logo
Lowcountry veteran fears impact of proposed VA job cuts on care

Lowcountry veteran fears impact of proposed VA job cuts on care

Yahoo23-05-2025

CHARLESTON, S.C. (WCBD) — James Weninger travels to a Veterans Affairs clinic in the Lowcountry every few months for health care treatment.
The 36-year-old veteran was medically discharged in 2023 after 14 years of active duty in the Navy and two years in the reserves. Since leaving the service, he has suffered from back pain, mental health issues, and a few other physical ailments.
'The care they provide for me is valuable because if I don't have it, my mental health stuff will be difficult to handle, and they're helping me through it,' he said, noting that he also participates in the Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) job training program.
'It's not just medical, it's everything else the VA does, too,' he added.
Weninger said he had been satisfied with his care from the VA up until a few months ago, when he started to notice some changes.
'Doctors are doing their own scheduling, like in person, when before it would just be someone calling me,' he said, adding that though his care is ongoing, he has already experienced some appointments 'getting pushed out further.'
An internal memo obtained by the Associated Press in March stated that the VA will undergo an agency-wide reorganization at the end of the summer, taking a 'pragmatic and disciplinedapproach to identify and eliminate waste, reduce management and bureaucracy,reduce footprint, and increase workforce efficiency.'
The memo notes that the agency's overall goal is to reduce staffing to 2019 levels. Thousands of employees have already been terminated, and VA Secretary Doug Collins told members of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs earlier this month that the agency is looking to cut an additional 15% of its workforce.
A statement from the VA Central Office noted that about 70,000 people could be affected by the reduction, which is intended to 'eliminate duplicative, unnecessary layers of management and bureaucracy that do nothing to serve our Veterans and actually hinder our mission.' Those positions could include administrators, advisors, and mid-level managers.
'VA staffing levels have increased by more than 30% over the last decade, and the department's budget has more than doubled, even though VA healthcare enrollment has remained flat and the department's performance has gotten worse,' the statement read, in part.
Patriots Point and Coastal Community Church honors veterans ahead of Memorial Day
Still, Collins insisted that job reductions would not weaken benefits or care, accusing Democrats of stoking fear.
'I will not let you sit here and scare my veterans and scare my employees,' Collins responded to a question from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) during the contentious May 6 hearing. 'No one has discussed firing doctors or firing nurses. We've always said that we're going to keep frontline health care.'
But Weninger isn't so sure.
'I couldn't see that not happening,' he said, referencing Collins' comments that medical personnel were not on the chopping block.
He also worries that downsizing within the VA could lead to more veterans getting pushed into community care.
The community care program allows eligible veterans to see healthcare providers outside of the VA when the agency is unable to meet an individual's needs. It is designed to ensure veterans receive timely and adequate care if they have specialized needs or do not live close to a VA clinic.
While Weninger recognizes that community care can be a valuable asset, he said the specific expertise of VA doctors is irreplaceable.
'It's not to say that medical doctors on the civilian side are bad — they're just as good as the doctors in the VA — but the VA doctors understand what caused these ailments or mental health issues because they deal with just military personnel,' he explained.
Weninger is one of more than 386,000 veterans living in South Carolina, more than half of whom are enrolled in the VA health care system, according to 2023 figures from the VA, the most recent year comprehensive data were available.
Many of those enrollees — about 85,000 — receive care through the Ralph H. Johnson VA Health Care System, a network of providers that includes the main medical center in downtown Charleston and six outpatient clinics throughout the state.
Weninger, who is part of a veteran-led organization called Common Defense, traveled with dozens of other U.S. veterans to Washington, D.C., in early May to voice their concerns about the pending cuts to lawmakers.
He discussed the issue with staffers from Democratic Rep. James Clyburn's office, and a representative from Common Defense also attempted to set up a meeting between Republican Rep. Nancy Mace's office and the group but was unsuccessful, according to Weninger.
'We receive hundreds of requests daily, and meetings with constituents are a priority,' Mace spokesperson Sydney Long wrote in a statement to News 2. 'The representative who reached out to us from the group is not a constituent of Congresswoman Mace's district.'
Weninger said he would welcome an opportunity for a town-hall style meeting in the future where lawmakers can hear directly from their constituents.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die
Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die

The Brief Debra Robertson, a Lombard woman with terminal cancer, has been advocating for the right to die with dignity. The Illinois General Assembly failed to legalize medical aid in dying during its spring session. Supporters say the bill would provide terminal patients with end-of-life options, while skeptics argue it could allow doctors to violate their oath to "do no harm." LOMBARD, Ill. - Lombard resident Debra Robertson has been fighting for the right to die on her own terms for the last three years. She's been advocating for a bill that was considered but ultimately not passed by state lawmakers, to allow her the option to stop her suffering. The backstory Robertson said she understands why that might be controversial, but she has one request: don't call it suicide. "I get very upset when people talk about this being assisted suicide," Robertson told FOX 32 Chicago. "I'm already dying. I want to die with dignity and I wanna die the way I wanna die." Robertson was diagnosed with an aggressive rare form of cancer in 2022, called neuro-endocrine carcinoma. She was given six months to live. "I think I was just in denial for a while because I couldn't believe that's where I was at, because the doctor said I was gonna die," she said. Three years and four debilitating rounds of treatment later, Robertson said she's out of options and fears she will suffer if not given the option to die via medication. "I know that my death is going to be painful based on the type of cancer I have," she said. Robertson said she's already expressed her wishes to her two children and grandchildren, and they've come to accept her decision. "At first they struggled because they said, 'Granny are you gonna die now? Are you gonna die today?'" Robertson said. "And I said no and I explain to them about what medical aid in dying is and what it means to me and other people, and now they're very supportive of it. They have some sort of a peace." Big picture view Illinois would become the 11th state in the nation to legalize medical aid in dying if the legislation passes. Last month it stalled in the Senate, after some Democrats joined all Republicans in opposition. The sponsor, State Rep. Robyn Gabel (D-Evanston), said the debate was passionate, and lawmakers simply ran out of time. "These complex pieces of legislation need time to make sure we get them right," Gabel said. Under the bill, a patient would need to be diagnosed with a terminal illness and given six months or less to live. They must be evaluated for mental health concerns and get verbal and written approval from two physicians, five days apart. And doctors who prescribe would be immune from any prosecution, unless they coerce a patient, in which case, they would face felony charges. Gabel said the bill is simply about giving terminal patients end-of-life options. "Just because you ask for the medicine doesn't mean you have to take it – 38% don't take it. What they tell me is it gives them peace of mind knowing they can," Gabel said. Downstate Republican Rep. Bill Hauter is also a physician. He said the medical community is split, but believes the bill would allow doctors to violate their Hippocratic oaths that state "first do no harm." "Medicine is a field of healing, taking care of patients and comforting them and trying to solve their issues and not to partake in the act of suicide," Hauter said. Gabel said she believes lawmakers will have the votes to pass the bill next year. Robertson realizes she might not be around to see it, but said she hopes to pave the way for others that are suffering. "I'm dying and I don't have any control over it. The only thing I could have control over is how I die if this was passed," she said. A representative from the Illinois State Medical Association said the organization took an official position to support the bill, but that they "remain a house divided," with physicians advocating passionately on both sides of the issue.

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults
GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Minnesota lawmakers voted Monday to strip MinnesotaCare health insurance from undocumented adults. The measure, which was the most controversial of the legislative session, passed both the House and Senate after leaders reached a budget agreement to avoid a government shutdown. In the evenly-divided House, DFL caucus leader Melissa Hortman was the only Democratic lawmaker to vote for the bill's passage. In the DFL-controlled Senate, Majority Leader Erin Murphy, Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope and others joined Republicans in voting for the bill. "I cannot vote to shut down our state, I just can't," Rest said in brief remarks on the Senate floor. "I made an agreement, I gave my word," Murphy said shortly before the vote. "I will vote for this. And it's among the most painful votes I've ever taken." The move rolls back a 2023 legislative accomplishment for Democrats, handing a major win to GOP lawmakers who refused a series of offers from DFL leaders and continued to leverage the threat of a government shutdown to get the bill across the finish line. Around 17,000 undocumented adults are currently enrolled in MinnesotaCare, which offers state-subsidized health care plans for low income people who pay premiums in exchange for coverage. The move is expected to save the state $56.9 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Opponents of the bill decried the measure as shameful and several Democratic lawmakers have said the change will cause some undocumented immigrants to die as serious health issues go undetected or untreated. Democrats have also claimed fiscal responsibility is not the motive of the GOP, as the change could drive costs associated with emergency hospital care. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

700 Rhode Islanders to lose Medicaid coverage; state blames old mistake
700 Rhode Islanders to lose Medicaid coverage; state blames old mistake

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

700 Rhode Islanders to lose Medicaid coverage; state blames old mistake

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — While Democrats are fighting proposed Medicaid cuts at the federal level, Rhode Islanders are facing their own cuts on the state level due to a change in the program's income limit. 'I think the only reason that a state would be motivated to do that is to save money,' said Sam Salganik, executive director of RIPIN, a nonprofit that helps people navigate the health care system. Salganik said the state used to have an income limit of about $19 an hour for a single parent of two. But he said the state is now lowering that to roughly $18.30. REPORT: 366K+ Rhode Islanders would be impacted by proposed Medicaid cuts A spokesperson for the state's Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) said 700 parents and caretakers will lose Medicaid coverage because of the new income limit, which was put in place due to a mistake made years ago. According to the state agency, it will take effect for new patients beginning this month. 'If [the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)] has not approved the state to spend federal Medicaid money for a certain group at a certain income level, the state is not allowed to do so,' spokesperson Kerri White wrote. But Salganik said the federal income limit is the floor, not the ceiling. 'States always have the flexibility to have higher income limits than the minimums that were established by the Affordable Care Act, as long as it's part of the approved state Medicaid plan,' he explained. 'And this has been part of the approved state Medicaid plan for many, many years.' Salganik is also concerned this is being done through agency regulations rather than the legislative budget process. 'This is an example of why administrative departments need to do the fundamental things right the first time,' House Speaker Joe Shekarchi wrote in a statement to 12 News. 'Errors like these have real consequences.' MORE: Suspected Medicaid fraud in RI sparks criminal probe, proposed changes EOHHS said affected Medicaid recipients will be sent a letter, but they'll be able to keep their benefits until their annual renewal, or until a quarterly post-eligibility verification process. White said the change will save $1.9 million in state funds and $4.5 million when federal money is included. And while EOHHS said people will be able to buy coverage through HealthSource RI, Salgank said that will still cost low-income parents hundreds of dollars each year, if not more. 'It's just one more cost that is really difficult for them to afford,' he said. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store