Only 5% of UK medical school entrants are working class, data shows
Students from working class backgrounds still only make up 5% of entrants to medical schools across the UK, a proportion that has doubled over the past decade, analysis has found.
The research, conducted by the Sutton Trust and University College London (UCL), looked at almost 94,000 applicants to UK medical schools between 2012 and 2022, which represent almost half of all UK medical applicants.
The analysis found that although the proportion of medical students from the lowest socio-economic backgrounds had doubled since 2012, they made up only 5% of entrants in 2021.
In comparison, 75% of medical school entrants were from a higher socio-economic background. Socio-economic status was calculated by using the five-level National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) groupings of parental occupation.
Applicants from independent schools across the UK were 1.5 times more likely to receive an offer from a medical school compared with students from non-selective state schools and, even after adjusting statistically for their exam grades, socio-economic status and other demographic factors, independent school applications were still more likely to receive an offer.
The data also showed that a relatively small number of schools and colleges were producing a disproportionately high number of medical students. Eighty per cent of the 2,719 schools or colleges providing medical applicants had fewer than five a year. In comparison, there were 58 schools or colleges, 2% of all institutions, which had an average of 20 or more applicants per year.
Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said the figures were outrageous, especially at a time when the NHS faces a 'chronic shortage of doctors and a heavy reliance on overseas recruitment'.
He added: 'The medical profession is stretched to breaking point, and urgent action is needed to widen access and create a more diverse pipeline of talent from all parts of society. Patients benefit from doctors who reflect the diversity of the communities they serve, but it's clear that we're a long way from that today.
'If you have the ability, where you grow up or your parents' income shouldn't be a barrier to becoming a doctor. Working-class entry into medicine is in a critical condition. The profession urgently needs a shot of equality.'
Prof Katherine Woolf, professor of medical education research at UCL Medical School, said: 'Getting into medical school remains a huge hurdle in any doctor's career. Despite the many changes medical schools have made over the past decade to improve access to the profession, our research has shown low prior attainment remained a major barrier to many aspiring doctors from the poorest backgrounds.
'Providing enough doctors to meet the country's needs will require better support for future doctors, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds. This support is needed at all stages of a doctor's career: from school, before and during application to medical school, and throughout the many years of medical education and training that are essential to practise as a doctor.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
A government spokesperson said: 'While we inherited an education system with a number of baked-in inequalities, our ambitious plan for change sets out our clear mission to break the link between background and success.
'We will act to address the persistent gaps for different student groups and to break down the barriers to opportunity.
'This Government is committed to growing our own homegrown talent, and training thousands more doctors. We will work with partners including NHS England and the university sector to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to study medicine – regardless of their background.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital
The first bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we're born – could protect us from dangerous infections, UK scientists have shown, for the first time, that good bacteria seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung researchers said it was a "phenomenal" finding and could lead to therapies that boost good bacteria in early encounters with microbes are thought to be crucial in how our immune system come out of the womb sterile, but this doesn't last for long. All the nooks and crannies of the human body become home to a world of microbial life, known as the microbiome. Researchers at University College London and the Sanger Institute investigated the earliest stages in our body's colonisation by bacteria, fungi and collected stool samples from 1,082 newborns in the first week of life. The team then performed a massive genetic analysis on all the DNA in the samples to work out exactly which species were present and how common they were in each then tracked what happened to those babies, using hospital data, for the next two years. One particular early inhabitant of the human body, Bifidobacterium longum, seemed to have a protective 4% of babies with this species would spend a night in hospital with a lung infection over the next two years. Babies with different starter-bacteria were two-to-three times more likely to need to stay in is the first data to show the formation of the microbiome affects the risk of infection."I think it's really phenomenal. It's amazing to be able to show this. I'm excited," Prof Nigel Field, from UCL, told the BBC. How are these bacteria doing it? The most likely culprit for children ending up in hospital is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but what joins the dots between this and B. longum?That is the "million dollar question" for Prof know B. longum starts off digesting breast milk which both contains food for the baby and encourages good bacteria. The exact details have not yet been worked out, but either the bacteria themselves or the compounds they make by digesting food are interacting with the immune system "and are influencing the way in which the immune system matures and is able to recognise friend from foe," according to Prof protective bacteria were found only in babies that came into the world via a vaginal delivery rather than a caesarean. Even then they were not discovered after every vaginal researchers say their findings do not justify the practice of vaginal seeding, where some new parents smear babies with a swab taken from the vagina. The good bacteria seem to be coming from the end of the mother's digestive system, an idea known in the field as the "first lick"."I feel pretty confident in saying that vaginal seeding is not a good thing," said Prof the long-term ambition is to come up with microbial therapies – like a probiotic yogurt – that could be given to babies to set their microbiomes on a healthy Louise Kenny, from the University of Liverpool and a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, said: "A caesarean section is often a life-saving procedure, and can be the right choice for a woman and her baby."She said that while the benefit was seen only in babies born vaginally, it was not in every child born that way so "further research is needed to create a full, nuanced picture".
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
CPS criticised for dropping assault charge after officer allegedly gave CPR while man was awake
A leading academic of English literature has criticised prosecutors for dropping an assault charge against a police officer who allegedly gave him forceful chest compressions meant for a heart attack victim while he was awake. John Sutherland, 86, emeritus Lord Northcliffe professor of modern English literature at University College London, fell ill on a London underground train in May 2023. An off-duty Metropolitan police constable, Sam Wilks, performed chest compressions on Sutherland, meant to revive a stopped heart, breaking a number of ribs. Sutherland's witness statement said he was conscious when the chest compressions started and that the 'pain was excruciating'. He said: 'I was screaming as loud as I can to stop him. I screamed: 'Stop, kill me, kill me, I can't stand this.' I was dissenting at the top of my voice.' Cardiopulmonary resuscitation or CPR is usually used on someone who has stopped breathing and is unconscious. The Met accepted the officer's actions caused injuries but said Wilks had every reason to think Sutherland's life might be in danger and he was trying to help. Wilks was investigated by the British Transport Police and charged with inflicting grievous bodily harm, but Sutherland was informed two working days before the scheduled trial date last Tuesday, that the CPS had dropped the case. The Met said Wilks had been treated unfairly, facing almost two years under the threat of conviction and jail. Sutherland said emails from his solicitors to the CPS to explain its decision went unanswered, meaning he could not seek any review of the decision. During a brief hearing last Tuesday, the judge, HHJ Kelleher, asked the prosecutor representing the CPS if the decision to drop the case 'had been communicated to Prof Sutherland'. Prosecutor Michael Shaw, who made it clear he was acting on instructions, claimed Sutherland and his partner had not responded to emails. Sutherland told the Guardian this claim was untrue and 'misleading', and after questioning by the Guardian the CPS accepts it sent no emails. He said: 'The assault and its after-effects have been the greatest trial of my life. The statement by the prosecutor has added to it. The excuse for no actual trial taking place has added to my injury.' Just after 8.45pm on 27 May 2023 Sutherland fell ill while on an underground train. His wife called for help, believing he could be suffering from a cardiac arrest, and a doctor and Wilks responded. Sutherland was taken off the train and a defibrillator kept at the station was attached to his torso. The machine gave spoken instructions wrongly saying no heartbeat was present and that emergency chest compressions should begin. Sutherland was breathing, conscious and able to talk. According to Sutherland, Wilks took charge and decided the instructions from the defibrillator to perform chest compressions should be followed. Sutherland and his wife pleaded for the chest compressions to stop. A note by doctors who later treated Sutherland for his injuries describes them as coming from an 'assault/chest compressions while awake … had chest compressions WHILST AWAKE …' After the criminal case was dropped, the Met on Friday decided Wilks should not face any disciplinary action and returned him to full duties: 'PC Wilks intervened off duty during what he had every reason to believe was a life-threatening medical episode. There is no evidence to suggest he had any ill intent. He believed he was trying to save a life. We did not feel this case should have been pursued through the courts. 'Even though the case has now been dropped, we should not underestimate the impact it will have had on him to this point. 'We of course also recognise the unintended impact on the gentleman who had fallen ill and who sustained injuries as a result of PC Wilks's intervention.' The CPS did not respond directly to Sutherland's view that the court and judge had been misled. A spokesperson said: 'After carefully reviewing the case, including the medical evidence and witness statements, we concluded that there was no realistic prospect of conviction in this case. 'The complainant was informed of our decision last week and we will be writing to him to further explain our decision.' Sutherland, both of whose parents were police officers, now plans to sue the Met and has formally complained to the CPS about its conduct.
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Is it true that … taking collagen supplements slows signs of ageing?
Collagen is one of the body's building blocks. Made up of amino acids absorbed from the protein we eat, there are more than 20 subtypes found everywhere – from our bones and muscles to organs. Types I, II, and III are the most common in skin, cartilage and connective tissue, helping with strength and elasticity. In recent years collagen has become known as the protein that keeps the skin on our face young-looking, with collagen powders and pills promising to slow signs of ageing – but is there any truth in those claims? Dr Afshin Mosahebi, a professor in plastic surgery at University College London, says the science is 'dubious', with a lack of large-scale, peer-reviewed studies. 'There's no direct evidence that collagen, taken on its own, can do anything more than eating enough protein,' says Mosahebi. He says it's true that, as we age, changes in collagen level makes the skin on our face start to look 'crinkly' and less firm, but that it's wrong to assume that simply supplementing collagen is the solution. 'When you eat something it doesn't go directly to your skin. Of course, parts of it are eventually absorbed and used in skin repair, but it's not going to go straight from your mouth to your face and wrinkles.' He adds that using skincare containing collagen won't make a long-term difference to ageing either, as 'it doesn't penetrate the skin itself'. Instead, he says that the way we age is down to genetics (like having fair skin that's sensitive to the sun) and our lifestyles. His tips for slowing that process down include making sure to eat a balanced diet that includes proteins, keeping away from the sun, avoiding smoking, staying hydrated and keeping your skin moisturised with products like hyaluronic acid.
