Animal rights group reveals illicit market for ivory and endangered animals in Pennsylvania
A taxidermied giraffe was found for sale in a Luzerne County shop in an investigation by an animal rights organization. (Human World for Animals)
A taxidermied giraffe head, cut from its body at the shoulders, was found on sale for $6,000 in a Luzerne County store. It is just one of hundreds of endangered animal parts being sold across the state uncovered through an investigation by a global nonprofit animal rights organization.
State Rep. Leanne Krueger (D-Delaware) says Pennsylvania has a responsibility to fight illicit sales that fuel poaching of at-risk animals abroad. Her legislation, House Bill 994, would ban the sale of covered endangered animal parts within the state.
'Iconic species of animals continue to face the threat of extinction due to the demand for their parts,' Krueger wrote in a memo seeking support for the bill. 'While many of these species reside in countries or oceans thousands of miles away, we have a duty to ensure that the residents of our great Commonwealth are not supporting the poaching and trafficking that threaten these at-risk species of animals.'
Lawmakers gathered with Humane World for Animals representatives Wednesday to rally support for the legislation.
Gabe Witgil, wildlife trafficking program director at Humane World for Animals, said states must close legal loopholes that allow illicit animal parts markets to thrive.
'Iconic species across the planet continue to face the threat of extinction due to demand for their body parts,' he said. 'Each year, 10,000 to 15,000 elephants are killed in Africa to supply the global demand for their ivory.'
The group's investigation team visited 31 Pennsylvania antique and vintage stores over a three week period in March and searched 31 online auctions between January and April, uncovering 383 pieces of ivory with a total retail value of $38,000. Bracelets, necklaces, figurines and even silverware were among the found ivory products taken from elephants, hippos, warthogs, walruses, mammoths and whales.
'What we found was a gruesome amount of evidence that accelerates the call to action,' said Whitney Teamus, the organization's senior director of investigations. 'The number of ivory items identified exceeds what we've seen in our previous investigations over the last several years, including in Connecticut and Florida.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Of the stores and auctions investigated, 59% had endangered wildlife products for sale.
A key problem, the investigators said, was a lack of documentation for many ivory products being sold, which makes it difficult to determine if the parts were illegally imported. Many ivory items were found to be mislabeled as bone or mammoth ivory, which is currently legal to sell.
'The labeling of ivory was also disturbingly unreliable, with some vendors uncertain of the material they were selling, while others appeared to be intentionally mislabeling items,' Teamus said. 'This is a misleading sales tactic we and others have witnessed in other investigations to obscure the trade of these items.'
Teamus told the Capital-Star that the number of endangered animal parts they found is likely miniscule compared to the total amount being sold in the state.
'There's tons more out there. Ivory is in your backyard, for sure,' she said. 'You think elephants are thousands of miles away. You don't think of them as being in your backyard.'
What would H.B. 994 do if passed?
The legislation would make the sale of ivory and other endangered animal parts illegal while expanding the list of protected animals that aren't covered under the federal Endangered Species Act, such as giraffes.
While federal law prohibits the importation of endangered species parts and the sale of these parts between states, it does not ban the sale within states. Pennsylvania law currently allows endangered animal parts to be sold only with a permit.
Animals covered by the the bill are the baleen whale, bonobo, cheetah, chimpanzee, dolphin, elephant, giraffe, gorilla, hippopotamus, jaguar, leopard, lion, mammoth, mastodon, orangutan, panda, pangolin, polar bear, ray, rhinoceros, sea turtle, shark, tiger and walrus.
If passed, civil penalties would be imposed upon violators based on the value of the illegal animal product. Thirteen states and Washington D.C. have passed similar legislation.
The bill passed the House Judiciary Committee by a 25-1 vote on Monday and now awaits consideration on the House floor.
'We expect the bill to be on the floor soon, and we'll work hard to maintain the bipartisan vote that we earned in committee this week,' Krueger said. 'I'm hopeful that we're going to be able to send this bill to the Senate very soon, and am hopeful that our colleagues there will see the value of ending the demand for trafficked animal parts in Pennsylvania.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Finds Out About Musk's Epstein-Files Posts During Theo Von Interview: ‘S— Missile!'
JD Vance found out Elon Musk had alleged Donald Trump is in the Epstein files in real time — but unlike the rest of us, he was doing a live podcast. Vance was being interview for Theo Von's 'This Past Weekend' when the host noted, 'Elon just hit the airwaves today.' 'Oh man,' Vance replied. Von then added, 'The f–king s–t missile is in the cannon' before he read Musk's tweet. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote on X. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. The extremely former DOGE chief deleted the post sometime Friday night. 'This is one I haven't even seen. I haven't even seen this one before,' Vance told Von before he described the accuastion as 'total BS.' 'Jeez. Man. Well … so just so your audience is aware, when is this going to air? Like, tomorrow or two days from now?' Vance asked. Von joked that the show was airing within minutes before reassuring Vance that wasn't the case. 'I'm just saying, like, presumably when this comes out, people are gonna know more about this than even I do because this kind of happened on the plane when I was coming on down here,' Vance added. Musk and Trump entered into a very public dispute on Thursday morning. The war of words played out on X and in the White House. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told White House reporters the same day. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also said he believes he would have won the state of Pennsylvania and the 2024 Election with or without Musk. In response to Trump's remarks, Musk tweeted, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' In an additional tweet, the billionaire accused Trump of expressing 'such ingratitude.' Trump has also said he believes Musk is incensed because his proposed Big, Beautiful Bill would cut the federal electric vehicle tax credit. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said of Musk. 'He only developed [a] problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate.' Musk deleted his tweets tying Trump to the Epstein files sometime Friday or early Saturday. His tweets inspired Democrats California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch to ask U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel to unseal the files. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' the letter read. In February Bondi released over 100 declassified documents pertaining to Epstein, the so-called 'first phase' of a larger release. The documents are heavily redacted and largely disappointing got those who hoped to gain real insight into the investigation. Trump was asked about another release of documents in April, but said he was unsure of when anything else would come out. 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know,' the president explained. Watch the interview with JD Vance in the video above. The post JD Vance Finds Out About Musk's Epstein-Files Posts During Theo Von Interview: 'S— Missile!' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: 'Iceberg is ahead'
FIRST ON FOX: A House committee witness who was called out by Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia of California during a hearing this week is pushing back after the congressman unearthed a past social media post on Social Security in an attempt to discredit his testimony. During a House oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, Garcia grilled Power the Future CEO Dan Turner while holding up a posterboard of a past tweet calling Social Security a "government-sponsored Ponzi scheme." "Madoff went to jail for it. Congress runs on it," the post said. "I should be able to keep 100% of my money and not watch government waste it with a paltry percentage return." Garcia then suggested that post was evidence that Turner lacks the credibility to be testifying about the billions of federal tax dollars directed to left-wing NGOs. Social Security Commissioner Breaks Down Plan To Save Agency From Insolvency "A Ponzi scheme and so I think it's interesting, of course, as one of our Republican witnesses is calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme, and that's the person that we should be taking advice from here today," Garcia said. Read On The Fox News App "Without Social Security, 22 million people would be pushed into poverty. That includes over 16 million seniors and nearly 1 million children. And in fact, Elon Musk has also said and agreed with you, sir, that this is a Ponzi scheme. I think it's ironic that you are one of our witnesses talking about efficiency when you want to attack the single best program that we have to support people not just out of poverty, but across this country to uplift them, to ensure they can afford a decent life." Fox News Digital spoke to Turner, who stood by his post and outlined his belief, echoed by many, that Social Security is structured like a Ponzi scheme by definition. Sen Elizabeth Warren: Social Security Is Under Attack. Gutting It Is A Broken Promise "Rep Garcia does not know the definition of Ponzi scheme," Turner said. "Social Security is the ultimate Ponzi, demanding more and more people at the bottom pay in to fund the people at the top, expect our demographics have this now reversed. The system will default. Mr. Garcia nor I will likely never see a dime. That should worry him more than my social media feed." Turner told Fox News Digital that if Garcia's staff were to spend as much time trying to save Social Security as it did "combing through my social media" then "perhaps the Ponzi scheme can survive long enough for me to get a small percentage of what the government confiscated during my lifetime." Turner explained that his father had received a "paltry percentage" of what he paid into the program and the the government "kept the rest" when his father died. "That's not just a Ponzi scheme, it's government greed and politicians running a money-laundering operation to get reelected. No one should be compelled to pay into a failed system, yet in a free America, you don't have that choice." In addition to Turner and Elon Musk suggesting that Social Security is by definition set up like a Ponzi scheme, Fox News Digital previously spoke to James Agresti, president of the nonprofit research institute Just Facts, who said the characterization has "validity." 'Failure's Not An Option': Trump Budget Bill Will Be 'Big' Help For Seniors, Top House Tax-writer Says "A Ponzi scheme operates by taking money from new investors to pay current investors," Agresti said. "That's the definition given by the SEC, and contrary to popular belief, that's exactly how Social Security operates." Agresti explained to Fox News Digital that Social Security, a program mired for decades with concerns about waste, fraud, and improper payments, "doesn't take our money and save it for us, as many people believe, and then give it to us when we're older" like many Americans might believe. "What it does is, it transfers money when we are young and working and paying into Social Security taxes," Agresti said. "That money, the vast bulk of it, goes immediately out the door to people who are currently receiving benefits. Now, there is a trust fund, but in 90 years of operation, that trust fund currently has enough money to fund two years of program operations." The trust fund only being able to last for two years is not a result of the fund being "looted," Agresti explained, but rather it was put in place to "put surpluses in it" from money that Social Security collects in taxes that it doesn't pay out immediately and pays interest on. "The interest that's been paid on that has been higher than the rate of inflation," Agresti said. "So, the problem isn't that the trust fund has been looted. The problem is that Social Security operates like a Ponzi scheme." Democrats have vocally pushed back against efforts by Republicans and DOGE to reform Social Security or make cuts to what they say are examples of wasteful or improper spending from the department. "There's been a lot of misinformation about that as of late," Agresti told Fox News Digital. "You know, when DOGE came in and suggested that the Social Security Administration cut, I think it was about 10,000 workers, Democrats erupted that this is going to weaken Social Security. But the fact of the matter is that Social Security pays those workers who are for administrative overhead from the Social Security trust fund. So, by cutting out the money that they're paying them, you actually strengthen the program financially." Agresti told Fox News Digital that the current administrative overhead for Social Security is $6.7 billion per year, which is enough to pay more than 300,000 retirees the average old-age benefit. "Every single study shows social security going completely bankrupt in the next few years. Garcia and other democrats know the iceberg is ahead but rather than turn the ship, they are yelling at the iceberg about the senior citizens onboard," Turner said. "This Ponzi scheme is collapsing fast, and turning my tweets into posters is not going to stop it."Original article source: House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: 'Iceberg is ahead'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Finds Out About Musk's Epstein-Files Posts During Theo Von Interview: ‘S— Missile!'
JD Vance found out Elon Musk had alleged Donald Trump is in the Epstein files in real time — but unlike the rest of us, he was doing a live podcast. Vance was being interview for Theo Von's 'This Past Weekend' when the host noted, 'Elon just hit the airwaves today.' 'Oh man,' Vance replied. Von then added, 'The f–king s–t missile is in the cannon' before he read Musk's tweet. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote on X. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. The extremely former DOGE chief deleted the post sometime Friday night. 'This is one I haven't even seen. I haven't even seen this one before,' Vance told Von before he described the accuastion as 'total BS.' 'Jeez. Man. Well … so just so your audience is aware, when is this going to air? Like, tomorrow or two days from now?' Vance asked. Von joked that the show was airing within minutes before reassuring Vance that wasn't the case. 'I'm just saying, like, presumably when this comes out, people are gonna know more about this than even I do because this kind of happened on the plane when I was coming on down here,' Vance added. Musk and Trump entered into a very public dispute on Thursday morning. The war of words played out on X and in the White House. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told White House reporters the same day. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also said he believes he would have won the state of Pennsylvania and the 2024 Election with or without Musk. In response to Trump's remarks, Musk tweeted, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' In an additional tweet, the billionaire accused Trump of expressing 'such ingratitude.' Trump has also said he believes Musk is incensed because his proposed Big, Beautiful Bill would cut the federal electric vehicle tax credit. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said of Musk. 'He only developed [a] problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate.' Musk deleted his tweets tying Trump to the Epstein files sometime Friday or early Saturday. His tweets inspired Democrats California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch to ask U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel to unseal the files. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' the letter read. In February Bondi released over 100 declassified documents pertaining to Epstein, the so-called 'first phase' of a larger release. The documents are heavily redacted and largely disappointing got those who hoped to gain real insight into the investigation. Trump was asked about another release of documents in April, but said he was unsure of when anything else would come out. 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know,' the president explained. Watch the interview with JD Vance in the video above. The post JD Vance Finds Out About Musk's Epstein-Files Posts During Theo Von Interview: 'S— Missile!' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.