Ramaphosa to press Trump on attending G20 summit, racial redress
President Cyril Ramaphosa is welcomed by Minister Ronald Lamola at the South African embassy in Washington. (GovernmentZA/X)
President Cyril Ramaphosa is meeting
The meeting is the result of extensive spade work from South Africa's side since Donald Trump
Tensions have only escalated since, and there have been media reports that Ramaphosa's aides have sought to prevent an Oval Office showdown similar to the humiliation experienced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on 28 February.
Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said there were several topics on the agenda for Wednesday's meeting at the White House, including South Africa's year-long presidency of the G20 and the barbs the Trump administration has hurled at South Africa about the country's official state policy of racial redress.
Ramaphosa intended to use his meeting with the US president to
Trump has indicated that he may well not do so, posting on his social media platform Truth Social in mid-April that he could not be expected to do so when the government was, he claimed, expropriating white-owned land and persecuting the descendants of white settlers.
He
Ramaphosa's office has, for months, described his remarks and executive orders to this effect as informed by a campaign of disinformation.
The hard-won visit comes just over a week after 49 South Africans arrived in the US as beneficiaries of Trump's special dispensation for asylum for victims of alleged persecution.
Magwenya said Ramaphosa would not only again invite Trump to attend the G20 summit but hoped that his presence in South Africa would suffice to persuade him that no race group was subject to persecution.
'We hope that he will use that opportunity to see for himself that there is no truth to the propaganda around racial persecution in our country,' he said.
The narrative is not new. Trump alleged racial persecution in South Africa in 2018, during his first term. Among the commentators who contradicted him at the time was Witney Schneidman, one of the authors of the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), and a former US assistant deputy secretary of state for African affairs.
Trump's stance has been widely attributed to a campaign by Breitbart News editor Joel Pollak to discredit the country's domestic and foreign policy.
Pollak's agitation in recent months was widely seen as a second audition for the post of ambassador to South Africa. He was again overlooked. Trump instead
South Africa's ambassador to Washington, Ebrahim Rasool, was expelled in March after calling Trump a white supremacist. Ramaphosa has yet to name a replacement, but has in the interim appointed former deputy finance minister and current MTN chairperson Mcebisi Jonas as his special envoy to the US capitol.
Jonas is accompanying the presidential delegation to Washington on what is his maiden voyage in that capacity. His special brief is to
Ramaphosa is also accompanied by International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen and Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, who have for months been drafting a bilateral trade pact with the US which will be put on the table during this visit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 minutes ago
- IOL News
The fallout from Trump's Afrikaner project on Ramaphosa's National Dialogue agenda
President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended BEE as an engine of growth. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa's upcoming national dialogue aims to tackle critical issues facing the country, including the divisions sparked by US President Donald Trump's controversial offer of resettlement to white Afrikaners, alongside pressing concerns regarding unemployment and poor governance. On Wednesday, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of an 'eminent persons group,' comprising 31 South Africans, who will spearhead the National Dialogue scheduled for August 15. One of the eminent persons, who requested anonymity, said the dialogue can be seen as a response to concerns, aiming to address the country's challenges and promote national building. 'The issue should definitely come up, although everybody has a choice to leave the country. "We are way beyond the colour lines now and should focus on nation building with the people who are in the country, instead of dwelling in the past. 'Sure, it's a bone of contention but we do have bigger problems," she said. However, not all are on board with Ramaphosa's dialogue initiative. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party has rejected the dialogue as an "elitist farce," saying it is a "staged theatre for the political elite". In a statement its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, asked why there were no ordinary South Africans, such as shack dwellers, represented? 'The so-called Eminent Persons Group, handpicked by the very same ruling class responsible for mass unemployment, deepening poverty, collapsing infrastructure and the ongoing betrayal of the Freedom Charter, is a mockery of the suffering endured daily by millions of destitute and despondent South African,' Ndhlela wrote. The EFF has also expressed skepticism, questioning the government's motives and the selection process for the Eminent Persons Group. "The challenges Ramaphosa's National Dialogue seek to address are not a product of triumph of human sacrifice against evil, which require collective national reconstruction, but are a product of man-made destruction and corruption of which he and the party he leads have been at the centre of," the EFF said in a statement. The DA's national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, welcomed the National Dialogue saying his party would embrace the opportunity. 'I think it's high time that we as a nation get together and discuss collectively what we see as a road forward for this country,' he said. Build One South Africa (BOSA) described the announcement as a positive and necessary step forward for the country at a time of great political uncertainty, public anxiety, and economic malaise. The GOOD Party's general secretary Brett Herron said it was long overdue as the wait had been frustrating.
The Herald
17 minutes ago
- The Herald
'You are rude': McKenzie slams DA MP Jacobs' conduct in parliamentary meetings
'Jacobs knows that I haven't breached any act or law, hence he's talking about ethics. My ethics and his are different. We are not dealing with what he feels and what I feel. The act allows me to appoint Eugene Botha,' McKenzie said. 'I've breached no act. The PA is not the first party and certainly will not be the last party to do that. Your party in the Western Cape is riddled. When you say I've done something wrong, quote the act, not your feelings.' McKenzie also addressed Jacobs' conduct during the meeting, referencing a previous committee meeting where Jacobs grilled Safa president Danny Jordaan over his leadership and travel expenses. 'What I will never allow is for this honourable member to speak when I'm speaking. On a personal level, I want him to know that when he showed Danny Jordaan his finger, I will never allow him to do that to me. I respect you; respect me. When you speak, I am obliged to listen, and when I speak, you should listen. You should not come in as you feel. You can only interject with a point of order through the chairperson. 'You are rude. I will never stand for this rudeness of Jacobs.' TimesLIVE
The Herald
17 minutes ago
- The Herald
Godongwana declares contentious Budget the new normal as parly adopts fiscal framework
While finance minister Enoch Godongwana did not run this past weekend's Comrades marathon, his 2025 Budget finally reached the last mile of its race for adoption, after three lockups, two tablings and a court challenge. The National Assembly voted to adopt the 2025 fiscal framework and revenue proposals as well as the committee report thereof on Wednesday afternoon, with 268 voting in favour of the adoption, 88 voting against the adoption, and two abstentions. Godongwana told the National Assembly sitting that he suspected that over the next four years, the management of the Budget as well as the fiscal framework would be similar to how it was handled this year. 'We have had a painful journey to arrive at this date, where the fiscal framework is being approved. It has been a very painful journey. Definitely, from the Treasury perspective, we've drawn a number of lessons, but I suspect, also members of this house, must draw a number of lessons as to how, in practice, are we going to manage the debates around the fiscal framework moving forward?' Parliament's February sitting to table the Budget was postponed over resistance at a cabinet level to a VAT hike proposal. Godongwana returned to parliament in March with a revised VAT hike proposal, and the fiscal framework was challenged in court. He finally tabled a Budget in May with a fuel levy hike in place of the scrapped VAT hike. He challenged the assertion that his 2025 Budget was an austerity budget. 'This budget is not austerity. We are increasing taxes, not to focus on debt, but to focus on funding social services. Education, health and so on.' ANC MP and standing committee on finance chair Joe Maswanganyi moved for the adoption of the fiscal framework and revenue proposals report, saying that processing a budget within a coalition government can be complex due to the competing interests involved. In Godongwana's defence, Maswanganyi said anyone calling for Godongwana's head was out of tune with the realities facing coalition governments around the world. 'Considering these realities, particularly the tariffs and trade tensions initiated by the US , it is prudent to pay attention to the five-year plan ... This is not an austerity budget. The Budget has garnered praise for being pro-poor and pro-growth.' He said stakeholders welcomed the scrapping of the proposed VAT hike ahead of its effective day of May 1, but raised concerns over the financial impact of the fuel levy hike on business as well as middle-to-low-income households around the country. MK Party MP and former finance minister Des van Rooyen said his party rejected the committee's report on the 2025 budget as a 'sell-out pact' led by the parties that came together to form the government of national unity after last year's election. 'It is in this report that the ANC, DA, IFP, FF Plus, Action SA, and other GNU beneficiaries agreed that the majority of our people should be subjected to the fuel levy hikes and personal income tax. Think-tanks are in agreement that the fuel levy is the most regressive tax: even worse than VAT.' South Africans will pay more for work, school and travel expenses, and the buying power of people's income will be whittled away due to bracket creep. He said the report sought to protect the interests of a wealthy few. DA MP Wendy Alexander said for the first time in years, the budget process included ordinary South Africans rather than being rubber-stamped by a legislature where the ANC enjoyed a strong majority. She called the scrapping of the VAT hike a victory for democracy and South Africans. 'When citizens watch, comment and engage the budget process, the democracy grows, and this is precisely what the constitution envisioned — a government accountable to the people and not the other way around.' She said the GNU must prove that government can function across spheres when the stakes demand it. She said the projected 77% debt-to-GDP ratio was unsustainable and that the country could not be expected to build more schools and hospitals on the back of untenable debt levels. EFF MP Omphile Maotwe said her party rejected the fiscal framework and revenue proposal report as a project which would condemn South Africans to considerable tax burdens, courtesy of the 'former liberation movement', the ANC. 'It took the EFF to approach the Western Cape High Court to stop the VAT increase. If it were not for the EFF South Africans would already be paying 15.5% VAT today. The people of South Africa know now without any doubt that the EFF is the only dependable tool in the hands of the poor and the working class.' She said the fuel levy increase was an attack on motorists, the poor and the working class, who were already facing rising costs before the proposal was tabled. IFP MP Nhlanhla Hadebe said his party accepted the report. Supporting the report, Patriotic Alliance MP Ashley Sauls said the 2025 budget process tested the GNU's resolve as the government remained intact through an ordeal that has collapsed coalition governments elsewhere in the world. Freedom Front Plus MP Wouter Wessels pointed out that MPs calling for a wealth tax were calling for a deeper tax on themselves and their steep salaries. He said a credible budget was one where every rand and cent was channelled towards the benefit of ordinary South Africans. Action SA Alan Beasley said his party was among the first to oppose the proposed VAT hike, saying it was immoral to ask the poor to pay more for essentials while corruption goes unchecked. 'We welcome the minister's decision to scrap the VAT increase and are proud of the role we played in securing this outcome. We also welcome the R7.5bn n allocated to Sars over the medium term, an investment ActionSA championed.' He said that while Action SA rejected the R22bn raised through regressive taxes like fuel levy hikes and bracket creep, strengthening Sars is essential. 'Properly funded, Sars can close the tax gap, tackle illicit trade and boost revenue collection by a conservative R50bn annually. We are encouraged that the minister has committed to monitoring Sars's performance and will provide tax relief in next year's budget if revenue exceeds targets.' ACDP MP Steve Swart said the National Treasury should produce the fuel levy review that was promised to the legislature. He said while the ACDP believed in miracles, it appeared to be a remote possibility that South Africa's GDP would grow well beyond 2% in the coming years. UDM MP Nqabayomzi Kwankwa said the fuel levy was worse than VAT as there was no way of mitigating its regressive impact on low-income households, and anyone who considered the scrapping of VAT a victory for these households was being 'hypocritical'. Supporting the report, RISE Mzansi MP Songezo Zibi said the national balance sheet remained unsustainable as over 80% of the revenue collected by the SA Revenue Service (Sars) pays for over R820bn in salaries, R420bn in debt service costs and R440bn a year to the social security package. 'That leaves very little money to invest in the things we need to unlock economic growth and create sustainable jobs. [Dated] national and local infrastructure continues to choke our economy, together with policy assumptions that still assume we live in the 1960s.' BOSA MP Mmusi Maimane said one of the grimmest realities in the Budget's fiscal framework was that the rate of investment remained low, leaving the government with little funding for its spending programmes. 'I fear it is a missed opportunity for us to really speak about reform. The question we should be obsessed about is not just GDP growth or actually looking at debt. It should be the rate of investment in this country. And on the same budget, it proposes that our rate of investment is at 4.2%.' TimesLIVE
