logo
Ban on child marriage is deemed 'un-Islamic' by Pakistan's religious leaders

Ban on child marriage is deemed 'un-Islamic' by Pakistan's religious leaders

Daily Mail​29-05-2025

A new law banning child marriage in Pakistan has been criticised by a prominent council for being 'un-Islamic'.
Pakistan's government last week passed the Child Marriage Restraint Bill, which aims to put an end to minors being forced into marriages and cohabitation with adults.
The legislation, set to be signed into effect by President Asif Ali Zardari, will see adults found to be cohabiting with minors punished by up to seven years in a prison and a fine of one million rupees (£2,663) on charges of statutory rape.
It is set to roll out in the Pakistani capital Islamabad, with hopes that other parts of the country will introduce the law in short order.
But Pakistan's Council of Islamic Ideology - a prominent body that advises the government of the Muslim majority nation 'whether or not a certain law is repugnant to Islam' - has opposed the bill.
The council said in a statement published Tuesday: 'Declaring marriage below the age of eighteen as child abuse and prescribing punishments for it, and other controversial provisions, are not in line with Islamic injunctions.
'Overall, the Council rejected the bill. It also clarified that this bill was not sent to the Council for review by the Parliament or the Senate.
'Marriage should be protected from unnecessary legal complications, and a public awareness campaign in this regard could prove more effective,' it argued.
The bill was passed after several female politicians who were married off as minors shared their personal support.
Pakistan ranks among the top 10 countries with the highest absolute number of women who were married before the age of 18 - more than 20 million.
Data compiled by activist group Girls Not Brides and Pakistan's National Institute of Population Studies suggest nearly 1 in 5 women in Pakistan (18%) are married before the age of 18, and 4% before the age of 15.
Researchers and activists point to a range of factors contributing to Pakistan's soaring child marriage rate, including religion, long-entrenched societal and gender norms, and rampant poverty.
Sherry Rehman, a senator who tabled the bill after MP Sharmila Farooqi introduced it in Pakistan's National Assembly, said the new legislation will 'send a powerful message'.
'It's a very important signal to the country, to our development partners, and to women that their rights are protected at the top.'
Naseema Ehsan, 50, told the Senate: 'I got married at 13 years old and I want child marriage to be banned.
'I was lucky to have good and affluent in-laws but most Pakistani women are not so lucky. Not every child has a supportive husband like me.'
The bill's text pointed out that research had 'invariably proved' that child marriage 'is harmful to both genders and especially girls who have hit puberty and are able to bear children'.
Ehsan added: 'I've never been so content to vote for a bill as the child marriage restraint bill,' in comments to The Guardian.
'The world has changed and developed. We have progressed and we must embrace the progress… It was a very much needed bill.'
Pakistan in 2010 devolved much political power to regional governments, entrusting provinces to draft and enact many of their own laws.
The regional government in the Pakistani province of Sindh passed a Marriage Restraint Act back in 2013 that outlawed marriage under the age of 18, but it remains the only province to have done so.
It is hoped that the new legislation set to come into effect across the Islamabad Capital Territory will lead to the measure being adopted throughout the country.
Nadeem Afzal Chan, a member of the Pakistan People's Party, said the government in Balochistan province would soon follow suit.
The provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has also drafted a child marriage restriction bill, though it is yet to be passed.
Pakistan has committed to ending child, early and forced marriage by 2030 in line with the Sustainable Development Goals outlined by the United Nations.
But underage marriage is still rampant, particularly in rural areas of Pakistan.
The CII is seen as one of the most influential and prominent bodies preventing politicians from taking action.
A recently published article in Pakistani outlet Dawn described theological authorities as 'self-appointed custodians of belief and convention' that 'reject empowerment, making it difficult for political parties to criticise child marriage, forced conversions and other atrocities in their party manifestos and poll campaigns'.
'The deeply patriarchal undercurrents of our sociopolitical setting, too, have kept politicians from stressing on the need to abandon laws that validate child abuse as well as allow adults to coerce young girls into illegal unions,' it read.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SNP 'squanders' £144k on misogyny Bill... and guess who picks up tab?
SNP 'squanders' £144k on misogyny Bill... and guess who picks up tab?

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

SNP 'squanders' £144k on misogyny Bill... and guess who picks up tab?

Nearly £144,000 has been 'squandered' on Holyrood's doomed misogyny legislation, the Mail can disclose. The Scottish Government last month ditched plans to introduce a Bill in this parliamentary term to make misogyny a specific offence. It said the decision to put the Bill on hold was down to the implications of April's Supreme Court transgender ruling – and the need to ensure there are 'clear and unambiguous provisions in regard to the circumstances in which they apply'. The Supreme Court stated the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex – plunging public bodies into turmoil over their trans policies. Last night Scottish Tory deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said misogyny 'remains a serious issue' and 'Scots will be appalled to see how much taxpayers' money was squandered by the SNP before they ditched another Nicola Sturgeon-era policy'. The government said £143,668 had been spent on preparing the abortive Bill – but this does not cover civil servants' time, which was not recorded. The sum includes a fee of £109,117 which was paid to Baroness Helena Kennedy, KC, who led a working group on the misogyny law. In 2022, Baroness Kennedy, a Labour peer and human rights lawyer, backed separate anti-misogyny legislation rather than incorporating abuse and violence against women into Scotland's hate crime law. She said ditching the Bill had been driven by concerns the legislation would create 'too much of a headache'. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'These costs relate to the Misogyny and Criminal Justice in Scotland Working Group, which operated in 2021-2022, as well as the Scottish Government's subsequent consideration of the Working Group's report.'

Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus
Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus

NEW DELHI, June 6 (Reuters) - Bangladesh's national elections will be held in the first half of April 2026, the country's de facto prime minister, Muhammad Yunus, said on Friday. "The Election Commission will provide you with a detailed roadmap for the elections at an appropriate time," said Nobel peace laureate Yunus, who took over as interim head of the South Asian nation of 173 million last August after a student-led uprising forced then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee to India.

Musk's tax bill attacks have rattled Republicans. But Trump still reigns supreme
Musk's tax bill attacks have rattled Republicans. But Trump still reigns supreme

The Guardian

time6 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Musk's tax bill attacks have rattled Republicans. But Trump still reigns supreme

The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is a godsend for Democrats, a headache for the president and a problem for Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of the House. Between now and the Fourth of July, Trump expects congressional Republicans to deliver a badly needed win. After more than four months back in the Oval Office, he still lacks a major legislative achievement. Republicans control both the House and Senate, but the public sees goose eggs on the scoreboard. Almost daily, the courts upend the president's executive orders. Slim legislative majorities and government by rage come with drawbacks. Trump's popularity is under water. The afterglow of inauguration is gone. His so-called Liberation Day has morphed into Groundhog Day, each day beginning and ending as it did the day before. Except Groundhog Day wasn't a horror movie. Substantively, Trump's tariff hikes have brought little by way of jobs or negotiations. On Wednesday, the payroll company ADP reported that monthly US job growth stands at a two-year low. The US dollar weakens, and interest rates climb. Home-buying belongs more and more to the old and wealthy. So much for Republicans having the interests of working Americans at heart. Yet all is not lost for Trump. He has recast the Republican party in his image. What was once the party of Lincoln belongs to him – Musk, the former king of Doge, be damned. By historical standards, Trump is doing OK. His disapproval numbers stand at a meager seven points higher than his approval rating. At the end of April, he was staring at a double-digit deficit. The stock market since rebounded. His end is again nowhere near nigh. What autumn yields remains to be seen. Beyond that, Republicans approve of Trump, 87-11, a mirror image of his standing among Democrats. He also outpaces Musk by 20 points among the party faithful. An acquired taste, Musk wore out his welcome in the West Wing much as he did in April in Wisconsin. He mojo ebbs. Two months ago, Wisconsinites defied Musk and elected a liberal to the state supreme court. In the run-up to the election, Musk had handed out $1m checks to voters. He also appeared on stage wearing a giant yellow cheese hat. His nod to the state's dairy industry and the Green Bay Packers failed to amuse or garner votes, much the same way his apparent Nazi salutes came up short. Money doesn't always buy Musk love. Turning to Speaker Johnson: last month he cobbled together a bill that satisfied the needs of his caucus and the demands of his president. Now, he watches the world's richest man threaten to transform it all into a pile of ash. Already, Johnson complains that Musk declines his phone calls. Then again, Musk has no reason to take them. Unlike Trump or Musk, Johnson's clout is derivative. Without the president to lean on, he appears limited. Daddy standing in his corner makes all the difference. House Republicans nod at Johnson because they fear Trump. Musk's barrage is relentless. Think Tony Stark, the alter ego of Ironman, and you get the picture. 'Was it all bullshit?' Trump asked of promised budget savings that never materialized. The South Africa native quickly returned fire. Mincing no words, he branded the 'big, beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination'. Chuck Schumer, the Democrats' leader in the Senate, couldn't have scripted things any better. Musk stays on the warpath. 'No one who actually reads the bill should be able to stomach it,' he posted to social media on Wednesday. 'Bankrupting America is NOT ok! 'KILL the BILL.' On Thursday, things escalated; now Musk says he wants Trump impeached. Battle lines are drawn. What the Senate eventually passes is a work-in-progress. The bill authored by the House will probably be amended. Already, Rand Paul of Kentucky has announced his opposition, earning Trump's ire. Utah's Mike Lee too postures as a 'no'. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin demands deeper cuts. If four Republicans give a thumbs down, the bill fails. In the end, a legislative version of Frankenstein's monster is more likely, a pastiche pieced together behind closed doors, a matter of political necessity for Trump and his party. 'Trump tries to shore up support for megabill among Senate GOP at White House meeting,' a headline blared on Wednesday night. As drafted, the 'big, beautiful bill' addresses an array of core issues, including raising the debt ceiling to avoid a default and financial cataclysm, and making permanent the Trump tax cuts, set to expire at the end of the year. Funding for the wall is also on the line. If the BBB failed, under the rules of the Senate, Republicans would be forced to work with Democrats to achieve a compromise, something almost unheard of these days and an anathema to the president and Maga. That would mean egg on Trump's face, but the public would probably enjoy the spectacle. Maybe Elon would, too. On Thursday, he posted: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.' Indeed! Lloyd Green is an attorney in New York and served in the US Department of Justice from 1990 to 1992

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store