&w=3840&q=100)
Trump once called Pakistan a terror haven: Why is it not on his travel ban list?
Trump's new travel ban includes 19 countries but not Pakistan, despite its history of supporting terrorist groups. Once subject to $800 million in aid cuts and visa sanctions, Pakistan is now lauded by Trump, who cited its 'incredible products'. The change follows Islamabad's crypto deal with a Trump-linked firm in which his family holds a major stake read more
US President Donald Trump speaks as he participates in a roundtable discussion with the Fraternal Order of Police at the White House in Washington, DC, US, June 5, 2025. File Image/Reuters
US President Donald Trump has unveiled an updated travel ban impacting 19 countries, citing the need to defend the United States from external threats.
While the new restrictions cover a wide range of nations considered potential security risks, Pakistan — a country long accused by US officials of providing shelter to terrorist networks — has not been included on the list.
The decision to leave Pakistan out stands in sharp contrast to Trump's previous actions and statements during his earlier presidential term, where he took a markedly tougher line on Islamabad's alleged support for extremism.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
An internal memo, reviewed by Reuters in March, confirmed that Pakistan was originally under consideration for inclusion in the revised travel ban. However, by the time the final list was issued, Pakistan's name had been removed.
This change comes at a time of deepening commercial and political ties between Pakistan and business entities directly linked to the Trump family.
How Trump's stance towards Pakistan has changed
During his first tenure in office, Trump made his views on Pakistan abundantly clear. On January 1, 2018, he posted on then-Twitter (now X): 'The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!'
Later that year, the US government cut $300 million in military assistance, following an earlier decision by Congress to withhold an additional $500 million.
Trump also suggested Pakistan was complicit in hiding al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, stating, 'But living in Pakistan right next to the military academy, everybody in Pakistan knew he was there.'
In April 2019, visa restrictions were introduced under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), a provision reserved for countries that obstruct deportation processes.
The sanctions were applied to certain Pakistani officials and government representatives, reflecting Washington's growing dissatisfaction with Pakistan's cooperation.
Despite these tensions, Trump made overtures towards restoring bilateral ties. In July 2019, then Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan visited Washington.
Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan shakes hands with US President Donald Trump at the start of their meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, US, July 22, 2019. File Image/Reuters
Trump advocated closer trade cooperation and controversially offered to mediate the Kashmir dispute — an idea that India promptly rejected.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What may have led to Trump's change of heart
The development in US-Pakistan relations appears to coincide with the announcement of a cryptocurrency collaboration between Pakistan and World Liberty Financial (WLF), a fintech firm based in the United States.
WLF is reportedly tied to members of the Trump family, including Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr, and Jared Kushner, who collectively hold a substantial ownership stake in the firm.
The agreement, signed in April, involves developing blockchain infrastructure and tokenising national assets. The partnership has been publicly endorsed by both sides.
WLF's delegation to Islamabad included Zachary Witkoff, son of Steve Witkoff, who currently serves as the US Special Envoy to the Middle East and is a known associate of Donald Trump.
Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, personally received the WLF delegation.
Subsequent meetings involved key government figures including Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, and senior ministers responsible for defence and information. The scale and visibility of these engagements suggested that this was no ordinary commercial agreement.
The WLF website highlights the project with Trump's portrait and the tagline 'Inspired by Donald J Trump.' According to reports, this association with the Trump family has spurred criticism that commercial interests could be shaping national policy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How Trump has maneuvered India-Pakistan tensions
Pakistan's exclusion from the travel ban list has come shortly after a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which triggered India's military Operation Sindoor. Trump initially condemned the incident, but as the situation evolved, he began highlighting the need for diplomacy.
In media interactions, Trump claimed to have mediated a de-escalation between India and Pakistan. Speaking to Fox News, he remarked: 'They are brilliant people and make incredible products.'
He added that trade was a key lever in his negotiations and claimed responsibility for halting military operations.
India, however, denied the characterisation, asserting that the pause in action was a tactical decision taken independently.
The Ministry of External Affairs clarified that trade was not part of any bilateral dialogue, stating that 'it was the force of Indian arms that compelled Pakistan to seek ceasefire.'
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official, criticised Trump's position, writing in the Washington Examiner that by asserting he had used economic threats to broker peace, 'Trump drew moral equivalence between terror-sponsoring Pakistan and terror-victim India.'
How this move points to favouritism towards Pakistan
The Trump administration's decision to shield Pakistan from immigration sanctions, even as it imposed them on 12 other countries including Myanmar, has drawn fire from geostrategic experts.
Author and strategist Brahma Chellaney wrote on X: 'Trump's entry ban on visitors from 12 countries includes Myanmar (where the US is aiding anti-junta rebels), but excludes terrorism-hub Pakistan, indicating his embrace of the Deep State approach to India's neighborhood.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Chellaney also argued that 'Trump effectively bailed out Pakistan during its recent military standoff with India, claiming that he used economic-sanctions threat to compel India to halt its military operation after just three days.'
Pakistan's investment deal with Donald Trump's family-linked crypto firm is paying rich dividends.
Trump effectively bailed out Pakistan during its recent military standoff with India, claiming that he used economic-sanctions threat to compel India to halt its military… — Brahma Chellaney (@Chellaney) June 5, 2025
He added that 'Trump has carved out special exceptions for Pakistan from his actions, including exempting $396 million in security assistance for Islamabad from his foreign-aid freeze.'
The absence of any formal US response to cross-border terrorism in the wake of the Pahalgam attack has only increased the scrutiny over Trump administration's policy direction.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Once targeted with aid cuts and visa sanctions, Pakistan now finds itself praised by the very same administration that once denounced it.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump-Musk Break Up Drama Gets UGLIER: Trump Warns Of ‘Severe Consequences
/ Jun 08, 2025, 02:47AM IST U.S. President Donald Trump has issued a sharp warning to Elon Musk over alleged political funding. In a recent interview, Trump said Musk would face 'very serious consequences' if he backs Democrats. The remarks follow a series of public jabs between the two, including accusations and social media posts. Watch.
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Dynastic feuds may reshape Indian politics
In Bihar, the Rashtriya Janata Dal leans on its OBC and Muslim vote bank, and Lalu Prasad Yadav's anti-elite legacy. His sons, Tej Pratap and Tejashwi, are locked in a clownish feud as Tej Pratap's social media rant about 'Jaichands' and a 12-year romance clash with Tejashwi's steady hand as Lalu's heir. The RJD's political now wobbles as Tej Pratap's antics, in the backdrop of his estranged wife Aishwarya's lament, alienate voters. If the RJD fractures, Bihar's educated youth craving jobs over drama could turn to the BJP's development narrative or Nitish Kumar's JD(U) again. Consolidation under Tejashwi would bolster the RJD's clout, challenging the BJP's dominance and forcing the Congress to play second fiddle in alliances. UP's Samajwadi Party (SP), rooted in Yadav and OBC identity, still stings from its 2016 family feud, when Akhilesh Yadav ousted uncle Shivpal, costing the party the 2017 election. Akhilesh now wields the SP's political clout consisting of its caste-based vote bank. But UP's urbanising youth, less swayed by caste, demand results. If the SP splinters further, the BJP with its Hindutva and development mix will tighten its grip on the state, leaving the Congress to pick up scraps. A unified SP leveraging its Yadav-Muslim base could challenge the BJP's hegemony, forcing national parties to negotiate hard for UP's 80 Lok Sabha seats. Maharashtra's NCP, built on Maratha pride and rural networks, is reeling from Ajit Pawar's 2023 betrayal splitting from Sharad Pawar and his daughter Supriya Sule to join the BJP. Ajit's grab for the NCP's name, symbol and the Maratha vote bank left Supriya's faction scrambling. If the split persists, the BJP and its ally Shiv Sena will dominate the state, with the Congress gaining marginal urban votes. A reunited NCP, though a long shot, could reclaim its kingmaker status, forcing national parties to vie for its support in coalition games. The BSP, anchored in Dalit empowerment, is Mayawati's fortress. Her anointment of brother Anand Kumar and nephew Aakash screams of nepotism. Its political capital is its Jatav Dalit base, which is slipping as educated Dalits drift to BJP's development promises. If the BSP collapses under dynastic weight, the BJP will absorb its voters, cementing dominance in UP, while the Congress might snag urban Dalits. Consolidation under Aakash, if Mayawati steps back, could revive the BSP's Dalit clout, challenging national parties in UP's caste cauldron. West Bengal's Trinamool Congress, fuelled by Bengali sub-nationalism, is Mamata Banerjee's domain, with nephew Abhishek Banerjee as heir. His rise as MP and party general secretary irks veterans, but Mamata's grip keeps dissent at bay. But Bengal's growing middle class demands merit. If the TMC fractures post-Mamata, the BJP's Hindutva pitch could sway voters, with the Congress a distant contender. A consolidated TMC under Abhishek could dominate Bengal, forcing national parties to cede ground in eastern coalitions. In Tamil Nadu, the DMK thrives on Dravidian identity, championing Tamil pride and social justice. M K Stalin, Karunanidhi's son, rules unchallenged, grooming his son Udhayanidhi Stalin as successor, with hardly any overt pushback from anyone within the family or outside. The DMK's politics, comprising its Tamil base and anti-Hindi stance, is robust, but Tamil Nadu's IT-driven prosperity is breeding a youth sceptical of dynasty. In the unlikely but hypothetical situation of the DMK splintering, the BJP could gain urban footholds while the AIADMK mops up rural votes. A unified DMK, with Udhayanidhi at the helm, would keep Tamil Nadu a regional stronghold by marginalising national parties. The Pattali Makkal Katchi, ensconced in Tamil Nadu's Vanniyar caste silo, faces collapse as S Ramadoss battles son Anbumani, who was sacked from party president's chair in April 2025 over a BJP alliance spat. Anbumani's defiance targets the PMK's political foundation. If the PMK implodes, the DMK and AIADMK will rupture its fountainhead, with the BJP gaining marginal caste votes. But a united PMK could still sway coalitions, forcing national parties to court its niche clout.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES -Federal agents in Los Angeles on Saturday faced off against demonstrators protesting immigration raids following Friday's protests that senior White House aide Stephen Miller condemned as an "insurrection" against the United States. The security agents on Saturday engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters in the Paramount area in southeast Los Angeles, where one demonstrator was seen waving a Mexican flag and some covered their mouths with respiratory masks. A live video feed showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. A first round of protests kicked off on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted enforcement operations in the city and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that "1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property." Reuters was unable to verify DHS's accounts. Miller, an immigration hardliner and the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X that Friday's demonstrations were "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States." The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant portion of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made cracking down on immigration a hallmark of his second term. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. In a statement on Saturday about the protests in Paramount, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said: "It appeared that federal law enforcement officers were in the area, and that members of the public were gathering to protest." ICE, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Los Angeles Police Department did not respond to a request for information about the protests or potential immigration sweeps on Saturday. POLITICAL DIVISIONS OVER FRIDAY'S SWEEP Television news footage earlier on Friday showed unmarked vehicles resembling military transport and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. The Democratic mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." The LD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. In a statement, DHS criticized Democratic politicians including Mayor Bass, saying their anti-ICE rhetoric was contributing to violence against immigration agents. "From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end," said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said.
