precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels, according to the U.S. Air Force. It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. However, Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. How tough a target is Fordo? Fordo is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility. So far, Israeli strikes aren't known to have damaged Natanz's underground enrichment hall, nor have the Israelis targeted tunnels the Iranians are digging nearby. Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, about 60 miles (95 kilometers) southwest of Tehran. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In addition to being an estimated 80 meters (260 feet) under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defenses, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign. Still, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. 'This entire operation … really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S., told Fox News on Friday. Why does the U.S. need to be involved? In theory, the GBU-57 A/B could be dropped by any bomber capable of carrying the weight, but at the moment the U.S. has only configured and programed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds (18,000 kilograms) but the U.S. Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds (27,200 kilograms). The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles (11,000 kilometers) without refueling and 11,500 miles (18,500 kilometers) with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman. Whether the U.S. would get involved is another matter. At the G7 meeting in Canada, Trump was asked what it would take for Washington to become involved militarily and he said: 'I don't want to talk about that.' In a weekend interview with ABC News, Israeli Ambassador Leiter was asked about the possibility of the U.S. helping attack Fordo and he emphasized Israel has only asked the U.S. for defensive help. 'We have a number of contingencies … which will enable us to deal with Fordo,' he said. 'Not everything is a matter of, you know, taking to the skies and bombing from afar.'
Vancouver Sun
21 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Why are Iranian missiles hitting Israel? What to know about Iron Dome and other defence systems
It's not just the so-called Iron Dome that's protecting Israel from hundreds of Iranian missiles. The term Iron Dome has become 'a stand-in for Israeli missile defence more broadly; so, it's kind of like how we use Kleenex to describe every type of facial tissue,' said Wes Rumbaugh, a fellow in the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Defence systems known as David's Sling and The Arrow are also both helping Israel to intercept and destroy long-range missiles fired from Iran. But even Israel's vaunted missile defence system can't stop everything. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Iranian missile attacks began June 13 after Israel launched what it called a pre-emptive strike to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Operation Rising Lion targeted Iranian nuclear sites and military installations, killing hundreds, including several of the country's top military leaders. 'Iran retaliated by firing waves of ballistic missiles at Israel, where explosions flared in the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and shook the buildings below,' the Associated Press reported Saturday. The Jerusalem Post reported Monday that the Israeli Defence Force 'provided its first statistics of the war on its shoot down success against Iran's ballistic missiles, setting it at 80-90 per cent, with only about 5-10 per cent of ballistic missiles hitting actual residential areas.' Per the Post, 'eight more Israeli civilians were killed in Iran's Sunday-Monday middle-of-the-night attacks, bringing the total number of deaths to 24, with one more missing person expected to be declared dead in the coming hours.' Here's what we know about Israel's missile defence systems, including how they work and why some missiles are still getting through. Israel fields three tiers of missile defence systems, Rumbaugh said. 'At the lowest tier is Iron Dome, which has gotten more popularity just because it gets used a lot more often against rocket and maybe lower-tier cruise missile attacks. Every time that Hamas shoots rockets at Israel, that's where Iron Dome comes in.' Recent exchanges with Iran 'are more illustrative of some of the higher tier systems — that's The Arrow missile defence system or the David's Sling missile defence system,' he said. 'Those systems intercept longer range missiles coming from Iranian territory. The Arrow system intercepts them' outside of the earth's atmosphere, Rumbaugh said. 'When it comes to missile defence systems, all of them work in a similar way,' Rumbaugh said. They all have radar systems that detect the incoming threat, some sort of control system that manages data coming in from all the various sensors 'that allows them to form a track and then translate that information to a watcher system that then engages the threat,' he said. 'In all of these cases, the engagement system is a surface-to-air missile that goes up and intercepts the threat through kinetic energy.' It reportedly costs about $50,000 to fire one interceptor from the Iron Dome system, and each missile fired from the other two would likely cost more than that, Rumbaugh said. Rumbaugh noted that the U.S. contributes about $500 million a year toward Israel's missile defence. 'Right now, I think you're getting a lot of engagements for, most likely, The Arrow system,' he said, noting Germany is acquiring the Israeli-developed system for its own protection. 'We're seeing long-range missiles fired from Iranian territory to Israel, and so to engage those at the higher speeds, you want to engage them a little bit farther away.' The further a missile travels, the faster it will be moving 'because it goes up to a higher apogee and then is coming down at a quicker rate, and so you need an interceptor that is just a little bit more capable. The Iron Dome is designed to be able to intercept smaller rocket systems like the Katyusha rockets that Hamas fields.' While the Iron Dome isn't much use against long-range missiles, it would be capable of defending against Iranian drone attacks, Rumbaugh pointed out. 'It is far too soon to have a conclusive assessment of effectiveness of the systems,' he said. 'We saw multiple examples of reasonable effectiveness of Israeli missile defence systems against Iranian attack last year. The question going forward … will be just when do the inventories start to deplete of interceptor missiles? There's not an infinite supply of these capabilities.' There are also reports, he said, of the U.S. Navy intercepting Iranian missiles with their Standard Missile 3, a ship-based surface-to-air missile. It's difficult to determine 'from grainy Twitter videos' what Iranian missiles are getting through to Israel, he said. 'There's no such thing as a perfect air and missile defence system,' Rumbaugh said. 'It's not going to stop every single missile…. Because it's just a very technical, challenging mission set, it's going to be a challenge to have a perfect defence. And as inventories sort of deplete, Israel is going to have to get more choosy and will have to make more difficult decisions about its interceptor usage and it's going to have to prioritize certain target sets or certain areas for defence over others.' Some Israeli citizens might be surprised to see missiles making it through the country's defences, Rumbaugh said. 'But I think the Israeli military probably knew and would have … factored into its decision to launch these strikes that at least some are going to get through. Even when Iron Dome is defending against rocket attacks, some of those rockets get through and, to some degree, that's occasionally a decision of the system.' If the Iron Dome detects a missile or a rocket 'isn't going toward a highly populated area, they'll preserve interceptors by not engaging that particular missile,' Rumbaugh said. The Israeli defence establishment is obliged to let the public know about casualties and what they can expect in terms of missile attacks, he said. 'The Israeli public does not want to live near their bomb shelters for an indefinite period of time,' Rumbaugh said. Rumbaugh couldn't say when Israel will run out of interceptors. 'Those sorts of inventory numbers are pretty tightly held secrets for a reason. You don't want to say how many missiles it takes to exhaust your inventory' because that would help Iran plan its attacks, Rumbaugh said. Though he noted Israel has 'managed to make the defensive task more tractable with some of their efforts to destroy Iranian missile production bases as well as destroying Iranian missiles and launchers through some of their air strikes.' But it's 'difficult to get them all,' he said. 'Both the United States and Israel have tried to eliminate the Houthis' abilities to launch missiles in the Red Sea over the last couple of years with limited success.' This is likely 'the most sustained and long-term defence' Israel has mounted against ballistic missiles, Rumbaugh said. 'They've dealt with periods where there has been lots of rocket fire from Hamas and other groups in the area,' including Hezbollah, he said. Those might have involved deploying more interceptors, Rumbaugh said. 'But the technical sophistication of the long-range missiles that Iran is firing, combined with the period over which Israel is having to defend (itself) over multiple days,' means this has been one of the 'longer range air and missile defence engagements that Israel has seen.' Israeli air bases are likely on Iran's top list of targets, he said. 'They probably need to disrupt Israeli air operations as much as possible, considering that those are what are delivering the majority of the weapons on Iranian territory right now that are destroying some of the nuclear infrastructure and are being used to carry out the attacks on Iranian military leadership,' Rumbaugh said. 'But then as the (supply of) Iranian missiles gets lower and lower, do you start to shift your focus toward civilian areas to sort of start inflicting punishment on civilian areas in an attempt to create pressure on the Israeli government to stop becomes one of the considerations that Iran's leadership has to make.' Israel hasn't been able to hit some Iranian nuclear facilities 'because they're buried deep in the mountains and they would need certain munitions types that they don't have and that the United States fields in terms of the massive ordnance penetrator type weapons,' known as Bunker Busters, Rumbaugh said. 'But is the goal to entirely roll back Iran's civilian nuclear industry? Or is Israel's goal to weaken (and) reduce the capacity of Iran's missile capabilities?' He questions whether regime change in Iran is the goal of Israeli air strikes. 'I'm not seeing Israel being able to mobilize the sort of ground forces they would need to impose regime change militarily, so will air strikes be sufficient is sort of an unclear picture for me.' Israel has said this could be a 'multi-week' set of operations, according to Rumbaugh. 'So, we might just be at the start of this.'
National Post
23 minutes ago
- National Post
Jesse Kline: The Globe and Mail dismisses threat from Iran to bash Israel
Article content We may never know the truth, but claiming, as Saunders did, that there is 'no looming nuclear-weapons threat from Iran' is disingenuous, at best. Playing games with nuclear inspectors and threatening to ramp up nuclear activities following the IAEA's damning resolution may be par for the course for the mullahs in Tehran, but the cost of not taking them and their word is far too high for the Jewish state. Article content During the Cold War, the principle of mutual assured destruction ensured the Americans and Soviets never unleashed their nuclear arsenals, but this only worked because both governments were rational actors that did not want to bring about Armageddon. The same cannot be said for the Islamists in Tehran, who are far more concerned with collecting their 72 virgins in the afterlife than protecting life here on earth. Article content For decades, Iranian leaders have been making explicit threats against the Jewish state. Twenty years ago, then-Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gave a talk at the 'World Without Zionism' conference, in which he called for Israel to be 'wiped off the map.' Article content In 2018, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel a 'cancerous tumour' that must be 'removed and eradicated.' A couple years later, his website featured an image calling for a ' final solution ' in Palestine. And in 2019, the deputy head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said the Islamic Republic intends to 'erase Israel from the global political map.' Article content It's easy for us, in a safe country like Canada, to watch from afar and criticize the Israeli government's policies; to claim, as the Globe's journalists seem apt to do, that Netanyahu is 'addicted to war' and that his decision to go to war was pure 'political opportunism.' Article content But Netanyahu did not start this war. Israel was the victim of a brutal terrorist attack on Oct. 7, 2023, when thousands of Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists stormed southern Israel, brutally raping and slaughtering 1,200 people, mostly innocent civilians, and took over 250 hostages. Article content Israel was then attacked by Hezbollah and the Houthis, which are also Iranian proxies. And last year, Tehran turned the long-simmering cold war between the two countries into a hot one when it launched a direct assault against Israel for the first time in history. Article content It's important to remember that Israel is a small country — less than half the size of Nova Scotia — and it's surrounded by mortal enemies. According to the Nukemap website, a 150 kiloton nuke, the size of the one tested by North Korea in 2017, would take out Tel Aviv and some of its suburbs, killing an estimated 214,000 people and wounding around 278,000; a 100 megaton bomb, the world's largest, dropped on Tel Aviv would destroy all of central Israel and kill millions. Article content In the current conflict, Israeli officials estimate that five to 10 per cent of the missiles fired by Iran have penetrated Israel's air defences. As tragic as it is to see whole apartment buildings destroyed, the effects of even one nuclear warhead detonating within Israeli territory would be catastrophic (and would surely invite a second strike that would bring about even more death and destruction). Article content In the end, the calculation for Netanyahu was simple. He has the solemn duty of protecting the world's only Jewish state, home to around two-thirds of the global Jewish population, from experiencing a repeat of the Holocaust. And he is faced with a regime in Tehran that has explicitly stated that it wants to annihilate Israel and has been developing weapons capable of realizing that goal. Article content
