DOJ opens probe after left-wing DA requires prosecutors to consider race in plea deals
The Justice Department has opened a civil rights investigation into the Minneapolis-area Hennepin County Attorney's Office's new directive for its prosecutors to consider race when negotiating plea deals with criminal defendants.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, Acting Associate Attorney General Chad Mizelle and Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon informed Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty in a letter that the Justice Department is opening a probe into whether the Hennepin County Attorney's Office "engaged in a pattern of practice of depriving persons of rights, privileges or immunities secured or protect by the Constitution or laws of the United States."
The letter, dated May 2, cited Moriarty's recently adopted "Negotiations Policy for Cases Involving Adult Defendants," which instructs prosecutors to consider race when formulating plea offers, stating that "racial identity… should be part of the overall analysis," and that prosecutors "should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate."
"In particular, the investigation will focus on whether HCAO engages in illegal consideration of race in its prosecutorial decision-making," they said said in the letter, which Dhillon shared on X.
Bondi, Mizelle and Dhillon said their investigation will include "a comprehensive review of all relevant HCAO policies and practices that may involve the illegal consideration of race in prosecutorial decision-making."
Dhillon has also authorized a "full investigation to determine whether the HCAO is engaged in a pattern or practice of depriving persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States."
"Please be assured that we have not reached any conclusions about the subject matter of the investigation," their letter addressed to Moriarty said. "We will consider all relevant information, and we welcome your assistance in helping to identify what that might be. We would appreciate your cooperation in our investigation. In our years enforcing civil rights statutes involving state and local law enforcement agencies, we have worked with jurisdictions of all sizes across the nation to resolve investigations, usually without contested litigation."
The letter said the Civil Rights Division's Special Litigation Sections will oversee the investigation and will be in contact with Moriarty "shortly to set up a mutually agreeable date and time to discuss the parameters of this investigation, including the scope of information that we will be seeking from you."
Fox News Digital reached out to Moriarty's office and the DOJ for comment on Sunday.
Moriarty was elected among a wave of progressive district attorneys who took office following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis and subsequent Black Lives Matter protests and riots. She has been backed by groups tied to money from megadonor George Soros, one of the most prominent backers of progressive issues in the United States.
The former chief public defender for the county, Moriarty became the Hennepin County Attorney in January 2023 after promising to deliver on holding police accountable in the community where Floyd was killed.
Moriarty's two immediate predecessors had been in office for a combined 31 years, and her promises of dramatic changes had the backing of the state Democratic Party and community leaders. Since then, however, Moriarty has faced fierce backlash, even among some former supporters, as critics questioned decisions to seek lighter sentences for violent crimes in some cases and to divert more people to programs rather than jail.
Police officers, local officials and some progressive activists condemned Moriarty after she charged a White state trooper with the killing of a Black man last summer, only to later reverse course and drop the charges. Leaders of the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association had waged a high-profile campaign urging Tim Walz, the state's governor and former Democratic vice presidential nominee, to reassign the prosecution away from Moriarty.
Last month, Republicans across the North Star State condemned Moriarty for failing to charge a Walz staffer who allegedly vandalized at least six Tesla vehicles. President Donald Trump's administration has identified Tesla vandalism as "domestic terrorism" and led a nationwide effort alongside the Justice Department to hold vandals accountable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
29 minutes ago
- E&E News
DOJ tells Trump he can wipe out national monuments
A key legal adviser to the White House said that President Donald Trump has the authority under existing federal law to abolish a pair of national monuments in California, as well as any others across the country created by prior presidents. Lanora Pettit, who helms the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), overturned a nearly 90-year-old precedent governing national monuments in a new legal opinion published Tuesday but dated May 27. The opinion, authored by Pettit, declares that the Antiquities Act of 1906 not only allows presidents to create national monuments from federal lands, but also says they can declare that existing monuments 'either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act's protections.' Advertisement Pettit said in her opinion that the White House asked the office to examine whether Trump could revoke former President Joe Biden's proclamations creating the Chuckwalla and Sáttítla Highlands national monuments in California. 'We think that the President can, and we should,' wrote Pettit in the opinion, which covers monuments broadly. There are more than 100 monuments established by prior presidents that have not been altered by Congress in some way, including converting the lands into national parks. Pettit also wrote that she was asked to review a 1938 opinion issued by then-Attorney General Homer Cummings to then-President Franklin Roosevelt, which has long guided interpretations of the Antiquities Act. In that opinion, Cummings determined that one president could not abolish a monument created by predecessors, ruling that because the designations are equivalent to an act of Congress, only lawmakers could abolish a monument. But Pettit criticized the 1938 ruling, writing that 'presidents have long been understood to have the power to come to a different factual decision regarding whether particular objects within a previously reserved monument merit protection.' 'For large parcels with multiple monuments (like Chuckwalla and Sáttítla Highlands), there is no principled distinction between determining that one object is not worth protecting or all of them — and, by operation of law, no reasoned distinction between reducing and eliminating the parcel,' she added. In addition to the two California sites, the Trump administration has been weighing reductions to four other monuments: Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in Utah, Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni-Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon and the Ironwood Forest monuments in Arizona, and the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks monument in New Mexico. Justin Pidot, a law professor at the University of Arizona who previously worked at White House's Council on Environmental Quality, said the OLC opinion marks a 'radical shift' that could potential impact dozens of monuments now and into the future. 'This will go down as one of the most significant rollbacks in conservation in history,' Pidot said. Pettit's interpretation of the Antiquities Act would effectively reduce protections for monuments to just the length of a presidential term, he said. 'It means that national monuments exist only at the pleasure of the current president who is in power,' Pidot said. 'It protects the resources, but there's no permanence. 'That's a big difference from where we've been for more than 100 years where the president protects monuments and they stay unless Congress acts,' he added. But Margaret Byfield, executive director of American Stewards of Liberty, which advocates for private property rights, praised the change and views it as an avenue to roll back a monument process that critics argue have enshrined too much federal acreage. 'The legislative record shows Congress never authorized Presidents to use the Antiquities Act to protect millions of acres of land across America,' Byfield said. 'The new legal opinion from the Counsel to the President makes this clear and our hope is that President Trump will immediately begin eliminating, or at the very least, drastically shrink the massive National Monuments created by the Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden administrations. These lands need to be opened back up to the people for recreation and productive uses.'
E&E News
29 minutes ago
- E&E News
Energy, enviro agencies eager to resume layoffs
Trump administration officials are anxious to resume sweeping layoffs inside energy and environmental agencies as they push the Supreme Court to green-light their plans. The administration's push for large-scale layoffs are on hold across much of the government due to a lower court's sweeping order. But the administration — arguing that it's being forced to keep 'large numbers of employees on the payroll without necessity' — is making a case to the Supreme Court that it ought to urgently intervene to allow those layoffs to proceed. The Trump administration on Tuesday submitted its latest plea to the Supreme Court, saying that the lower court's injunction has caused 'confusion and paralysis' within the executive branch and that agencies are being blocked 'from taking needed steps to make the federal government and workforce more efficient.' Advertisement The Justice Department previously told the Supreme Court in its June 2 request that 40 reductions in force in 17 agencies had been paused by the court. The layoffs put on hold by the court include staff reductions expected at EPA and the Interior and Energy departments.
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
LAPD: Over 100 arrests Monday night, 2 officers injured
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) said over 100 people were arrested Monday night amid recent Los Angeles-area protests against arrests made by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a Tuesday press release, the department said that it, alongside 'multiple local law enforcement partners, responded to protest and criminal activity in the downtown area' Monday. The LAPD said 96 people were arrested over 'Failure to Disperse,' one person was arrested over 'Assault with a Deadly Weapon,' one person was arrested over 'Resisting Arrest' and another over 'Vandalism' that night. 'Two LAPD officers were injured and transported to a local hospital for medical treatment and released,' the LAPD said in the release, adding later that 14 people were arrested over 'Looting.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) recently claimed that President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles amid ongoing protests against Trump administration immigration raids was a warning to other states. 'Pod Save America' host Tommy Vietor asked the Golden State governor what his message was to people in all the other U.S. states who believe, 'Eh, this is just Trump going after crazy California, where all the liberals are like, we'll be fine.' 'To preview things to come. It's a coming attraction,' Newsom said Monday on 'Pod Save America.' 'I mean you, I'm sure you guys have been saying it. This is what he did to create the conditions that led to the insurrection on January 6th.' Trump and Newsom have been going at it over unrest in Los Angeles in recent days. On Monday, Trump said he would support arresting the Golden State governor, Newsom responded to on X. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America,' Newsom said on X.
