
Trump's push for Lumbee recognition causes concern among other Native tribes
President Donald Trump's move toward federal recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina fulfills a repeated promise he made on the campaign trail, but it has sparked concern from other Native American tribes about the precedent set by the different process used in this instance.
During the first days of his second term in office, Trump signed an executive order urging the Department of the Interior to create a plan that would identify a pathway for the federal recognition of the Lumbees.
To be federally recognized, tribes must meet a specific set of criteria, including: proving their nation existed before the founding of the United States, that the tribe has been recognized as Native since 1900 or before, that the tribe has operated as an 'autonomous entity' and that members have genealogies that demonstrate both Native heritage and distinct ancestry from previously recognized tribes.
The Lumbee Tribe claims to be 'the amalgamation of various Siouan, Algonquian, and Iroquoian speaking tribes' and to have a recorded existence since 1725. Currently, the Lumbees boast over 55,000 members who are spread across multiple counties in their home state of North Carolina. Although they were recognized by the state over a century ago, the Lumbee Tribe has not been recognized by the United States as a sovereign tribe.
'The fact that we are still here centuries after colonial expansion, centuries after war and disease … should be celebrated,' Lumbee Chairman John L. Lowery told The Robesonian, a local newspaper. Lowery declined an interview request from NBC News but said in a statement that he looks 'forward to the White House formalizing the document and sending it over to congressional leadership.'
The Lumbees were denied the full benefits of recognition by the Lumbee Act of 1956, a law that prohibits the U.S. from having a federal relationship with the group. This blocks the tribe's outright recognition along with access to government funding for needs such as health care, education and economic development.
'The more than 60,000 North Carolina members of the Lumbee Tribe have waited decades for federal recognition,' Sen. Ted Budd, R-N.C., said in a 2023 press release. 'They deserve the same rights, privileges, and respect granted to other Native American tribes throughout our country.'
In the past, the Lumbees have looked to other means for recognition, including multiple bills in Congress, most of which never made it off the chamber floor due to backlash from established Native tribes. Now, Trump's Interior Department is searching for another path forward — and these methods go around the traditional process established in 1978 by the Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA), which has granted recognition to more than 500 tribes across the nation.
By circumventing this evaluation, multiple Native groups and tribal leaders worry that this could set the wrong precedent for tribal recognition in the future. Chief Michell Hicks of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians says that a 'diligent process' must be in place, and he worries about how this order could erode the current method of recognition.
'We've always known who we were and where we came from, and the difficulty with the Lumbee group is they've attempted to attach to a number of historical tribal and nontribal names, trying to identify themselves,' Hicks told NBC News. 'I think part of it is just the clarity around who they are and are they truly a sovereign nation or are they remnants of something else, and not necessarily Native?'
For some chiefs like Brad KillsCrow of the Delaware Tribe of Indians, this order undermines the efforts that other Native groups have undertaken toward their own recognition.
'There's a process that has been put in place, a process that we all have gone through and each of the 574 [recognized] tribes were able to prove who they were and their existence,' KillsCrow said. 'Don't try to take a back door and not do what everybody else has and then get federal recognition.'
Broader implications
For KillsCrow, the Lumbee Tribe's recognition loophole is not a lone issue. The chief says he has interacted with multiple groups claiming to have Delaware ancestry but that haven't proved their historic roots. He worries that if the Lumbee are able to successfully bypass the OFA standards, other organizations that haven't met those guidelines will be able to do the same in the future.
KillsCrow also highlights some potential financial ramifications to Lumbee recognition. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that it would cost over $350 million to recognize the Lumbee Tribe and provide it with the allotted benefits. As the leader of a small tribe, he worries this will strip money away from his own budget.
Hicks and KillsCrow believe this push for Lumbee recognition by the executive branch is rooted in the politicization of Native issues. Multiple times during campaign stops in North Carolina, Trump promised the Lumbee Tribe that it would be recognized under his administration. In Robeson County, North Carolina, where the Lumbee Tribe is headquartered, 63.3% of the population voted Republican last November. Previously, Trump carried the county by 51% in 2016 and 59% in 2020.
But making tribal recognition a voting issue risks Native voices going unheard depending on election winners, KillsCrow and Hicks argued.
'I would recommend to President Trump, let this go through the OFA process,' Hicks said. 'Let the experts do their job. Whatever that answer is, it is.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's crusade against all immigrants – even legal ones – is unprecedented
The Donald Trump administration has billed itself as taking unprecedented steps to crack down on illegal immigration. While the total number of deportations has yet to surge, it may happen soon. The homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, supports suspending habeas corpus to speed up deportations, and the border czar, Tom Homan, has suggested blatantly ignoring court orders. Private companies are also lining up to cash in on mass deportations. Nonetheless, Trump's approach so far to immigration deemed illegal has not differed much from what Barack Obama and Joe Biden did. So why does everything feel different? The answer is that Trump has launched an unprecedented crusade against legal immigrants. And the tactics have been jarringly lawless and cruel. For example, Trump's administration has almost completely banned refugee resettlement, sought to revoke temporary protected status for hundreds of thousands who have immigrated to flee extreme conditions, eliminated the legal status of thousands of international students, arrested legal asylum seekers at their immigration check-ins, jailed other legal asylum seekers in a maximum security prison in El Salvador, declared an end to birthright citizenship and revoked the legal status of nearly a million humanitarian parolees who had applied for legal entry using the CBP One app. While the Obama and Biden administrations likewise took aggressive measures to regulate undocumented immigration – thus earning well-founded criticisms from immigration activists who took to calling Obama the 'deporter-in-chief' – both presidents also worked to expand the pathways for legal immigration. Some of their initiatives were blocked by Congress or the courts, but the result was a net expansion of legal immigration under both administrations. On the other hand, Trump has consistently worked to block as many pathways to legal migration as possible. In Trump's first term, certain aspects of his immigration agenda were similarly constrained by Congress or the courts, but the result was still a major decrease in legal immigration. In Trump's second term, this assault on legal immigrants has escalated at a furious pace, and while courts have already found many of these actions illegal according to long-established precedent, the administration shows no sign of slowing down. Indeed, Trump officials have become increasingly bold in defying court rulings, and all of this is taking place under the watch of a supreme court so Trump-friendly that last year it granted him sweeping immunity to commit crimes. As a historian of border policy, I find Tump's attack on the CBP One app especially demoralizing. A longstanding contradiction in our immigration system is that while technically people have the right to apply for asylum once they reach US soil, it is incredibly difficult to arrive in the US to exercise this right. Accordingly, the only legal way to immigrate for the vast majority of people is to first survive a deadly gauntlet of oceans, jungles, deserts and criminal organizations, and only then begin an asylum application, which is still a long shot. David Fitzgerald's 2019 book Refuge Beyond Reach offers a detailed description of this insidious system and its long history. While it was largely unappreciated at the time, the Biden administration took meaningful steps to address this deadly contradiction by creating a way to legally apply for asylum through the CBP One app while still abroad. This enabled people facing grave humanitarian crises to start applications outside the US, and if approved, they could then buy plane tickets and travel to the US safely with humanitarian parole. The initiative was successful, legal, and in many ways, historic. Hundreds of thousands of people were able to migrate legally and escape extremely difficult conditions. This infuriated conservatives, who launched a barrage of vicious lies to demonize the program and the people using it. JD Vance insisted on the debate stage that these immigrants were illegal, and when corrected by debate moderators, whined that fact-checking was against the rules. Ted Cruz used his podcast to accuse Biden of chartering flights to bring in undocumented people who would vote Democrat. And Trump accused them of eating pets. Just by cancelling the program for future enrollees, Trump is already launching a disturbing assault on legal immigration. Yet in an escalation of cruelty that is difficult to even comprehend, Trump canceled the program retroactively as well, capriciously revoking the legal status of hundreds of thousands of extremely vulnerable people who simply followed the rules. If you think that that sounds dystopian and cruel, you're right. And that's exactly the point: cruelty itself is a tactic to scare immigrants away. The child separation policy from Trump's first term was an early example of this penchant for using visible displays of cruelty as an immigration deterrent and his new administration has worked around the clock to invent creative new horrors: from shipping deportees to Guantánamo Bay, to sending masked agents to disappear students, to indefinitely detaining immigrants with no criminal record in a notoriously dangerous prison in El Salvador (many of whom were arrested while attending legal immigration appointments), and then sending Noem to El Salvador to do a photoshoot with these political prisoners as props. The message to immigrants is clear: leave, or never come in the first place, because this could happen to you, even if you do it 'the right way'. The takeaway from all of this is that right now, real people – our friends, families, students and neighbors – are suffering at the hands of a cruel and lawless government. And while Republican policymakers are driving these actions, many centrist Democrats, such as Gavin Newsom, are giving tacit approval by writing off these disturbing human rights violations as merely the 'distraction of the day'. I refuse to ignore this suffering. I hope you refuse as well. Daniel Mendiola is a professor of Latin American history and migration studies at Vassar College.


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's administration has asked Serbia to accept deportees, Bloomberg News reports
June 5 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is pushing Serbia and other Balkan countries to take in the migrants deported from the U.S, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday.


The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump travel ban to ‘sow division and vilify communities'
Update: Date: 2025-06-05T09:38:37.000Z Title: Nearly five months into his second term,', 'Donald Trump', 'has announced a new sweeping travel ban that could reshape the US's borders more dramatically than any policy in modern memory. Content: Nearly five months into his second term, Donald Trump has announced a new sweeping travel ban that could reshape the US's borders more dramatically than any policy in modern memory. The restrictions, revealed through a presidential proclamation on Wednesday, would target citizens from more than a dozen countries – creating a three-tiered system of escalating barriers to entry. The proclamation represents one of the most ambitious attempts to reshape the US's approach to global mobility in modern history and potentially affects millions of people coming to the United States for relocation, travel, work or school. Update: Date: 2025-06-05T09:29:06.000Z Title: Opening summary: Trump travel ban to 'sow division and vilify communities' Content: Good morning, and welcome to our blog covering developments in US politics and Donald Trump's administration as international aid groups and affected countries reacted to the sweeping order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting visitors from seven others, with claims that it will sow division and vilify communities. The nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be 'fully' restricted from entering the US, according to the proclamation. Meanwhile, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. In a video released on social media, Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. Few of the affected countries have so far responded but Somalia immediately pledged to work with the US to address security issues. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, a close ally of president Nicolas Maduro, described the US government as fascist and warned Venezuelans of being in the US. The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans … They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.' We'll be covering all the developments in this story and you can read our report here: In other news: Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into Joe Biden's actions as president, alleging top aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline'. The investigation will build on a Republican-led campaign already under way to discredit the former president. Biden issued a statement dismissing the idea of a cover-up as 'ridiculous'. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is set to meet with Trump on Thursday, hoping to build a personal relationship despite discord over Ukraine and the threat of a trade war. The president is due to greet Merz at 11.30am EST. Trump is committed to passing his so-called 'big beautiful' tax bill in the US Senate despite opposition from billionaire Elon Musk, a White House official said on Wednesday. The official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, added that the White House will not consult Musk on every policy decision. Estimates say that the bill could add $2.4trn to the deficit. Musk has stepped up attacks on the bill on X, urging supporters to 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.'