Nigeria's defence chief proposes fencing borders to curb insecurity
ABUJA, June 3 (Reuters) - Nigeria's defence chief on Tuesday called for the country's borders with its four neighbours to be completely fenced to curb the entrance of armed groups amid escalating insecurity.
Nigeria's military has been strained by widespread security issues, particularly a 16-year insurgency in the northeast led by Islamist militant group Boko Haram and its offshoot Islamic State West Africa Province. Security forces and civilians have been attacked and killed and tens of thousands of people have been displaced.
Defence Chief of Staff, General Christopher Musa, who spoke at a security conference in the capital Abuja, said "border management is very critical," citing Pakistan's 1,350 km (839 miles) fence with Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia's 1,400 km barrier with Iraq as successful precedents.
This is the first time a top Nigerian official has publicly suggested such a measure.
"Other countries, because of the level of insecurity they have, had to fence their borders," he said.
Nigeria borders Niger Republic, Cameroon, Benin, and Chad, which are all grappling with escalating militant campaigns across the Sahel.
Nigerian authorities often attribute its prolonged insurgency, including recent attacks on military stations, to foreign fighter infiltration.
Nigeria's longest border (1,975 km) is with Cameroon in the northeast, a Boko Haram hotspot. It also shares 1,500 km with Niger and 85 km with Chad, nations that have lost territory to armed groups.
Musa warned Nigeria's perceived wealth makes it a target.
"It is Nigeria that everybody is interested in. That is why we need to secure fully and take control of our borders," he said. "It is critical for our survival and sovereignty."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Arrests of undocumented migrants working illegally in UK surge 51 per cent as Home Office raids nail bars, building sites and restaurants
Arrests for illegal work have surged 51 per cent this past year after the Home Office raided restaurants, nail bars and construction sites throughout the UK. More than 6,400 people have been arrested over the last 12 months as police focus on 'unscrupulous' employers who exploit undocumented migrants. The data from the Home Office reveals that more than 9,000 businesses were visited for checks to be made on paperwork and working conditions. It did not provide how many of the arrests led to charges, convictions or deportations but said immigration enforcement officials had 'intensified' their work to 'tackle those abusing the UK immigration system and exploiting vulnerable people'. The Home Office said said there were a range of industries exploiting migrant workers with businesses often subjecting migrants to 'squalid conditions and illegal working hours' and below-minimum wages. Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Dame Angela Eagle, said: 'For too long, employers have been able to take on and exploit migrants, with people allowed to arrive and work here illegally. 'This will no longer be tolerated on our watch. That's why we are ramping up our enforcement activity and introducing tougher laws to finally get a grip of our immigration and asylum system. 'Under our Plan for Change, we will continue to root out unscrupulous employers and disrupt illegal workers who undermine our border security.' The video was released as part of the Home Office's attempts to project a tough stance on immigration enforcement It is a legal requirement for employers to carry out Right to Work checks and those who fail to do so face hefty penalties including fines of up to £60,000 per worker, director disqualifications and potential prison sentences of up to five years. Over the past year, the government said it had returned almost 30,000 people who did not have the right to be in the UK. In one case at a construction site in Belfast's historic Titanic Quarter in March, officers made 36 arrests with offences ranged from breaching visa conditions to illegal entry in the UK with no permission to work. Elsewhere, 9 arrests were made at a caravan park in Surrey last month following intelligence individuals were working illegally as delivery drivers in the gig economy. Meanwhile, 9 people were also arrested in Bradford in March as officers intercepted a popular illegal working pick up point in Naples Street. Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime at Immigration Enforcement Eddy Montgomery said: 'Our work to tackle illegal working is vital in not only bringing the guilty to account, but also in protecting vulnerable people from exploitation. 'I'm incredibly proud of our enforcement teams across the country for their hard work, skill and co-operation on these often challenging but highly important operations.'
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Mass deportations from Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill could quietly cost U.S. over $1.4 trillion
Mass deportations enabled by the Trump administration 's Big, Beautiful Bill spending and tax package could cost the U.S. over $1 trillion in the coming years, as the administration is already reportedly struggling to fund its rapidly expanding immigration crackdown. The package, which the House of Representatives passed last month, directs $168 billion towards immigration and border law enforcement agencies. That spending, combined with the economic impact of removing scores of immigrants and more granular changes, like a potential decline in revenues thanks to the possible deterrent effect of new fees on migrants, could cost the U.S. over $1.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis from the libertarian Cato Institute. David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Institute, argued on X on Friday that the bill is an 'absolute explosion of cash unparalleled in American history,' spending that could be better used on other public safety investments. 'The fiscal cost of mass deportation will equal the cost of all federal law enforcement spending over the next decade,' Bier wrote. 'Imagine how many rapes, murders, thefts, etc. could be solved with this money. We could have a much, much safer society spending this money on ANYTHING ELSE.' Even without the Big, Beautiful Bill, the administration is already rapidly burning through immigration funding. As of March, Immigration and Customs Enforcement was reportedly $2 billion short of maintaining its current pace of operations through the end of the fiscal year, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, the architect of much of the administration's immigration agenda, has brushed off such concerns, arguing last week on X that, 'Anyone serious about limited government and improving America's financial health would understand that ending mass migration is the prerequisite for every other problem we wish to solve.' Immigration analysts aren't the only ones concerned about the fiscal impact of the reconciliation package. As part of the acrimonious split between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the Tesla billionaire lambasted the Big, Beautiful Bill as an ' outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination ' that added too much spending to the federal balance sheet.
BreakingNews.ie
14 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Justice Minister defends deportation of children to Nigeria
It would be 'untenable' to have an immigration system in which children could not be deported, the Minister for Justice has said. Jim O'Callaghan said it would not be a 'good idea' to prevent the deportation of children as it would have a 'very significant impact' on the number of people seeking asylum in Ireland. Advertisement He was speaking after five children and nine women were among 35 people deported from Ireland to Nigeria on Wednesday night. The minister said the move, which was the third chartered flight used for deportations this year, was 'value for money' at a cost of 324,714 euro. Speaking on Friday, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'Can I just say it's not a pleasant part of the job, but it is a very important part of the job. 'In order to have a functioning immigration system, there has to be a consequence for people who are in the country unlawfully, whether they have overstayed a work permit, or whether they sought asylum and have not been granted asylum. Advertisement 'I've heard the commentary in respect of children being deported. 'I think the system will become untenable if we introduce rules or a new policy that says children cannot be deported.' He added: 'It's an unpleasant part of the job, but I think if I introduced a policy like that, the effect would be that we'd be an outlier in Europe, and that people would know that if they came to Ireland seeking asylum with children, that irrespective of the outcome, they couldn't be removed. 'It would have a very significant impact in the number of people coming to Ireland seeking asylum. So I don't think it's a good idea.' Advertisement The minister said Ireland is a 'very fair country' in allowing people seeking asylum to integrate into communities. 'The alternative is that we would do what they do in some countries and don't allow any form of integration – we allow people to integrate. He added: 'But I suppose a consequence of the asylum process is if you apply and you're refused there has to be a consequence, and if there isn't a consequence then what's the point in having the whole system in place in the first place? 'I can understand the concern that people have about it, but I just say the system will become untenable if a rule was introduced which said that children could not be deported. Advertisement 'It would mean that people could come to Ireland with children in the knowledge that no matter what the outcome, they would never be required to leave.' Mr O'Callaghan said his message to people was that they had to comply with the law. 'If you receive a deportation order, you have to comply with it. It's not meaningless. It means something. 'If you get a deportation order, and if you have children, you've got to get your circumstances in order, and that requires you to leave.' Advertisement Speaking at Leinster House earlier on Friday, Sinn Féin TD Eoin O Broin said that the international protection system needs to be 'compassionate', 'human rights-based', and 'timely'. He said: 'Nobody should be waiting three, four or five years for the final decision to be made, and then when people are refused, not just refused in the first instance, but refused on appeal, they need to be safely returned to their country of origin. 'So that's the way the system should work. Obviously, we've expressed enormous concern in the way in which the government is operating the current system.' Ireland Total of 120 new garda recruits sworn in at ceremo... Read More He added: 'There's far too much privateering, very poor-quality accommodation for adults and children awaiting the decisions. The decisions are taking far, far too long, and I know that from working with people inside the process. 'Where people are refused and are to be returned to the country of origin, it needs to be done in a compassionate and a safe manner. 'We will continue to raise our concerns with the government, but the system has to work. It has to work fairly efficiently, but ultimately the decisions have to be enforced.'
