logo
Pete Hegseth's wife taking on unofficial role managing his image at Pentagon, report says

Pete Hegseth's wife taking on unofficial role managing his image at Pentagon, report says

Yahoo30-04-2025

The wife of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took on an active role in managing his public appearances and even crafting messaging issued by the Department of Defense itself, a new report claimed on Wednesday.
Jennifer Rauchet, the Washington Post reported, often acts as a go-between who transmits her husband's plans to agency staffers. The former Fox News producer does not hold an official position at the Pentagon but has been identified as a constant presence at the agency over the past several months. The Wall Street Journal first reported in March that Rauchet was present at two meetings between her husband and his foreign military counterparts where 'sensitive' information was discussed. At the time, the Pentagon declined to say if she had any kind of security clearance, which some spouses of officials sometimes do.
Now, the Post reports that Rauchet is involved in at least two group chats using the public encrypted Signal messaging app with Pentagon appointees, and at times has directed agency staffers directly on managing the secretary's image via social media.
'We would always hear that she was saying what kind of videos he should be doing, and what kind of statements he should be doing, and how the press should be handled,' one unnamed person told the Post.
Her inclusion in one Signal group chat was just one of several problematic factors which snowballed into a scandal over the Trump administration's use of the group messaging app earlier this year. Hegseth, along with other top US officials including National Security Adviser Michael Waltz and Vice President JD Vance, was outed as a member of a Signal text chain on which specific sensitive information about US plans to attack Yemen were discussed prior to those attacks taking place. Also on that text chain (accidentally) was the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, who reported the messages after the attack.
Though Rauchet was not part of that primary text chain, she was on a separate chain with Hegseth's brother, Phil Hegseth, a Pentagon appointee working as liason with DHS, and the secretary's personal lawyer. On that second chain, the secretary reportedly shared very similar information about the attack prior to it being carried out.
The breach in security has dragged the administration down for weeks and led to calls especially for the resignation of Hegseth, who shared the attack plans on the text chain, as well as similar condemnation of Waltz for his apparent erroneous inclusion of Goldberg in the messages. President Donald Trump has expressed his support for the two officials.
But Rauchet's inclusion in the text chains and continued presence at the Pentagon may in fact be a more significant issue for the administration. The Pentagon has not explained her role at the agency or completed a formal inquiry into whether any of the information shared in the two chains was classified, which Hegseth and others have strongly denied. The agency's inspector general launched an investigation in early April, which has yet to reach a conclusion.
The Independent has reached out to the department for comment.
A DoD spokeswoman said in response to the Post's reporting: 'Secretary Hegseth has delivered more victories to the DoD in 100 days than most Secretaries have in four years. We are focused on RESULTS.'
Critics of the administration say that the case is a clear-cut example of Hegseth and others flouting longstanding Defense Department protocols and possibly violating the law regarding sharing of classified information.
'The most recent revelations about Hegseth's having shared military plans with members of his personal circle demonstrates a brazen disdain for rules and protocols that Americans expect their leaders to follow. It also raises questions about whether Hegseth is prioritizing his own political or media ambitions over the interests of the American people,' the nonprofit watchdog group American Oversight wrote in a statement.
Republicans, who currently control both chambers of Congress, are not likely to begin their own investigations of the matter, but Democrats could easily do so if the party retakes control of the House or Senate in the 2026 midterms.
A number of former defense officials have said in interviews that at least some of the information shared by Hegseth in the initial Signal chain was likely classified, or should have been. The AP reported that some of the information was pulled by Hegseth from a secure channel used by US CENTCOM.
'It is unheard of to have a secretary of defense committing these kind of serious security breaches,' said former Defense secretary and former CIA director Leon Panetta. 'Developing attack plans for defensive reasons is without question the most classified information you can have.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK military could 'potentially' be used to defend Israel, chancellor tells Sky News
UK military could 'potentially' be used to defend Israel, chancellor tells Sky News

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK military could 'potentially' be used to defend Israel, chancellor tells Sky News

The chancellor has told Sky News that UK military assets could "potentially" be used to help defend Israel, and the government is "not ruling anything out". Rachel Reeves said that while the UK is calling for de-escalation in the region, it is also sending military assets, including fighter jets, "to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies". The chancellor went further than the prime minister last night, who confirmed the movement of military assets, but refused to say if they could be used to help Israel. She also warned about rising oil prices and disruption to key trade routes in the Middle East, which could see inflation in Britain. Politics Hub: Speaking to Sky's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, the chancellor said sending military assets to the Middle East "does not mean that we are at war", and emphasised that "we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict". "But we do have important assets in the region," she continued. "And it is right that we send jets to protect them. And that's what we've done. It's a precautionary move, and at the same time, we are urging de-escalation." Asked what the UK government would do if the Israelis requested the deployment of assets to support their operations, Ms Reeves reiterated that there has been no UK involvement so far and would not get in to "operational decisions for the future". She said: "This is a fast moving situation. Israel has every right to defend itself. We also are very concerned about Iran's nuclear deterrent." She continued: "We have, in the past, supported Israel when there had been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future. But so far we haven't been involved. We're sending in assets to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies." Pushed on the question of what the UK would do if Israel asked for support with its operations, the chancellor replied: "I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage. It's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. But we don't want to see escalation." Read more: Asked if the UK would support a change of regime in Tehran, she replied: "I've got no time for the Iranian regime for the suppression and repression of their own people, and we have serious concerns, which we've expressed on a number of occasions, about the Iranian nuclear programme. "But we want to see de-escalation at the moment. We are not trying to ramp up the rhetoric." Ms Reeves also warned of the consequences of the conflict in the UK, saying that oil and gas prices "have gone up by just over 10%" since the conflict started, and warning there is a risk that key trade routes through the Middle East could be disrupted.

After Decades of Atrophy, Canada Vows to Beef Up Its Military. Can It Deliver?
After Decades of Atrophy, Canada Vows to Beef Up Its Military. Can It Deliver?

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

After Decades of Atrophy, Canada Vows to Beef Up Its Military. Can It Deliver?

At the end of World War II, Canada boasted one of the world's largest navies, with 95,000 uniformed members and 434 ships. The current Royal Canadian Navy is far less impressive — about 11,500 members and 40 vessels. Only one of its four diesel submarines, which were bought secondhand from Britain in the 1990s, is operational. And Canada's armed forces as a whole are about 16,000 people short of an approved head count of 101,500, including reserves. Prime Minister Mark Carney, seeking to reverse what he characterized as the atrophying of Canada's military, is directing billions of dollars to the armed forces, with the goal of reaching a NATO spending commitment this year, seven years ahead of schedule. And while the move comes after repeated claims by President Trump that Canada was effectively sponging off the United States to ensure its defense, Mr. Carney also cast the spending as part of his effort to loosen Canada's ties with its neighbor after Mr. Trump's repeated comments about making it the 51st state. Many of Canada's allies in Europe, including Britain and Germany, are also expanding their militaries in the face of Mr. Trump's isolationism. Mr. Carney has yet to say where the 9.3 billion Canadian dollars, about $6.8 billion, he has added to the defense budget will come from. Many people also question whether the armed forces will be able to actually spend that extra money so quickly. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store