
Trump: I Warned Netanyahu Against Iran Strike
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he has told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to not attack Iran, or at least to hold off any preemptive action to give more time for Washington and Tehran to forge a nuclear agreement.
'Well, I'd like to be honest. Yes, I did. Next question, please?'…and also: 'I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution,' Trump told reporters at the White House when asked about the issue.
Q: "On Iran, did you warn Prime Minister Netanyahu against taking some sort of actions that could disrupt the talks there in a phone call last week?"President Trump: "Well, I'd like to be honest. Yes I did." pic.twitter.com/yoXB3t90SZ — CSPAN (@cspan) May 28, 2025
'It's not a warning,' Trump added. 'I said, 'I don't think it's appropriate.' I just said I don't think it's appropriate. We're having very good discussions with them, and I don't think it's appropriate right now.'
The question to Trump was prompted by an Axios report published the day prior:
President Trump cautioned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call last week not to take any action that could jeopardize negotiations between the U.S. and Iran on a new nuclear deal, a White House official and a source familiar with the details tell Axios.
Trump's message was 'he doesn't want him to antagonize at a time when he is trying to solve problems,' the official said.
Trump also repeated his tone optimism on the talks, telling reporters, 'We're doing very well with Iran.'
The White House's messaging to Israel has been to say 'stay united and let this process play out' – and that the process needs some time. Of course, Trump has still warned that 'other options' are on the table should Tehran refuse to make progress.
The Iranians have said they are willing to guarantee (and allow monitoring) that uranium enrichment is only for peaceful nuclear energy production, and will pledge no development of nukes. Critics of Trump point that this was essentially the 2015 JCPOA nuclear which the first Trump administration pulled out of in April 2018.
Plenty of indirect 'threats' were peppered into Trump's Wednesday Iran comments:
He seems to suggest that his conditions for a deal with Iran include the US being allowed to come in and 'take whatever we want, we can blow up whatever we want.' Seems unlikely that Iran would consent for the US to come in and 'blow up' its infrastructure pic.twitter.com/jxHUM8oljw — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) May 28, 2025
Also on Wednesday, the head of the United Nations' atomic watchdog, the IAEA's Rafael Mariano Grossi, said that 'the jury is still out' on negotiations. 'For the moment, the jury is still out. We don't know whether there's going to be an agreement or not,' Grossi told journalists in Vienna.
'I think that is an indication of a willingness to come to an agreement. And I think that, in and by itself, is something possible,' he added of ongoing meetings.Also read: Trump Sent A 'Free Speech Squad' To The UK To Investigate Erosion Of Rights

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
5 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Hamas Criticizes Israeli Response to U.S.-Backed Ceasefire Proposal, Reviews Offer
A senior Hamas official has criticized Israel's stance on a new ceasefire proposal put forward by the United States, even as the group reviews the terms of the plan aimed at pausing the nearly 20-month-long conflict. Basem Naim, a member of Hamas' Political Bureau and spokesperson, confirmed in a statement shared with Newsweek that the group had received the latest proposal presented by U.S. President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. The Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has responded to the framework—a response acknowledged by the White House on Thursday. However, Naim argued that Israel's reply does not move the situation toward peace. "Upon careful examination, it is clear that the Israeli response fundamentally seeks to entrench the occupation and perpetuate policies of killing and starvation, even during what is supposed to be a period of temporary de-escalation," said Naim. He added that the proposal fails to meet Hamas' core demands, including a complete cessation of hostilities and immediate relief for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Nevertheless, Naim stated that Hamas is seriously evaluating the proposal. "Despite this, and in full awareness of the gravity of the ongoing genocide against our people, Hamas leadership is currently undertaking a thorough and responsible review of the new proposal," he said, emphasizing the group's commitment to the rights and future of the Palestinian people. Following Naim's remarks, Hamas released a separate statement saying it is currently consulting with Palestinian factions and stakeholders regarding the offer conveyed via mediators.


Daily Tribune
11 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Court blocks Trump tariffs
AFP | Washington A US federal court blocked most of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, boosting markets yesterday with a ruling that could derail his trade strategy. The opinion marks a significant setback to Trump as he bids to redraw the US trading relationship with the world by forcing governments to the negotiating table through tough new tariffs. Trump's global trade war has roiled financial markets with a stop-start rollout of import levies aimed at punishing economies that sell more to the United States than they buy. Trump argued that the resulting trade deficits and the threat posed by the influx of drugs constituted a 'national emergency' that justified widespread tariffs. But the three-judge Court of International Trade ruled Wednesday that Trump had overstepped his authority, and barred most of the duties announced since he took office in January. Attorneys for the Trump administration promptly filed an appeal against the ruling, which gave the White House 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process of halting the tariffs. 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. 'President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness,' Desai said. The ruling comes as Trump was using the tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations with friends and foes, including the European Union and China. Beijing -- which was hit by 145 percent tariffs before they were sharply reduced to give space for negotiations -- reacted to the court ruling by saying the United States should scrap the levies.


Daily Tribune
11 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Israel announces creation of 22 settlements in West Bank
Israel announced yesterday the creation of 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank, putting further strain on relations with the international community already taxed by the war in Gaza. Both Britain and neighbouring Jordan slammed the move, with London calling it a 'deliberate obstacle' to Palestinian statehood. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are regularly condemned by the United Nations as illegal under international law, and are seen as one of the main obstacles to a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. The decision to establish more, taken by the country's security cabinet, was announced by far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, himself a settler, and Defence Minister Israel Katz, who is in charge of managing the communities. 'We have made a historic decision for the development of settlements: 22 new communities in Judea and Samaria, renewing settlement in the north of Samaria, and reinforcing the eastern axis of the State of Israel,' Smotrich said on X, using the Israeli terms for the southern and northern West Bank, which it has occupied since 1967. 'Next step: sovereignty!' he added. Katz said the initiative 'changes the face of the region and shapes the future of settlement for years to come'. Not all the 22 settlements are new, however. Some are existing outposts, while others are neighbourhoods of settlements that will become independent communities, according to the left-wing Israeli NGO Peace Now.