Law professors, legal groups back Perkins Coie in lawsuit over Trump order
April 3 (Reuters) - More than 300 law professors and other legal groups submitted court briefs backing law firm Perkins Coie in its lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump's executive order that punished the firm for its work for Hillary Clinton and its diversity policies.
Professors from dozens of U.S. law schools including Harvard, Yale and Stanford argued in their filing, opens new tab late on Wednesday that Trump's March 6 order targeting Perkins Coie is unconstitutional and threatens the integrity of the U.S. judicial system.
"Today, Perkins Coie has fallen into the President's disfavor. Tomorrow, it could be any one of us whose speech the President unilaterally deems antithetical to 'the interests of the United States' because that person or organization has chosen to litigate against him," the brief said.
The filing was part of a wave of "friend of the court" briefs from outside groups voicing alarm over the president's orders against Perkins Coie and other law firms.
In another brief, opens new tab, a coalition of advocacy groups across the ideological spectrum — including the American Civil Liberties Union and Cato Institute — denounced Trump's orders against Perkins Coie and other firms as "assaults on the bar" that threaten the ability of Americans to hire attorneys for important cases.
The White House in a statement said it was "absurd that a billion-dollar law firm is suing to retain its access to government perks and handouts." It has defended Trump's executive orders against law firms as "lawful directives to ensure that the President's agenda is implemented and that law firms comply with the law."
The Justice Department on Wednesday night asked a U.S. judge in Washington to dismiss Perkins Coie's lawsuit.
Trump's orders against Seattle-founded Perkins Coie and two rival firms — Jenner & Block and WilmerHale — sought to cancel federal contracts held by the firms' clients and to restrict access by their lawyers to federal buildings and officials.
Perkins Coie, Jenner and WilmerHale's lawsuits challenging executive orders against the firms are pending in Washington. Three U.S. judges have blocked key provisions in the orders targeting the firms.
Four other law firms — Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Milbank have struck deals with the White House to avoid similar sanctions.
The professors argued in their brief supporting Perkins Coie that Trump's campaign against the firms "dangles a Sword of Damocles over all those who refuse to place loyalty to the President above the interests of their clients and the law."
"If the order stands, it will be open season on lawyers who have dared to take on clients or causes the President or other officials don't like," the brief said.
Why target these law firms? For Trump, it's personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
The left needs to act more boldly or we are all doomed
According to immigration lawyers, agents arrested people – including families with small children – and held them in a stuffy office basement for days without sufficient food and water. Given the brutal nature of these raids, and the failure to uphold basic human rights (such as the right to due process and the right to legal representation), it is no wonder that protests have taken place. However, unlike the 1992 LA riots, the protests sparked by the actions of ICE have been overwhelmingly peaceful, and have been confined to a six-block stretch of downtown LA. READ MORE: Israel launches second wave of major strikes on Iran Yet, despite this, Donald Trump ordered the National Guard to be deployed against the California governor's wishes – the first time since 1965 that a president had deployed National Guard troops to a state without a governor's request. Although it is heartening to see ordinary Americans beginning to make a stand against the inhumane, illegal, and downright cruel actions of the Trump administration, we cannot forget the path that led the United States here – corruption, obscene inequality, and the deliberate fanning of the flames of racism and bigotry. I find myself grateful on a daily basis that I do not live in America, only to be reminded that these issues are much closer to home than many of us care to admit. Over the last several nights, Ballymena in Northern Ireland has been rocked by racist riots. They began after a vigil held for a teenage girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted by two 14-year-olds. (Image: Brian Lawless/PA Wire) When rumours spread that a Romanian interpreter was in the court, it was enough to ignite the racism that has long been simmering away. Police said the unrest escalated into racially motivated violence, with mobs targeting foreign residents by breaking their windows, and setting fire to their homes. The justification given for these racist riots is that residents feel their community is being 'overrun' by foreigners, and that it has happened very quickly. For context, 3.4% of Northern Ireland's population are from ethnic minority backgrounds compared to 12.9% in Scotland and 18.3% in England and Wales. Northern Ireland is the least diverse part of the United Kingdom. The rioters claim immigrants are 'freeloading' off taxpayer-funded resources, and are committing crimes. Again, this is an age-old claim which barely masks the racism motivating it. But when a young, white, Irish or British person moves to somewhere like Australia or Spain to start a new life, we encourage them and wish them the best. We do not assume they are scroungers looking to suck resources away from native Australians, so why is it different when people come to the UK for a better life? Equally, the vast majority of sexual assaults in the UK are committed by white men born in the UK – where are the riots then? The anger and despair that people feel when they see their communities decline, their opportunities disappear and their national institutions disintegrate is completely understandable and justified. The problem comes when that righteous anger is manipulated and aimed at entirely the wrong people. While standards of living in the UK continue to decline, while social security is dismantled piece by piece – no matter which party is in government – when the waiting lists for NHS appointments and decent housing seem to only ever grow, it is fair to feel angry and attacked. However, when the richest people in society are getting richer while ordinary people are simultaneously told that they must, again, tighten their belts, it seems obvious to me where that anger should be directed. And it certainly is not at immigrants just trying to live their lives. This same manipulation of that anger and despair that we have seen in the US, and in Northern Ireland, can also be seen much closer to home in Scotland. Nigel Farage's Reform UK came third in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. It was once unthinkable that Farage would ever enjoy even close to that level of success in politics, never mind in Scottish politics. As I have said previously, something is going to eventually give way. People are desperate for change from the status quo, and they will vote for whoever they perceive to be deviating the most from it, no matter how false that perception is. Given that the status quo has been moving increasingly further to the right, it is the perfect time for left-leaning political parties to think and act boldly. If they don't, then we are all doomed.
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Glamorous GOP Rep. reveals Dem plot to cause chaos at 'No Kings Day' protests… and blame MAGA
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., floated a conspiracy theory on Friday that Democrat agitators will be embedded within the upcoming 'No Kings Day' protests. She is specifically worried about leftists impersonating Trump supporters and committing violence to make MAGA look bad. 'Do NOT attend the No Kings protests. I have screen shots circulating that leftists are going to wear MAGA gear in an attempt to cause chaos,' the conservative firebrand posted on X. These protests, which are occurring Saturday in over 2,000 locations across the US, are meant to counter President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C. on the same day. Organizations involved with coordinating this large-scale resistance are strongly pushing back against what they describe as Trump's march toward authoritarianism on issues such as immigration enforcement, civil rights and cuts to the federal government through DOGE. The simple message people involved want to get across is that 'we don't do kings in America,' Ezra Levin, the co-executive director of progressive organizing group Indivisible, told ABC News. Organizers have also pointed out that the military parade, meant to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US Army, coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. Trump has denied a connection between the parade's timing and his birthday, pointing out how June 14 is Flag Day, a holiday that's been around for over a century. On Thursday, reporters gathered in the East Wing of the White House asked Trump his thoughts on the 'No Kings Day' protests. 'I don't feel like a king,' he said. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' Trump was signing a resolution to roll back California's electric vehicle mandate, a first-of-its-kind initiative that would have stopped the sale of gas-powered vehicles in the state by 2035. 'A king would have never had the California mandate ... he wouldn't have to call up Mike Johnson and Thune and say "fellas you've gotta pull this off" and after years get it done,' Trump continued, name-checking House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Trump then added, 'We're not a king, we're not a king at all, thank you very much,' before moving onto the next question. The 'No Kings Day' protests come as anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles stretched into their seventh day 'No Kings' organizers have told potential demonstrators to actually stay away from Washington, D.C., which already has a heavy security presence thanks to the parade. Fencing was erected around the White House, the Capitol Building and parts of the National Mall ahead of Saturday's event. A group of anti-Trump veterans didn't heed organizers' advice, as 60 of them were arrested outside the US Capitol Building late Friday night. At first, roughly 75 people were demonstrating peacefully at the Supreme Court, according to a statement by the Capitol Police. By around 7pm, about 60 people left the group and migrated over to the Capitol, which was when officers established a perimeter as a precaution, the statement said. A few people in the crowd pushed over a bike rack, illegally crossed the police line and began running toward the Rotunda Steps, Capitol Police said. 'USCP is in the process of arresting approximately 60 demonstrators. All will be charged with unlawful demonstration and crossing a police line. Additional charges for some will include assault on a police officer and resisting arrest,' according to the statement. Capitol Police added that two people who were arrested had to be taken to a local hospital for their injuries. Members of the organization Veterans for Peace were the ones behind the sit-in on the Capitol Steps, according to an Instagram post. 'Approximately 60 veterans and military family members staged a sit-in on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC to demand the military get off our city streets from LA to DC, and taxpayer money be directed towards real investments in housing, health care, and food — not political stunts or militarism,' the group wrote. The Secret Service, which is leading security for Trump's military parade, told CNN they have planned for mass protests on Saturday.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
US military parade has global counterparts in democracies, monarchies and totalitarian regimes
The military parade to mark the Army's 250th anniversary and its convergence with President Donald Trump 's 79th birthday are combining to create a peacetime outlier in U.S. history. Yet it still reflects global traditions that serve a range of political and cultural purposes. Variations on the theme have surfaced among longtime NATO allies in Europe, one-party and authoritarian states and history's darkest regimes. France: Bastille Day and Trump's idée inspirée The oldest democratic ally of the U.S. holds a military parade each July 14 to commemorate one of the seminal moments of the French Revolution. It inspired — or at least stoked — Trump's idea for a Washington version. On July 14, 1789, French insurgents stormed the Bastille, which housed prisoners of Louis XVI's government. Revolutionaries commenced a Fête de la Fédération as a day of national unity and pride the following year, even with the First French Republic still more than two years from being established. The Bastille Day parade has rolled annually since 1880. Now, it proceeds down an iconic Parisian route, the Avenue des Champs-Élysées. It passes the Arc de Triomphe — a memorial with tributes to the French Revolution, Napoleonic Wars and World War I — and eventually in front of the French president, government ministers and invited foreign guests. Trump attended in 2017, early in his first presidency, as U.S. troops marched as guests. The spectacle left him openly envious. 'It was one of the greatest parades I've ever seen,' Trump told French President Emanuel Macron. 'It was military might, and I think a tremendous thing for France and for the spirit of France. We're going to have to try and top it.' The British set modern ceremonial standards In the United Kingdom, King Charles III serves as ceremonial (though not practical) head of U.K. armed forces. Unlike in France and the U.S., where elected presidents wear civilian dress even at military events, Charles dons elaborate dress uniforms — medals, sash, sword, sometimes even a bearskin hat and chin strap. He does it most famously at Trooping the Colour, a parade and troop inspection to mark the British monarch's official birthday, regardless of their actual birthdate. (The U.S. Army has said it has no specific plans to recognize Trump's birthday on Saturday.) In 2023, Charles' first full year as king, he rode on horseback to inspect 1,400 representatives of the most prestigious U.K. regiments. His mother, Queen Elizabeth II, used a carriage over the last three decades of her 70-year reign. The British trace Trooping the Colour back to King Charles II, who reigned from 1660-1685. It became an annual event under King George III, described in the American colonists' Declaration of Independence as a figure of 'absolute Despotism (and) Tyranny.' Authoritarians flaunt military assets Grandiose military pomp is common under modern authoritarians, especially those who have seized power via coups. It sometimes serves as a show of force meant to ward off would-be challengers — and to seek legitimacy and respect from other countries. Cuba's Fidel Castro, who wore military garb routinely, held parades to commemorate the revolution he led on Dec. 2, 1959. In 2017, then-President Raúl Castro refashioned the event into a Fidel tribute shortly after his brother's death. Venezuela's Hugo Chávez, known as 'Comandante Chávez,' presided over frequent parades until his 2013 death. His successor, Nicolás Maduro, has worn military dress at similar events. North Korean dictator Kim Jung Un, who famously bonded with Trump in a 2018 summit, used a 2023 military parade to show off his daughter and potential successor, along with pieces of his isolated country's nuclear arsenal. The event in Pyongyang's Kim Il Sung Square — named for Kim's grandfather — marked the North Korean Army's 75th birthday. Kim watched from a viewing stand as missiles other weaponry moved by and goose-stepping soldiers marched past him chanting, 'Defend with your life, Paektu Bloodline' — referring to the Kim family's biological ancestry. In China, Beijing's one-party government stages its National Day Parade every 10 years to project civic unity and military might. The most recent events, held in 2009 and 2019, involved trucks carrying nuclear missiles designed to evade U.S. defenses, as well as other weaponry. Legions of troops, along with those hard assets, streamed past President Xi Jinping and other leaders gathered in Tiananmen Square in 2019 as spectators waved Chinese flags and fighter jets flew above. Earlier this spring, Xi joined Russian President Vladimir Putin — another strongman leader Trump has occasionally praised — in Moscow's Red Square for the annual 'Victory Day' parade. The May 9 event commemorates the Soviet Union's role in defeating Nazi Germany in World War II — a global conflict in which China and the Soviet Union, despite not being democracies, joined the Allied Powers in fighting the Axis Powers led by Germany and Japan. A birthday parade for Hitler Large civic-military displays were, of course, a feature in Nazi Germany and fascist Italy before and during World War II. Chilling footage of such events lives on as a reminder of the dangers of authoritarian extremism. Among those frequent occasions: a parade capping Germany's multiday observance of Adolf Hitler's 50th birthday in 1939. (Some far-right extremists in Europe still mark the anniversary of Hitler's birth.) The four-hour march through Berlin on April 20, 1939, included more than 40,000 personnel across the Army, Navy, Luftwaffe (Air Force) and Schutzstaffel (commonly known as the 'SS.') Hundreds of thousands of spectators lined the streets. The Führer's invited guests numbered 20,000. On a street-level platform, Hitler was front and center. Alone.
