Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin unveils crew for 10th space tourism launch
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
We now know who's flying on Blue Origin's next suborbital space tourism mission — most of them, anyway.
That mission is known as NS-30, because it will be the 30th overall launch of Blue Origin's New Shepard rocket-capsule combo. It will be the 10th crewed flight for the company, which was established in 2000 by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
NS-30 will lift off from Blue Origin's West Texas launch site at an as-yet unspecified date. It will carry six people on a brief trip to and from suborbital space, and the company just revealed who five of them are.
Those crewmates are Lane Bess, Jesús Calleja, Elaine Chia Hyde, Richard Scott and Tushar Shah, Blue Origin announced in an update on Tuesday (Feb. 18).
Related: Blue Origin crew, including history's 100th woman to fly to space, lands safely (video)
Bess is the principal and founder of Bess Ventures and Advisory, a venture capital firm based in Florida. NS-30 will be his second ride with Blue Origin; he also flew on the NS-19 mission in December 2021. (Three other people have also flown on New Shepard two times.)
Calleja is a Spanish TV host, pilot and mountaineer whose "adventures have taken him to every corner of the world, including the Seven Summits, the North and South Poles, and numerous deserts, active volcanoes and ancient sinkholes," Blue Origin wrote in Tuesday's update.
Chia Hyde is an entrepreneur, physicist and pilot who was born in Singapore, grew up in Australia and now lives in Florida. Scott is a reproductive endocrinologist who works as an adjunct professor at the medical schools of Yale University and the University of South Carolina (Greenville), and Shah is a partner at a hedge fund in New York City.
You can learn more about these five folks in Blue Origin's update. That update mentions "an undisclosed sixth crew member," whose name we will presumably learn at some point.
RELATED STORIES:
— Facts about New Shepard, Blue Origin's rocket for space tourism
— In photos: William Shatner launches to space on Blue Origin's New Shepard
— Blue Origin launches Michael Strahan and crew of 5 on record-setting suborbital spaceflight
New Shepard flights last 10 to 12 minutes from liftoff to the parachute-aided touchdown of the reusable vehicle's capsule. Passengers get to experience a few minutes of weightless and see Earth against the blackness of space. Blue Origin has not revealed how much it charges for this experience.
The first crewed New Shepard flight took place on July 20, 2021, the 52nd anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Bezos flew on that landmark Blue Origin mission, along with his brother Mark, aviation pioneer Wally Funk and Dutch student Oliver Daemen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists discover strong, unexpected link between Earth's magnetic field and oxygen levels
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Earth's magnetic field and oxygen levels are inextricably linked, new research suggests. The strength of the geomagnetic field has gone up in lockstep with the percentage of oxygen in Earth's atmosphere over the past 540 million years, a new study finds — but it remains unclear if one of these influences the other, or whether other unknown factors explain the link. "This is the first discovery we've ever had to establish the link between the geomagnetic field and the oxygen level," lead author Weijia Kuang, a senior scientist in the Geodesy and Geophysics Laboratory at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, told Live Science. Earth's magnetic field and oxygen levels have increased more or less in parallel since the start of the Cambrian period (541 million to 485.4 million years ago), and both factors spiked between 330 million and 220 million years ago, the results indicate. The research could help to narrow down requirements for life on other planets, Kuang and study co-author Ravi Kopparapu, a planetary scientist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, said in a joint video interview. It may be that the geomagnetic field controls oxygen levels, or vice versa — but there is another possible scenario, which is that both factors are related to a third geochemical or geophysical process that the researchers haven't yet pinpointed, Kuang said. For the new study, scientists used two independent datasets spanning the past 540 million years. One of the datasets showed atmospheric oxygen, derived from multiple indicators such as the abundance in sediments of fossilized charcoal, which remains after wildfires and gives clues about how much oxygen was available at a given time. The other dataset showed the strength of the geomagnetic field, derived from magnetic information that is recorded in ancient rocks and sediments. The researchers plotted these datasets against each other and found there was a strong correlation between them. If the geomagnetic field controls oxygen levels, its influence would likely be due to the protection it offers Earth's atmosphere against space weather. Previous research indicates that the geomagnetic field can prevent or reduce the escape or erosion of atmospheric molecules. The magnetic field also shields life on the planet, including plants that produce oxygen, from X-ray and extreme ultraviolet radiation. If, in contrast, atmospheric oxygen levels dictate the strength of Earth's magnetic field, then plate tectonics would play a central role. Plate tectonics is the process that continuously recycles Earth's crust into the mantle, which is the planetary layer that covers Earth's liquid outer core. Earth's geomagnetic field originates from currents in the outer core, so it's possible that the recycling of crustal material and oxygen into the mantle could impact the lower mantle, which could then affect the geomagnetic field, Kuang said. Related: Did plate tectonics give rise to life? Groundbreaking new research could crack Earth's deepest mystery. "Plate tectonics [...] will definitely impact the thermal and the dynamical conditions at the base of the mantle where it borders the liquid outer core," he said. "On the other hand, plate tectonics also impacts the cycling of chemicals and other elements from the interior to the surface, which certainly will impact oxygenation, or the production of oxygen." It's more likely that the geomagnetic field affects oxygen levels, rather than the other way round, Kuang said. That's because scientists know the geomagnetic field originates deep inside the planet and propagates to Earth's surface and into space. "The other direction is less well understood," he said. The third possible scenario is that another, separate process is pushing the geomagnetic field and oxygen levels in the same direction over time. The study's authors don't know what that process might be yet, but a spike that exists in both datasets may hold the answer. The spike coincides with the existence of the ancient supercontinent Pangaea, which formed about 320 million years ago and broke up about 195 million years ago. Due to the massive tectonic rearrangements involved, supercontinents might be the missing link between Earth's magnetic field and oxygen levels — but the evidence for this is still very tentative at this point, Kuang and Kopparapu cautioned. "This is one of the conjectures we didn't really put out strongly in our paper, but it is something we think is a very enticing mechanism for us to pursue," Kuang said. The reason the researchers held back with this idea is that they have robust data for only one supercontinent — Pangaea — and not the ones that came before, he said. RELATED STORIES —Earth's magnetic field formed before the planet's core, study suggests —Listen to haunting sounds of Earth's magnetic field flipping 41,000 years ago in eerie new animation —'A force more powerful than gravity within the Earth': How magnetism locked itself inside our planet "There seems to be some eye-sight correlation between oxygen and magnetic field and all the other supercontinents," Kopparapu said. "However, we don't have reliable data for oxygen [going farther back] than 540 million years, and so we are unable to make that kind of a conclusion for [farther back in time] and past supercontinents." The researchers are already working on the next step, which is to search for other geophysical and geochemical factors that might link to the geomagnetic field and oxygen levels. For this, the authors say communication and collaboration between scientists is of paramount importance. "One single mind cannot comprehend the whole system of the Earth," Kopparapu said. "We're like kids playing with Legos, with each of us having a separate Lego piece. We're trying to fit all of it together and see what's the big picture."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cillian Murphy Is Amazing In 28 Days Later, But I Was Shook By The A-Listers Who Originally Vied For The Role
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I'm still amazed that director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have reassembled to deliver a new tale of terror to the 2025 movie schedule in 28 Years Later. The occasion has left me also thinking about 28 Days Later a lot, a film that would eventually become known as Academy Award winner Cillian Murphy's star-making performance. But while the Oppenheimer lead has always been pitch perfect in the role of Jim, there's a long existing list of names that have been rumored to be up for the part back in the day. And when I say names, I truly mean 'names,' like Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Gosling and frequent Boyle collaborator Ewan McGregor. When the opportunity to watch the first 28 minutes of 28 Years Later was paired with an in-person interview with its intrepid director, I had to try and weed out fact from fiction, which saw all three names debunked in the process. However, that's when Danny Boyle gave CinemaBlend two names I never expected to be in the mix: I'll tell you who did audition for Jim. … Tom Hardy and Orlando Bloom, because they'd all finished either drama school or Black Hawk Down. … We didn't have very much money, we thought 'We'll never be able to afford a bigger actor.' And we wanted newbies who just didn't know which way it would break with them. So the trio of Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Gosling and Ewan McGregor were never going to even make the list for 28 Days Later's casting. With that being said, I'm very surprised that Tom Hardy and Orlando Bloom hadn't been reported more often - especially at that point in their careers. Although coincidentally enough, McGregor was in Black Hawk Down himself, as well as entrenched in the Star Wars prequel trilogy at the time. Likewise, by the time Danny Boyle's film was making the rounds in its initial 2002 release in the UK, Hardy and Bloom were going head to head at the box office thanks to their respective roles in Star Trek: Nemesis and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Honestly, either man would have been a distraction to the tense, harrowing journey 28 Days Later took, as audiences would know they'd survive the ride. The whole point of the third act is that by time Jim's on his rampage through Major West's estate, you're supposed to wonder if he's an Infected at that point. While we now know that wasn't the case, and with Cillian Murphy set to return for 28 Years Later's sequel The Bone Temple, that point tends to get a bit lost. However, Danny Boyle's perspective seemed to see him pick between two finalists, with the Christopher Nolan vet winning out in the end. At least, that's what it sounded like when the 28 Years Later mastermind shared this with CinemaBlend: And I remember seeing [them], and we saw Cillian, and I remember thinking, 'Whoa, he'll have an amazing career.' I remember thinking that. I was right. I remember thinking that about Orlando Bloom, I thought 'He'll do all right. ' The rest, as they say, is history. 2003's US release lit a fuse that saw both Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris both launch into higher profile roles, and Danny Boyle and Alex Garland being heralded as the men who reanimated the zombie (and zombie-adjacent) subgenre. Seeing as Stephen King bought out showings of 28 Days Later just so he could give them out to spread the word, that was clearly the right choice. And as Danny Boyle himself suggested, Orlando Bloom and Tom Hardy did 'do alright' in the end. Let's hope that 28 Years Later renews its franchise's King Seal of Approval, when it opens in theaters on June 20th.


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Visa Stock Plunges: Here's Why This Analyst Is Bullish
Visa (NYSE:V) was amongst several payment processor stocks taking a hit in Friday's trading as crypto's ongoing march toward mainstream adoption has sparked concerns about the implications for the group. Confident Investing Starts Here: Specifically, the Wall Street Journal reported that major retailers are seriously looking into using stablecoins as a way to sidestep the high fees tied to traditional card payments. Companies like Walmart and Amazon have apparently explored creating their own U.S.-based stablecoins, a shift that could potentially save them billions in processing costs by moving away from the conventional banking and card network infrastructure. If either Walmart or Amazon were to launch such a payment system, it could pose a major threat to traditional financial institutions, especially regional and community banks. These retailers not only have enormous customer and employee bases, but also access to massive amounts of consumer data and far fewer regulatory hurdles than banks. That combination has long made them powerful, and potentially disruptive, players in the financial space. Stablecoins are digital tokens typically pegged one-to-one with a government-issued currency like the dollar. They're backed by reserves such as cash or U.S. Treasurys and are currently used mainly for storing value or trading other cryptocurrencies. Whether these retail-led stablecoin projects move forward will likely depend on the outcome of the Genius Act, a bill that would lay the groundwork for stablecoin regulation in the U.S. The legislation recently passed a key procedural step but still needs to clear both the Senate and the House. So, credit card use might get switched to crypto, marking a continuation of sorts as Visa's growth has long been powered by people switching from cash to cards, historically accounting for about two-thirds of its volume growth. For Mizuho's Dan Dolev, an analyst who covers both crypto and payment platforms, a big issue he recently mulled revolved around how much 'US cash conversion runway' remains. Dolev's deep dive into different spending categories suggests that Visa's slower-than-expected growth compared to overall U.S. consumer spending since the pandemic isn't necessarily a sign of weakness. Instead, it's mainly because Americans have been spending more in areas that don't typically rely on cards, like rent or healthcare, and less in card-heavy areas like travel or dining. The good news is this trend is beginning to reverse. More importantly, Dolev believes there's still a lot of untapped potential for card adoption in the U.S. While consensus estimates put card penetration at 80 to 90%, the analyst thinks the real figure is closer to 75%. 'This leaves room for another decade of solid top-line growth domestically. Plus, V's performance in Canada & Nordics offers evidence of above-PCE growth, even when card penetration is >90%,' Dolev said. But whether stablecoin adoption changes all that remains to be seen. All told, for now, Dolev rates V shares as Outperform (i.e., Buy), while his $425 price target makes room for 12-month returns of 20%. (To watch Dolev's track record, click here) The rest of the analyst community remains firmly in V's corner too; the stock claims a Strong Buy consensus rating, based on a mix of 24 Buys and 4 Holds. The average price target stands at $388.85, implying shares will climb 10.5% higher in the months ahead. (See Visa stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.