Another farm infected with bird flu
A third Victorian farm has been infected with bird flu, less than a month after the state government declared the disease eradicated.
Announced on Thursday, the third farm is close to two other outbreaks detected earlier in February in the northern town of Euroa.
The strain is different to the variant which swept across Victoria, NSW and the ACT in 2024, and different again from a strain wreaking havoc overseas.
These infections severely cut the supply of eggs to Australian supermarkets for the second half of 2024.
'A strong biosecurity system relies on everyone playing their part,' Victoria's acting chief veterinary officer Cameron Bell said.
Being close to two farms already infected, this third discovery was 'not unexpected', Dr Bell said.
Affected farmers were being cooperative and Dr Bell told consumers eggs and poultry products were safe to eat.
This strain of bird flu is H7N8 high pathogenicity avian influenza.
When the first two H7 infections were found, bird, product, equipment and vehicle restrictions were put in place 5km around the farms.
A wider 'control area' spans east of the Goulburn Valley Freeway and includes the townships of Euroa, Violet Town, Longwood, Ruffy, Avenel and Strathbogie. This restriction bans moving of equipment, animals and products too.
In 2024, seven southwestern Victorian farms were infected with the H7N3 strain, and one had the H7N9 strain. These infections were eradicated.
The likelihood of a person being infected with bird flu in Australia through normal contact with healthy birds is very low.
However, humans are susceptible to infection with avian influenza viruses. Natural exposure to some types of bird flu has caused human disease in various forms, ranging from mild or inapparent infection to death.
Most of the bird flu viruses circulating in birds do not readily infect humans.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Controversial 'alcohol alternative' coming to Woolworths this month: 'Impacts can vary'
A plant-based product promising relaxation, mood boosts, and even a safer alternative to alcohol is set to hit Woolworths shelves this month. A bitter-tasting drink made from the root of a Pacific Island plant, kava has long been used in traditional ceremonies across Polynesia. Now, it's being marketed as a wellness beverage in supermarkets across Australia. But not everyone is convinced. While the plant is often marketed as natural and non-intoxicating, the science behind kava's safety and efficacy is still emerging, particularly when it comes to modern, concentrated formulations, Dr Blair Aitken from Swinburne's Centre for Mental Health and Brain Science, told Yahoo News. Some hail its calming effects and link the substance to lower anxiety, while others warn that these commercialised forms come with poorly understood health risks and little regulation. "Kava contains active compounds called kavalactones, which can have a calming effect by influencing brain chemicals like gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and dopamine," Dr Aitken explained. "It may reduce anxiety and promote relaxation without the intoxicating effects of alcohol, but its impact can vary widely depending on the formulation and dosage. "Kavalactones increase levels of GABA, a neurotransmitter that helps calm the brain and nervous system. They also enhance dopamine levels, which may improve overall mood and create a mild sense of well-being, and they slow down brain signals by blocking sodium and calcium channels, reducing overactivity in the nervous system." Woolworths is the latest major retailer to introduce kava-based products, joining Coles, which already offers a small range, including powders and capsules. The move is part of a broader trend following the federal government's 2021 import pilot program, which eased access to kava across most of the country. Commercial availability has since expanded, with products now found in chemists, health food stores, and increasingly on supermarket shelves. Unlike alcohol, Dr Aitken said, kava doesn't typically impair motor skills or reaction time when used in traditional or therapeutic amounts. "Its effects are more subtle and stabilising rather than intoxicating," he said. However there are still concerns, particularly when it comes to modern extracts and non-traditional preparations, he added. "There is no well-established toxic dose for kava," Dr Aitken said. "Most capsule formulations range from 50 to 100 mg of kavalactones, with a recommended maximum daily dose of 250 mg." "When prepared traditionally and used within recommended amounts, kava is considered safe by both the World Health Organisation and the Australian government. The substance shows few serious side effects when used short-term at recommended doses,' he said. "However, higher risks may occur with modern extracts, combined use with alcohol or medications, high doses, or use by individuals with underlying liver issues." Research into kava's use for treating anxiety has yielded mixed results. "While earlier trials showed promising results in generalised anxiety disorder, a more recent study by the same research group did not replicate those findings," Aitken said. "Kava appears more effective for situational or mild anxiety, rather than as a first-line treatment for diagnosed, clinically relevant anxiety." 🍎 Woolworths customers spark debate over brazen fruit act 💰 Woolworths responds to glaring pricing issue 👩 Aussie mum's sad supermarket confession: 'Do anything for my children' In Australia, kava is regulated as a food when imported for personal use or through approved programs. The Northern Territory bans personal importation and restricts use under separate legislation due to concerns about misuse and harm. Other states and territories allow limited personal use under federal guidelines. Internationally, the substance has a range of legal classifications — it's listed as a psychoactive substance in New Zealand, for example. The way kava is prepared also plays a key role in its safety. Traditional water-based methods extract kavalactones while leaving behind many of the potentially harmful compounds. In contrast, modern commercial products sometimes use alcohol or acetone as solvents, which can extract flavokavains—compounds that may negatively affect the liver and nervous system. Some also include stems or leaves, which have different and more toxic chemical profiles than the root. Coles offers several kava products, though not all have clear labelling around kavalactone content. For example, FijiKava Noble Root Powder contains an estimated 70–150 mg per 2.5g serving, but the exact amount is not specified. The TakiMai 50mL kava shot also lacks precise dosing information. By contrast, Bioglan Kava capsules sold at Chemist Warehouse offer standardised dosing, with 60 mg per capsule and a recommended daily intake of 60–120 mg — well within safe limits. "Transparent labelling is essential," Dr Aitken said. "Consumers should monitor their intake carefully and stay within the recommended daily limit." Dr Aitken is also a member of the International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (ICADTS) Special Interest Group for 'Driver State Monitoring Systems,' and noted that while kava is not typically associated with impairment, more research is needed around its effects on alertness and driving, especially at higher doses or in combination with other substances. With Woolworths set to join the expanding commercial kava market, health professionals are calling for increased transparency, clearer consumer education and regulatory oversight. "Just because it's natural doesn't mean it's risk-free," he said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
If books could kill: The poison legacy lurking in libraries
The Victorians loved the colour green. In particular, they loved a vibrant shade of emerald created by combining copper and arsenic, which was used in everything from wallpaper to children's toys. "This colour was very popular for most of the 19th Century because of its vibrancy and its resistance to light fading," says Erica Kotze, a preservative conservator at the University of St Andrews. "We know that many household items were coloured with arsenic-based green pigments. It was even used in confectionery." The trouble is, the combination of elements used is toxic and that's still a problem more than a century later. And it's a particular problem when it comes to old books. Victorian bookbinders used arsenic as well as mercury and chrome to create striking covers. And unlike domestic items, books have survived in archives around the world, creating a 21st Century problem from 19th Century fashion. Prolonged exposure to multiple green books can cause low level arsenic poisoning. Long-term exposure can cause changes to the skin, harm to the liver and kidneys and a reduction in red and white blood cells, which can lead to anaemia and an increased risk of infections. In 2019, an attempt to tackle the problem was set up in Delaware between the Winterthur Museum and the state university. The Poison Book Project tested books and drew up a list of titles which are potentially harmful to humans. These included four books in the National Library of France, which were immediately withdrawn. Inspired by this, Erica Kotze called on her colleague Dr Pilar Gil, who trained as a biochemist before working in Special Collections at the University of St Andrews. Dr Gil took a practical approach to surveying the thousands of historic books in their collection. "The most important thing was to find a non-destructive, portable instrument that could tell us if it was a poisonous book or not," she says. She rule out X-ray technology because of the fragile nature of the books being examined and instead looked to the geology department. They had a spectrometer - a device that measures the distribution of different wavelengths of light - for detecting minerals in rocks. "Minerals and pigments are very similar," says Dr Gil, "so I borrowed the instrument and started looking for emerald green in books." She tested hundreds of books and then realised she was looking at a breakthrough. "I realised there was a distinctive pattern to the toxic ones. It was a 'eureka' moment. I realised it was something that no one had seen before." The next task was to speak to the physics department to build their own prototype. Dr Graham Bruce, senior research laboratory manager explains how it works. "It shines light on the book and measures the amount of light which shines back," he says. "It uses green light, which can be seen, and infrared, which can't be seen with our own eyes. The green light flashes when there are no fragments of arsenic present, the red light when there are pigments." The new testing device is smaller and will be less costly to produce and use than a full-scale spectrometer It has already been used to survey the thousands of books in the St Andrews collections and in the National Library of Scotland, and the team hope to share their design with other institutions around the world. "We're lucky as a large institution to have expensive kit, so that we can test 19th Century potentially toxic books," says Dr Jessica Burge, deputy director of library and museums at the University of St Andrews. "But other institutions with big collections may not have those resources, so we wanted to create something which was affordable and easy. It doesn't require a specialist conservator or analysis, and it's instant." It's also a problem which isn't going away. If anything, toxic books will become more harmful as they get older and disintegrate. Identifying them means they can stored in a safe way and still enjoyed with controlled access and precautions such as wearing gloves. "It will continue to be a live issue," says Dr Burge. "But I think that the biggest issue for institutions at the moment is that any book that's got a green cover from the 19th Century is being restricted because they don't know. "And as libraries and museums, that's not really what we're about. We want people to be able to use the books and help bring back access to collections, rather than restricting their use."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Urgent Health Alert Issued Over Ground Beef Potentially Contaminated With E-Coli
A public health alert has been issued for select ground beef distributed nationwide to Whole Foods retail locations over concerns of E. coli contamination. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) shared information on the exact product affected by the alert. Here's how to tell if your ground beef is safe to eat. If you have ground beef in your fridge or freezer, you'll want to check the label, stat. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) just issued a public health alert for raw, ground beef that may be contaminated with E. coli. A food recall was not enacted as the products are no longer available for purchase, but there is concern that contaminated products may be in consumers' homes. The affected product comes from Organic Rancher Organic Ground Beef. The beef is grass-fed and 85% lean, 15% fat. The product comes in a 1 lb. vacuum-sealed package with a green label displaying either 'use or freeze by 6-19-25' or 'use or freeze by 6-20-25' date. It also shows an establishment number 'EST. 4027' inside the USDA mark of inspection. The items were shipped to distributor locations in CT, GA, IL, and MD, and were distributed to Whole Foods Market retail stores nationwide. 'The problem was discovered when the establishment notified FSIS that they shipped into commerce ground beef product that tested positive for E. coli O157:H7,' the FSIS explained. Fortunately, as of press time, there have been no confirmed reports of illness related to this public health alert, but the FSIS urges anyone concerned that they have impacted product to not eat it. And if you're concerned that you may have E. Coli, contact your healthcare provider. E. coli O157:H7 is the most common strain of the bacteria that makes people sick. It is a potentially life-threatening bacterium that may cause dehydration, bloody diarrhea, and stomach cramps two to eight days (three to four days, on average) after exposure, according to the FSIS. While infections can be mild with many people recovering within a week, they may also be severe or life-threatening for some. The FSIS specifically warns of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a type of kidney failure that can be caused by an E. coli infection. It can happen in people of all ages, but is most common in children under five years old and older adults. Easy bruising, pallor, and lessened urine output are markers, per FSIS. If you experience these signs, seek emergency medical attention immediately, FSIS notes. If you find that you have any of the ground beef included in this public health alert in your fridge or freezer, do not eat it; instead, throw it away or return it to the place of purchase. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
