The Intifada Is Already Globalized. Its Victims Must Unite
In Colorado on Sunday, a man shouting, "Free Palestine!" attacked a Jewish gathering and set elderly victims on fire. Eleven days earlier, another man shouting, "Free Palestine!" executed a young couple in cold blood as they were leaving a Jewish event in Washington, D.C.
Americans are asking: Does this mean the slogan "Globalize the Intifada" is coming true?
Our answer: "Globalize the Intifada" has long since come true. And now it's coming to America.
The world often associates the Intifada with the Israel-Palestine conflict. But the same ideology also targets Hindus, Nigerian Christians, other Africans, Yazidis, Druze Arabs, Alawite and Ahmadiyya Muslims, Kurds, Copts, Maronites, Assyrians, Amazigh, Iranians, Sikhs, Samaritans, Baha'is, Armenians, and so many others. And that ideology is gaining a disturbing level of influence in Western societies.
Railway Police officers stand in formation on a platform during a security drill at Srinagar railway station, India, on June 4, 2025. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit Jammu in early June...
Railway Police officers stand in formation on a platform during a security drill at Srinagar railway station, India, on June 4, 2025. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit Jammu in early June to inaugurate the first Vande Bharat train service from Katra to Kashmir, a route that passes through the world's highest Chenab Bridge and connects the region to New Delhi for the first time. The visit follows Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, in response to a deadly attack in Pahalgam that killed tourists. More
BASIT ZARGAR/Middle east images/AFP via Getty Images
The victims of the Globalized Intifada are a natural coalition that's waiting to happen. And it will happen once we all realize how each of our conflicts is connected.
The horrific massacre in India in April, where 24 Hindus and one Christian were murdered by Islamists in Pahalgam, Kashmir, gave many Jews flashbacks to Oct. 7, 2023. It wasn't just because of how cruelly the victims were slaughtered. It was because the immediate reaction in some quarters was to demonize the victims.
Many pounced on the tragedy as an opportunity to vilify India for its policies in its Muslim-majority region of Kashmir. Former Al Jazeera journalist Sana Saeed characterized Kashmir as an "occupied" territory where India was "brutally repressing its Muslim population." Others accused India of committing "genocide" in Kashmir and engaging in "apartheid" and "settler-colonialism" there. Kashmir was characterized as an "open air prison" where Hindus were committing "land theft," giving Muslims the right to "resist."
The anti-India terrorists and their apologists clearly use the same propaganda playbook as their ideological brethren in Hamas. They make the same accusations to justify atrocities against innocent civilians—Globalize the Intifada, indeed.
Terrorist narratives aside, Hindus in Kashmir—like Jews in Israel—have a continuous history that dates back thousands of years. Kashmir became majority Muslim through invasions, forced conversions, persecution, and periodic expulsions. Most of the remaining Kashmiri Hindus, primarily from the scholarly Pandit community, fled after a wave of religious attacks in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Islamists gave Hindus an ultimatum to "convert, leave, or die." One of the many Hindus killed during that period was Girija Tickoo, a teacher who was gang raped by terrorists. When they were finished with her, they cut her in half with a mechanical saw while she was still alive.
While the Pahalgam massacre triggered Jews with flashbacks to October 7, October 7, in turn, triggered Hindus with flashbacks to the sadistic butchery in Kashmir over three decades ago. Same ideology, same playbook.
Pahalgam also triggered flashbacks in Kenya. Victims in Pahalgam were asked to recite the Islamic declaration of faith. If they couldn't, they were executed on the spot. The Somali Islamist group al-Shabaab used the same method to identify non-Muslims to kill during a series of terrorist attacks in Kenya. These included a shopping mall siege in 2013 that killed over 60, a bus hijacking in 2014 that killed 28, and a 2015 college massacre where 148 people—predominantly Christian students—were killed. Same ideology, same playbook.
And so it goes, all around the world, conflict after conflict linked by a shared ideology. What the communities under attack share is that their plight is mostly unknown to the outside world. You could call them the "Coalition of the Ignored."
Jews, both in Israel and in the diaspora, are the outlier. They are constantly getting attention throughout the world, most of it negative. Since the October 7 attacks, Jews have been buried under an avalanche of propaganda. This has really driven home to Jews how outnumbered they are.
As long as the world remains fixated on the Jews and Israel, Islamists and their allies can use their overwhelming numbers (and, yes, their financial superiority) to flood the zone with demonizing propaganda and portray themselves as the good guys. Meanwhile, the members of the Coalition of the Ignored are each left to struggle in isolation and obscurity.
Jews have the world's attention but not the numbers. The Coalition of the Ignored has the numbers but not the world's attention. The solution is for us all to come together, to amplify one another's stories, and to lend our support to one another with our voices, numbers, and moral authority.
We must form a Coalition Against Terror. Not against any culture or faith. But against an ideology that seeks dominance by intentionally targeting non-combatants with violence.
It's time for every community struggling against this ideology to unite. We are the ones who must resist. The survival of our civilizations depends on it.
David Cohen is an attorney who served as head of the Office of Insular Affairs and deputy assistant secretary of the Interior during the Bush administration.
Avatans Kumar is a linguist and a recipient of the California News Publishers Association and San Francisco Press Club's journalism awards.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Lululemon fans furious as tariffs threaten to drive prices even higher amid stock plunge
Lululemon lovers are already stretching their wallets to the limit — and now they've had enough. Fans and critics alike were clucking their tongues Friday after the athleisure giant warned customers they'd soon be paying even more for already-pricey workout gear — following a whopping stock nosedive. The culprit? President Donald Trump's tariffs — and, apparently, broke Americans tightening their purse strings. Advertisement 'We experienced lower store traffic in the Americas, partially reflective of economic uncertainty, inflationary pressures, lower consumer confidence, and changes in discretionary spending,' the company said in a recent statement. Translation: Even the brand's cult-following of millennial and Gen Z yoga bunnies aren't splurging $128 on leggings like they used to. 4 Even Lululemon's loyal legging junkies — from millennial moms to Gen Z gym rats — are tightening their waistbands on those $128 yoga pants. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement Execs are scrambling as the one-time Wall Street darling fell short of analyst predictions, seeing just a 1% increase in sales year-over-year, falling short of the 3% forecast. 'We are planning to take strategic price increases … on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature,' chief financial officer Meghan Frank said on an earnings call, adding the hikes will roll out within weeks. 'It will be price increases on a small portion of our assortments, and they will be modest in nature,' she claimed. 4 The blame for all this? President Trump's tariffs — and cash-strapped shoppers cutting back. REUTERS Advertisement CEO Calvin McDonald admitted he was 'not happy' with U.S. growth figures and blamed the belt-tightening on skittish shoppers. 'We experienced lower store traffic … lower consumer confidence,' he echoed. While some may point to floundering new lines like the Glow Up collection or Daydrift trousers, the company is pinning the blame on tariffs — particularly those slapped on goods made in Vietnam and China, where the company sources most of its fabrics. In 2024, 40% of Lululemon's products were made in Vietnam, and 28% of its fabrics came from mainland China — both hit hard by Trump's trade crackdown. Advertisement Now, Lulu says it's working to cut costs and negotiate with vendors to offset the tariff hit. But customers aren't exactly downward dogging in support. On X, disgruntled users lashed out at the brand's pricing and manufacturing decisions. 4 The athleisure company says it's trimming costs and haggling with vendors to ease the tariff pain — but shoppers aren't exactly striking a warrior pose in approval. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images 'You better get it together. Lulu. Using tariffs as an excuse in your rest of the year outlook is not a smart move. Amazon/Walmart tried this it didn't go well. You're Down 65$ today. Our family was a big lulu fan not so much anymore,' one raged. 'For what they charge for their products, you'd think it was made in America,' snapped another. 'It can't be that yoga pants shouldn't cost $125 a pair. No. That's not it,' someone joked. Others were more blunt: 'Their stuff is ridiculously overpriced… total ripoff.' 'Lululemon's collapse isn't about tariffs — it's about betting on foreign manufacturing while ignoring American resilience,' one critic seethed. Advertisement They continued, 'Relocating production… was always a gamble, and now they're paying for it.' Some simply slammed the entire brand: 'Lululemon clothing is so overpriced — always has been. Only the Gen Zers think its the name on them that make them special.' 4 In 2024, Lulu pumped out 40% of its gear in Vietnam and got 28% of its fabrics from China — two prime targets in Trump's tariff smackdown. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement Another scorched: 'Stupid rich women paying exorbitant prices for stretch pants. SMH.' Despite the backlash, Lululemon doesn't appear to be sweating just yet — but with costs climbing and customers stretching their budgets, the future might not be quite so flexible.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Federal panel rules in favor of state in Arkansas congressional redistricting lawsuit
(Getty Images) A three-judge federal court panel on Friday dismissed with prejudice a case challenging Arkansas' congressional district map. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas by a group of voters and the Christian Ministerial Alliance. It claimed boundaries for Arkansas' 2nd Congressional District were racially gerrymandered and diluted the votes of Black Arkansans. Congressional and state legislative districts are redrawn after the U.S. Census each decade in a process known as redistricting. The goal is to create districts that contain roughly the same population. The Ministerial Alliance's lawsuit was one of four filed to challenge Arkansas' 2021 redistricting process and the only one that hadn't been dismissed. On Friday, U.S. Circuit Judge David Stras, U.S. District Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. and U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. granted the state's motion for summary judgment, saying there was not enough evidence to support the plaintiffs' racial discrimination claims. 'Multiple Arkansas citizens challenge how the General Assembly redrew the state's congressional district lines,' Friday's order states. 'Although their allegations were plausible enough to survive a motion to dismiss [Docs. 35, 42], the evidence does not back up their claims of racial discrimination. For that reason, we grant summary judgment to Secretary of State John Thurston.' Thurston, who was secretary of state when the lawsuit was filed in 2023, was elected state treasurer in 2024 during a special election. The governor appointed Cole Jester to succeed Thurston. Previously, the entirety of Pulaski County was included in Arkansas' Second Congressional District, which is represented by Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill. During the 2021 redistricting process, Pulaski County was split between three congressional districts. Plaintiffs alleged the General Assembly considered racial data when redrawing district lines and unconstitutionally 'cracked' the Black voting bloc in southeast Pulaski County. The state's attorneys submitted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the state last October. According to Friday's order, the original complaint alleged two constitutional claims — one for racial gerrymandering under the Fourteenth Amendment and one for vote dilution under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The federal panel said race needed to be 'the predominant factor' motivating the General Assembly's decision and that awareness or acceptance of a 'racially disparate impact is not enough.' Three-judge panel hears arguments but doesn't rule in Arkansas redistricting lawsuit Creating 'an alternative map' is one way to prove redrawn boundaries were racially motivated, the panel said. However, that only works if the alternative map still accomplishes the Legislature's partisan goals. 'If it does not, then it just highlights how the pursuit of a nonracial aim — like retention, partisanship, or geography — could have led to an unintended racial disparity,' the panel wrote. 'All three of the plaintiffs' alternatives fall short in exactly this way.' Citing a U.S. Supreme Court reversal of a decision by a three-judge panel that found South Carolina had discriminated against Black voters in a 2023 redistricting lawsuit, Stras and his counterparts noted the high court emphasized that the courts must 'start with the presumption that the legislature acted in good faith.' 'Absent direct evidence of racial discrimination and with only weak circumstantial evidence supporting the plaintiffs' case, the presumption of legislative good faith tips the balance,' Stras wrote. That coupled with the fact that no alternative map achieves the General Assembly's goals with 'significantly greater racial balance,' meant the judges could not reasonably find that the plaintiffs had proved enough for their claim of racial gerrymandering to survive summary judgment, according to the ruling. The primary obstacle of the presumption of good faith holds true for the plaintiffs' vote-dilution claim, according to Friday's order. While the vote-dilution claim requires race to be a 'motivating factor' instead of the predominant one, the panel argued 'the plaintiffs do not have enough evidence to get there.' 'Most of what the plaintiffs offer are the materials we have already discussed: maps, statistics, and legislative history, none of which are enough to infer a racial motivation,' the panel wrote. The federal judges acknowledged as evidence a report from a university doctoral candidate that describes Arkansas' 'long history' with racism and resistance to Black voters, but wrote that much of that predates the passage of the 1964 Voting Rights Act. 'Even if he identifies a few scattered examples since then, none are 'reasonably contemporaneous with the challenged decision,' giving us little insight into what the General Assembly may have been thinking four years ago,' the panel wrote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump reluctant to confront China over support for Russia's war against Ukraine, Bloomberg reports
U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling back from pressuring China over its support for Russia's war effort, instead prioritizing other aspects of the U.S.-China relationship, U.S. and European officials familiar with internal discussions told Bloomberg. These officials, speaking anonymously, said that the administration has lowered the issue of Russia's war against Ukraine on its list of foreign policy priorities and is focusing on bilateral issues with Beijing, though they noted Trump could still shift course. The change in approach marks a departure from the long-held stance of the U.S. and its G7 partners, who have consistently called out China as a key enabler of Russia's war in Ukraine. In March, G7 foreign ministers condemned Beijing's support for Moscow and urged it to use its influence over Russian President Vladimir Putin to help end the war. However, Trump said that "nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine" during his recent call with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Officials suggest this pivot reflects Trump's desire to break with the foreign policy priorities of former President Joe Biden, who viewed relations with other governments largely through the lens of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, Trump's team is prioritizing issues like tariffs, technology restrictions, and rare earths. One official noted that Trump is reluctant to directly criticize China's role in aiding Russia while he continues talks with Putin aimed at brokering a ceasefire. At the same time, Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing for new sanctions against Russia, including measures targeting Chinese and Indian purchases of discounted Russian oil. Graham's bill has gained over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, signaling strong bipartisan support. U.S. officials have also expressed frustration at European countries that continue buying Russian energy while criticizing Beijing's exports to Moscow—exports that include dual-use components and sanctioned technologies used in weapons production. Despite Trump's current stance, the European Union has maintained public pressure on China, both through diplomatic channels and public statements. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas recently accused Beijing of fueling Russia's war through dual-use exports. Moscow has continued to receive critical components from China, including drone parts, even as Beijing has restricted similar exports to Ukraine and the West. While the Biden administration and EU have sanctioned several Chinese firms involved in aiding Russia's military production, Trump has yet to impose any new penalties. Read also: 'Find and destroy' – how Ukraine's own Peaky Blinders mastered the art of bomber drones We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
