How do local communities feel about low-traffic neighbourhoods?
A number of low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) have been implemented despite being opposed by nearly nine in 10 local residents, it has been reported.
According to research by the Times, out of 90 LTNs looked at, neighbours objected in 87% of cases where polling was conducted - but the majority of councils went ahead with them.
LTNs involve preventing vehicles from using some residential streets and were deployed by many councils during COVID lockdowns in 2020 to make it easier for people to walk and cycle.
They seek to reduce traffic congestion and pollution within a residential area, by making driving less convenient and simultaneously making walking and cycling more appealing. Many are in London.
In 2022, extensive polling by Ipsos indicated that the public was split in its support, with 50% of respondents in favour of LTNs. However, when asked to consider any potential personal financial impact, support dropped, with just 22% in support.
A separate report commissioned by the government in March 2024 found a mixed response, too: "While the review of existing evidence showed that LTN schemes have had several positive impacts, this remains largely unrecognised by stakeholders or residents (in the four scheme areas where survey research was conducted)," it said, adding: "Low awareness of the schemes among residents and uncertainty about benefits, does not automatically translate into widespread opposition."
Such concerns have been raised about the impact of LTNs on drivers. This week, campaigners presented a 1,700-signature petition to Enfield Council, in north London, calling for their blocked roads to be reopened. 'When the North Circular grinds to a halt as it so often does,' he said, 'we're trapped. We can't get in, we can't get out.'
It's an issue which stirs deep anger… to the extent that the High Court recently heard Lambeth Council workers in south London were offered a wellbeing day after 'hostility and anger' at a meeting over a proposed LTN scheme left them 'in tears'.
Yahoo News has curated recent reports around this issue from its media partners. Read below - or click the headlines to skip ahead
> Anti-LTN campaign groups join forces to lobby for law change
> Ambulances charged for entering clean-air zone
> Edinburgh councillors call for extension of low traffic zone
> Motorists who breach LTNs to be fined an extra £30
> Disinformation about LTNs 'soared after Government U-turn'
> Council workers left 'in tears' after LTN meeting
> Mum's LTN plea after three-year-old 'sent flying' in hit-and-run
> Islington residents divided over first low-traffic scheme
Campaign groups opposing Low Traffic Neighbourhoods have joined forces for the first time to lobby the Government to change the law.
Fifteen community groups have sent a letter to the transport secretary Heidi Alexander arguing that LTN schemes often 'do not have the backing of local people'.
Read the full story on the Standard
Police cars, fire engines and ambulances responding to life-and-death 999 calls are to be charged for entering a Somerset low-traffic neighbourhood (LTN).
From March, emergency services which do not meet the local council's emission standards will have to pay to enter the city.
Read the full story on the Telegraph
Edinburgh councillors have voted to make a controversial low traffic area in a city neighbourhood permanent.
For over a year, roads and junctions in Leith have been temporarily closed or modified as part of a pilot scheme to reduce traffic and make the area more walkable. Now, councillors have voted in a committee to make the modifications permanent, with a few minor changes to address concerns raised from the scheme.
Read the full story on Edinburgh Live
Motorists who breach low traffic neighbourhood rules or park illegally in London will be fined an extra £30 after Sadiq Khan approved 'unjustifiable' price increases.
The move, which will be brought in from April, is expected to add hundreds of millions of pounds to council coffers.
Higher-level offences – such as parking on double yellow lines – will now attract fines of £160 in the city's so-called 'Band A' areas like Croydon, Hackney and Islington. This is up from £130.
Read more from the Telegraph
Disinformation and conspiracy theories about low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) soared last year amid Government opposition to the schemes, according to a study.
Cross-party think tank Demos, which conducted the analysis, claimed there is a 'worsening democratic chasm between councils and communities'.
LTNs, which involve preventing vehicles from using some residential streets, were deployed by many councils during coronavirus lockdowns in 2020 in a bid to make it easier for people to walk and cycle.
Opponents raised concerns about the impact on drivers.
The Demos report found the proportion of the most popular social media posts on LTNs it classed as disinformation rose from 5% in 2022 to 28% in 2023.
Read the full story from PA Media
Lambeth Council workers were offered a wellbeing day after 'hostility and anger' at a meeting over a proposed Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) scheme left them 'in tears', the High Court has heard.
The West Dulwich Action Group (WDAG) is bringing a legal challenge and has asked the court to stop the council's plans for an LTN after it made a decision to proceed in July last year. A lawyer for Lambeth Council said the claim is 'without foundation' and should be dismissed.
Read the full story on MyLondon (12 Feb)
A mother whose three-year-old was 'sent flying' by a hit-and-run driver has called on councillors to restart an apparently stalled plan to introduce a low-traffic neighbourhood (LTN) scheme.
Jess Smith's son Fionn 'miraculously' only suffered minor injuries when he was struck by a white Nissan Qashqai car being driven at about 20mph in Balmoral Road, Manor Park, on February 11.
Read the full story on the Standard (19 Feb)
Islington's first 'liveable neighbourhood' scheme has divided residents as work begins to improve pedestrian access in Newington Green. Supporters of reducing cars driving through the area say it will make it both more pleasant and much safer for young families.
However, it has also faced backlash over claims it will only push more traffic onto surrounding roads which are already congested due to existing schemes in Hackney, Dalston and Stoke Newington.
Read the full story on MyLondon (16 Feb)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Two Virginia Democrats are battling Tuesday to be their party's nominee for attorney general. Yet, the name mentioned most in their campaigns is not that of their opponent, but rather a man who lives just over the Arlington Memorial Bridge: President Donald Trump. The barrage of changes Trump has wrought to American culture in the first few months of his second White House residency has ignited the campaigns of Virginia Democrats Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor as they appeal unrelentingly to the most devout swaths of their base ahead of down-ballot primary elections. The primary will also determine the party's nominations this year for lieutenant governor and some contested seats in the House of Delegates. In one of only two states electing governors in November — the other is New Jersey — the caustic anti-Trump rhetoric could be a hint of what voters nationwide will hear from Democrats in next year's midterm elections, when the stakes will be higher. Virginia's nominees for governor have been settled by default. Democrat Abigail Spanberger became her party's nominee after running unopposed, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears was the only contender who gathered enough signatures to be on the ballot. The other statewide races are for attorney general and lieutenant governor, and Democrats in both contests seem to be vying to top each other with anti-Trump rhetoric and caustic ads. Republicans are not hosting statewide primaries this year, so only Democrats will pick a nominee for lieutenant governor. It's a part-time position that pays about $36,000 a year but is often a stepping stone to higher office. Six Democrats want the job , and most of them have pushed ad after ad on the airwaves and online about their commitment to taking on Trump if elected to the mostly ceremonial role. In the contest for attorney general, Jones and Taylor are competing in much the same way. Turnout is likely to be sluggish, which means firing up base voters is widely seen as the way to go. The last time a left-wing candidate for governor ran unopposed, roughly 142,000 Democrats voted for an attorney general nominee compared with more than 485,000 this past election cycle. Still, the AG's race has been spicy, more so when the candidates' criticism isn't directed at each other. Jones and Taylor have lambasted the White House and argued that the administration's actions should be litigated in court. When they are not lamenting Trump, their attacks are directed toward incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection. In their respective campaigns, the Democrats argue that Miyares submits to the president by not suing him. They say that sets him apart from more progressive attorneys general across the United States, who are going to court over such things as birthright citizenship and elections . Their main message: A Democrat will take the White House to trial when Miyares won't — and saving democracy starts there. 'The job is to protect Virginians, to fight for them, to work for them, to keep us safe,' Jones said while campaigning in June in Falls Church, Virginia, adding, 'I don't understand why he is not going after them.' Last month, Taylor told a room full of Democratic voters that Miyares would enable Trump's overreaches in Virginia, and potentially double down on institutions that don't comply with the president. Either way, 'the result is the same for Virginians: getting hurt,' she said. In a wide-ranging interview in May, Miyares said he identifies as a balls-and-strikes Republican. The former Virginia Beach state delegate, elected top prosecutor in 2021, worked to reduce violent crime. He sought settlements from Big Pharma. When he felt President Joe Biden's administration overstepped, he went to court . But as Trump was ushered into office for a second term, Miyares entered new political terrain. Unlike most other states, Virginians will elect their attorney general this November, nearly a year after the country voted for the president and his consequential agenda. Miyares has waded into the political arena. He often spars on social media with progressive prosecutors throughout Virginia for being too lenient in prosecuting criminal cases. Still, Miyares rebuffed the notion that suing Trump is his top concern. He said the Democrats looking to replace him fail to understand the nature of his position. The attorney general touted meaningful work his office has shouldered: holding listening sessions for crime victims, designating resources to support law enforcement and beefing up his office's prosecutions of child support cases. He flashed his law enforcement badge, tucked within a leather wallet, and described the emblem as a guidepost for being an effective people's prosecutor. 'They seem very obsessed with Donald Trump, whereas I'm obsessed with how am I going to keep Virginians safe?' Miyares said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dozens of Wisconsin cities holdng 'No Kings' protests against Trump
Wisconsinites in more than 50 towns and cities are expected to take to the streets Saturday, June 14, as part of what organizers say will be the largest nationwide protest yet against President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. More than 100 pro-democracy advocacy groups are working together to organize "No Kings" protests across the country, with actions planned in more than 1,500 cities, according to its website. Spearheading the effort is the national organizing group, 50501 — short for "50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement." The group's local chapter, 50501 Milwaukee, also helped organize an anti-Trump protest in downtown Milwaukee on June 10. That followed local reports of federal arrests and the Trump administration's crackdown against demonstrations in Los Angeles. Hundreds gathered in Cathedral Square Park, before marching to Milwaukee's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices. The protests take their name from the idea that in the United States, we don't have kings — a reference to Trump's own language about himself and his perception of virtually unchecked power. Saturday's protest in Milwaukee will be held in Cathedral Square Park. It coincides with Trump's military parade — expected to cost upwards of $30 million — to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Army and his own birthday. Organizers said scheduling the protests for the same day as the parade was deliberate. "President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday," No Kings organizers wrote. "A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." In Madison, a protest is scheduled from 2 to 5 p.m. at Library Mall, 715 State St. In the Milwaukee area, No Kings protests will be held in the following places: Milwaukee: Noon to 2 p.m. in Cathedral Square Park, 520 E. Wells St. This will likely be the largest protest in the greater Milwaukee area. Shorewood: 2 to 3:30 p.m. at Oak Leaf Trail Bridge & Capitol Drive. Greenfield: 10 to 11 a.m., South 76th Street & West Layton Avenue. Brookfield: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. 19400 W. Bluemound Rd. Waukesha: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., 321 Wisconsin Ave. This story is developing and will update through the day. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Dozens of Wisconsin cities holdng 'No Kings' protests against Trump
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Two Virginia Democrats are battling Tuesday to be their party's nominee for attorney general. Yet, the name mentioned most in their campaigns is not that of their opponent, but rather a man who lives just over the Arlington Memorial Bridge: President Donald Trump. The barrage of changes Trump has wrought to American culture in the first few months of his second White House residency has ignited the campaigns of Virginia Democrats Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor as they appeal unrelentingly to the most devout swaths of their base ahead of down-ballot primary elections. The primary will also determine the party's nominations this year for lieutenant governor and some contested seats in the House of Delegates. In one of only two states electing governors in November — the other is New Jersey — the caustic anti-Trump rhetoric could be a hint of what voters nationwide will hear from Democrats in next year's midterm elections, when the stakes will be higher. Virginia's nominees for governor have been settled by default. Democrat Abigail Spanberger became her party's nominee after running unopposed, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears was the only contender who gathered enough signatures to be on the ballot. The other statewide races are for attorney general and lieutenant governor, and Democrats in both contests seem to be vying to top each other with anti-Trump rhetoric and caustic ads. Republicans are not hosting statewide primaries this year, so only Democrats will pick a nominee for lieutenant governor. It's a part-time position that pays about $36,000 a year but is often a stepping stone to higher office. Six Democrats want the job, and most of them have pushed ad after ad on the airwaves and online about their commitment to taking on Trump if elected to the mostly ceremonial role. In the contest for attorney general, Jones and Taylor are competing in much the same way. Turnout is likely to be sluggish, which means firing up base voters is widely seen as the way to go. The last time a left-wing candidate for governor ran unopposed, roughly 142,000 Democrats voted for an attorney general nominee compared with more than 485,000 this past election cycle. Still, the AG's race has been spicy, more so when the candidates' criticism isn't directed at each other. Jones and Taylor have lambasted the White House and argued that the administration's actions should be litigated in court. When they are not lamenting Trump, their attacks are directed toward incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection. In their respective campaigns, the Democrats argue that Miyares submits to the president by not suing him. They say that sets him apart from more progressive attorneys general across the United States, who are going to court over such things as birthright citizenship and elections. Their main message: A Democrat will take the White House to trial when Miyares won't — and saving democracy starts there. 'The job is to protect Virginians, to fight for them, to work for them, to keep us safe,' Jones said while campaigning in June in Falls Church, Virginia, adding, 'I don't understand why he is not going after them.' Last month, Taylor told a room full of Democratic voters that Miyares would enable Trump's overreaches in Virginia, and potentially double down on institutions that don't comply with the president. Either way, 'the result is the same for Virginians: getting hurt,' she said. In a wide-ranging interview in May, Miyares said he identifies as a balls-and-strikes Republican. The former Virginia Beach state delegate, elected top prosecutor in 2021, worked to reduce violent crime. He sought settlements from Big Pharma. When he felt President Joe Biden's administration overstepped, he went to court. But as Trump was ushered into office for a second term, Miyares entered new political terrain. Unlike most other states, Virginians will elect their attorney general this November, nearly a year after the country voted for the president and his consequential agenda. Miyares has waded into the political arena. He often spars on social media with progressive prosecutors throughout Virginia for being too lenient in prosecuting criminal cases. Still, Miyares rebuffed the notion that suing Trump is his top concern. He said the Democrats looking to replace him fail to understand the nature of his position. The attorney general touted meaningful work his office has shouldered: holding listening sessions for crime victims, designating resources to support law enforcement and beefing up his office's prosecutions of child support cases. He flashed his law enforcement badge, tucked within a leather wallet, and described the emblem as a guidepost for being an effective people's prosecutor. 'They seem very obsessed with Donald Trump, whereas I'm obsessed with how am I going to keep Virginians safe?' Miyares said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
