US backs Pakistan, China arms it — why India must rethink its strategy
US backs Pakistan, China arms it — why India must rethink its strategy
Indrani Bagchi
ET Bureau
Jun 27, 2025, 17:49 IST IST
Stars aligned for Pakistan, US and China should be a matter of concern for India. If India wants to handle China, a weakened Pakistan is in its interest. This is what it needs to do
Donald Trump finally got his ceasefire, and a shot at the Peace Nobel. He even publicly toyed with the idea of regime change in Iran in the run-up to the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. Thankfully, unlike in the India-Pakistan context, he did bang heads together, cussed, and brought calm to the skies.
Trump should actually claim credit for executing a silent and smooth regime change — in Pakistan. With an intimate lunch meeting between him and Asim Munir on June 18, the US president effectively blessed Pakistan with a military leadership, completely undermining its elected civilian government. The message rang through clearly: Rawalpindi has the support of Washington, and Pakistan's political stakeholders in Islamabad should fall in line.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
US Supreme Court upholds key preventive care provision in Obamacare
The 6-3 ruling comes in a lawsuit over how the government decides which health care medications and services must be fully covered by private insurance under former President Barack Obama's signature law, often referred to as Obamacare read more The Supreme Court preserved a key part of the Affordable Care Act's preventive health care coverage requirements on Friday, rejecting a challenge from Christian employers to the provision that affects some 150 million Americans. The 6-3 ruling comes in a lawsuit over how the government decides which health care medications and services must be fully covered by private insurance under former President Barack Obama's signature law, often referred to as Obamacare. The plaintiffs said the process is unconstitutional because a volunteer board of medical experts tasked with recommending which services are covered is not Senate approved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Donald Trump's administration defended the mandate before the court, though the Republican president has been a critic of his Democratic predecessor's law. The Justice Department said board members don't need Senate approval because they can be removed by the health and human services secretary. Medications and services that could have been affected include statins to lower cholesterol, lung cancer screenings, HIV-prevention drugs and medication to lower the chance of breast cancer for women. The case came before the Supreme Court after an appeals court struck down some preventive care coverage requirements. The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Christian employers and Texas residents who argued they can't be forced to provide full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. Well-known conservative attorney Jonathan Mitchell, who represented Trump before the high court in a dispute about whether he could appear on the 2024 ballot, argued the case. The appeals court found that coverage requirements were unconstitutional because they came from a body — the United States Preventive Services Task Force — whose members were not nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. A 2023 analysis prepared by the nonprofit KFF found that ruling would still allow full-coverage requirements for some services, including mammography and cervical cancer screening. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US consulates in Pakistan mandate public social media accounts for visa applicants
The US consulates in Karachi and Lahore have mandated that all F, M, and J nonimmigrant visa applicants make their social media accounts public as part of enhanced vetting measures, ARY News reported. The move is part of President Donald Trump's broader strategy to tighten immigration screening.(Representational Image) This directive aligns with a similar policy recently enacted by the US Embassy in Delhi. An internal US State Department cable, dated June 18, instructs consular officers to screen visa applicants more thoroughly to detect any individuals with hostile views toward the United States or its institutions. The move is part of President Donald Trump's broader strategy to tighten immigration screening, according to official statements. ARY News further reported that the consulates announced on Instagram that applicants must adjust their social media privacy settings to allow officials to verify identity and eligibility. The consulates warned that failure to comply could result in visa denial or future ineligibility. Since 2019, visa applicants have been required to list their social media handles on application forms. However, the updated rule extends transparency by requiring public access to profiles for F (academic), M (vocational), and J (exchange visitor) visa categories. ARY News noted that these updated screening procedures, aimed at bolstering national security, require consular officers to conduct comprehensive background checks, including detailed reviews of applicants' social media activity. The State Department stated, "Every visa adjudication is a national security decision... We must ensure that those applying for admission do not intend to harm Americans or our institutions." Building on this approach, the US government has now made it mandatory for all F, M, and J nonimmigrant visa applicants to set their social media profiles to 'public' so that officials can properly verify their identity and admissibility under US law.
India.com
41 minutes ago
- India.com
Was Irans Supreme Leader Khamenei A Target In Recent Conflict? Israeli Defence Minister Katz Reveals…
Israel-Iran Conflict: After days of tensions in the Middle East, as Israel and Iran exchanged several attacks, a ceasefire was reached. Meanwhile, several media reports had earlier claimed that the United States had vetoed the plans to kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. On the other hand, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has revealed the intentions of his country regarding the assassination. ANI reported, citing Al Jazeera, that Katz said that Israel wanted to assassinate Khamenei during the recent 12-day conflict. Speaking to Israel's Channel 13, he stated on Thursday that his country did not require Washington's permission to carry out the operation. This claim of the Israeli Defence Minister countered the reports of a US veto on assassination plans. He said, "We wanted to eliminate Khamenei, but there was no operational opportunity." As per Al Jazeera, Katz asserted that Israel had a "green light" from Trump to strike Iran again should its nuclear activities resume. "I do not see a situation where Iran will restore the nuclear facilities after the attack," he said. Was Khamenei Aware Of Plan? Al Jazeera also reported that Katz further claimed that Khamenei was aware of the threat and went into deep hiding, cutting communication with commanders who had replaced Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) leaders killed in the initial Israeli strikes. The Iranian Supreme Leader reportedly released video messages during the Israel-Iran conflict, but there has been no confirmation yet that he was cut off from the military commanders. The plan, if executed, would have resulted in a major escalation of the tensions between the two West Asian nations. Iran's Regime Change According to Al Jazeera, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had earlier hinted that the war could lead to regime change in Iran. Trump had posted on social media that the conflict could "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN." The remarks came amid reports of damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure following US strikes on key sites including Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. Meanwhile, as per ANI, Khamenei on Thursday said that the US had "exaggerated" the extent of the damage. The 12-day war concluded with a US-brokered ceasefire following Iran's retaliatory missile attack on Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base.
