Former world No 5 Max Homa carries own bag at US Open qualifier after split from caddie
Max Homa stood out more than usual on Monday in a US Open qualifier filled with PGA Tour players. He was the only one carrying his own bag.
Homa didn't have a caddie and didn't feel like talking about it, regardless of how much attention it was getting on social media.
He and his caddie of two months, Bill Harke, are no longer together, according to a person informed of the split who said only that Harke 'lost his job.' And Homa didn't offer much insight.
'I'm much rather talk about the golf instead of all the questions about the caddie,' Homa said. 'I'm good. Just hoofed it 36.'
As for the golf?
'It's going to probably be heartbreaking, but it's all right,' Homa said. 'I haven't carried my bag 36 holes in a while so I'm a little tired.'
He ended up carrying it for 38 holes. Homa's three-putt for par on his 36th hole at Kinsale put him in a five-man playoff for the final spot to get to the US Open. Cameron Young won it with a 12ft birdie. Homa then lost a playoff for an alternate spot on the next hole.
When asked about his approach to golf, Homa dropped one clue about the split with his caddie.
'It seems to be better than when someone is standing next to me for some reason,' he said. 'I might need to walk by myself more. Maybe I just looked at it as a nice, peaceful walk. Probably got to battle some demons and have no one to lean on. Maybe that helps a little bit. There's no one ... everything is me. The battle helped that a little bit.'
The qualifier at Kinsale offered six spots to the US Open at Oakmont next week. Homa was around the bubble most of the day. He left a chip in the rough on his ninth hole of the second round and made double bogey, followed that with a bogey and then responded with two straight birdies.
He looked to be safe with a second shot into 25ft on the par-5 ninth hole, his last one. But he three-putted for par to finish at five-under.
Homa didn't imagine being in this position a year ago when he was No 10 in the world. But he has changed equipment and changed coaches. He split with his caddie of six years just before the Masters. And then he had no caddie at all. His highest ranking was No 5; he is now 90th.
Homa said he had not felt tired on Monday because he was around the cutoff line all day, pushing himself forward. After he three-putted his final hole was when fatigue started to hit him. He said not having anyone to consult over a shot led him to be a little more conservative, not a bad tactic on a course he doesn't know all too well.
Asked one last time about the caddie situation, Homa whispered, 'I wanted to carry for 36 holes. Everyone is going to ask me that.'
Homa is not entirely out of the US Open. He is playing the Canadian Open this week, though he likely would have to win to get into the top 60 and qualify.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Family golfing rivalry fuels Weaver's US Open bid
"I can still beat him on a squash court but at table tennis he's pretty good and in terms of golf, it's amazing to have a younger brother who's really kicked on and is producing some great scores."When Suffolk amateur Tyler Weaver steps out onto the first tee at Oakmont for next week's US Open, he will have one of the people who knows him best alongside him - elder sibling Max will be his 20, played 36 holes in a day in a qualifying event in Atlanta and finished joint third on 11 under par, with major winners Zach Johnson and Jason Dufner among those to fall by the he wasted no time in contacting Max, 22, via the family Whatsapp group to recruit him for bag duties in Pennsylvania."He said 'I hope you don't mind but I think you're going to have to carry my clubs around Oakmont', and I said 'I think that will work with my schedule, mate', Max told BBC Radio Suffolk."I've had quite a bit of caddying experience, I caddied for a couple of friends in some big tournaments - the only thing I've got to remember is that he hits the ball slightly further than me so the yardages change a little bit." 'It's going to be awesome to be there with him' They will be brothers in arms at Oakmont - but there is also a serious rivalry as two Weavers have played together for the Suffolk county team and Max made a notable mark of his own by winning the 2023 Welsh Amateur Championship in Newport."We always said that if one of us gets a big opportunity, the other one would definitely help them. It's going to be awesome that I can be there with him and see what we can produce as a team," Max said."There's no-one I know who hates losing more than him. Everything he does is about winning and I do think he can take it to the top in this game - but on the flip side of that, I need to hunt him down." The brothers - sons of former flat jockey Jason Weaver, who rode more than 1,000 winners over his career - first took up the game at a very young age, playing with plastic clubs in the is now part of the university golf scene in the United States and will be drawing on his experiences in his first major championship."We're flying out on Sunday, so we have Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday to get settled in and really understand the golf course, that's when the main work will be done. Away from that, you can do a lot of research on the course and speak to a few people (about it)," Max added."We know all the US style courses are brutal, so it's going to be a challenge but he's used to playing tough courses in college and at top level amateur events, so that should definitely help him."So how does Max think his brother will fare in the US Open, won by Dustin Johnson the last time it was played at Oakmont in 2016?"He's improved so much in the last two years and he's on this level where I think he can go out and do anything he wants," he said."Beating those guys (in qualifying) will give him some confidence going into the week, and he had a win earlier this year, which has given him a PGA tour start in November. "It's nice that he's got two big opportunities coming up and we are all looking forward to it as a family."He added: "I think the whole experience is really important and taking that in. We always like to play with no expectations but making the cut at his first major would be nice. "But even more than that, going a little bit further and seeing how far he can move up that leaderboard on Sunday would be a great achievement."
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump is right to protect American citizens. We should protect ours
Sometimes the best policies are the ones that produce the shrillest wails from the Left. Such may be the case with Trump's latest travel ban, which by rights should spark serious soul-searching in Britain. Overnight, the President announced restrictions on the citizens of 12 countries. This was a response to the recent terror attack on Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is alleged to have thrown firebombs and sprayed burning petrol at a Jewish vigil on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Although Egypt is not on the list, Homeland Security officials said Mr Soliman was in the country illegally, having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. So far, so Trumpian. (He took similar measures during his first term, after all, and they were repealed by Joe Biden who called them 'a stain on our national conscience'.) But then came the kicker. 'We will not let what happened in Europe happen in America,' Trump said. Ouch. If the months of Trump 2.0 have so far shifted the Overton window across the West, allowing even the likes of Sir Keir Starmer to contemplate – at least rhetorically – tackling immigration, then such a travel ban should be welcomed on these shores as well. Already, the usual suspects are accusing Trump of being 'racist'. But a glance at the range of countries on the list shows that this is not a question of race, or even religion. Rather, it is a question of homeland security, and that holds a stark lesson for Britain. A few months back, official data revealed that though foreigners comprise just 15 per cent of the population of our country, they commit 41 per cent of all crime and up to a quarter of sex crimes. In the first nine months of 2024, almost 14 per cent of grooming suspects were Pakistani, five times their share of the population. Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens, according to the data. Overall, foreign nationals were 71 per cent more likely than Britons to be responsible for sex crime convictions. Based on convictions per 10,000 of the population, Afghans with 77 convictions topped the table with a rate of 59 per 10,000, 22.3 times that of Britons. They were followed by Eritreans, who accounted for 59 convictions at a rate of 53.6 per 10,000 of their population. In March 2025, data from the Ministry of Justice revealed that foreigners, who claim £1 billion a month in benefits, were also responsible for large proportions of violence, robbery, fraud and drug offences, between 2021 and 2023. There was no data for terrorism offences or acts of anti-Semitism. But does anybody want to hazard a guess? Which brings us to a fundamental question. Why? Why does Britain need to allow the criminals of the world to come to our shores to abuse women and girls, run criminal enterprises, foster terrorism and anti-Semitism, and claim benefits in the process? Obviously not all foreigners from these countries behave in this way. But facts aren't racist. Large numbers are pulling down our pants, spanking our buttocks and pulling them up again. In fact, the problem is not one of race but one of politics and culture. In my new book, Never Again? How the West Betrayed the Jews and Itself, which is coming out at the end of September, I look at groundbreaking research published in April by cognitive scientists Scott Barry Kaufman and Craig Neumann. They found that 'citizens in democratic countries have more benevolent traits, fewer malevolent traits, and greater well-being' than those living under autocratic regimes. Based on a study of 200,000 people from 75 countries, people living under autocracies were found to be much more likely to exhibit the 'Dark Triad' of negative personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. In democracies, by contrast, more people displayed the 'Light Triad' of humanism, faith in humanity and 'Kantianism', or treating people with dignity in their own right rather than viewing them as a means to an end. Obviously, this is not related to race. Russians are hardly black, but they hardly live in a democracy either. It is a case of cognitive development. The problem occurs when, in an age of global travel, 'Dark Triad' migrants who grew up in despotic regimes encounter gullible 'Light Triad' officials in the democracies, whose empathies are easily played upon. That is why we find British judges ruling that an Albanian convict should avoid deportation because his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, a Pakistani drug dealer could stay so he could teach his son about Islam, and a paedophile of the same nationality should not be sent home since it would be 'unduly harsh' on his own children. These real-life cases, reported by the Telegraph, provide a clear collision of the 'Dark Triad' traits in the criminals and the 'Light Triad' tendencies in the judges. It is a chemical reaction waiting to happen, and the vast majority of the population, wherever they are born, are suffering the consequences. In other words, we are being taken for fools. No foreign criminal has a God-given right to set up home in Britain just because he fancies it. This is our home, and although we are delighted to welcome strangers, that generosity should be withdrawn from those who nick our television and threaten our children – even if their own happen to like the chicken nuggets in our fridge. Trump has now thrown down the gauntlet. What is the British Government going to do to set our own house in order? Will it take an anti-Semitic outrage like the firebombing in Colorado before the Prime Minister takes action? Will he take action even then?
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘It was supposed to stay confidential' – Rory McIlroy ‘p***ed off' after private information is leaked
RORY McILROY was 'p***ed off' that news of his driver failing technical standards was leaked at last month's USPGA Championship. Two days before the tournament, the club was pulled from his bag after official testing showed it crossed the 'trampoline effect' threshold — when the club face becomes more springy. 2 2 Failures are supposed to be confidential with no blame attached to the player but the news broke on the Friday evening. World No 1 Scottie Scheffler 's driver also failed but that never became public until he revealed it at his winner's press conference. Masters champ McIlroy, 36, left Quail Hollow without speaking a word in public. Ahead of teeing up in the Canadian Open, which starts today, the Northern Irishman said: 'I was a little p***ed off because I knew that Scottie's driver had failed but my name was the one that was leaked. It was supposed to stay confidential. 'I didn't want to get up there and say something that I regretted, either, because I'm trying to protect Scottie, I don't want to mention his name.' He went on to add: "I'm trying to protect TaylorMade. I'm trying to protect the USGA, PGA of America, myself. I just didn't want to get up there and say something that I regretted. "With Scottie's stuff, that's not my information to share. I knew that that had happened, but that's not on me to share that, and I felt that process is supposed to be kept confidential, and it wasn't for whatever reason. That's why I was pretty annoyed at that. "From a responsibility standpoint, look, I understand, but if we all wanted to, we could all bypass you guys and we could just go on this and we could go on social media and we could talk about our round and do it our own way. "I think there should be an understanding that this is a two-way street, and as much as we need to speak to you guys, we're sort of, like we understand the benefit that comes from you being here and giving us the platform and everything else. So I understand that. "But again, I've been beating this drum for a long time. If they want to make it mandatory, that's fine, but in our rules it says that it's not, and until the day that that's maybe written into the regulations, you're going to have guys skip from time to time, and that's well within our rights." Scheffler won the PGA Championship last month, marking his third major title. He finished at 11-under 273, five strokes clear of the field in Charlotte.
