Jennmar Canada seeks stable ground from tariffs by expanding its Sudbury plant
A company that manufactures ground control products for the mining industry is investing in its Sudbury plant, in part to create a stable future as the United States imposes tariffs on steel.
Jennmar Canada is putting $7 million into expanding the plant on Lasalle Boulevard, increasing the floor space, installing equipment from a sister plant in Pennsylvania and purchasing new equipment to enhance production.
Its products rely heavily on steel reinforcements such as bolts, beams and trusses.
Managing director, David Hurd, projects up to 15 jobs will be created in the city.
He said the expansion had been planned for years, but was stalled by the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, he said the tariff situation is spurring the company to make its Canadian operations more autonomous now.
"Obviously with what's happening with the tariff situation, and the uncertainties that that brings to major manufacturing companies in Canada, we feel that it's time for us to make sure that we are more self-sufficient in our Canadian operations versus depending somewhat on our US sister company," he said.
Hurd says their consumption of steel for their products in Sudbury and their plant in Rouyn-Noranda, Que., is contributing to their decisions.
He said they have purchased half of their steel in Canada but that will increase to more than 85 per cent.
"If you look at moving steel across the border, for instance, where you're facing 25 per cent tariffs from US steel coming into Canada. and vice versa going the other way, of course, then that's a cost that you can't always expect the end users to cover," he said.
"So we're taking a proactive approach at looking at how we can secure our position in the marketplace and be better positioned, quite frankly, to serve the customer in the most cost-effective manner without putting the quality, or any of our supply chains, at risk here in Canada," he said.
While Hurd said the Trump administration may well be correct that tariffs will create more manufacturing jobs in the United States, he said it's Jennmar's corporate philosophy to be as close to its customer base as possible which means investing in its Sudbury operations, in the heart of the mining sector.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
an hour ago
- Cision Canada
Biggest-ever aid cut by G7 members a death sentence for millions of people, says Oxfam
Aid cuts could cost millions of lives and leave girls, boys, women and men without access to enough food, water, education, health treatment G7 countries are making deliberate and deadly choices by cutting life-saving aid, enabling atrocities, and reneging on their international commitments Low and middle-income countries face reduced aid, rising debt, and trade barriers — a perfect storm that threatens development and recovery. OTTAWA, ON, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - The Group of Seven (G7) countries, which together account for around three-quarters of all official development assistance, are set to slash their aid spending by 28 percent for 2026 compared to 2024 levels. It would be the biggest cut in aid since the G7 was established in 1975, and indeed in aid records going back to 1960, reveals a new analysis by Oxfam ahead of the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada. "The G7's retreat from the world is unprecedented and couldn't come at a worse time, with hunger, poverty, and climate harm intensifying. The G7 cannot claim to build bridges on one hand while tearing them down with the other. It sends a shameful message to the Global South, that G7 ideals of collaboration mean nothing," said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar. 2026 will mark the third consecutive year of decline in G7 aid spending – a trend not seen since the 1990s. If these cuts go ahead, G7 aid levels in 2026 will crash by $44 billion to just $112 billion. The cuts are being driven primarily by the US (down $33 billion), Germany (down $3.5 billion), the UK (down $5 billion) and France (down $3 billion). "Rather than breaking from the Trump administration's cruel dismantling of USAID and other US foreign assistance, G7 countries like the UK, Germany, and France are instead following the same path, slashing aid with brutal measures that will cost millions of lives," said Behar. "These cuts will starve the hungry, deny medicine to the sick, and block education for a generation of girls and boys. This is a catastrophic betrayal of the world's most vulnerable and crippling to the G7's credibility," said Behar. Canada allocated $10.17 billion to official development assistance in 2023/2024. Although its foreign aid budgets have been declining for the past two years, Canada is one of the few G7 countries that as not announced its intention to cut ODA. Oxfam Canada is calling on the federal government to clearly affirm its commitment to combating global inequality by maintaining its international aid budget for the coming years. "The Canadian government's recently announced intention to increase Canada's military spending to meet the NATO target of 2% of GDP makes the announcement all the more necessary. International aid makes a crucial contribution to global stability by focusing on prevention and providing essential services that strengthen social cohesion," said Lauren Ravon, Executive Director of Oxfam Canada. Economic projections show that aid cuts will mean 5.7 million more people across Africa will fall below extreme poverty levels in the coming year, a number expected to rocket to 19 million by 2030. Cuts to aid are putting vital public services at risk in some of the world's poorest countries. In countries like Liberia, Haiti, Malawi, and South Sudan, US aid had made up over 40 percent of health and education budgets, leaving them especially exposed. Combined with a growing debt crisis, this is undermining governments' ability to care for their people. Global aid for nutrition will fall by 44 percent in 2025 compared to 2022: The end of just $128 million worth of US-funded child nutrition programs for a million children will result in an extra 163,500 child deaths a year. At the same time, 2.3 million children suffering from severe acute malnutrition – the most lethal form of undernutrition – are now at risk of losing their life-saving treatments. One in five dollars of aid to poor countries' health budgets are cut or under threat: WHO reports that in almost three-quarters of its country offices are seeing serious disruptions to health services, and in about a quarter of the countries where it operates some health facilities have already been forced to shut down completely. US aid cuts could lead to up to 3 million preventable deaths every year, with 95 million people losing access to healthcare. This includes children dying from vaccine-preventable diseases, pregnant women losing access to care, and rising deaths from malaria, TB, and HIV. G7 countries are not just reneging on commitments to global aid and solidarity, they are fuelling conflicts by allowing grave violations of international law, like in Gaza where people are facing starvation. Whether in Ukraine, the occupied Palestinian territory, the Democratic Republic of the Congo or elsewhere, civilians must always be protected, and aid is often the first line of protection they get. G7 countries are illuminating a double standard that risks more global instability, conflict and atrocities. While G7 countries cut aid, their citizen billionaires continue to see their wealth surge. Since the beginning of 2025, the G7 ultra-rich have made $126 billion, almost the same amount as the group's 2025 aid commitment of $132 billion. At this pace, it would take the world's billionaires less than a month to generate the equivalent of the G7's 2025 aid budget. By taxing the super-rich, the G7 could easily meet their financial commitments to end poverty and climate breakdown, whilst also having billions in new revenue to fight inequality in their own countries. "The world is not short of money. The problem is that it is in the hands of the super-rich instead of the public. Rather than fairly taxing billionaires to feed the hungry, we see billionaires joining government to slash aid to the poorest in order to fund tax cuts for themselves," said Behar. Oxfam is calling on the G7 to urgently reverse aid cuts and restore funding to address today's global challenges. More than 50 years after the United Nations set the target of 0.7 percent for aid spending, most G7 countries remain well below this. Oxfam is also urging the G7 to support global efforts led by Brazil and Spain to raise taxes on the super-rich, and to back the call from the African Union and The Vatican for a new UN body to help manage countries' debt problems. NOTES TO EDITORS According to OECD Data Explorer, the combined annual aid expenditure of the G7 in 2024 was $156.694 billion. Canada spent $7.323 billion, the United States $61.821 billion, Japan $17.583 billion, France $15.047 billion, Germany $31.382 billion, Italy $6.534 billion, and the United Kingdom $17.005 billion. Donor Tracker estimates that the decline in combined annual aid spending of the G7 countries for the period 2024 to 2026 will be -$44,488 billion. In 2024, aid from G7 countries declined by 8 percent, and projections for 2025 point to a sharper drop of 19 percent. Modelling using finds that 5.7 million more Africans would fall below the US$2.15 extreme poverty income level in the next year if Trump's administration succeeds in its aid-reduction ambition. This assumes a 20 percent reduction of aid to Africa, considering that some US aid would be maintained as the US alone accounted for 26 percent of aid to Africa before the cuts. The dismantling of USAID and major aid reductions announced by Western donors threaten to undo decades of progress on malnutrition. A 44 percent drop in funding from 2022 levels could lead to widespread hardship and death. Up to 2.3 million children with severe acute malnutrition risk losing life-saving treatment, warns the Standing Together for Nutrition Consortium. There are 2,968 billionaires in the world, and 1,346 live in G7 countries (45 percent). For real-time updates, follow us on X and Bluesky, and join our WhatsApp channel tailored specifically for journalists and media professionals.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Edmonton faces $1.5B capital funding budget shortfall — which is set to grow
The City of Edmonton doesn't have enough money to maintain its existing infrastructure, let alone build anything new. In a fiscal update on Tuesday at City Hall, administration said there is $1.5 billion capital funding shortfall. The money goes towards grants, neighbourhood renewals, fleet replacements and also for debt finance infrastructure. Edmonton isn't unique in this struggle — the city said this is an issue many cities are struggling with in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic. Five years ago, Edmonton paused increasing taxes — something thought to be necessary at the time when many households were dealing with financial struggles such as layoffs or business closures due to the global health emergency. Story continues below advertisement But now, Mayor Amarjeet Sohi says decisions like that, made by previous councils, are coming back to bite the city now. 'They froze taxes, they reduced taxes, they left this council with a huge deficit in our day-to-day operations — underfunding of city services like snow removal, not caring much about social equity issues that we are trying to tackle here, or grant funding that we have increased to community organizations.' 'Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see." 2:01 Edmonton city council approves 8.9% property tax increase in 2024 City leaders say the solution isn't as simple as just spending less, because that can end up costing more down the road. Get weekly money news Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Fiscal responsibility isn't just about keeping taxes low or repressing things because this is what you end up getting,' said Ward Anirniq councillor Erin Rutherford. Story continues below advertisement 'You end up with deferred maintenance, deferred renewal, and then we have the deficit that we're seeing today. 'That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop." Rutherford said one of the long-term solutions the city has come up with is a Universal Renewal Fund. She explained it's dedicated to things like neighbourhood renewal and road maintenance – which can't be funded through loans or money from other levels of government. 'Renewal isn't sexy. It's a lot of behind-the-scenes stuff. So you need what we call pay-as-you-go funding, which means we need cash in hand to fix the things. That's really hard to find unless you build up a piggy bank, so to say, of tax funding that is going straight to that purpose,' Rutherford said. 'It's saying to the residents, 'You know, I know we're taxing you on this, this is what it's going for. You know those potholes that you're complaining about all the time? It's because we're actually not renewing at our ideal state.' So to get there, we need to actually have this fund that, on an ongoing basis, will give us more cash in hand to do the work of maintaining our city.' 1:44 City of Edmonton explores avenues to address funding shortfall Sohi said the city has reduced the operating budget by nearly $200 million but more still needs to be done. Story continues below advertisement The mayor said the city's finances took a hit due to changes the province made to Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI) funding. The program allocated more than $15.2 billion to Alberta communities when it was in place between 2007 and 2023. The provincial government replaced MSI with the Local Government Fiscal Framework (LGFF) in 2024-25. 'We are getting one-third of what we were getting before, and we had to make it up by raising taxes or deferring the repairs. So I think municipalities in Alberta do not get the kind of support that is necessary to continue to provide good quality public services,' Sohi said. On top of the current shortfall, the city expects to be another $1.8 billion short in the next budget cycle, making the gap $3.2 billion. But that doesn't mean the city can just stop maintaining its assets — if nothing is done, Rutherford said it could mean closing down facilities and selling off assets. 'If we do nothing, in 20 years we'll have a huge proportion of our city assets in D and F condition, which means they're basically at failure level, and we will have to shut down some of the most valuable assets that Edmontonians have come to love, right? Our recreation centres, our libraries, our transit service will get worse. 'We will start to see those failures in service across the system.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "We will start to see those failures in service across the system." Story continues below advertisement 1:54 City of Edmonton environmental policies driving up capital budget costs Rutherford said that means the City of Edmonton will be quite limited in what new builds it commits to in the next four-year budget cycle. 'Any growth projects need to very strategic on things like safety — so fire halls, police stations — things that create tax uplift and economic wellness, and things that have funding from other orders of government.' Ultimately to tackle a billion-and-a-half-dollar gap, Edmonton taxpayers will be on the hook.
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Updated: Minister raises concerns over B.C. Ferries' deal with Chinese shipyard
B.C.'s transportation minister has raised concerns with B.C. Ferries about its decision to have a Chinese shipyard build four new large ferries for its passenger fleet during a trade conflict between Canada and China. The winning bidder on the contract announced Tuesday is Chinese state-owned China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards. Mike Farnworth said in a statement he was worried about procuring services from 'any country that is actively harming Canada's economy' with tariffs and protectionism. 'B.C. Ferries is an independent company responsible for its own operational decisions. While B.C. Ferries has made its decision to purchase new vessels offshore, I am disappointed more involvement from Canadian shipyards was not part of the contract,' he said. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Farnworth's remarks came hours after the announcement by B.C. Ferries CEO Nicolas Jimenez that the Chinese shipyard had been chosen to build its vessels, with the first expected to come into service in 2029 and the others following in six-month intervals. Jimenez said he wasn't worried about geopolitical tensions between Canada and China, adding his primary focus was getting the province a good deal. 'Customers expect us to go source the best possible deal, (the) highest quality, a yard that provides safety, a yard that provides the highest in standards when it comes to oversight (and) labour, and to get the best cost,' he said at a news conference Tuesday. 'When it comes to things like trade policy, industrial policy, geopolitics, I think we would really defer that to the federal and provincial governments and expect them to manage and work those issues.' He said in a news release that the shipyard was 'the clear choice based on the overall strength of its bid.' It said Weihai Shipyards has built vessels for Canada's Marine Atlantic ferry company and other operators such as Corsica Linea and Brittany Ferries of France. Canada and China are engaged in a trade dispute, with Beijing imposing retaliatory tariffs on Canadian canola and meal, peas and seafood after Ottawa slapped levies on Chinese-made electric vehicles, steel and aluminum. Jimenez said Tuesday that there are currently no tariffs associated with the import of vessels of this type into Canada and tariff disputes didn't factor into the decision. B.C. Ferries is not releasing the value of the contract other than Jimenez saying it fits within the budget approved by the B.C. Ferries Commissioner earlier this year. He said releasing the deal before the project is complete could put future procurements at risk. The corporation has said it expects to spend up to about $5 billion replacing both major and smaller vessels by 2034. 'To protect B.C. Ferries and our customers, we've structured the contract in a way that reduces our risk while increasing shipyard accountability. Most of the payment is tied to delivery, and that means the shipyard doesn't get fully paid until the vessels are delivered and meet the rigorous standards that we've laid out in the contract,' he said. 'There are also measures like refund guarantees and fixed price terms that will further protect B.C. Ferries and our customers.' B.C. Ferries' head of fleet renewal, Ed Hooper, said no Canadian companies bid on the ships that will carry about 52 per cent more passengers and 24 per cent more vehicles than the ferries they are replacing. Jimenez said 60 per cent of the world's ships are built in China, and B.C. Ferries did due diligence to make sure it understood the 'technical and delivery and country risks associated with making this decision.' B.C. Ferries said it will have its own team of experts at the shipyard throughout construction to provide oversight and quality assurance. In a statement, the Opposition B.C. Conservatives accused Premier David Eby of 'abandoning Canadian workers' by awarding a 'multibillion-dollar' contract to a Chinese state-owned enterprise. The oldest ferry being replaced is the Queen of New Westminster, built in 1964, while the Queen of Cowichan, Queen of Alberni and Queen of Coquitlam all turn 50 next year. B.C. Ferries had hoped to buy five new vessels and bring its fleet size from 10 to 11 but earlier this year the provincial regulator rejected the pitch, saying a fifth ferry 'is not in the public interest' as it is 'not essential for safe and reliable service and is not fiscally prudent.' The parent company of China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards is China Merchants Industry Holdings. The conglomerate's website describes it as a 'centrally administrated state-owned' enterprise with more than a 100 years of history, making it one of the oldest 'Chinese-funded enterprises' in existence. The website says the company is based in Hong Kong and operates nine major shipyards across the Chinese coast as well as overseas subsidiaries and agencies in countries such as Finland and Germany.
