Trump Mobile reiterates claims that new phones are 'made in America'
President Donald Trump's newly launched cellular service is defending its claims that its T1 cellphone are produced in the United States, but the device's website no longer touts the "made in America" message it displayed when it launched.
Instead, it uses language like "brought to life right here in the USA," and "proudly American."
Earlier this month, the Trump Organization, the group that oversees the president's business ventures, unveiled the new T1 Phone, which uses an Android operating system, and an accompanying cellular network with 5G service.
Following the announcement, the service's homepage initially featured a banner claiming the phones would be "MADE IN AMERICA," according to technology news outlet The Verge. However, the outlet reported that all language indicating that claim has been scrubbed as of Wednesday, June 25.
Chris Walker, a Trump Mobile spokesperson, dismissed the report, saying that "T1 phones are proudly being made in America."
"Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate," Walker said in a statement to USA TODAY.
A pre-order message on its website previously referred to the device as a "MADE IN THE USA 'T1 Phone,'" a June 16 Getty Images photo illustration shows.
In a June 16 news release announcing T1 Phone, the Trump Organization touted a "sleek, gold smartphone engineered for performance and proudly designed and built in the United States for customers who expect the best from their mobile carrier."
Eric Trump said T1 Phone will be 'made right here' in US
In a June 16 interview with Fox Business' "Mornings with Maria", Trump Organization Executive Vice President Eric Trump also alluded to the device being manufactured in the U.S.
"You're not calling up call centers in Bangladesh − do it right out of St. Louis, Missouri, and you're going to have phones that are made right here in the United States of America," he said.
Eric Trump added that Trump Mobile is "going to revolutionize cell phones, mobile calling" as it will fully operate in the U.S.
"I really believe we're gonna have one of the great kind of tech platforms as part of the Trump Organization of any company in the world," he added.
How much is Trump's T1 Phone?
Trump Mobile's T1 Phone is priced at for $499 with a down payment of $100.
The phone is expected to debut later this year.
Its cellular service plan, titled "The 47 Plan," offers unlimited talk, text and data and costs $47.45 per month, a nod to the president's first and second White House terms.
The plan grants users with free international calling to 100 countries, with Eric Trump adding that it will provide free long distance calling for military members and their families.
According to Trump Mobile, other services with the plan include:
Contributing: Melina Khan, USA TODAY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON -- One key unsettled issue stalling progress on President Donald Trump's big bill in Congress is particularly daunting: How to cut billions from health care without harming Americans or the hospitals and others that provide care? Republicans are struggling to devise a solution to the health care problem their package has created. Already, estimates say 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage under the House-passed version of the bill. GOP senators have proposed steeper reductions, which some say go too far. 'The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts, and I think that's problematic,' said GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senators have been meeting behind closed doors and with Trump administration officials as they rush to finish up the big bill ahead of the president's Fourth of July deadline. Much of the package, with its tax breaks and bolstered border security spending, is essentially drafted. But the size and scope of healthcare cuts are among the toughest remaining issues. It's reminiscent of the summer during Trump's first term, in 2017, when Republicans struggled to keep their campaign promise to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, only to see the GOP splinter over the prospect of Americans losing health coverage. That legislation collapsed when then-Sen. John McCain famously cast a thumbs-down vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is determined to avoid that outcome, sticking to the schedule and pressing ahead with voting expected by the end of the week. 'This is a good bill and it's going to be great for our country,' Thune said Wednesday, championing its potential to unleash economic growth and put money in people's pockets. The changes to the federal health care programs, particularly Medicaid, were always expected to become a centerpiece of the GOP package, a way to offset the costs of providing tax breaks for millions of Americans. Without action from Congress, taxes would go up next year when current tax law expires. The House-passed bill achieved some $1.5 trillion in savings overall, a large part of it coming from changes to health care. The Medicaid program has dramatically expanded in the 15 years since Obamacare became law and now serves some 80 million Americans. Republicans say that's far too high, and they want to shrink the program back to a smaller size covering mainly poorer women and children. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans are 'trying to take away healthcare from tens of millions of Americans.' Democrats are uniformly opposed to what they call the 'big, ugly bill.' Much of the health care cost savings would come from new 80-hour-a-month work requirements on those who receive Medicaid benefits, even as most recipients already work. But another provision, the so-called provider tax that almost all the states impose to some degree on hospitals and others that serve Medicaid patients, is drawing particular concern for potential cuts to rural hospitals. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said several senators spoke up Wednesday during a private meeting indicating they were not yet ready to start voting. 'That'll depend if we land the plane on rural hospitals,' he said. States impose the taxes as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics decry the system as a type of 'laundering' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide the health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the provider taxes at current levels, while the Senate proposal goes deeper by reducing the tax that some states are able to impose. 'I know the states are addicted to it,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. But he added, 'Obviously the provider tax needs to go away.' But a number of GOP senators, and the hospitals and other medical providers in their states, are raising steep concerns that the provider tax changes would decimate rural hospitals. In a plea to lawmakers, the American Hospital Association said the cuts won't just affect those who get health coverage through Medicaid, but would further strain emergency rooms 'as they become the family doctor to millions of newly uninsured people.' 'And worse, some hospitals, especially those in rural communities, may be forced to close altogether,' said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the hospital group. The Catholic Health Association of the United States noted in its own letter that Medicaid provides health insurance coverage for one in five people and nearly half of all children. 'The proposed changes to Medicaid would have devastating consequences, particularly for those in small towns and rural communities, where Medicaid is often the primary source of health care coverage,' said Sister Mary Haddad, the group's president and CEO. Trying to engineer a fix to the problem, senators are considering creating a rural hospital fund to help offset the lost Medicaid money. GOP senators circulated a proposal to pour $15 billion to establish a new rural hospital fund. But several senators said that's too high, while others said it's insufficient. Collins has proposed that the fund be set at $100 billion. 'It won't be that big, but there will be a fund,' Thune said. Hawley, who has been among those most outspoken about the health care cuts, said he's interested in the rural hospital fund but needs to hear more about how it would work. He has also raised concerns about a new $35 per service co-pay that could be charged to those with Medicaid, which is in both the House and Senate versions of the bill. 'Getting the fund is good. That's important, a step forward,' Hawley said. But he asked: 'How does the fund actually distribute the money? Who will get it to hospitals? ... Or is this just going to be something that exists on paper?' A new analysis from the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates the package would result in up to $2.3 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years, a markedly different assessment from other analyses. In contrast, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's dynamic analysis of the House-passed measure estimates an increase in deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Makes Major Change to Mortgages: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is calling on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider cryptocurrency as an asset on mortgage applications, in a move director William J. Pulte described as in line with the Trump administration's agenda. "After significant studying, and in keeping with President Trump's vision to make the United States the crypto capital of the world, today I ordered the Great Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage," Pulte wrote on X, sharing the directive issued by the agency on Wednesday. In the document, the FHFA called on the two housing giants to prepare a proposal for considering cryptocurrency as an asset for reserves in their respective single-family mortgage loan risk assessments, without conversion to U.S. dollars. Only crypto assets that can be evidenced and stored on a U.S.-regulated centralized exchange subject to all applicable laws should be taken into consideration, it said. Use of crypto for home buying has been limited. Only 1 percent of those who made a down payment said they used crypto cash, a National Association of Realtors survey of people who bought a home between July 2023 and June 2024 found. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference following the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25, 2025, in The Hague, Netherlands. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference following the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25, 2025, in The Hague, is a breaking news story and will be later updated with more information.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump picked a horrible time to crush electric cars
Just a few short months ago, American consumers had an appealing off-ramp: electric vehicles. EV sales pushed above 1.3 million vehicles in 2024. The future of cars was increasingly looking like it would be electric. Advertisement But since he took office, President Trump has been methodically stifling the EV market. He has issued orders Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up He wants to gut EV charging infrastructure and has threatened to cancel tax credits that prompted many people to switch to an electric vehicle. He even says he plans to sell the Tesla he bought from former DOGE czar Elon Musk Faced with that hostility and the ever-shifting tariff landscape, Detroit automakers have Advertisement Meanwhile, plans to build EV battery plants — many in red states — are slowing down, potentially threatening future jobs. Even those that survive are shrinking. On Monday, Ford Motor gave journalists a tour of its All this is alarming to Ford, which has another headache: It is licensing lithium-ion battery technology from a Chinese company 'We don't want to back off on scaling, hiring, or training in an industry we need to be competitive in the future,' said Lisa Drake, Ford's vice president of technology platform programs and EV systems, Trump's attacks on EVs threaten to put the United States even further behind the rest of the world. Globally, analysts think For now, the main alternative to EVs are gas-powered hybrid-electric vehicles, which are expected to set records themselves this year, in part because Toyota has switched two of its best sellers, the Camry and the RAV4, to hybrids. Advertisement Those past spikes in gas prices have also led to jumps in the popularity of hybrids. I bought my first one in 2008, when gasoline in Michigan soared above $4 a gallon, and I'm now on my second. Hybrid sales so far this year Counting hybrids and EVs together, it could turn out that one in four vehicles sold this year is 'electrified,' as Toyota calls it. Already, For now, hybrids may be the compromise for environmentally minded consumers. But who knows: Maybe they'll appear on Trump's radar once he's unplugged EVs.
