logo
APS Board of Education defends change in media policy amid criticism

APS Board of Education defends change in media policy amid criticism

Yahoo20-03-2025

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – A change to the Albuquerque Public School Board of Education's governance manual is drawing scrutiny with some claiming it limits transparency. But the APS board president said it was all a misunderstanding.
Story continues below
Weather: Hazardous winds leave a trail of destruction in New Mexico
Crime: ABQ police take 11-year-old into custody in connection to fatal hit and run
Entertainment: These movies were filmed in Santa Fe. Have you seen them?
In a February board meeting, the board made changes to its governance manual, which included a tweak to how it handles the press. 'Essentially the APS school board said that the president of the board will act as the sole spokesperson on behalf of the board,' said Danielle Gonzales, president of the APS school board.
The manual states, 'board members will support the legitimacy and authority of the final determination of the board on any matter regardless of the member's personal position on the issue.'
In the February meeting, the board president said the policy aligns with guidance from the Council of Great City Schools, which also said board members speaking to the media will be interpreted as speaking on behalf of the board even if the member says it is their personal opinion.
Gonzales maintains no one is being silenced. 'There's nothing within the policy that limits the board member's or any individual in the public's freedom to speak to the media,' said Gonzales.
She said the goal is to limit misinformation and to present a united front to the public. 'The main goal is to maintain our unity to the public and to be really clear that when the board acts, we act as a seven-member board that represents the entire community, not a group of individuals who are representing our own opinions or our own perspectives,' said Gonzales.
Still, the new language in the manual is getting scrutiny. 'It's basically saying once the school board has voted on something, every school board member has to fall in line behind that vote even if they voted against it, even if they don't agree with it,' said Christine Barber, executive director of New Mexico Foundation for Open Government. 'That is very anti-transparency. It's also against the First Amendment and free speech.'
She said NMFOG got several calls alerting them to the policy change after the board meeting. 'On top of that, the school board members are elected officials. They were elected specifically by the public to represent the interest of the public on the school board,' she said.
The ACLU of New Mexico also said it is monitoring the media policy.
'We are concerned that APS's speech policy unconstitutionally limits school board members from discussing board decisions. While board members must respect the democratic process, they also have a fundamental First Amendment right and duty to explain their votes and engage in public discussion about policies that impact the community.
Courts have routinely held that while casting a vote is a governmental act, discussing policies and expressing opinions is protected speech. Silencing board members threatens transparency and accountability,' said Leon Howard, ACLU of New Mexico Interim Executive Director.
'It was our practice prior to this vote and prior to this governance manual, and so I'm sorry there's been some misinterpretation of either the intent or the impact of the policy, but it was really meant to be a minor tweak to our governance manual,' said Gonzales.
The next APS school board meeting is scheduled for April 2, 2025, at 5 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Methodists oppose Indiana's attacks on higher education
Methodists oppose Indiana's attacks on higher education

Indianapolis Star

time40 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Methodists oppose Indiana's attacks on higher education

Gov. Mike Braun, Attorney General Todd Rokita and Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith are engaging in a terrible behavior directed toward Indiana's institutions of higher education. Braun, for his part, acted autocratically to change Indiana University's Board of Trustees structure and supports the closure of decades-long programs to address systemic racism. Meanwhile, Rokita has threatened Butler, DePauw and Notre Dame over support for diversity, equity and inclusion. Last weekend, Indiana United Methodists took a bold stance against their behavior and in support of inclusion and justice. 'We aspire to extend our support for institutions of higher education facing governmental threats. Attacks from state officials have been attacks on institutions of higher education, a resolution passed by the Indiana United Methodists said. 'It's important that we stand with all the institutions of higher education… [and] we will continue to struggle against the systemic racism that pervades our nation and state.' While university administrators at state institutions remain silent, or cower in fear, failing to stand for academic freedom, inclusion and the common good, at least the United Methodists have taken a stand. As longtime allies of higher education, they have provided a word of hope for the future rather than seeking a return to the bigotries of the past. The universities under attack have deep and historic ties to the faith traditions of the Disciples of Christ, the United Methodist Church and Catholic churches. In attacking these universities, Rokita has ignored the First Amendment, which sets out the separation of church and state. In Indiana nearly 700 congregations and well over 70,000 members are counted as United Methodists. The UMC vote condemning threats to our universities may not have made the newspapers, but our state politicians should know Hoosiers are soundly rejecting their bullying.

Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat
Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat

Donald Trump's threat to use 'very heavy force' on anyone who dares to protest his administration during the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebrations in Washington, D.C., on Saturday — which coincides with the president's 79th birthday — drew fierce blowback on social media. 'If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump told reporters on Tuesday. 'For those people, that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' he reiterated. Trump claimed he hadn't 'even heard about a protest' being planned on the day. But he deployed his usual rhetoric against his critics, claiming they are just 'people who hate our country.' And he added again, 'They will be met with very heavy force.' Critics reminded Trump of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.' Former Trump aide Anthony Scaramucci, who is now a vocal critic of his onetime boss, slammed Trump for 'threatening state sponsored violence on citizens exercising their first amendment right' and called Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to 'grow a backbone' and speak out to 'reject fascism.' Others agreed: Surprise Departure Deals Blow To Slim GOP House Majority Rachel Maddow Reveals Sure Sign Trump Is 'Absolutely Panicking' Right Now Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk

Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat
Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Donald Trump's Latest Threat

Donald Trump's threat to use 'very heavy force' on anyone who dares to protest his administration during the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebrations in Washington, D.C., on Saturday — which coincides with the president's 79th birthday — drew fierce blowback on social media. 'If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump told reporters on Tuesday. 'For those people, that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' he reiterated. Trump claimed he hadn't 'even heard about a protest' being planned on the day. But he deployed his usual rhetoric against his critics, claiming they are just 'people who hate our country.' And he added again, 'They will be met with very heavy force.' Trump says anybody who protests the military parade on Sunday will be met with 'very heavy force' — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 10, 2025 Critics reminded Trump of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.' Former Trump aide Anthony Scaramucci, who is now a vocal critic of his onetime boss, slammed Trump for 'threatening state sponsored violence on citizens exercising their first amendment right' and called Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to 'grow a backbone' and speak out to 'reject fascism.' Others agreed: Threatening state sponsored violence on citizens exercising their first amendment right. But @LeaderJohnThune is silent. Grow a backbone John and reject fascism. — Anthony Scaramucci (@Scaramucci) June 11, 2025 So much for the First Amendment — Sarah Longwell (@SarahLongwell25) June 10, 2025 The First Amendment specifically prohibits the government from using heavy force on citizens who protest the government. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 10, 2025 But, hear me out here, what if the protesters attack the Capitol? Would we be cool with that? — Stephen Shewmaker (@sbshew) June 10, 2025 Ah yes, such a great confident leader he can't even handle peaceful protest — studio_dad (@studio_daddy) June 10, 2025 I've already said this but the people will stand up for what's right and they will be protesting there Saturday. It will be peaceful until they decide to use 'heavy force' - what a psycho. The president of the United States constantly threatening the American people. I've never… — Jenna (@jennaxkc) June 10, 2025 Surprise Departure Deals Blow To Slim GOP House Majority Rachel Maddow Reveals Sure Sign Trump Is 'Absolutely Panicking' Right Now Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store