Dixon Family YMCA seeking community support to maintain programs
May 30—DIXON — The Dixon Family YMCA is asking the community to help ensure everyone, regardless of their financial circumstances, has access to its programs and services.
Dixon YMCA Chief Executive Officer Andy McFarlane said his nonprofit facility is trying to raise $85,000 by Sunday, June 1, as part of its annual Strong Kids Campaign. Without that funding, he said the Dixon YMCA may be forced to scale back some of the assistance it provides to less fortunate families and individuals.
McFarlane said the funds raised through the campaign help to subsidize the YMCA's youth programs while providing direct financial assistance to youths and families who otherwise could not afford a membership or services, such as after-school or sports programs.
"The good news is we've reached the 50% mark," McFarlane said. "We're thankful for the community and those people willing to donate funds, and also the volunteers who donate their time and give us the support that we need as a non-profit."
McFarlane said that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Dixon YMCA had no trouble reaching the Strong Kids Campaign's yearly goal. But over the past three years, he said the facility has struggled to reach the 50% mark.
McFarlane said the situation is partly due to economic factors, but also reflects shifts in how people give to charities. He said the change is influenced by uncertainty surrounding federal government actions, funding availability and limited access to government grants.
If the Dixon YMCA does not meet its funding goal, McFarlane said it may have to reduce the level of financial assistance it provides.
"For instance, somebody that may have a 50% reduction in fees for a program or membership, we may have to knock that down to 35%," McFarlane said. "Or we wouldn't approve as many of the financial assistance applications, but we'd want to stretch those dollars to go the furthest that they can for those in need. The bottom line is we wouldn't be able to help as much."
In addition to the Strong Kids Campaign, McFarlane said there are multiple ways people can help support the Dixon YMCA.
* Give to the Greatest Need Campaign: These donations provide YMCA leaders the flexibility to direct funds to the areas that need it most — whether that is supporting critical programs, keeping facilities running, or responding to unexpected challenges.
* Capital Gifts: These are long-term investments in YMCA facilities. Capital donations support major projects, such as building or improving centers.
McFarlane said the Dixon YMCA tries to keep membership costs affordable, noting that the most recent rate increase — the first in 18 months — went into effect in January.
Despite the best efforts to limit price hikes, McFarlane acknowledged that rising operational costs, including monthly utility bills that can range from $4,800 to $6,500, and increases in staff wages because of minimum wage adjustments are making it more difficult.
"So, even though we're trying to keep those fees affordable for everyone, some programs may have to drastically jump just to cover expenses for those services," McFarlane said. "We need people's support now more than ever."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's big bill making its way through Congress will cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the United States without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill'In the words of Elon Musk, this bill is a 'disgusting abomination,'' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reviving the billionaire former Trump aide's criticism of the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he called Musk late Tuesday to discuss the criticism but had not heard back. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson told reporters. The analysis comes at a crucial moment in the legislative process as Trump is pushing Congress to have the final product on his desk to sign into law by the Fourth of July. The work of the CBO, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress, will be weighed by lawmakers and others seeking to understand the budgetary impacts of the sprawling 1,000-page-plus package. Ahead of the CBO's release, the White House and Republican leaders criticized the budget office in a preemptive campaign designed to sow doubt in its findings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the CBO has been 'historically wrong,' and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the CBO was 'flat wrong' because it underestimated the potential revenue growth from Trump's first round of tax breaks in 2017. The CBO last year said receipts were $1.5 trillion, or 5.6% greater than predicted, in large part because of the 'burst of high inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. White House Budget Director Russ Vought said when you adjust for 'current policy' — which means not counting some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that are simply being extended for the next decade — the overall package actually doesn't pile onto the deficit. He argued the spending cuts alone in fact help reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion over the decade. Democrats and even some Republicans call that 'current policy' accounting move a gimmick, but it's the approach Senate Republicans intend to use during their consideration of the package to try to show it does not add to the nation's deficits. Vought argued that the CBO is the one using a 'gimmick' by tallying the costs of continuing those tax breaks that would otherwise expire. Leavitt also suggested that the CBO's employees are biased, even though certain budget office workers face strict ethical rules — including restrictions on campaign donations and political activity — to ensure objectivity and impartiality. 'When it comes time to make prognostications on economic growth, they've always been wrong,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at a press conference. Asked if it's time to get rid of the CBO, Scalise did not dismiss the idea, saying it's valid to raise concerns. Alongside the costs of the bill, the CBO had previously estimated that nearly 4 million fewer people would have food stamps each month due to the legislation's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The bill, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after the president's own catch phrase, is grinding its way through Congress, as the top priority of Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate — and face stiff opposition from Democrats, who call it Trump's 'big, ugly bill.' All told, the package seeks to extend the individual income tax breaks that had been approved in 2017 but that will expire in December if Congress fails to act, while adding new ones, including no taxes on tips. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To help cover the lost revenue, Republicans want to slash some federal spending. They propose phasing out green energy tax breaks put in place during Democrat Joe Biden's presidency. New work requirements for some adults up to age 65 on Medicaid and SNAP would begin in December 2026 and are expected to result in less spending on those programs. Republicans argue their proposals are intended to make Medicaid and other programs stronger by rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. They want the federal funding to go those who most need health care and other services, often citing women and children. But Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said those claims are bogus and are simply part of long-running GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as most states have expanded Medicaid to serve more people under the program. 'They just want to strangle health care,' Schumer said. The package also would provide a $4 trillion increase to the nation's debt limit, which is now $36 trillion, to allow more borrowing. The Treasury Department projects the debt limit will need to be raised this summer to pay the nation's already accrued bills. Now in its 50th year, the CBO was established by law after Congress sought to assert its control, as outlined in the Constitution, over the budget process, in part by setting up the new office as an alternative to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Staffed by some 275 economists, analysts and other employees, the CBO says it seeks to provide Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. Its current director, Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury official in Republican President George W. Bush's administration, was reappointed to a four-year term in 2023.
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Health care stocks are due for a turnaround after a historically bad month, according to the charts
The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) was down over 5% in May, as the S & P 500 gained over 6%, which means that XLV underperformed the index by 11%. That's a huge performance discrepancy. In fact, it was the worst relative monthly percent move vs. the SPX in XLV's history, dating back to late 1998. As is clear from this long-term chart, the odds of this horribly bad relative weakness continuing at this same pace is low – at least for June. XLV itself now has approached two major long-term support levels after the recent downturn. The first is the rising trendline that begins at the 2009 financial crisis low and extends through the Covid bottom. XLV tested this line in mid-May, bounced and finished the month modestly off its lows. The second key support zone comes from the cluster of lows in 2021, 2022 and 2023, noted by the horizontal line that's in the low 120s. The converging lines present a confluence of support that clearly could help XLV's bouncing prospects in June. XLV: The 3 biggest holdings Believe it or not, 34 of XLV's 61 components actually logged gains in May. That's encouraging, but we'll need to see its biggest holdings respond soon. If they can't rally, XLV will continue to struggle. The three largest stocks within the ETF are Eli Lilly , Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie , which make up nearly 27% of XLV combined. So, what are the odds that all three stocks actually can mount strong up-moves in June? Let's take a closer look. We'll start with LLY since it's XLV's biggest component, with a 12% weighting. LLY last made an all-time high in August 2024. From that peak to its April low, the stock lost 30%. But as the following weekly chart (in log scale) shows, it wasn't straight down from there. LLY logged various rallies and drawdowns since then, all of which have taken place within the pictured downward sloping trading channel. The best time to buy LLY, thus, has been after a big, long decline. The stock just fell another 20% from April 30 through May 25. As we can see, the past ensuing bounces yielded big percentage moves, even if they ultimately failed to break through the channel's upper threshold. Additionally, LLY's weekly Williams %R indicator (on the lower panel) is emerging from an oversold condition, which has supported three of the last four big up-moves. In fact, LLY quietly has logged gains in six of the last seven trading days. That's a good start. JNJ (7.7% weight) has been trending lower since topping in 2022, while ABBV (6.8%) has been in a clear uptrend the last few years. However, both have experienced various swings within their respective long-term trading channels — like LLY. And with both JNJ and ABBV having sold off from their 2025 highs, now would be an opportune time for the next bounce to commence. From a big picture market perspective, rotation is an important component of true, long-lasting uptrends. Thus, if/when the air comes out of the more extended sectors and groups soon, capital could find its way to the underperforming areas, which of course, includes health care. DISCLOSURES: None. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.
Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What is the Congressional Budget Office? And why is it a target of Trump?
The budget office also projected that by 2034, 10.9 million more people would be uninsured, due to proposed spending cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Related : The bill now Advertisement In the weeks ahead of the CBO's analysis, the White House and Republican leaders have criticized the budget office in an effort to sow doubt in its findings. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's what to know about the nonpartisan agency and what the Trump administration has said about it: What is the CBO? The CBO is a nonpartisan agency that helps lawmakers estimate the cost of proposed legislation and provides reports on federal spending. It's led by a director appointed by Congress to a four-year term, with the selection alternating between the House and Senate Budget Committee chairs. The CBO emphasizes that political affiliation plays no role in its hiring process, stating it selects candidates 'solely on the basis of his or her fitness to perform the duties of the position.' Advertisement Is the CBO partisan? CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is also prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. What has the CBO said in the past about Trump policy? The budget office said in April 2018, during Trump's first term, that tax receipts would reach $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. However, receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected and Republican lawmakers have seized on that discrepancy since then. The CBO later reported that revenues were higher than expected because of the 'burst of inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those factors. What Trump and his allies have said about the agency Ahead of the CBO's analysis, Trump slammed the agency in a 'The Democrat inspired and 'controlled' Congressional Budget Office (CBO) purposefully gave us an EXTREMELY LOW level of Growth, 1.8% over 10 years,' Trump wrote. 'I predict we will do 3, 4, or even 5 times the amount they purposefully 'allotted' to us (1.8 percent) and, with just our minimum expected 3 percent growth, we will more than offset our tax cuts (which will, in actuality, cost us no money!),' Trump added. Advertisement In an 'The CBO sometimes gets projections correct, but they're always off every single time when they project economic growth,' Johnson told NBC News. '[The CBO] always underestimate the growth that will be brought about by tax cuts and reduction in regulations,' Johnson added. At a Alyssa Vega can be reached at
