'Absurd and surreal': Trump's comments on war hurt Ukrainians in Vegreville, Alta.
Social Sharing
Yuliia Kalutska doesn't have the will to talk about plans for her future.
She says it's because of rebukes this week of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump called the European leader a "dictator" and blamed Ukraine for starting the war.
"It's hard not to watch the news, and it's even harder to watch news," said Kalutska, a 30-year-old Ukrainian who fled after the war began with her newborn son. They now live in Vegreville, Alta., a town east of Edmonton.
"[Trump's comments] are absurd and surreal," Kalutska said. "It makes me cry. It makes me feel horrible.
"I'm scared every single day."
Monday marks the third anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The U.S. and Russia have been talking about a possible end to the war. Trump has warned Zelenskyy that he "better move fast" with negotiations or risk not having a nation to lead.
Zelenskyy has said Trump is falling into Russian disinformation.
"We have no idea where this is going. [Trump] is off his rocker. I hate to see it happening," said Jerrold Lemko, a volunteer liaison for Ukrainian newcomers in Vegreville.
He said most of the recent talk in the town's coffee shops is about Trump.
Many in the town of 6,000, known for its giant sculpture of an Easter egg, or Pysanka, have Ukrainian roots. The community has sponsored at least 125 people fleeing the war.
"If I feel this bad, I can't imagine how newcomers are feeling because they have family there," said Lemko, who has Ukrainian heritage.
Sheryl Cymbaliuk, finance chair for the Vegreville Stands With Ukraine support group, said Trump's comments have been disappointing for community members.
"Social media is littered with the fallacies that Trump has been spreading, so there is frustration, more than we can even imagine when their families are still in Ukraine," she said.
Some Ukrainians in Vegreville had hopes of returning to their homes one day.
"Now that dream might be slightly diminished," Cymbaliuk said.
A march and church service in support of Ukraine are set for Sunday.
"We want to remind everybody that the war is not over and that Ukraine continues to need our support," Cymbaliuk said.
Kalutska said she'll be at the march with other Ukrainian women who fled the war and have become her support system. She plans to speak and share her story about how she fled with her son and left behind her family, some of whom are on the front lines of the fight.
Vegreville Mayor Tim MacPhee said it's important for the town to show its support for the Ukrainian community.
"There was a lot of confidence in the community that maybe President Trump would have the ability to put [Russian President Vladimir Putin] in his place and try to bring this conflict to an end," said MacPhee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
41 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
How a multibillion dollar defence bank could help Canada increase its military spending
Article content The Defence, Security and Resilience Bank would be similar to Export Development Canada, a Crown corporation that provides financial and risk management services to Canadian exporters and investors, 'but way bigger,' Reed said. Article content It would offer large banks such as RBC and BMO credit guarantees 'that would loosen up capital so they could offer lines of credit, trade finance, you name it, but we can grow the industrial base a lot faster,' Reed said. Article content That would, in turn, speed up military procurement, he said. Article content 'It takes nine years to get a jet or seven years to get a shoulder-fired rocket launcher,' Reed said. 'It's because the industrial base just isn't big enough. It's been constrained. So, this would push liquidity into the commercial banks.' Article content Sovereign countries could also 'enhance procurement' by borrowing from the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank on the promise that they 'have to execute within two years,' Reed said. 'We want to foster that rapid-fire procurement that we know has been a problem for all member nations.' Article content Article content Right now, it takes 16 years for startups to go from selling the Department of National Defence on their products to procurement, he said. Article content 'Companies just can't live in that — they call that the Valley of Death,' Reed said. Article content 'That is a problem. If you want to invent a new bullet … in your garage, you're going to wait a long time.' Article content Rob Murray, NATO's inaugural head of innovation and a former U.K. army officer, started writing the blueprint for the bank about five years ago. Article content But, at the time, interest rates were flat, Russia hadn't launched its full-scale war in Ukraine, and U.S. President Donald Trump was not in power. Article content When the Ukraine war began, interest rates started climbing and people started recognizing 'threat levels are changing around the world,' Reed said. Article content Then Trump came to power in his second term and started 'forcing the hand of many NATO nations' to increase their defence spending, Reed said. Article content Article content Murray published his blueprint last December. Article content 'On the back of that he was invited down to brief the president elect down at Mar-a-Lago,' Reed said, 'and Rob's world just started to expand rapidly with proposed member nations seeking him out, asking how would this work? How can we get involved?' Article content Murray asked Reed to step in as the bank's president in early February 'to help stitch together the coalition of governments' needed to bring the idea to fruition. Article content 'Every European nation has been briefed,' Reed said. Article content 'And we did the briefing for Canada right after the election' with senior people in Prime Minister Mark Carney's office, the Privy Council Office, and departments including National Defence, Finance, Global Affairs and Treasury Board. Article content Reed also briefed officials in Singapore last week and plans to do the same in Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand this week. Article content 'We're trying to drive this around a consensus of a dozen anchor nations,' he said. Article content NATO figures from last June suggest Canada spent just 1.37 per cent of its GDP on defence in 2024. The Liberals have said they expect it to reach two per cent by 2030 'at the latest.' Article content But that's not fast enough for Trump, who has complained repeatedly about Canada piggybacking on the U.S. for military protection. Article content 'While I don't like what he's saying, I see this as an opportunity to get ourselves going,' Reed said. 'We have not done our job in a long time. We've not fulfilled our commitments, and this a kick in the pants to say who are we, and what do we stand for?' Article content Later this month, Reed expects NATO countries to accept a new spending minimum of 3.5 per cent of GDP for defence and 1.5 per cent for border security. Article content 'To go from our base today … it's another $100-110 billion a year to ramp up to that,' he said of Canada. 'And that's not in future dollars. That's in last year's dollars. So, any available mechanism that can help grow the industrial base and get them towards those NATO soon-to-be targets is going to be well received.' Article content Article content Founding members of the bank will start meeting in the fall to hammer out details. Reed anticipates standing up the bank next year. Article content 'I like the idea of another mechanism, and a very powerful and large one, and I think a very influential one, that can help us do more in the defence and security domain in Western democracies,' said retired general Rick Hillier, Canada's former top soldier, who has joined the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank's board of directors. Article content He predicts Canada is going to need 'a revolution in defence and security procurement' to solve the Canadian Forces' equipment woes. Article content More money could accelerate the acquisition of new aircraft, warships and submarines, he said. Article content 'The component I'm most worried about is the army,' Hillier said. 'The army is broken. We're down people. Our bases and our infrastructure are in very sad condition. And we lack every kind of capability that a force needs in the kind of areas where we would find ourselves fighting right now. If things go south in Eastern Europe and (Vladimir) Putin and Russia get into some kind of thing they can't extract themselves from and start heading into Lithuania and Latvia, where there are several thousand Canadians, our sons and daughters, we are ill-prepared to insure that they're ready to look after themselves.' Article content Article content The army lacks self-propelled artillery pieces, air defence systems, technology that can detect, track, and neutralize drones, and equipment to remove minefields, Hillier said. 'We need to focus a huge amount of that defence spend on the army.' Article content Canada has also been lagging in spending to defend our north, he said. 'We've got to know what's going on in the Arctic, to be able to see what's going on specifically, to be able to communicate what's going on and then to be able to respond to what's going, whether its air, land, or depending on the time of year, sea forces. Right now, we can only do a very small part of that.' Article content The country needs satellites and ultra-long endurance drones to cover the north, Hillier said. Bases should be built in Inuvik, Rankin Inlet, and Iqaluit, he said. 'Then you have to connect … those spots by upgrading the airfields across the north.'
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
As his trade war faces legal pushback, Trump has other tariff tools he could deploy
WASHINGTON – U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs are facing legal headwinds for the first time — but he has other tools he could deploy in his quest to realign global trade. A federal appeals court is still deciding whether there will be a stay on Trump's universal tariffs enacted through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled the duties were unlawful last month. IEEPA is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. It had never previously been used for tariffs. Trump declared emergencies at the United States' northern and southern borders linked to the flow of fentanyl and migrants in order to hit Canada and Mexico with economywide tariffs. He later declared an emergency over trade deficits to impose his retaliatory 'Liberation Day' duties on most nations. The trade court found Trump exceeded presidential powers by using IEEPA to broadly implement the duties. The Trump administration quickly appealed the decision and the White House said it would take the case to the Supreme Court. Following the ruling, White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said he was confident the court ultimately would decide in Trump's favour. Hassett said that if it doesn't, 'we'll have other alternatives that we can pursue as well to make sure that we make American trade fair again.' While the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress, Greta Peisch, the former general counsel for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, said it passed laws over the last century that allow the president some control in certain situations. Trump is now looking to use those laws — some of them for the first time. The president may be considering Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It allows a president to hit countries with tariffs of up to 50 per cent if the country 'is treating products of the United States disfavourably, compared to products of another foreign country,' said Peisch, a partner at Wiley Rein in Washington, D.C. Section 338 has never been used by a president before and Peisch said it might be difficult for the administration to make a case for it. Trump also might look to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows a president to take trade actions if an investigation finds a trading partner's policies are unreasonable and discriminatory. Trump used this law during his first administration to impose tariffs on some Chinese imports and European Union goods. But Section 301 requires country-by-country investigations of trade policy before a tariff can be imposed — investigations that could take weeks or months and would include a period for public comment. That certainly would slow down Trump's efforts to target the world with tariffs. If the president is looking for speed, Peisch said, he might try to use Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 — another law that has never before been used. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Section 122 allows a president to implement tariffs of up to 15 per cent to address large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits. But those duties can only stay in place for a maximum of 150 days before they need Congressional approval to continue. That reduces Trump's leverage if his goal is to pressure countries to sign trade deals — those countries could simply decide to wait the president out. Trump also has said tariffs will help pay down the deficit; the short-term Section 122 power is unlikely to work as a long-term revenue strategy. Ultimately, Peisch said, none of the replacement statutes could easily build Trump's universal tariff wall around the United States. 'Nothing is a great fit without a lot of work,' she said. 'So I think it's potentially going to be a challenge.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 7, 2025.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Trump shrugs off Musk feud: ‘Not even thinking about Elon'
U.S. President Donald Trump seemed to brush off his public feud with former close ally Elon Musk on Friday, saying he's not even thinking about him. Trump is even said to be considering selling, or giving away, the red Tesla he recently purchased from Musk.
