Unifor raises alarm over sale of B.C. refinery to U.S. firm amid energy security concerns
BURNABY, BC, May 9, 2025 /CNW/ - Unifor is raising serious concerns about the sale of one of British Columbia's last remaining oil refineries to American energy giant Sunoco. The refinery is part of a larger list of assets across Canada being sold from Parkland to Sunoco.
"This is not the time to hand over control of critical energy infrastructure to a foreign multinational, especially in the middle of a trade war," said Unifor National President Lana Payne. "Unifor is sounding the alarm because energy security is national security, and we cannot afford to gamble with it."
The Burnaby refinery, which employs approximately 150 workers represented by Unifor Local 601, is a vital piece of B.C.'s energy supply chain. Unifor is calling on federal and provincial regulators to ensure binding commitments are in place to protect jobs and preserve the refinery's operations as a strategic asset. Nearly one-third of the region's domestically supplied gasoline and jet fuel comes from the refinery.
"The refinery is essential for the region's fuel supply and provides good union jobs," said Unifor Western Regional Director Gavin McGarrigle. "British Columbians deserve solid, enforceable commitments that this refinery will be sustained through continued investment."
Parkland's proposed sale comes at a time when Canada's economy is under increasing strain from America's trade war. For Canada to secure refining capacity and reduce dependence on foreign-controlled infrastructure, Unifor is urging the federal and B.C. governments to review the sale and to secure binding commitments from foreign buyers of critical assets.
Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector, representing 320,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's tax bill could raise taxes on foreign companies, hurting investment from abroad
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump likes to say he's bringing in trillions of dollars in investments from foreign countries, but a provision in his tax cuts bill could cause international companies to avoid expanding into the United States. The House-passed version of the legislation would allow the federal government to impose taxes on foreign-parented companies and investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Known as Section 899, the measure could cause companies to avoid investing in the the U.S. out of concern they could face steep taxes. The fate of the measure rests with the Senate — setting off a debate about its prospects and impact. A new analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimates that the provision would cost the U.S. 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. The analysis estimates that the tax could cut a third off the economic growth anticipated from the overall tax cuts by Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. 'While proponents say this punitive tax hike is intended as a retaliatory measure against foreign governments, this report confirms that the real victims are American workers in states like North Carolina, South Carolina, Indiana, Tennessee and Texas,' said Jonathan Samford, president and CEO of the Global Business Alliance. Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, has defended the provision as protecting U.S. interests by giving the president a tool that can be used against countries with tax codes that, in the federal government's opinion, put American companies at a disadvantage. 'If these countries withdraw these taxes and decide to behave, we will have achieved our goal,' Smith said in a statement last week. 'It's just common sense. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to move quickly to pass this bill and protect Americans from economic bad actors around the world.' The tax gets at a fundamental tension within Trump's policy agenda: a contradiction in the broad strokes of Trump simultaneously trying to tax imports and foreign profits at higher rates while also seeking investments from companies headquartered abroad. In late May, Trump defended his approach by saying that his tariffs were causing more countries to invest in the U.S. to avoid imports getting taxed. While some countries and companies have made announcements, there is not evidence of the investments pushing up spending on new factories as measured in the government's monthly report on construction spending. The Republican president said his tendency to impose steep tariffs, then retreat to lower rates, had succeeded. 'We have $14 trillion now invested, committed to investing,' Trump said then. 'You know we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. I went to Saudi Arabia, the king told me, he said, you got the hottest — we have the hottest country in the world right now.' The Global Business Alliance was among the groups that signed a letter on Monday warning of the consequences of Section 899 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo of Idaho, both Republicans. The Investment Company Institute, representing financial firms, said the provision 'could limit foreign investment to the U.S. — a key driver of growth in American capital markets that ultimately benefits American families saving for their futures.' The analysis performed by EY Quantitative Economics and Statistics notes there is a degree of uncertainty in how the taxes under Section 899 could be implemented. But they could be charged against companies based in countries that tax digital services, as is the case in parts of Europe. If the U.S. judged the taxes unfair, there would be a 30% tax rate on foreign companies' profits and income. People working in the U.S. for the companies who are not citizens could also be taxed, among other provisions. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The possibility of the taxes and seemingly arbitrary nature by which they could be imposed is also a challenge, said Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of New York University's Tax Law Center. 'Section 899 creates a game of political chicken with trade partners that risks harming businesses, consumers, and workers in the hopes of securing US multinationals the ability to shift more of their profits out of the US to tax havens,' Huang said in an email. 'It's a high-risk strategy that could expand the damage of the failed tariff war.' There could also be political repercussions if key states in Trump's political coalition from 2024 suffer layoffs or simply find job growth slowing. The Global Business Alliance finds job losses could amount to 44,200 in Florida, 27,700 in Pennsylvania, 24,500 in North Carolina and 23,500 in Michigan. ___ Associated Press writer Fatima Hussein contributed to this report.
Montreal Gazette
2 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
‘Stable' Quebec avoids a second credit rating downgrade
Quebec News By QUEBEC — A second credit rating agency has taken a look at the Quebec government's finances and says it is comfortable with the province's debt situation. In a statement issued Tuesday, the Canadian agency DBRS decided to maintain Quebec's credit rating, which determines the costs of borrowing to finance the debt, at AA (low) with a 'stable perspective.' The DBRS decision is the opposite of the decision to lower Quebec's credit rating by another agency, Standard and Poor's, in April. S&P lowered Quebec's rating from AA- to A+. It was the first time in 30 years that Quebec suffered a credit downgrade. It came as a blow to Premier François Legault's government, which was first elected in 2018 promising sound fiscal management. 'Because or the ongoing tariff threat, Morningstar DBRS anticipates some near-term deterioration in Quebec's fiscal and debt metrics, potentially reducing flexibility within its current credit ratings,' DBRS said in a statement. 'However, the slowing pace of expenditure growth and continued commitment to restore fiscal balance, along with the province's large and diversified economy, give us comfort that Quebec can minimize the deterioration in its public finances. 'Despite the near term deterioration, the province remains committed to restoring fiscal balance by 2029-30, consistent with the goal articulated in last year's budget.' In his 2025-2026 budget presented March 25, Quebec Finance Minister Eric Girard forecast a $13.6-billion deficit, a historic record. The budget included an annual increase in spending of only 1.7 per cent but record spending on infrastructure projects as a way to counter the effects of an economic downturn sparked by American trade tariffs. S&P based its downgrade on the increase in government spending, including the infrastructure allocation. DBRS takes note of Quebec's approach but remains optimistic. 'As a result of near-term deterioration in the fiscal outlook and a substantial capital investment program, Quebec has relaxed its debt reduction targets. The province plans to reduce net debt to GDP to 35.5 per cent by 2032-33 and 32.5 per cent by 2037-38 (previously 33 per cent and 30 per cent respectively). The agency adds: 'While the ongoing trade uncertainty is expected to weigh on consumer and business confidence and investment intentions, domestic consumption should remain supported by easing monetary policy along with relatively strong labour markets and household savings.' Legault has said if Quebec is hit with full 25-per-cent tariffs on its trade, the province could lose 100,000 to 160,000 jobs.
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Cost of F-35A fighter jet program has ballooned to more than $33B, auditor general finds
OTTAWA—The federal government has spent $713 million on its paused plan to buy F-35A fighter jets through the U.S. government, while the total cost of the program is now far higher than previously advertised, with delays and inflation helping push the original price tag of $19 billion to at least $33.2 billion, a new auditor general's report has found. After years of review, the Liberal government decided in 2022 to return to previous plans to replace Canada's aging fleet of decades-old fighters with 88 F-35As purchased through the U.S. government and built by American defence industry giant Lockheed Martin for $19 billion.
