EXCLUSIVE Third time lucky? Our £50k Jeep Wrangler was stolen by keyless car thieves. We loved our wagon so much we bought another only for it to get nicked TEN DAYS later. We won't let that stop us snapping up another
An NHS doctor couple have vowed to buy a third Jeep Wrangler despite a keyless car thief gang stealing two from them in a month.
Neurologists Vijeya Ganesan, 57, and Peter Garrard, 64, noticed their two-year-old £47,500 motor had been taken from the road outside their London home of 27 years on Easter Sunday.
They had bought the car mainly for long trips and their Border Terrier, Gus, so they decided to use the insurance money and splash out £54,000 to buy the exact model and colour as a replacement.
Yet despite purchasing Faraday pouches from Amazon to act as a defence barrier to stop thieves cloning the keys, and hiding an AirTag in the glove box, the Jeep was astonishingly nicked again on May 21 - just ten days after they collected it.
To add insult to injury, Gus has also had his bed stolen twice as it was in the Jeep on both occasions.
The brain doctors thought the AirTag had pinpointed their beloved car dumped in Hackney, but when officers raced to the area it was nowhere to be seen with the criminals appearing to have found and then discarded the tracker.
Vijeya told MailOnline she felt like the Jeep Wrangler had been targeted by crooks as Porsches and Lamborghinis parked on their street had been left untouched.
The thefts came in the same month LBC presenter Nick Ferrari had his Jeep Wrangler stolen from outside his home, raising fears the model could be being stolen to order before it is ferried out on ships.
The couple, who have also had their bikes twice stolen before, are staying defiant in the wake of their extraordinary bad luck, and are even contemplating buying a third Jeep Wrangler.
Speaking about the thefts, Peter told MailOnline: 'I felt rather stupid and also unlucky as we had taken the precaution of getting these additional security measures.
'Also, I'm terrified that we won't be insurable anymore because they were both stolen from exactly the same place in similar circumstances.'
He added: 'It's like anything that's yours and then somebody else decides to help themselves to, it's always a very unpleasant feeling. But in the end, it's only an object.'
Although worried it may be stolen for a third time, they hope £700 worth of additional security - including an immobiliser and having to push buttons on the car in a certain order akin to a phone's passcode - will create a ring of impenetrable steel.
They are also fearing the cost of the car insurance with the premium surging from £1,400 to £3,100 after the first wagon was stolen.
Peter said: 'I know it should have done [put us off buying another Jeep]. But it's a great car and good for doing the things we want to do, which is mainly infrequent very long drives, rather than buzzing around the neighbourhood.'
He added: 'There's almost an element of defiance about it as well. Almost like we are not going to give into these bastards. They are such nice cars.'
A neighbour's CCTV footage showed the Jeep parked on the road outside their home (left), but in a snapshot taken an hour (right) later the car had disappeared
Vijeya admitted there had been 'petty theft' on their street where homes cost an average of £860,000, with a running joke in the neighbourhood being to leave anything on the pavement if you don't want it.
'We had become so paranoid that we had kept the keys in the pouches, and only took them out to get into the car,' Vijeya said.
'I would say they were very effective because if you got in the car with the keys in the Faraday pouches it would say "key not detected".'
No one from Scotland Yard has met with the couple face-to-face since they reported the thefts, instead communicating with them over the phone and email.
The street is swarming with CCTV meaning the culprits have almost certainly been caught on camera, but the couple were told by police in an email, seen by MailOnline, officers would only gather the footage if the vehicle had been used in a serious crime, such as a rape or murder.
Police sources have told this publication it was incorrect for it to be suggested CCTV is only considered in serious offences, but that officers can make further inquiries if the offence is narrowed down to a 20 minute window.
And now Scotland Yard has reopened the case after MailOnline raised questions as to why the footage wasn't collected.
Peter feels police have done a good job despite the initial failure to collect what could be vital evidence.
'I think [the police] got quite excited about it first of all as I phoned 999... and then within ten minutes I was getting phone calls from officers saying "I'm in the area with my patrol car",' he said.
'I think they actually did carry out their job well, and I think they thought maybe this is one of those rare cases they could actually do something about. But they didn't.
'And I didn't hear that they hadn't done anything until I received an email three days later. But I think they took it seriously.'
Vijeya, however, has a different view: 'I just feel really p****d off that there are cameras everywhere, and this is the second occasion.
'We knew exactly the window the car was stolen from so it's not like we were asking them to look through hundreds of hours of footage.
'I mean, Peter said he thought the police response was good, but I think it's pretty pathetic when they don't tell you until three days later whether they've found the car or not.
'I don't think that's terribly good actually.'
The couple say they don't want anyone else to fall victim to keyless car thief gangs as Vijeya said: 'We thought we were fine with this Faraday pouch thing.
'I gather it is a bit of an epidemic at the moment [keyless car thefts] and it would be good for other people not to have to go through this nonsense.'
A spokesperson for the Met Police told MailOnline: 'The Met understands the impact motor vehicle crime has on victims.
'Every report made to police is carefully assessed to identify and pursue any viable lines of enquiry, including forensic evidence and available footage.
'A tracking device indicated the vehicle might be at a specific location. Officers promptly attended, but the vehicle was not found. As no further actionable evidence was available, the victim was advised that the case would be closed due to the lack of viable lines of enquiry.
website.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Teachers given new guidance in dealing with AI-generated child sexual abuse material
Guidelines on how to deal with AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) have been issued to 38,000 teachers and staff across the UK. The guidelines are an attempt to help people working with children tackle the "highly disturbing" rise in AI-generated CSAM. They have been issued by the National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). The AI-generated content is illegal in the UK and is treated the same as any other sexual abuse imagery of children, even if the imagery isn't photorealistic. "The rise in AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery is highly disturbing and it is vital that every arm of society keeps up with the latest online threats," said safeguarding minister Jess Phillips. "AI-generated child sexual abuse is illegal and we know that sick predators' activities online often lead to them carrying out the most horrific abuse in person. "We will not allow technology to be weaponised against children and we will not hesitate to go further to protect our children online," she said. The guidelines suggest that if young people are using AI to create nude images from each other's pictures - known as nudifying - or creating AI-generating CSAM, they may not be aware that what they're doing is illegal. Nudifying is when a non-explicit picture of someone is edited to make them appear nude and is increasingly common in "sextortion" cases - when someone is blackmailed with explicit pictures. "Where an under-18 is creating AI-CSAM, they may think it is 'just a joke' or 'banter' or do so with the intention of blackmailing or harming another child," suggests the guidance. "They may or may not recognise the illegality or the serious, lasting impact their actions can have on the victim." Last year, the NCA surveyed teachers and found that over a quarter weren't aware AI-generated CSAM was illegal, and most weren't sure their students were aware either. More than half of the respondents said guidance was their most urgently needed resource. The IWF has seen an increasing amount of AI-generated CSAM as it scours the internet, processing 380% more reports of the abuse in 2024 than in 2023. "The creation and distribution of AI-manipulated and fake sexual imagery of a child can have a devastating impact on the victim," said Derek Ray-Hill, interim chief executive at the IWF. "It can be used to blackmail and extort young people. There can be no doubt that real harm is inflicted and the capacity to create this type of imagery quickly and easily, even via an app on a phone, is a real cause for concern." Multiple paedophiles have been sent to jail for using artificial intelligence to create child sexual abuse images in recent years. Last year, Hugh Nelson was sentenced to 18 years in jail for creating AI-generated CSAM that police officers were able to link back to real children. "Tackling child sexual abuse is a priority for the NCA and our policing partners, and we will continue to investigate and prosecute individuals who produce, possess, share or search for CSAM, including AI-generated CSAM," said Alex Murray, the NCA's director of threat leadership and policing lead for artificial intelligence. In February, the government announced that AI tools designed to generate child sex abuse material would be made illegal under "world-leading" legislation. In the meantime, however, campaigners called for guidance to be issued to teachers. Laura Bates, the author of a book on the spread of online misogyny, told MPs earlier this month that deepfake pornography "would be the next big sexual violence epidemic facing schools, and people don't even know it is going on." "It shouldn't be the case that a 12-year-old boy can easily and freely access tools to create these forms of content in the first place," she said.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
'Atrocity not accident': Families of pedestrians killed by drivers running red lights speak out
On the wall of her family's living room, there is a large framed photograph of Alice Williams on the day of her first communion. It's a short walk from that family home to Alice's grave. "On her headstone, we've put 'joyful, creative, gentle, kind, bright, loving' because those are the things that we want the world to know about Alice," her mother Clare tells Sky News. "We don't want them to look at that headstone and think, 'Oh, she only got to nine, I wonder why', because then her killer has overwritten everything she was. And it's not fair." Alice's killer was 55-year-old Qadeer Hussain who, on a Saturday morning, failed to stop at a red light in Halifax, West Yorkshire, as she was crossing with her mother and brother. "In front of our eyes he ploughed into her, massively fast, and he carried her off on his wing mirror," she recalls. "I've just got this very clear image of her being swept off her feet and then she tumbled off and, by the time I got to her, it was almost like she was gone." In May, Hussain was jailed for eight years for causing Alice's death by dangerous driving. Her parents have chosen to speak publicly to highlight the deadly consequences of drivers running red lights. Her dad Chris says: "It seems bizarre that you would take any risks at all in breaking the law in order to get somewhere slightly faster." "The real risk isn't being caught. It's actually killing somebody," Clare adds. "He's quite gratuitously killed my child. He slaughtered her in the street for nothing, for no reason at all. "He battered her to death and any adult should know that when you speed through a pedestrian crossing, there is a risk that you could do that." 1:29 A lack of red light cameras A Sky News investigation has found that fewer than 1.5% of traffic lights in the UK have red light cameras monitoring them. Of the 157 local authorities who responded to our request for data or who directed us to their local police forces, many reported no working red light cameras at all. There are only five in all of Scotland. In West Northamptonshire, the cameras were switched off in 2011 and, in London and Greater Manchester, fewer than 4% of traffic lights have a red light camera. In Greater Manchester, we also witnessed drivers routinely running red lights at a number of junctions. Police increasingly rely on dash cam footage submitted by other motorists to take action against drivers who run red lights. The initiative, called Operation Snap, operates nationwide. Inspector Bradley Ormesher, of Greater Manchester Police, says: "Everyone knows police can't be everywhere, but a lot of motorists now have dash cams, so effectively they are assisting us in delivering road safety messages. We've seen a big increase in submissions. "There is a bigger picture to everything and just saving a couple seconds by jumping a red light, you're not thinking about wider society, are you?" Pat Grace was on her way to clean her local church in Oxfordshire when she was struck and killed by a heavy goods vehicle that failed to stop at a red light on a pedestrian crossing. The driver Dariusz Meczynski fled the country. He was extradited back to the UK and jailed for three years for causing the 74-year-old's death by dangerous driving. Pat's son Oliver says: "The driver wasn't distracted just for a second, it was a substantial period of time while he was driving a heavy goods vehicle through a village at 9am. It couldn't be much worse. "It could have been a crocodile of schoolchildren crossing the road and he wouldn't have seen them because he wasn't looking. "The chances of being caught are so few and far between. I think there should be cameras on all red lights so there is less chance of getting away with it." Dash cams could help Oliver and Alice's family are encouraging all drivers to install dash cams. "We bought a dash cam after this happened," says Clare. "And we've reported four people who went through red lights, and three of them got warnings. "That is essential because they're going about thinking they're invisible and they're not accountable but actually when they get a warning, hopefully they'll think again. "It's really opened my eyes to how unprotected we are." She adds: "We were doing everything we could have done to stay safe. But the only thing that was keeping us safe was a red light bulb and the presumption of goodwill from drivers. "And I feel like this is being treated dismissively as if it's an accident when actually it was it was a pure atrocity." Red light cameras have since been installed at the crossing where Alice died. "I'm glad they're there," Clare says. "Now they've got the cameras and it's cost whatever they would have cost - plus her life, a lifetime of grief, and all the ripple effects that come from a life without Alice in it. "She filled our lives with light. She was innocent. She was happy. She loved dancing. She loved singing. She loved us. We just can't live without her."
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Post Office scandal: Government has not done enough to ensure compensation for victims, committee of MPs finds
The government has not done enough to ensure all victims entitled to compensation from the Post Office scandal have applied for it, a report has found. Many current and former postmasters affected by Horizon IT failings and associated miscarriages of justice are not yet receiving fair and timely compensation, according to the report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Only 21% of the 18,500 letters the Post Office sent to postmasters to make them aware of the Horizon Shortfall Scheme had been responded to, figures provided by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) show. About 5,000 further letters are expected to be sent in 2025. Long-time Post Office victims campaigner Sir Alan Bates told Sky News: "What is evident is that the PAC, along with ourselves, are dismayed about the length of time all this is taking and the failure of all victims to be contacted. "It really only goes to support what I have been saying time and time again, that government departments are the entirely wrong people to run these types of schemes as they only grind them into the dust with bureaucracy." Under the scheme, current and former postmasters who were financially affected by the Horizon IT system, but who were either not convicted or did not take the Post Office to the High Court, can either settle their claim for a final fixed sum of £75,000 or have it fully assessed. There is also the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), which is for sub-postmasters who had their convictions quashed after the passing of the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act last year. The 800 or so sub-postmasters who are eligible to claim under the HCRS are entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or the option to pursue a full claim assessment. By the end of March, 339 had accepted the settlement sum, the report by the PAC, which is made up of MPs from all sides of the House of Commons, found. But the PAC report states the government has no plans to follow up with people who are, or may be, eligible to claim but are yet to apply. 3:09 The committee recommends that the DBT should outline what more it will do to ensure every affected postmaster is fully aware of their options for claiming. A third scheme provides compensation to sub-postmasters who were wrongly convicted of fraud, theft and false accounting. Of the 111 sub-postmasters eligible to claim for the Overturned Convictions Scheme and who are either entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or to pursue a full claim assessment, 25 have not yet submitted a claim, some of whom represent the most complex cases. The DBT has taken over the management of the scheme from the Post Office, and the PAC report recommends the department should outline how it plans to handle the remaining cases under the scheme. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, chair of the PAC, said thousands of people were "deeply failed" by the system during "one of the UK's worst ever miscarriages of justice". He added: "This committee would have hoped to have found government laser-focused on ensuring all those eligible were fully and fairly compensated for what happened. "It is deeply dissatisfactory to find these schemes still moving far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements. "It is entirely unacceptable that those affected by this scandal, some of whom have had to go through the courts to clear their names, are being forced to relitigate their cases a second time."
