logo
Trumpworld Is Getting Tired of Laura Loomer. They Hope the President Is Too

Trumpworld Is Getting Tired of Laura Loomer. They Hope the President Is Too

WIRED5 days ago

Jun 2, 2025 6:00 AM Trump advisers tell WIRED that their mutually beneficial arrangements with the notorious right wing influencer may be coming to an end. Photo-illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images
It's not totally clear what Laura Loomer, the 32-year-old conspiracy monger and right-wing media personality, means to President Donald Trump. She really, really doesn't like it when people call her an influencer or an adviser to the president, and, technically, she's not a lobbyist—although that's becoming increasingly complicated within Trumpworld. Loomer is also not officially employed by the White House or the federal government.
Whatever she is, Trump's advisers have officially grown tired of her. And they hope that Trump may soon too.
But on a sunny California day in May, Loomer had just cemented herself as the influencer in Trump 2.0, with the ultimate feather in her cap to prove it.
Just shy of a month after Loomer met with Trump in the Oval Office and successfully advocated for the firings of six National Security Council officials, Loomer had finally gotten what she really wanted: Mike Waltz was removed from his post as national security adviser. At the meeting, she had also urged Trump to fire the National Security Agency (NSA) director and head of the US Cyber Command, four-star General Timothy Haugh—which the president did, not long after the NSC purge. (Waltz, Hough, and the NSC officials did not reply to requests for comment.)
Loomer had already told the president that she thought the officials and Waltz were allegedly disloyal. In a phone call with WIRED, Loomer was adamant that Waltz's appearance in a 2016 ad about veterans opposing Trump was grounds for his departure. Both in private and in front of her more than 1.6 million followers on X, Loomer had been waging a holy war against Waltz for hiring, she alleged, 'individuals who have a history of anti-Trump remarks and anti-Trump associations.' Though it took a few extra weeks after her meeting with Trump for it to finally happen, Loomer said she had successfully convinced the president—who considers her 'terrific' and 'very special,' in his own words—to cut loose one of the most important officials in geopolitics.
A number of Trump's advisers tell WIRED that while they have seen a certain utility in Loomer, even if they find her tiresome and off-putting, their mutually beneficial arrangements may be coming to an end. With her role in the Waltz departure and her recent critiques of the Qatari government's mega jet gift, senior Republicans who interact with Trump tell WIRED, she's flying awfully close to the sun. As much as these sources, who requested anonymity to avoid incurring Loomer's wrath, believe that Loomer is reaching the end of her rope as far as her influence with the president goes, they're still aware that she possesses enough power to potentially destroy their careers with a single tweet or blog post.
Until recently, Loomer had established a role as something of a digital directed-energy weapon. The White House would keep her at a distance, but also let her rip when it was convenient for certain factions within the West Wing. Internal discontent with Waltz, in this case, was one of those instances. 'She overestimates and overstates her influence,' an administration source with knowledge of the Waltz discussions told WIRED at the time of the firing, 'but that doesn't mean her takes aren't ever appreciated from time to time.' (The White House did not answer questions from WIRED about Loomer's role in personnel decisions. A source close to Trump tells WIRED that 'Laura Loomer plays no role in the administration.')
The Trump superfan and MAGA version of a gonzo content creator had gone from gadfly status to something approaching a real player in just under two years, but her ascent was particularly rapid upon Trump's return to office. Loomer, whether Trump's advisers liked it or not, couldn't be squelched. The MAGA embodiment of Arnold Schwarzenegger's 'I'll be back,' Loomer had frustrated campaign advisers to such an extent that they tried, and mostly failed, to keep her at arm's length during both the 2024 GOP primary and general elections, and she wasn't officially hired by the campaign despite repeated requests. (When asked by WIRED what those roles were, Loomer said that the jobs were in opposition research, vetting personnel, and 'assisting with Panama.')
Loomer has emerged as one of the most important voices in Trump's ear, meeting him at his Mar-a-Lago club and speaking to him on the phone with some degree of frequency, after years spent on the fringes of the far-right conspiracy internet. Loomer rose to prominence by openly embracing anti-Muslim rhetoric and other extreme positions, like sharing a video on X about how 9/11 was 'an inside job,' leading even the likes of GOP congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia to urge Trump in mid-2023 not to hire her. Her influence has only grown since.
'Hold on, one sec. My phone is blowing up,' Loomer told WIRED minutes after the news about Waltz broke on May 1. The pings eventually subsided, and she cut to the chase about why claiming the firings as a 'SCALP,' in her words, was so important. 'It's not about who your friends are, whether something is morally right or morally wrong,' she said. 'It has to be done. Hopefully the administration is serious about administering loyalty tests.' She's obsessed with these so-called loyalty checks: 'They're not doing loyalty checks,' she tells WIRED. 'You need to have loyalty to the commander in chief … You need to be loyal to President Trump.'
With an almost dystopian fervor for Trump loyalty as her guide, no target has been too small for the Trumpworld Terminator. She's gone after big fish like Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, but also takes broadsides at the spouses of lower-level nominees. In a May 4 post on her 'Loomered' website titled 'EXCLUSIVE: BLM-Linked Wife of Trump DOJ Nominee Raises Vetting Concerns,' Loomer attacked pro bono attorney Kristin McGough over alleged 'progressive signaling, including listing her pronouns in her official legal biography.' (McGough declined to comment.)
Her Loomerisms continue to physically make it into Trump's hands, as well. Natalie Harp, often referred to within Trumpworld as 'the human printer' (derogatory), is one of Loomer's portals into Trump's decisionmaking. Harp, another of Trump's favorite young women in his inner circle, sits directly outside the door to the Oval Office. She earned her nickname during the 2024 campaign by delivering Trump a steady stream of printed articles, social media posts, and other digital-turned-paper materials praising him. Harp continues to do so in her role at the White House as an executive assistant to the president.
And Loomer's attacks on administration officials deemed insufficiently loyal continue to make their way into the stacks.
'Natalie is going to ship everything that's sent to her to the president, if she thinks it warrants his attention,' the administration source tells WIRED. 'Which is most times.'
Trump's other staffers, sources tell WIRED, haven't figured out a way to stem the flow of dubious information from Harp to the president, or from Loomer to Harp.
'Natalie Harp is a trusted and valued member of President Trump's team,' Stephen Cheung, the White House communications director, tells WIRED. 'And she is certainly a big reason why his operation has been as successful as it has ever been. Her work ethic and dedication to helping President Trump achieve his historic victory is second to none.' (Harp did not respond to a request for comment WIRED put to the White House.)
Still, despite Loomer's claims that she was almost hired by Trump on four separate occasions, an administration role remains elusive for her. Trumpworld sources are more skeptical than ever about Loomer making it onto the payroll. 'You have to ask yourself: If Trump wanted her in, do you think his staff had some ability to prevent that, apparently?' says the administration source. 'Like, what?'
'One of Laura's challenges and the reason she really can't have an administration job is she thinks everything is cut-and-dry,' they continued, 'and that's just not how running the country works. If only it were all cut-and-dry.'
Their question now is what, if anything, Trump's inner circle could do to get rid of Loomer after this. And how much farther can Loomer push into this uncharted territory of the influencer as lobbyist—or vice versa—without winding up on the receiving end of Trump's own ire.
Inside the White House and among Trump's outside advisers, the weeks following Waltz's ouster would trend toward Loomer 'jumping the shark,' as one of the sources put it.
Just over a week ago, when Qatar gifted Trump the jet poised to one day become the new Air Force One, an emboldened Loomer began shifting her fire from faceless federal employees to subjects suddenly a little too close to home: the Qataris who had been so generous to the president. Loomer candidly told Politico, 'I'm hoping that it's not true,' when presented with details of the gift, and that she finds the reports of the jet deal, if true, to be 'concerning.'
Her critiques of the jet gift earned cascading media coverage that continued to irk Trumpworld as it bled into the conservative media ecosystem. One Fox News subheadline summed up the dynamic. 'As far as Team Trump goes: if you've lost Loomer, you've lost the plot.'
Two weeks later, that same source who gave Loomer partial credit for Waltz's ouster had a different assessment of Loomer's standing with the president. 'Oh, I think she's on ice,' the Republican with direct knowledge of the situation tells WIRED. 'With the president.'
After months of tolerating her antics, other Trump advisers began losing their patience. 'Trump likes Laura, and she obviously has some influence, but she runs the risk of overestimating her influence and blowing herself up if she's not more careful,' a source close to the White House tells WIRED. 'It's one thing to attack random government employees who Trump doesn't give a shit about, but when she's attacking him and his policies directly, that could end badly for her."
In the early stages of the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump's top advisers privately harbored concerns about Loomer's influence on their boss. Back then, the issues seemed relatively quaint. Campaign officials once discussed how to convey the need for Loomer to dial back her amplification of attacks on the then chair of the Florida Republican Party and his wife, or how to handle the optics of her flying on Trump's personal plane around the anniversary ceremony at the 9/11 memorial when she had previously reposted about the attack being 'an inside job.'
Now, the stakes are far higher.
'I think she jumped the shark by going out and taking credit for stabbing the national security adviser and a number of people, as if it happened in a vacuum, as if there weren't deep considerations and conversations about all of this,' the administration official adds. 'Because this is serious shit here. It's all fun and games to fuck around online when you're not responsible for anything. And I'm not defending Mike … But my point is, people like Laura don't have the burden of any actual responsibility, national security, or difficult decisions.'
Despite Loomer's proclamations of loyalty-at-all-costs, Trump's inner circle has become increasingly suspicious that Loomer is in it for herself. The alarm has grown even further amid a noticeable change in the issues she's begun to highlight on her MAGA version of a tabloid blog called Loomered. (Headlines range from '​​EXCLUSIVE: 100 Beagles Rescued From Labs This Week as Groups Urge Trump Administration to Retire NIH Lab Animals' to a much discussed story behind the scenes in Trumpworld that marked a notable pivot: 'Chevron's Venezuela Exit Hands China a Strategic Victory and Threatens U.S. Energy Security.)
'Everybody sort of knows that now, or at least we internally,' the administration source said of increasing outside interest in Loomer as a hybrid pseudo-lobbyist-influencer. 'And then the Qatari stuff, that's probably ideological, but she's fighting a battle she has no fucking idea about, and the mainstream media is picking it up.'
Nearly three weeks after Waltz's departure, Loomer—who did not comment any further on her role in it, nor on Republican critiques shown to her by WIRED before publication—was making a strategic retreat.
'I am sorry if my comments made anyone feel betrayed or were used by the media as ammunition to sow division during an important trip for the President,' she continued. I want to apologize to President Trump @realDonaldTrump more than anyone because I am a loyal person, I love President Trump, and I know I could have probably just had a private conversation about the plane instead.'
Loomer may have taken some damage when she fired at the highest levels of the US national security apparatus.
But the odds have always seemed to be in this Trumpworld Terminator's favor—she'll be back. The Chatroom
Who are some slept-on figures in the new administration or conservative media ecosystem you'd be interested in seeing more coverage on?
Leave a comment on the site or send your thoughts to mail@wired.com. WIRED Reads
Want more? Subscribe now for unlimited access to WIRED. What Else We're Reading
🔗 Steve Davis Leaves DOGE: A seismic development on the future of Elon Musk's brainchild that got our group chats and sources buzzing. (Wall Street Journal)
🔗 Democrats Consider Tearing Up the Playbook: In what might prove to be a 2020s version of Democrats being plagued by Iraq War votes from 2002, prospective presidential candidates for 2028 are trying to get some distance from former President Joe Biden's aging, including releasing 'copious amounts of health information. (The Bulwark)
🔗 AI-powered Fanfiction blurs Political Reality: The slop has arrived in the swamp, with AI-generated videos becoming 'a barometer of political fame, just as it has of pop culture celebrity.' (Semafor) The Download
Our flagship show Uncanny Valley took a break this week, but check out some recent episodes and listen now.
Thanks again for subscribing. You can find me on Bluesky or on Signal at Leak2Lahut.26.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020?
Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020?

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020?

Co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang is still leading the company, as I predicted in 2020. Nvidia's GPUs are still the gold standard for artificial intelligence (AI) training, as I predicted in 2020. Nvidia stock has "solidly outperformed the market" -- an understatement --- as I predicted in 2020. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › In March 2020, I outlined where I thought tech giant Nvidia's business and stock would be in five years, or in March 2025. It's now a little past the five-year mark, so how did I do? Overall, I'd give myself a B or a B+. I was mostly correct in my business predictions and accurate about what investors care about the most, the stock price: "I feel very comfortable predicting that Nvidia stock will solidly outperform the market over the next half decade," I wrote. Indeed, from March 1, 2020 (when my five-year predictions article published) through March 1, 2025, Nvidia stock's total return was 1,760% -- nearly 15 times the S&P 500's return of 118%. In other words, Nvidia stock turned a $1,000 investment into a whopping $18,600 over this five-year period. (Nvidia stock's five-year return through the date of this writing, June 4, is a little lower, as the chart below shows. Shares are up since March 1; it's the change in the 2020 start date that slightly lowers their current five-year return.) Nvidia stock's fantastic performance has largely been driven by the incredible demand for the company's graphics processing units (GPUs) and related technology that enable artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote that "as long as [Huang] stays healthy, the odds seem in favor of his still being at Nvidia's helm in five years." For context, Jensen Huang, who co-founded the company in 1993, turned 62 in February, according to public records. Nvidia investors should certainly hope that Huang remains the company's leader for some time. As I wrote in June 2024: Nvidia is many years ahead of the competition in AI-enabling technology thanks to Huang's foresight. Starting more than a decade ago, he began to steadily use profits from Nvidia's once-core computer gaming business to position the company to be in the catbird seat when the "AI Age" truly arrived. Status: Correct. Here's part of what I wrote in the March 2020 article: Nvidia dominates the market for discrete graphics processing units (GPUs) -- the key component in graphics cards for desktop computer gaming. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the company controlled 68.9% of this market. Nvidia has increased its leadership position over the last five years. In the fourth quarter of 2024, it had an 82% share of the desktop discrete GPU market, compared with longtime rival Advanced Micro Devices' 17% share, according to Jon Peddie Research. Intel, which entered this market in 2022, had a 1% share. Growth in Nvidia's gaming market platform will be covered below. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: "In 2025, the gaming market should be much bigger [relative to 2020]." By all counts -- the number of global gamers, total computer gaming market revenue, and computer gaming PC revenue -- the computer gaming market has grown solidly over the last five years. And Nvidia has benefited nicely from this growth. In fiscal year 2020 (ended late January 2020), the company's gaming market platform generated revenue of $5.52 billion. In fiscal 2025 (ended in late January), this platform's revenue was $11.35 billion. This increase amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.5%. This is strong growth for such a huge market. It might not seem so only because Nvidia's data center market platform's growth has been phenomenal over this same period. In fiscal 2020, gaming was Nvidia's largest platform, accounting for 51% of its total revenue. In fiscal 2025, gaming was its second-largest platform behind data center, contributing about 9% of its total revenue. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: The company's GPU-based approach to accelerating computing is considered the gold standard for DL [deep learning, the dominant type of AI] training, the first step in the two-step DL process. [The second step is inferencing.] This statement is extremely likely to hold true in 2025, in my opinion. Since 2020, both AMD and Intel have launched GPUs for AI-powered data centers, but Nvidia's grip on this market -- which is growing like wildfire -- remains tight. IoT Analytics, a technology market research firm, estimates Nvidia had a 92% share of the data center GPU market in 2024. As an added plus, since 2020, Nvidia's GPUs have gone from having very little share of the AI inferencing chip market to having the largest chunk of this market. Inferencing is the running of an AI application. In fiscal 2020, Nvidia's data center platform's revenue was $2.98 billion. It skyrocketed to $115.2 billion in fiscal 2025, equating to about a 107% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). This amazing growth powered the data center to account for 88% of Nvidia's total revenue in fiscal 2025, up from 27% in fiscal 2020. Status: My timeline was too optimistic. In March 2020, I wrote: "In 2025, fully autonomous vehicles should be legal -- or very close to being so -- across the United States. Nvidia is well positioned to majorly profit from [this event]." I wouldn't say that fully autonomous vehicles are "very close" to being legal across the U.S. This event seems at least a few years away. But I continue to believe this watershed event will "turbocharge" Nvidia's growth thanks to its widely adopted AI-powered DRIVE platform. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: "Nvidia is incredibly innovative, so there seems a great chance that the company will introduce at least one major new technology that takes nearly everyone by surprise." Over the last five years, Nvidia has launched a good number of major new technologies that have likely taken most investors and Wall Street analysts by surprise. One example is its Omniverse platform, which launched in 2021. This is a simulation platform that enables the creation of virtual worlds and digital twins. It's been widely adopted by a broad industry range of large enterprise companies -- including Amazon, PepsiCo, and BMW Group -- for uses such as designing products and optimizing facility workflow. Status: Correct. Here's what I wrote in March 2020: It's impossible to predict a company's stock price in five years because so many unknowns ... can have a huge influence on the market in general. That said, given the projections made in this article, I feel very comfortable predicting that Nvidia stock will solidly outperform the market over the next half decade. Stay tuned. I'm planning on a predictions article similar to my 2020 one. Hint: It's going to be optimistic, as Nvidia's highly profitable strong revenue growth is far from over, in my opinion. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Beth McKenna has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Intel, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft and recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020? was originally published by The Motley Fool

Jefferies Downgrades Chewy (CHWY) to Hold, Flags Valuation Concerns
Jefferies Downgrades Chewy (CHWY) to Hold, Flags Valuation Concerns

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jefferies Downgrades Chewy (CHWY) to Hold, Flags Valuation Concerns

On June 5, Jefferies downgraded Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) to Hold from Buy, highlighting concerns over valuation. Despite that, the price target was raised to $43 from $41, and the analysts observed that Chewy's stock has surged 41% year-to-date. A close-up shot of a store shelf stocked with pet food and supplies. The analysts had reservations about Chewy's capacity to outperform Street estimates in the upcoming Q1 results, to be released on June 11. Jefferies observed that Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) is seeing gains from sponsored ads and data-driven insights from its website and mobile application. However, the analysts believe that the current share price has already factored in these positive developments, which can temper potential gains outside of management's projected guidance. The downgrade happened because of Chewy's valuation, as analysts see limited scope for price appreciation. Jefferies maintains a conservative stance regarding the company's future performance. Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) is an online American pet retailer that sells pet food, supplies, medications, and services through its website and mobile app. While we acknowledge the potential of CHWY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store